1a-1.1 Introduction to Grid Computing ITCS 4146/5146, UNC-Charlotte, B. Wilkinson, 2008 Aug 27, 2008

1a-1.2 “The grid virtualizes heterogeneous geographically disperse resources” from "Introduction to Grid Computing with Globus," IBM Redbooks Using geographically distributed and interconnected computers together for computing and for resource sharing. Grid Computing

“Grid” Common practice to use word Grid as a proper noun (i.e. G is capitalized) although does not refer to one universe Grid. There are many Grid infrastructures. We have set up one for this course. You will learn how that was done and the technicalities in the course. 1a-1.3

1a-1.4 Need to harness computers Original driving force behind Grid computing same as behind the early development of networks that became the Internet: – Connecting computers at distributed sites for high performance computing.

1a-1.5 However, Grid computing is about collaborating and resource sharing as much as it is about high performance computing.

1a-1.6 Virtual Organizations Grid computing offers potential of virtual organizations: –groups of people, both geographically and organizationally distributed, working together on a problem, sharing computers AND other resources such as databases and experimental equipment.

Different organizations can supply resources and personnel. Concept has many benefits, including: Problems that could not be solved previously for humanity because of limited computing resources can now be tackled. Examples Understanding the human genome Searching for new drugs …. Continued. 1a-1.7

Users can have access to far greater computing resources and expertise than available locally. Inter-disciplinary teams can be formed across different institutions and organizations to tackle problems that require expertise of multiple disciplines. Specialized localized experimental equipment can be accessed remotely and collectively. Continued. 1a-1.8

Large collective databases can be created to hold vast amounts of data. Unused compute cycles can be harnessed at remote sites, achieving more efficient use of computers. Business processes can be re-implemented using Grid technology for dramatic cost saving. 1a-1.9

Crosses multiple administrative domains. Another hallmark of larger Grid computing projects. Resources being shared owned either by members of virtual organization or donated by others. Introduces challenging technical and social-political challenges. Requires true collaboration. 1a-1.10

Some key features we regard as indicative of Grid computing: –Shared multi-owner computing resources –Uses Grid computing software, with security and cross-management mechanisms in place –Tools to bring together geographically distributed computers owned by others. 1a-1.11

1a-1.12 Shared Resources Can share much more than just computers: Storage Sensors for experiments at particular sites Application Software Databases Network capacity, …

1a-1.13 Interconnections and Protocols Focus now on: using standard Internet protocols and technology, i.e. HTTP, SOAP, web services, etc.,

1a-1.14 History Began in mid 1990’s with experiments using computers at geographically dispersed sites. Seminal experiment – “I-way” experiment at 1995 Supercomputing conference (SC’95), using 17 sites across US running: –60+ applications. –Existing networks (10 networks).

1a-1.15 Applications Originally e-Science applications –Computational intensive Traditional high performance computing addressing large problems Not necessarily one big problem but a problem that has to be solved repeatedly with different parameters. –Data intensive Computational but emphasis on large amounts of data to store and process –Experimental collaborative projects

1a-1.16 Now also e-Business applications –To improve business models and practices. –Sharing corporate computing resources and databases –On-demand Grid computing … indirectly led to cloud computing.

Grid Computing verse Cluster Computing Important not to think of Grid computing simply as large cluster because potential and challenges different. UNC-C cluster computing course ITCS 4145/5145. UNC-C Grid computing course ITCS 4146/5146. Courses on Grid computing and on cluster computing are quite different. 1a-1.17

Cluster computing course One learns about : –Message passing programming using tools such as MPI, and –Shared memory programming using threads and OpenMP, given that most computers in a cluster today now multi-core shared memory systems. –Parallel algorithms (lots)‏ Network security is not a big issue. –Usually an ssh connection to front node of cluster sufficient. –User logging onto a single compute resource. Computers connected together locally under one administrative domain 1a-1.18

Grid computing course Learn about running jobs of remote machines, scheduling jobs and distributed workflow Learn in detail underlying Grid infrastructure How Internet technologies applied to Grid computing Grid computing software and standards Security is an issue. 1a-1.19

Grid Computing verse Cluster Computing Of course, there are things in common Both courses hands-on with programming experiences. Both use multiple computers Both require job scheduler to place jobs. 1a-1.20

Cloud computing Lot of hype on Cloud computing at the moment. Business model in which services provided on servers that can be accessed through Internet. Lineage of cloud computing can be traced back to on-demand Grid computing in the early 2000’s. 1a-1.21

1a.22 Fig 1.2 Cloud computing using virtualized resources

Common thread between Grid computing and cloud computing is use of Internet to access resources. Cloud computing driven by widespread access that Internet provides and Internet technologies. However cloud computing quite distinct from original purpose of Grid computing. 1a-1.23

Grid Computing verse Cloud Computing Whereas Grid computing focuses on collaborative and distributed shared resources, Cloud computing concentrates upon placing services for users to pay to use. Technology for cloud computing emphases: – use of software as a service (SaaS)‏ – virtualization (process of separating particular user’s software environment from underlying hardware). 1a-1.24

Ian Fosters’ check list Ian Foster credited for development of Grid computing. Sometimes called father of Grid computing Proposed simple checklist of aspects that are common to most true Grids: No centralized Control Standard open protocols Non-trivial quality of service (QoS)‏ 1a-1.25

1a-1.26 Computational Grid Applications Biomedical research Industrial research Engineering research Studies in Physics and Chemistry …

1a-1.27 Sample Grid Computing Projects

Enterprise Grids – Grid formed within an organization for collaboration –Still might cross administrative domains of departments and requires departments to share their resources –Example: campus Grids 1a-1.28

1a.29 Example University of Virginia Campus Grid

Partner Grids -- Grids between collaborative organizations This makes most use of potential of Grid computing and collaboration 1a-1.30

NSF Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES)‏ Transform our ability to carry out research vital to reducing vulnerability to catastrophic earthquakes from I. Foster Environment/Earth

1a-1.32 SCOOP Project Southeastern Coastal Ocean Observing and Prediction Program Integrating data from regional observing systems for real time coastal forecasts in SE Coastal modelers with computer scientists to couple models, provide data solutions, deploy ensembles of models on the Grid, assemble real time results with GIS technologies. From: "Urgent Computing for Hurricane Forecasts,“ Gabrielle Allen, Urgent Computing Workshop, Argonne National Laboratory, April 25th to 26th,

SCOOP Prototype Distributed Laboratory Funded by ONR & NOAA Bedford Institute of Oceanography Virginia Institute of Marine Science University of Alabama, Huntsville Texas A&M Renaissance Computing Institute 2005/2006 SCOOP Implementation Team University of North Carolina University of Florida Louisiana State University Gulf of Maine Ocean Observing System MCNC Southeastern Universities Research Association External Resources e.g. SURAgrid regional grid infrastructure, From: Dr. Philip Bogden "Designing a Collaborative Cyberinfrastructure for Event-Driven Coastal Modeling," Philip Bogden, Supercomputing 2006, Nov 2006, Tampa, Fl.

1a DOE Earth System Grid Goal Address technical obstacles to sharing and analysis of high-volume data from advanced earth system models

1a.35 Earth System Grid II

1a.36 ox.ac.uk/ Medicine /Biology Project period:

1a Project period: …

1a-1.38 Large Hadron Collider experimental facility for complex particle experiments at CERN (European Center for Nuclear Research, near Geneva Switzerland). Physics CERN LCH Computing grid (LCG)‏ Started in Expected operational 2008

1a

1a.40 CERN LCH Computing grid (LCG)‏

LCG depends on two major science grid infrastructures …. EGEE - Enabling Grids for E-Science OSG - US Open Science Grid From: LCG Overview - May Les Robertson,

1a-1.42 Grid computing infrastructure projects Not tied to one specific application

1a-1.43 Grid networks for collaborative grid computing projects Grids have been set up at local level, national level, and international level throughout the world, to promote Grid computing Grid Networks

1a-1.44 Funded by NSF in 2001 initially to link five supercomputer centers. Hubs established at Chicago and Los Angeles. Five centers connected to one hub: Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) (Chicago hub)‏ National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) (Chicago hub)‏ Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC) (Chicago hub)‏ San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC) ( LA hub)‏ Caltech (LA hub)‏ National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) (Chicago hub)‏ TeraGrid

1a-1.45 Hubs at Chicago and Los Angeles Interconnected using 40 Gigabit/sec optical backplane network. Five centers Connected to one hub using 30 Gigabit/sec connections State-of-the-art optical lines could reach 10 Gigabit/sec in the early 2000s Four lines used to achieve 40 Gigabit/sec. Three lines used to achieve 30 Gigabit/sec

1a-1.46 TeraGrid circa 2004

TeraGrid was further funded by NSF for period Has developed into a platform for a wide range of Grid applications and is described as: “the world’s largest, most comprehensive distributed cyberinfrastructure for open scientific research.” 1a-1.47

1a-1.48 TeraGrid as of 2008

Open Science Grid (OSG) Started around 2005, received $30 million funding from NSF and DOE in 2006: Boston University Brookhaven National Laboratory California Institute of Technology Columbia University Cornell University Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Indiana University Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1a-1.49 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center University of California, San Diego University of Chicago University of Florida University of Iowa University of North Carolina/RENCI University of Wisconsin- Madison

1a.50 Current status July 2008

1a.51 SURAGrid as of 2008 Southeastern Universities Research Association

1a-1.52 National Grids Many countries have embraced Grid computing and set-up Grid computing infrastructure: UK e-Science grid Grid-Ireland NorduGrid DutchGrid POINIER grid (Poland)‏ ACI grid (France)‏ Japanese grid etc, etc., …

1a-1.53 UK e-Science Grid Early 2000’s

UK National Grid Service Follow-up from UK e-Science Grid Founded in 2004 to provide distributed access to computational and database resources, with four core sites: – Universities of Manchester, Oxford and Leeds, and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory By 2008, it had grown to 16 sites. Access free to any academic with a legitimate need. 1a-1.54

Multi-national Grids , several efforts to create Grids that spanned across many countries. 1a.55

Multi-national Grid example ApGrid A partnership in Asia Pacific region involving: –Australia, Canada, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, USA, and Vietnam. 1a.56

European centered multi- national Grids Several initiatives for European countries to collaborated in forming Grid-like infrastructures to share compute resources funded by European programs. 1a.57

European centered multi-national Grid Example DEISA (Distributed European Infrastructure for Supercomputing Applications)‏ DEISA-1 project from DEISA-2 started in 2008, to extend to a.58

DEISA (Distributed European Infrastructure for Supercomputing Applications) As of a.59

DEISA-2 partners Barcelona Supercomputing Centre Spain (BSC), Consortio Interuniversitario per il Calcolo Automatico Italy (CINECA), Finnish Information Technology Centre for Science Finland (CSC), University of Edinburgh and CCLRC UK (EPCC)‏ European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast UK (ECMWF)‏ Research Centre Juelich Germany (FZJ)‏ High Performance Computing Centre Stuttgart Germany (HLRS), Institut du Développement et des Ressources en Informatique Scientifique - CNRS France (IDRIS), Leibniz Rechenzentrum Munich Germany (LRZ), Rechenzentrum Garching of the Max Planck Society Germany (RZG)‏ Dutch National High Performance Computing Netherlands (SARA), Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan Sweden (KTH), Swiss National Supercomputing Centre Switzerland (CSCS), Joint Supercomputer Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences Russia (JSCC). 1a.60

Vision of a single universal international Grid such as the Internet/World Wide Web May never be achieved though. More likely - Grids will connect to other Grids but will maintain their identity. 1a.61

Uses the teleconferencing facilities of NCREN and Clusters at various sites across North Carolina 1a.62 Our Grid computing course

1a.63 Our Grid Computing Course Uses the teleconferencing facilities of NCREN Broadcast on NCREN network across North Carolina. Uses clusters at various participating sites Relies heavily on faculty at participating sites First offered in 2004 (8 sites). Again in Fall 2005 (12 sites), Spring 2007 (3 sites), and Fall 2008 (5 sites)‏ WCU teleclassroom

15 Participating sites to total a.64

1a.65 Every state has its own network structure for the Internet Close to home: Basis of our course

1a.66 Fall 2005 Course grid structure MCNCUNC-WUNC-ANCSUWCU UNC-CASU CA Backup facility, not actually used

1a.67 Questions

1a.68 There will be multiple-choice quizzes in the course (on-line through Blackboard). Quiz Question: What is a virtual organization? (a) An imaginary company. (b) A web-based organization. (c) A group of people geographically distributed that come together from different organizations to work on a Grid project. (d) A group of people that come together to work on a virtual reality Grid project.

Question: What is meant by the term cloud computing? (a) Atmospheric Computing (b) Computing using geographically distributed computers (c) A facility providing services and software applications (d) A secure CIA computing facility 1a.69

Question: In addition to computers, which of the following resources can be shared on a Grid? (a) Storage (b) Application Software (c) Specialized equipment (such as sensors) (d) Databases (e) All of the above 1a.70

Questions Grid Computing is using ______________ ______________ and interconnected computers together for computing and resource ______________.

Questions The original driving force behind Grid Computing was ______________ ______________ ______________.

Questions However, Grid Computing is more about ______________ and ______________ ______________ than it is about high performance computing.

Questions Another important components of Grid Computing is ______________ ______________, groups of people, both geographically and organizationally distributed, working together on a problem, sharing computers AND other resources.

Questions Other models of computing that are similar but different to Grid Computing are ______________ Computing and ______________ Computing.

Questions Ian Foster's checklist for determining of a grid is a Grid: a)______________________ b)______________________ c)______________________