Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part II – SWMM Water Quality Calibration Maryland Department of the Environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
InVEST Sediment Retention Model Estimate the amount of watershet erosion and sedimentation and its economic impact on hydropower production and water quality.
Advertisements

Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
Impervious Surface Connectivity and Urban Stream Corridors Land Use Workgroup Meeting January 30, 2014 Steve Stewart Baltimore County.
Urban Watershed Challenge Storm Sewers & Watershed Models.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Sacramento Model Derivation of Initial Parameters.
Validation of Suitable index map using a GIS Approach; an example from a Case Study in Selangor, Malaysia Umi Raihana A. R. & Sharifah Norkhadijah S.I.
The Wisconsin River TMDL: Linking Monitoring and Modeling Ann Hirekatur, Pat Oldenburg, & Adam Freihoefer March 7, 2013 Wisconsin River TMDL Project Team.
Overview of Urban Drainage Flood Prediction Methods and Approaches J.Y. Chen1 and B.J. Adams2 1. Water Survey Division, Environment Canada 2. Department.
Comprehensive Watershed Modeling for 12- digit HUC Priority Watersheds – Phase II P RESENTED BY : N ARESH P AI PI: Dharmendra Saraswat Collaborator: Mike.
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
Impact of Sampling Frequency on Annual Load Estimation Amber Spackman Jones Utah Water Research Lab Nancy Mesner Watershed Science Jeff Horsburgh Utah.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
Identifying Critical Areas for BMP Applications. Critical Areas Those areas or sources where the greatest water quality improvement can be accomplished.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
A Water Quality Loading Model for Tillamook Bay Patrice A. Melancon Thanks to: Dr. David Maidment Dr. Michael Barrett Dr. Francisco Olivera Dr. Maidment’s.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
URBAN STORMWATER QUALITY AND LOAD ESTIMATION FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL AREA IN SKUDAI, JOHOR, MALAYSIA Siti Nazahiyah Bte Rahmat Faculty of Civil and Environmental.
Northwest hydraulic consultants 2NDNATURE Geosyntec Consultants September 11, 2007 Urban Upland / Groundwater Source Category Group (UGSCG) Overview Presentation.
SUSTAIN Pilot Study April 25, 2012 Curtis DeGasperi King County
Options for Identifying & Quantifying Pollutant Loads
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Sediment Retention model
ODOT 2015 Geo-Environmental Conference
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
BACKRIVER TMDL PROJECT Technical Outreach Prepared by MDE/TARSA Prepared for the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
Development of a Watershed-to- Very-Near-Shore Model for Pathogen Fate and Transport Sheridan K. Haack Atiq U. Syed Joseph W. Duris USGS, Lansing, MI.
Modeling to Understand Stormwater Management Efforts Portland Harbor Superfund Site Dawn Sanders City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services September.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Lake Whatcom Tributary Monitoring – Phase II Summary Whatcom County Department of Public Works April 26 | 2013.
Chowan River TMDL Development Tidewater Area 08/26/04.
Modeling Copper Runoff in San Francisco Bay Area Watersheds Jim Carleton US EPA.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
How Breakthroughs in Information Systems Can Impact Local Decisions Bruce Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
Adjustment of Global Gridded Precipitation for Orographic Effects Jennifer Adam.
Neuse River Basin Provided by Dr. D. Monreau to Dr. G
The influence of local calibration on the quality of UV-VIS spectrometer measurements in urban stormwater monitoring N. Caradot, H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel,
Watershed Plan for Heredia, Costa Rica Whitney Thomas, Matthew O’Malley, William Brown Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech Rio Tibas Watershed.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Volunteer-collected data can provide important baseline information to assist with decision making and improve watershed management. In this study, data.
Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River
Point Source Loads and Decision Criteria for Toxics Modeling Baltimore Harbor TMDL Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
1 Phase 5.3 Calibration Gary Shenk 3/31/ Calibration Method Calibration method largely unchanged for several years –P5.1 – 8/ first automated.
Urbanized Stream Source Ratio October 20, 2015 Urban Stormwater Workgroup Reid Christianson, PE, PhD Neely Law, PhD Bill Stack, PE.
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
SWAT Modeling of Priority Watershed- Phase II 2013 NPS Conference – September 19, 2013 Dharmendra Saraswat Assoc. Prof,/Ext. Engineer- Geospatial
Potomac Toxics Monitoring Status and Issues ICPRB March 8, 2004.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
The aim of this project is to estimate changes in runoff, and nonpoint source (NPS) pollution resulting from past land use changes in the Great Lakes Area.
Phosphorous Transport in Surface Overland Flow
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center University of Arkansas
Dan Child CEE 5440/6440 Utah State University Fall 2003
Emily Saad EAS 4480 Oral Presentation 27 April 2010
in the Neversink River Basin, New York
Test Drive Results and Revisions of the New Stream Restoration Crediting Protocols Bill Stack & Lisa Fraley-McNeal December 2, 2013.
Water Quality Analysis for Selected Streams in Utah and Idaho
Updates 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan
Nonpoint Source Pollution
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater
Nutrient Trading for NPDES Permittees
Nutrient Trading for NPDES Permittees
Gopal Bhatt1 and Lewis Linker2 1 Penn State, 2 US EPA
Presentation transcript:

Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part II – SWMM Water Quality Calibration Maryland Department of the Environment

Water Quality Calibration General –Aggregate Five Subwatersheds –Focus on predominant land uses –Calibrate EOS loads to literature values –Calibrate Event Mean Concentrations Detailed –Time series overlay –Comparative Analysis

Water Quality Calibration Urban TSS and Metals Objective –EMC (statistics of wet-weather events) –Unit Load (annual) Parameters –Buildup Rate (Linear - Calibrated) –Build Limit (Set high) –Wash-off Coefficient (Based on Literature) –Wash-off Exponent (Based on Literature) Calculation –Load =  (Flow*Conc.) –EMC =  Load /  Flow Results –Unique Solution of Buildup Rate Validation –Timeseries Comparision

Water Quality Calibration Non-Urban Land Use (USLE) Calibration Objective –Correlate with long term loading rate estimates USLE – Estimates gross long term erosion rate –Parameters (Land use specific) R=Rainfall Energy (from BWI) K=Soil Erodibility (Soil type) LS=Slope Length Gradient Ratio (DEM) C=Cropping Management Factor (Landuse – Calibrated) P=Erosion Control Practice (Literature) Delivery Ratio –Applied Based on Subwatershed Drainage to Baltimore Harbor Parameter –Adjusted cropping management factor within recommended values

Event Mean Concentration References

Unit Load References

Water Quality Data -DNR Core station TSS data available at stations 240, 230 and 211 (Data set contains mostly base flow samples) - Metals values not shown from 2/25/95 to 12/1/96 due to high detection limits *All data collected by Baltimore City

SWMM Baseflow Concentration Base Flow Data SourceTSSCrZnPb Baltimore County NPDES Report (2000)X Baltimore City NPDES Report (2001)X Baltimore City Wastewater Facilities Master Plan (1997)XXX Baltimore County DEPRM Watershed Monitoring Project ( )X MDE Upper Western Shore Monitoring Project (2001)X References Concentrations

Results

Jones Falls

Patapsco

Back River

Best Management Practices (BMPs) Uncertainty and variability in EMC –Instream sites from NPDES Report Timeseries comparison of model vs data show reasonable concentration magnitude agreement BMPs not explicitly included in model Established a baseline load scenario

Sub-Watershed Loads

Baltimore Harbor Watershed Land Use Loading Summary CBP TSS Results (93-97) Urban: 44.5% Crop: 28.4% Pasture: 4.1% Forest: 23.1%

Comparative Analysis - Existing Studies

SWMM Calibration Summary & Conclusions Focus on predominant land use for model calibration Calibrate EOS loads to mean literature values Calibration urban EMC’s to reported mean landuse values Overlay model with water quality timeseries data Comparative Analysis Model supports overall trends (Flow, TSS and metals) Next - Sensitivity of water quality model to NPS Loads