Update PI-SWERL Sampling on Owens Lake Maarten Schreuder, Air Sciences Inc. 3/17/2010 Maarten Schreuder, Air Sciences Inc. 3/17/2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summer Internship Program Outline
Advertisements

CFD Simulation: MEXICO Rotor Wake
WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project ENVIRON International Corporation and University of California, Riverside August 24, 2004.
External Peer Review of the FDA Office of Regulatory Affairs Pesticide Program FDA Science Board Advisory Committee Meeting Nov. 4, 2005.
Sand motion and dust emissions September 28 and 29, 2005.
Presentation to the Air Quality Forum – August 9, 2005 Clark County PM 10 Saturation Study Robert A. Baxter, CCM T & B Systems, Inc.
Department of Agroecology Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences Emission measurement database.
Seoul National Univ UAW2008 An assessment of uncertainties in the estimation of dust emission rate due to vegetation Eunjoo Jung & Soon-Chang.
HARPS-NEF PDR December 6 & 7, HARPS-NEF Program Project Manager Tim Norton.
GLAST LAT Project 1S. Ritz Purposes of the Data Challenges “End-to-end” testing of analysis software. –define the ends –define the tests (what is success?)
RECORDING WATER TABLE DYNAMICS T & D Project No. 1E11EM35 USDA FOREST SERVICE Technology & Development Center 444 East Bonita Avenue San Dimas, CA
Probe use while upside down CSIRO LAND AND WATER / WATER FOR A HEALTHY COUNTRY David McJannet & Aaron Hawdon CosmOz Australian cosmic-ray soil moisture.
Revisions To Heavy Duty Validation Report General Numerous clarifications to text as requested at December meeting Partial flow systems referred to consistently.
May 15, 2013 Space Weather Product Team (SWPT) Making Sense of the Nonsensical.
Wind Blown Dust Monitoring and Modeling at Owens Lake, CA Duane Ono Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District July 2004 WRAP Dust Emissions Joint.
Proposed Method to Quantify Particulate Matter Emissions from Windblown Dust Duane Ono, Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District Ken Richmond,
Global Design Effort 1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Overview A. Enomoto, J-L. Baldy, V. Kuchler GDE.
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Clark County PM 10 Saturation Study Robert A. Baxter, CCM T&B Systems Clark County Air Quality Forum – 03/14/06.
System of Environmental- Economic Accounting for Energy (SEEA-E) A project management framework Second Meeting of the United Nations Committee of Experts.
Windblown dust measurement (field) Vic Etyemezian DRI Las Vegas, NV Prepared for The Southwest Border Symposium on Air Quality and Climate, April 22-23,
Mitigation Dust Loading REMP Air Samplers. Dust Loading Definition / Symptoms Accumulation of loose particulate matter on air sampling particulate filter.
Workshop on the Origin and Development of the Keeler Dunes Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District Governing Board Meeting March 7, 2013 Part.
PMP Progress Report Activities since GRPE 58 Heavy Duty Validation testing Exercise completed in October Draft report and draft proposal to insert PN measurement.
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Predictions Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Status Report Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
Fugitive Dust Research at DRI Portable Wind Tunnel Unpaved Road Dust Emission Factors TRAKER measurements at Lake Tahoe Near Field Deposition Research.
Emergency Air Monitoring During Wildfires Jim Homolya USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC.
LQ status and plans – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collaboration Meeting - LBNL, April , 2006 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC OUTLINE: Goals, Input and Output Sub-tasks.
Ammonia Measurement Techniques Ji-Qin (Jee-Chin) Ni, Ph.D. Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering Purdue University October 21, 2008 Albuquerque,
Climate, Air Quality and Noise Graham Latonas Gartner Lee Limited RWDI Air Inc.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
SPACCS 2008 summary meeting 1 Storm Peak Aerosol and Cloud Characterization Study May 12, 2008.
Ozone at high elevation in Quebec region Kurt Anlauf, Kathy Hayden, Maurice Watt.
2011 National Air Quality Conferences March , 2011 Development of the USEPA Quality Assurance Guidance for the Collection of Meteorological Data.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Ambient Air Monitoring Chat Cowherd Midwest Research Institute March 17, 2010.
Consideration of Contractor Targeted Statewide Waste Characterization Studies CIWMB Board Meeting May 11-12, 2004.
Quality management, calibration, testing and comparison of instruments and observing systems M. Leroy, CIMO ET on SBII&CM.
1 Norfolk Girls Softball Technical Operations Roles & Responsibilities November, 2011.
AoH Conference Call August 10, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Jason A. Roney, Bruce R. White Estimating fugitive dust emission rates using an environmental boundary layer wind tunnel 2012/04/30 報告人:趙彥勛.
Scoring Criteria and Evaluation Process for the Used Oil Nonprofit Grant Program (7 th cycle – UNP7) FY 2006/2007; and the Used Oil Research, Testing,
FY09 NTHMP Grants Process and Budget Jenifer Rhoades November 19, 2008.
2006 IHC – Mobile, Alabama 20 – 24 March 2006 JHT Project: Operational SFMR- NAWIPS Airborne Processing and Data Distribution Products OUTLINE JHT Project.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project Results & Status ENVIRON International Corporation and University of California, Riverside Dust Emission Joint.
WRAP DEJF 11/02 MEETING May 2003: Mark Scruggs Identified Candidate Members Identified Candidate Members Identified Possible Co-chairs Identified Possible.
REAL-TIME CALIBRATION OF ACTIVE CROP SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MAKING IN-SEASON N APPLICATIONS K.H. Holland and J.S. Schepers Holland Scientific and USDA-ARS,
Radiometric Calibration of the ASTER Thermal Infrared (TIR) Subsystem Simon J. Hook NASA/JPL.
Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service NON-EXHAUST PARTICLE EMISSIONS.
Update on CASTNET Modernization Air Monitoring Steering Committee Meeting May 4, 2006 Larry Kertcher Office of Atmospheric Programs (OAP)
Doc.: IEEE Submission March 2009 George Cavage, iControl Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Content Lessons from writing proposals and work on PTDR How can this meeting help to remedy problems SCT AOB.
_________________________ U p d a t e O n M a r i c o p a C o u n t y ’ s F u g i t i v e D u s t C o n t r o l R u l e s ____________________________.
Mark Heggli Innovative Hydrology, Inc. Consultant to the World Bank Expert Real-time Hydrology Information Systems Module 12: Assuming Management of an.
Airborne Particulate Sampling using Direct Reading Instruments around Frac Sand Facilities Bloomer, WI Jacob Kentnich and Ella Keenan| Environmental.
RECORDING WATER TABLE DYNAMICS T & D Project No. 1E11EM35
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Detecting regional and point sources of methane from space
Seed Dust Working Group
Towards achieving continental scale field validation and multi-sensor interoperability of satellite derived surface reflectance in Australia Medhavy Thankappan1,
Site classifications, definitions, and updates to Landnet
Duane Ono & Scott Weaver,
LUCAS Task Force The way forward.
RadCalNet/Landnet process for adding new sites
Reporting and Water Information System for Europe (WISE)
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
Exhaust gas intake to cabin air.
Presentation transcript:

Update PI-SWERL Sampling on Owens Lake Maarten Schreuder, Air Sciences Inc. 3/17/2010 Maarten Schreuder, Air Sciences Inc. 3/17/2010

Outline Background Updates to Sampling Plan  Field Sampling  Calibration Schedule for Current Dust Season Background Updates to Sampling Plan  Field Sampling  Calibration Schedule for Current Dust Season

Background - Timeline 07/08 - PI-SWERL first discussed with Panel 05/09 - First test on Owens Playa 09/09 - Field demonstration with Panel and District 11/09 - Panel § recommended development of PI-SWERL sampling plan 12/09 - Draft sampling plan presented to Panel and District 1/10 - Updated sampling plan distributed to Panel and District 07/08 - PI-SWERL first discussed with Panel 05/09 - First test on Owens Playa 09/09 - Field demonstration with Panel and District 11/09 - Panel § recommended development of PI-SWERL sampling plan 12/09 - Draft sampling plan presented to Panel and District 1/10 - Updated sampling plan distributed to Panel and District § Expert Panel Position Statement, Nov. 10, 2009

Updates to Sampling Plan -Field Measurements-

Field Sampling Approaches Routine sampling Event sampling Instrument comparison Routine sampling Event sampling Instrument comparison

Routine Sampling Study Area 1 and Study Area 3 Monthly sampling Sampling time: 1 day per area Up to 25 sampling points per area Approx. one sample per 15 acres (~250x250 m) Co-locate several points with District Sensits Study Area 1 and Study Area 3 Monthly sampling Sampling time: 1 day per area Up to 25 sampling points per area Approx. one sample per 15 acres (~250x250 m) Co-locate several points with District Sensits

Routine Sampling Study Area 1Study Area 3

Event Sampling Sampling across borders of delineated areas Sampling within 5 days of wind event Sampling time: 1 day per area Up to 25 sampling points per area Two or three transects per area Co-locate several points with District Sensits (where possible) Sampling across borders of delineated areas Sampling within 5 days of wind event Sampling time: 1 day per area Up to 25 sampling points per area Two or three transects per area Co-locate several points with District Sensits (where possible)

Event Sampling

Instrument Comparison PI-SWERL District wind tunnel MRI wind tunnel

Instrument Comparison Recommended by Panel Two or three sampling locations, representing different soil/surface types Main criteria:  Surface emissivity (high/intermediate/low)  Accessibility Sampling time: up to 1 day per site Instruments:  MRI tunnel (N=4)  District tunnel (N=4)  PI-SWERL (N=8) Recommended by Panel Two or three sampling locations, representing different soil/surface types Main criteria:  Surface emissivity (high/intermediate/low)  Accessibility Sampling time: up to 1 day per site Instruments:  MRI tunnel (N=4)  District tunnel (N=4)  PI-SWERL (N=8)

Updates to Sampling Plan -Calibration-

Calibration of OGS Need: Conversion of Optical Gate Sensors (OGS) output to a mass-based sand flux Several options available:  Use recent progress by DRI/DustQuant in calibrating OGS output to total sand mass  Calibrate OGS in PI-SWERL to mass-based sand flux in MRI tunnel  Place OGS devices inside the MRI tunnel for real-time calibration Preferred option to be determined Need: Conversion of Optical Gate Sensors (OGS) output to a mass-based sand flux Several options available:  Use recent progress by DRI/DustQuant in calibrating OGS output to total sand mass  Calibrate OGS in PI-SWERL to mass-based sand flux in MRI tunnel  Place OGS devices inside the MRI tunnel for real-time calibration Preferred option to be determined

Calibration of DustTrak Need: Calibration factor(s) for DustTrak specific to Owens Lake material Two or three representative soil types 1 O option: Procedure proposed by Jack Gillies § 2 O option: Compare DustTrak filter mass with real-time output Need: Calibration factor(s) for DustTrak specific to Owens Lake material Two or three representative soil types 1 O option: Procedure proposed by Jack Gillies § 2 O option: Compare DustTrak filter mass with real-time output § Expert Panel Position Statement, March 12, 2010

Schedule for Current Dust Season

Original Time Schedule TaskPlanning Data Collection Data Analysis Report Preparation Routine Sampling 3/2010 Through 8/ /201012/2010 Event Sampling Through 6/2010 Instrument Cross Comparison 6/2010 PI-SWERL Calibration Through 7/2010

Updated Schedule Utilize remainder of current dust season for planning and coordination. Realistic schedule:  Instrument calibration: starting Fall 2010  Cross comparison: dust season  Field sampling: dust season Collaboration with the District would speed the process and lead to a more acceptable end product. Utilize remainder of current dust season for planning and coordination. Realistic schedule:  Instrument calibration: starting Fall 2010  Cross comparison: dust season  Field sampling: dust season Collaboration with the District would speed the process and lead to a more acceptable end product.

Questions