Cavity BPM processing and hardware upgrade plans 24.02.2015 A. Lyapin, S. Boogert, E. Yamakawa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Monitors Info from John Musson on new cavity receivers Other monitor issues.
Advertisements

ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Test of LLRF at SPARC Marco Bellaveglia INFN – LNF Reporting for:
Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.
C and S band BPM system update A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, S. Molloy, C. Swinson 5/25/20151ATF2 Software meeting.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
ATF2 Q-BPM System 19 Dec Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting J. May, D. McCormick, T. Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH) B. Meller (Cornell) Y. Honda (KEK)
IP-BPM NOV. BEAM TEST RESULTS Siwon Jang (KNU). 11cm Low-Q IP-BPM design  11cm Low-Q IP-BPM drawings of HFSS 100mm Sensor cavity Wave guide Antenna Designed.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Status of QBPM Electronics and Magnet Movers as of June 3 rd 2008 D. McCormick, J Nelson, G White SLAC S Boogert Royal Holloway Y. Honda, Y.Inoue KEK.
Status of ATF2 Cavity BPM Project Sep 29, 2005 Project Scope: Instrument both couplers ATF2 cavity BPM’s (35) Produce prototype for December cavity test.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Experience on design, prototyping and testing of cavity BPM for the European-XFEL > Motivation > Introduction > Principle of CBPMs > Mechanical properties.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
NanoBPM Signals Second Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF December 11-12, 2004 Toyoko Orimoto Yury Kolomensky Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory & University.
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
C/S-band cavity BPMs A. Aryshev (KEK), S. T. Boogert G. Boorman, F. Cullinan, J. Frisch, A. Heo, Y. Honda, J.Y. Huang, S.J. Hwang, N. Joshi,
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
IP-BPM status Siwon Jang KNU. Contents The electronics repair status –Repair work status –Electronics RF test (by using Oscilloscope) –Electronics shipment.
SPECTRUM ANALYZER 9 kHz GHz
LCLS_II High Rep Rate Operation and Femtosecond Timing J. Frisch 7/22/15.
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
Results on recent technology developments at ATF - Beam extraction study by a Fast Kicker - N. Terunuma, KEK LER11, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2011/Oct/5.
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.
1 ATF 2 Nanobpm (Q BPM) Electronics. Mark Slater: Cambridge Yury Kolomensky, Toyoko Orimoto: UCB Stewart Boogert, Steve Malton, Alexi Liapine: UCL Mike.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
Bunch Numbering P. Baudrenghien AB/RF for the LHC/RF team.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
Cold BPM development in KEK H. Hayano, March 2011 Jung Keun Ahn (PNU), Sun young Ryu (PNU), Eun San Kim (KNU), Young Im Kim (KNU), Jin yeong Ryu (KNU),
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
1 ATF2 Q-BPM Magnet Movers & 1 st Pulse Calibration Progress from May 7-11 J. May, D. McCormick, T.Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH)
RF low level control & synchronization A. Gallo, M. Bellaveglia, L. Cacciotti SPARC review committee – ENEA Frascati – 16/11/2005.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Dye ring laser control, spectroscopic, and locking feedback system showing overlapping,
30GHz system improvements Jan Kovermann RF meeting
S-band processing electronics R. Ainsworth (summer student), S. Boogert, G. Boorman (Royal Holloway) A. Lyapine (University College London) Weekly ATF2.
1/33Mikey Davis24 January 2013 Review of 23 rd of January Shift.
Current Status of QBPM Electronics and Magnet Movers D. McCormick, J Nelson, G White SLAC S Boogert Royal Holloway Y. Honda, Y.Inoue KEK.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme Stephen Molloy, QMUL Nano-Project Mini-Workshop at ATF.
Roundup of Week at ATF Mikey Davis 19 April /26.
Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich
Glen White, SLAC Jan th ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK
LCABD WP 4.2 – Spectrometer and BPM Studies
Re-entrant BPM R&D for ILC Main Linac
Resolution Study T. Bromwich FONT 8 September 2017.
NanoBPM Progress January 12, 2005 Steve Smith.
KNU IP-BPM and Reference cavity
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
ATF nanoBPM system - nanoGrid ATF2 Movers TTF HOM – dipole / monopole
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
Cavity BPMs at Diamond S. Boogert, A. Lyapine (UCL), G. Rehm
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Fabrication of KEK-ATF2 Q-BPM
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
Report on ATF2 Third Project Meeting ATF2 Magnet Movers ATF2 Q-BPM Electronics Is SLAC ILC Instrumentation Group a good name?
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

Cavity BPM processing and hardware upgrade plans A. Lyapin, S. Boogert, E. Yamakawa

Aims 2  Would like to study low-charge and multibunch (multi-train at ATF) operation  Low vs high charge: need to adjust the sensitivity of the system  Multibunch: need to upgrade the processing  Programme primarily supported by CBPM development for light sources, but will have immediate benefit to ATF2 operation (+ CERN/CLIC + e-JADE grants)  Any upgrades should avoid/minimise interruption to ATF2 studies  People:  Alexey – 2 months from March to May  Emi – 1 month in April  Stewart – mainly helping behind the scenes, will be at KEK in April for the Workshop

Low charge operation 3  Investigate timing (signal shape change) and other issues when going to lower charge  Locked vs. unlocked operation  Hardware changes may be required:  Remotely controlled attenuators (we are aiming to provide ~7-8 of HMC800’s, control via RS232/Ethernet)  Try free-running stable LO and clock generators (find what’s available) – also useful for measuring the dispersion, currently issues due to 714 MHz harmonic changing BPM Remote control via RS232/Ethernet

Multibunch studies 4  Need to modify processing for multiple bunches  Investigate time of arrival (diode) signals vs bunch charge, distance  Plan: replicate existing processing system, then modify step-by-step running in parallel to existing processing  Hardware: additional processing PC (already at KEK); attenuators may be useful if bunches are offset with respect to each other

Multibunch processing (1) 5  Acquire multiple signals in one digitiser reading  Remove residual signal by subtracting raw or processed waveforms  Need arrival time info for subtraction  use diode signal N. Joshi

Multibunch processing (2) 6  Subtraction is done on phasors, phase information is important  Errors in propagating the amplitude and phase degrade the resolution  Frequency differences between the pos and ref cavities and timing drifts, time of arrival detection are important N. Joshi

Multibunch investigations 7  Need at least 3 CBPMs for resolution measurements  Use the same subset for both low-charge and multibunch  Instrument with attenuators 3 CBPMs and a reference (+diode sep?) = 8 channels  Use 1-bit attenuators (still need to choose between 10, 15 and 20 dB)  Scan timing, charge etc  Processing for all CBPMs though, checks with the selected 3

Summary 8  Upgrades to the ATF system: new processing and PC, remote controlled attenuators  Will need some beam time for the studies during April-May running, estimating a minimum of:  2-3 half-shifts (ideally, following BPM calibration) for low-charge  2-3 full shifts for multibunch