Construction and Development Status SNOLAB Workshop V 21 August 2006 Fraser Duncan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality
Advertisements

Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
PRESENTATION TO THE JOINT RULES COMMITTEE 15 MARCH 2012 ON THE PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PANEL ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED.
The Cryopit Fraser Duncan Cryopit Workshop 16 August 2011.
Integrated Facility Management (IFM) For NSLS-II October 6, 2010 Chris Johnson Facility Complex Manager Facilities and Operations.
Lessons Learned in Initiating and Conducting Risk Assessments within a Risk Analysis Framework: A FDA/CFSAN Approach Robert Buchanan DHHS Food and Drug.
SNOLAB Facility Status Fraser Duncan SNOLAB Workshop 27 August 2009.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Environmental Management Systems Implementation. CH EMS Experiences CH conducted EMS audits of BNL’s EMS as required by a EPA MOU CH assisted the Yucca.
FACET: The Proposal Process with Q & A Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
INDUSTRIAL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Project Management John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
Jess Albino Facility Advisory October 29, 2007 FACILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE PLENARY CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES UPDATE October.
Richard M. Boyce FAC October 29-31, Installation Planning Integration process – IMT update Installation Planning &
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Process Engineer’s Role in Project Management Dr Abdullah Malik.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
Helmholtz Centre for Ion Research D. Krämer, 2nd Lab Directors Meeting, Protvino, January 15-16, 2008 Design and Engineering Issues; Standardization and.
Michael P. Andrews NuMI Shutdown & Facility Coordinator LBNE Project ESH Manager AD ESH Special Projects Coordinator.
Welcome to SNOLAB David Sinclair. Welcome to our new Building Note – Building is still under construction Note – Building is still under construction.
SNOLAB – An International Facility for Underground Science Expand underground space to allow several experiments to operate simultaneously Provide a surface.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES LOB - Ring Building Construction Coordination Michael P. Bromfield Construction Engineer NSLS-II Conventional Facilities.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Authorization Basis Plan Steven Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting December 10 – 11, 2009.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting March 3, 2010 Overview of the DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program Julie Carruthers, Ph.D.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Ring Building Construction Status Michael P. Bromfield Construction Engineer NSLS II Conventional Facilities Advisory Committee.
Capital Project Process
Status of SNOLAB Development Fraser Duncan SNOLAB Workshop 4 Oct 2008.
SuperB. SuperB has been approved as the first in a list of 14 “flagship” projects within the new national research plan. The national research plan has.
Andrew Hime Physics Division, LANL e-e- e-e- e SNOLAB Scientific Development Andrew Hime Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory SNOLAB Workshop.
GeoNeutrino 2008 Sudbury Sept 18 th, 2008 SNOLAB: A New International Facility for Underground Astroparticle Physics T. Noble Queen’s University.
1 Kenneth Osborne, 9/14/07 Inter Group communications at the Advanced Light Source. Overview of the different methods of communication between different.
Outstanding Issues on Infrastructure and Development Fraser Duncan SNOLAB/Queen’s University 4 th SNOLAB Workshop 15 August 2005.
Important informations
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
Tony Noble Queen’s University Development of the SNOLAB Scientific Program.
NOAA Administrative Order : Management of Environmental and Geospatial Data and Information Jeff Arnfield NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Version.
Fraser Duncan Queen’s University Synergies in Low Background Techniques 26 July 2005 Underground Facilities at SNOLAB.
Andrew Hime Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory Workshop on Low-Radioactivity Techniques Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
APS April meeting Jacksonville, 2007 WIMP Search With SNOLAB Chris Jillings SNOLAB Staff Scientist For the DEAP-1 Collaboration.
Using ISMS Principles and Functions in Developing an ARRA Readiness Review Process Presented by Linda K. Rogers Assessments & Readiness Programs Manager.
Thailand’s Preparation for Starting a Nuclear Power Program Mr. Pricha Karasuddhi Technical Advisor Nuclear Power Program Development Office(NPPDO) Ministry.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
1 EARLY SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS AND EXPERIMENTS HSE UNIT PH DSO EDMS No
Status of renewal of Buildings 115 & 507 Borge & Erwin Siesling.
1 Zoe Van Hoover 1 User Safety: Commissioning and Early Experiments NEH ARR User Safety: LCLS NEH Commissioning and Early Experiments.
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
ITWG Topical Workshop Management of Instrumentation Projects 19 to 21 May 2014 Rolf Lindner.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
Staffing and training. Objectives To understand approaches to the development of strategies and policies for staffing of a Regulatory Authority including.
BESAC Workshop on Opportunities for Catalysis/Nanoscience May 14-16, 2002 William S. Millman Basic Energy Sciences May 14, 2002 Catalysis and Nanoscience.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
New England Association of Schools and Colleges Community Resources for Learning.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
INDONESIA NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION Dr. A. Sarwiyana Sastratenaya Director, Center for.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
NA62 Organisation of the work - proposal 2/24/20161PD/DT/PO-MH.
The Role of a Program Director NCI Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop October 18-19, 2010 Jerry Li, MD, PhD Division of Cancer Biology NCI/NIH.
For Presentation at 28 th APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting Vancouver, Canada Walter Kulyk Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit.
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
PIP-II Environment, Safety, Health & Quality Assurance Strategy John Anderson Jr. DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.
Overview of FESHCom Subcommittees Don Cossairt, Radiation Protection Manager, ESH&Q Section October 1, 2013.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees
Guidance notes for Project Manager
Ian Evans SSRL Safety Office
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Presentation transcript:

Construction and Development Status SNOLAB Workshop V 21 August 2006 Fraser Duncan

Project History Outgrowth of the highly successful SNO project Proposal in 2001 Funding in 2002 SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Surface facility  Groundbreaking 2004  Occupancy 2005 Underground  Tunneling commenced Nov 2004  Completion (wait for it)

Existing SNO Facility SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 SNOLAB

Existing SNO Facility SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 SNOLAB Phase I Relocate -Lab Entry -Personnel Facilities Utility Area - Chiller - Generator

Existing SNO Facility SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 SNOLAB Phase I Relocate -Lab Entry -Personnel Facilities Utility Area - Chiller - Generator Phase II Funding decision expected shortly

Status: Surface

SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 IT Server Room Control Rooms Meeting Rooms Clean Room Laboratories

Status: Surface Occupancy of the 34,000 sq ft surface facility took place in the fall of Offices, meeting rooms Labs  4,600 sq ft of better than class 1000 clean rooms. Chemistry, assembly low bg counting.  generator power, upw, nitrogen cover gas Control Rooms IT  Environment controlled server room; high speed network surf/ug and on/off site Outstanding  Material Handling  Workshop SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Status: Off Site, Laurentian University Off site radio-isotope lab will be located at Laurentian University. Will include  Ultra Pure Water installation  Low BG counting alpha, ESCs (ElectroStatic Counters) Ready September SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Status: Underground Excavation has proceeded slower than originally forecast  Complexity of excavation in some areas  Coordination with maintaining the running SNO experiment.  The usual types of delays (cage down, power failures etc). These delays were not unexpected and are a normal part of mine excavation. SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Status: Excavation – Last Year SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Status: Excavation - Today SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Phase I Excavation is 76% complete

Wide Drift 20’x12’ (19’ to back) Wide Drift 25’x17’ (25’ to back) Access Drift 15’x10’ (15’ to back) Chemistry Lab Electrical, AHUs SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Ladder Labs

Rectangular Hall 60’L x 50’W 50’ (shoulder) 65’ (back) Utility Drift Control Rm Staging Area SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Rectangular Hall

SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Utility Areas and Ventilation Chiller Drift 9' Diameter Ventilation Raises Ventilation “Cross Over”

Breakthrough to existing SNO Access Drift SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Breakthrough from New Excavations Must Excavate the Lab Entrance without Disrupting SNO's Operations.

SNO Carwash Blast Wall Blast Monitor Breakthrough from New Excavations SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Before After SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Blasting in the SNO Track Drift

Breakthrough to New Lab

SNO Track Drift

Phase II SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Phase II: Cryopit Proposal has been submitted to the funding agencies. Decision expected within two months

Cryopit 50’ dia 50’ (Shoulder) 65’ (Back) Utility Drift Staging Area 20 Bar Bulkheads Exhaust Pipe SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Cryopit

SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Experiment Space

Status: Outfitting Outfitting design is complete and has gone to tender. Costs are higher than expected  Very expensive time to be doing construction, let alone in a mine. Will implement a phased approach to outfitting, priorities being: 1)New Personnel and Entry Facilities 2)Ladder Labs, Rectangular Hall 3)South Drift (old personnel facilities) The larger experimental spaces in the Ladder Labs and Rectangular Hall will initially be less extensively outfitted than originally intended. Completion of the outfitting will be done in the operations phase. SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Nickel Price  Outfitting is expected to begin late 2006 or early 2007

Operating Funds The CFI award to construct SNOLAB did not include long term operating funds. (Operating funds were only included for construction phase.) Extrapolating from the existing SNO operations expenses we anticipate the need for a $6M budget. We are developing a mixed agency funding strategy involving federal and provincial agencies.  Have met with positive responses from the agencies in question. SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Schedule (No Phase II) SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Phase I Excavation Complete ~1 May 2007 Begin Lab Outfitting Nov 2006 Lab Ready End 2007

Schedule (with Phase II) SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Cryopit Excavation Cryopit Ready Early 2008 Chiller Installation Delayed to end of Cryopit excavation Ladder Labs, Rectangular Hall, end of 2007

Summary of Construction Status Excavation  Phase I 76% complete. Rectangular Hall is the remaining major excavation. Completion Spring 2007  Phase II Expecting decision within two months If approved this fall, completion Fall 2007 Outfitting  Expected to begin late 2006  Completed (depending on Phase II) end of 2007 or early 2008 Beneficial occupancy  End of 2007 (experiment fit up could start several months earlier) Bottom Line: In 2008 there will be 27,500 sq ft (PI) or 34,300 sq ft (PI+PII) of class 2000 cleanroom space available for experiments. SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

SNOLAB OPERATIONS and ORGANIZATION

SNOLAB Organization We are transitioning from  SNO (an experiment with a lab) to  SNOLAB (a lab with experiments) Due to the different funding sources we have been intentionally keeping the SNO and SNOLAB operations independent. As SNO sunsets most of the operations at the site will be conducted through SNOLAB. We are still developing the SNOLAB organizational structure. SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

SNOLAB Organization SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

SNOLAB Facility Operations SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

SNOLAB Facility Operations SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Operations Support  Lab operations and supervision  Maintenance & Cleaning  Systems Operations (chiller, Ultra Pure Water,...)  Material transport and handling

SNOLAB Facility Operations SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Technical Support  Mechanical (millwright, pipe fitting)  Electrical/Electronics  Chemistry  Some Machining ...

SNOLAB Facility Operations SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Experimental Facilities  Coordination of new experiment installation  Some construction and fabrication

SNOLAB Facility Operations SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Quality Assurance  Procedures, Documentation, Regulatory Compliance  Radiological Materials Control  Cleanliness Control

SNOLAB Facility Operations SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

SNOLAB Safety SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

SNOLAB Safety SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 GLIMOS (Group Leader In Matters of Safety)  A lab scientist or engineer appointed to be the Director's representative on each experiment  In charge of the Experiment's workers when they are on site.  Has authority to stop work if necessary.

SNOLAB Safety SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

SNOLAB Scientific Structure SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

SNOLAB Scientific Structure To provide a mechanism to evaluate experiments on a merit and feasibility basis for deployment at SNOLAB. To provide an mechanism for the SNOLAB Experiments to interact with SNOLAB Management and with each other To provide an environment and mechanism for the SNOLAB user community to interact with each other. To provide a safe working environment. SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 “SNOLAB, Experiments, and You” The goals of the Scientific Organization of SNOLAB are:

SNOLAB Scientific Structure SNOLAB Operations Management The Scientific Executive Committee Experiment Advisory Committee Technical Review Committee User Group SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 To achieve these goals there are several structures within SNOLAB:

Scientific Executive Committee (SEC) SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Scientific Executive Committee (SEC) Mandate  Provide guidance to the SNOLAB Director on the scientific program SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Scientific Executive Committee (SEC) Mandate  Provide guidance to the SNOLAB Director on the scientific program  Communicate the needs of operating experiments to SNOLAB Management SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Scientific Executive Committee (SEC) Mandate  Provide guidance to the SNOLAB Director on the scientific program  Communicate the needs of operating experiments to SNOLAB Management  Resolve conflicts between experiments SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Scientific Executive Committee (SEC) Mandate  Provide guidance to the SNOLAB Director on the scientific program  Communicate the needs of operating experiments to SNOLAB Management  Resolve conflicts between experiments Composition  SNOLAB senior management  Representatives of the SNOLAB institutions  PI's from the experiments SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Experiment Advisory Committee (EAC) Mandate  To evaluate the scientific relevance and technical feasibility of experiments proposed for SNOLAB.  To assess if experiments continue to meet their technical milestones. Composition  Experts from the astro-particle physics community SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Technical Review Committee (TRC) Mandate  Assess technical readiness for deployment  Assess infrastructure needs.  Determine if the experiment has appropriate documentation (drawings, procedures,...)  Ensure regulatory approval  Assess schedule and manpower Composition  Technical experts from SNOLAB  External experts as necessary SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 (To Be Formed)

SNOLAB Users' Group (SUG) Mandate  To provide a forum for exchanging information on the development of SNOLAB and its scientific program The venue is this workshop We will start off simple and develop the mandate of the SUG as the needs evolve.  Feedback encouraged. Composition  Scientists, engineers and students interested in the SNOLAB science program SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 (To Be Formed)

Design Issues for coming to SNOLAB Designing to the Space  Fitting in the experimental halls  Fitting in the cage (elevator) Designing to the Infrastructure  Electrical capacity  Heat removal Regulatory Approval  Federal/Provincial/Inco  TSSA, ESA,... SNOLAB QA Safety SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Research Technical Proposals The RTP presents the deployment of the experiment. It should be as detailed as possible and cover:  Space requirement  Manpower  Infrastructure requests  Schedule The RTP may be for a full experiment or for a prototype or staged experiment. SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Resources for Experiments Operations Group Design Group Technical Support Experimental Facilities Group Users Handbook SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Resources for Experiments Operations Group Design Group Technical Support Experimental Facilities Group Users Handbook SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Operations Group  Lab supervision  Material transport  Cleaning  (Some) Maintenance

Resources for Experiments Operations Group Design Group Technical Support Experimental Facilities Group Users Handbook SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Design Group  Design review  Assistance with Regulatory Bodies  (Some) Design

Resources for Experiments Operations Group Design Group Technical Support Experimental Facilities Group Users Handbook SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Technical Support  Mechanical  Electrical & (some) electronics  Chemistry  Cryogenics?, Vacuum? ...

Resources for Experiments Operations Group Design Group Technical Support Experimental Facilities Group Users Handbook SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006 Experimental Facilities  Construction supervision  Small construction projects  Small fabrication  Liaison with Experiments to assist with deployment plan

Resources for Experiments Operations Group Design Group Technical Support Experimental Facilities Group Users Handbook SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Organization Summary SNOLAB's Scientific Structure is intended to provide mechanisms to:  Evaluate experiments;  Communicate the needs of experiments to the lab;  Communicate the abilities of the lab to the experiments. SNOLAB's Operational Structure is intended to provide resources and expertise to facilitate the successful deployment of an experiment at SNOLAB. These are evolving entities that will continue to change as the needs of these unique experiments become known. SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

Conclusions Construction Status  Beneficial Occupancy for experiments end of 2007 with the possibility of limited early space. Operations  Operational and scientific organization coming together. Now is the time to develop technical proposals for deploying experiments at SNOLAB. SNOLAB Workshop V, 21 August 2006

END