Understanding State Share of Instruction and Resource Analysis Jay Johnson Assistant Director, Higher Education Information (HEI) (614) 728-2902

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNIVERSITIES FY 2014 May 2013 State Share of Instruction.
Advertisements

UNIVERSITIES FY 2015 Spring 2014 State Share of Instruction.
FY15 PROPOSED TUITION AND FEE INCREASES TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-KINGSVILLE.
Overview of Performance Funding Model for Ohio’s Community Colleges
1 Changes in the State Share of Instruction FY 2008 and Beyond Presented by: The Office of Administrative Services.
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Budget & Performance Funding Formula Overview August 19, 2011.
PROGRAM PRIORITIZATION Open Forum January 16, 2013.
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Governance Commission Budget, Formula Funding, & Efficiencies September 28, 2011.
TUITION & FEE PROPOSAL (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas Board of Regents (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas.
1 FY 2014 Merit Presentation July 2, AGENDA – MERIT PROCESS  Merit Policy Overview and Timeline  Templates and Instructions, Forms Signature.
Open Budget Meeting 1. 2 State Appropriations Tuition & Fees Auxiliary Enterprises Major Repair & Renovation (MRR) Salaries and Wages Utilities Supplies.
BUDGET UPDATE: MID-YEAR REVIEW AND BUDGET CALENDAR MARY SIMON, SR. DIRECTOR BUDGET PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 18, 2015.
Performance Based Funding Formula. SSI History SSI Overview University Formula Performance Changes OTC Funding Formula 2.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget Presented by: Mary Simon Sr. Director Budget and Planning Development.
Tuition & Fee Proposal and FY 2009 Budget Tuition & Fee Proposal and FY 2009 Budget Presentation to UTSA Staff Council June 26, 2008 Janet Parker, Associate.
Academic Department Profiles: Creating an On-Line Budget Support Notebook Karen A. DeMonte University of Delaware
Faculty Compensation John Day Associate Provost for Academic Budget and Planning.
1 The FY 2006 Budget Request and Future Impacts Strategic Planning Study Session January 20, 2005.
Budget Office Division of Business and Finance DEVELOPING A UNIVERSITY-WIDE BUDGET An Overview of the External Budget Development Process.
1 Budget Model Update #2 Resources Implementation Team.
THE EXPECTED, BUT UNSTATED PROFIT MARGIN. Georgia Military College Two-year liberal arts public independent college 5 branch campuses, 3 extension centers,
Georgia State University An Overview of the Budget Process.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery March 5, 2009.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Brian Clark Data Analyst Data Management and Analysis (614) HEI New User Training -- Ohio Board of Regents.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 Overview of Federal Regulations for Federal Grants.
Sheri Austin Assistant Vice President, University Budgets Office of the Chief Financial Officer Academic Administrators Seminar Series October 2011.
Sheri Austin Assistant Vice President, University Budgets Office of the Chief Financial Officer Academic Administrators Leadership Series October 2013.
Fiscal Year Operating Budget Board of Trustees Meeting June 7,
A Glance Back  We have made significant progress in spite of significant financial challenges created from:  Declining state appropriations  Pressure.
© 2006 The Curators of the University of Missouri1 Providing Accountability Through Data and Process – The Program Audit Robert Mullen, Associate Director,
Update to FSUN HRMS April 23, ent/d/1k4FQ6xvh-MnE- erL1NEswbLLBjdq8A91zvozl14yieo/edit.
Budget Approved: June 25, Board of Trustees’ Planning Goals Maximize Student Access Guarantee Quality Education Guide Towards Educational.
April, 2005 Texas Public University Cost Study. April, 2005 Charge To develop a defensible and acceptable “Instruction and Operations Formula” Matrix.
HEALTH PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND RECREATION COURSES (HPER) ACADEMIC YEAR Board Presentation.
Self-Supporting Degrees Administrative Business Officers Group April 29, 2014.
University of Washington Tacoma Budget Presentation May, 2014.
Student-Athlete Advising Round Table – Fall 2010.
1 System Level Accountability Measures Dec. 16, 2003.
Merit Program  Overview – General Information  Employee Eligibility  Merit Allocation Pools & Funding  Merit Awards, Process, Rules  Draft.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
Budget Approved. 2 Contents State Funding Picture3 Effect on North Central State College4 Board of Trustees’ Planning Goals5 State Share of.
Florida International University G-51 April 9, 2010.
The Capital Budget Game in Utah SHEEO 2006 Professional Development Conference Kevin Walthers Assistant Commissioner Utah System of Higher Education August.
INCENTIVE FUNDING UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Created on 2/17/2016.
Faculty Salary Report (CBM008) Uses Average Budgeted Faculty Salaries Salaries reported on fall reports are: doubled, converted to full-time equivalent.
March 2014 Regents, Trustees, Coordinating Board Institutions Instructions, $ $ $ $ Suggestions, recommendations Texas Legislature.
Adding Cost and Benchmarking to Your Program Review Michelle Taylor| Senior Research Analyst National Higher Education Benchmarking Institute.
March 2014 Regents, Trustees, Coordinating Board Institutions Instructions, $ $ $ $ Suggestions, recommendations Texas Legislature.
Budget Calendar and Mid-Year review Mary Simon, Senior Budget Director March 23, 2016.
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE AND BUDGETING May 2017
Office of Financial Affairs
Evaluation of the Space Projection Models
FY18 Budget Planning Council Orientation
Merit Process Budget Planning and Development FAR Meeting
LEAD UNCW Financial Statements
Breakfast for Progress
Rebalancing State Appropriations
ADOPTED BUDGET FOR YEAR ENDING JUNE 30TH, 2019
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING OVERVIEW House Ways and Means Committee
Trends in College Pricing 2018
Sailing In Uncharted Waters
CTE Administrative Internship Program January 18, 2008
Sailing In Uncharted Waters
Porterville College College Learning Council April 6, 2015
Sailing In Uncharted Waters
Sailing In Uncharted Waters
Presentation transcript:

Understanding State Share of Instruction and Resource Analysis Jay Johnson Assistant Director, Higher Education Information (HEI) (614) Jay Johnson Assistant Director, Higher Education Information (HEI) (614) OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS HEI Users Conference March 23, 2001

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 2 Presentation Overview s State Share of Instruction l Two- & five-year moving averages s Resource Analysis s Queries Available s State Share of Instruction l Two- & five-year moving averages s Resource Analysis s Queries Available $1.7B awarded each Fiscal Year

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 3 State Support of Ohio Higher Education s State Share of Instruction Formula $1.6B in FY01 s Challenge Line Items $147M in FY01 l Success Challenge l Access Challenge l Research Challenge l Jobs Challenge s State Share of Instruction Formula $1.6B in FY01 s Challenge Line Items $147M in FY01 l Success Challenge l Access Challenge l Research Challenge l Jobs Challenge State support represents between 28% to 49% of campus revenue Allocation by Type - FY01

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 4 State Support of Ohio Higher Education

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 5 Cost of Instruction Factors in Resource Analysis Student Services: Registrar, Institutional Research POM: Facilities, Libraries, Technology Infrastructure President & VP Salaries Number of Students in Course or Credit Hours Subject Matter of Course Level of Course Collegiate Enterprise Course / Unit of instruction Indirect Costs/ Overhead Allocated to Instructor Salary + Fringe Benefits Department Chair Salary & other expenses Direct Instructional Costs

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 6 Resource Analysis Cost Allocation s Step 1: Allocate instructors' salaries & benefits among the subjects and levels of the courses they teach s Step 2: Allocate Funding Unit Overhead expenses to subjects and levels of course sections offered by the funding unit (department) s Step 3: Allocate student services, academic support, institutional support, libraries and POM to all subjects and levels of course sections offered by the campus s Step 4: Combine all costs into single table for entire state. l Costs are saved for each combination of campus, subject and level, and can thereby be aggregated by state, sector, campus, subject field, level and subsidy model. s Step 1: Allocate instructors' salaries & benefits among the subjects and levels of the courses they teach s Step 2: Allocate Funding Unit Overhead expenses to subjects and levels of course sections offered by the funding unit (department) s Step 3: Allocate student services, academic support, institutional support, libraries and POM to all subjects and levels of course sections offered by the campus s Step 4: Combine all costs into single table for entire state. l Costs are saved for each combination of campus, subject and level, and can thereby be aggregated by state, sector, campus, subject field, level and subsidy model.

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 7 Resource Analysis Step 1: Allocate Instructors’ Salaries s Calculating Course Credit Hours

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 8 Resource Analysis Step 1: Allocate Instructors’ Salaries s Calculating Student Credit Hours

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 9 Resource Analysis Step 1: Allocate Instructors’ Salaries s Average SCH & CCH

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 10 Resource Analysis Allocation s Step 1: Allocate instructors' salaries & benefits among the subjects and levels of the courses they teach l Allocated by SCH & CCH s Step 2: Allocate Funding Unit Overhead expenses to subjects and levels of course sections offered by the funding unit (department) l Allocated by SCH & CCH s Step 3: Allocate student services, academic support, institutional support, libraries and POM to all subjects and levels of course sections offered by the campus l Allocated by SCH and NASF for POM s Step 1: Allocate instructors' salaries & benefits among the subjects and levels of the courses they teach l Allocated by SCH & CCH s Step 2: Allocate Funding Unit Overhead expenses to subjects and levels of course sections offered by the funding unit (department) l Allocated by SCH & CCH s Step 3: Allocate student services, academic support, institutional support, libraries and POM to all subjects and levels of course sections offered by the campus l Allocated by SCH and NASF for POM

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 11 Resource Analysis Cost Allocation: Files that contribute to each step Step 1 s Faculty and Instructional Non-faculty Funding (FF) File: Salary s Course Enrollment (CN) File: Credit Hours s Student Enrollment (SN) File: Rank s Course Sections Taught (ST) File: Section Type s Course Inventory (CI) File: Subject and Course Level s Funding Unit Expenditure (FX) File: Funding Unit Step 2 s Funding Unit Inventory (FI) File s College Expenditure (CP) File Step 3 s Campus Expenditure (CX) File s Area Inventory (AI) File (used to calculate Net Area Square Footage (NASF)) Step 1 s Faculty and Instructional Non-faculty Funding (FF) File: Salary s Course Enrollment (CN) File: Credit Hours s Student Enrollment (SN) File: Rank s Course Sections Taught (ST) File: Section Type s Course Inventory (CI) File: Subject and Course Level s Funding Unit Expenditure (FX) File: Funding Unit Step 2 s Funding Unit Inventory (FI) File s College Expenditure (CP) File Step 3 s Campus Expenditure (CX) File s Area Inventory (AI) File (used to calculate Net Area Square Footage (NASF))

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 12 State Share of Instruction Processing s Step 1: Gather all course enrollments, cross registrations, and medical enrollments into a single table s Step 2: Exclude course enrollments that have no impact on subsidy s Step 3: Adjust the subsidy level of course enrollments that may have been classified for subsidy inappropriately. s Step 4: Map course enrollments to subsidy model based on their subject code and course level. s Step 1: Gather all course enrollments, cross registrations, and medical enrollments into a single table s Step 2: Exclude course enrollments that have no impact on subsidy s Step 3: Adjust the subsidy level of course enrollments that may have been classified for subsidy inappropriately. s Step 4: Map course enrollments to subsidy model based on their subject code and course level.

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 13 State Share of Instruction Processing s Step 5: Adjust the subsidy model for approved exceptions s Step 6: Classify student enrollments as eligible or ineligible for subsidy. s Step 7: The processing in this step has been distributed to other steps. s Step 8: Summarize course enrollments by campus and subsidy model for both eligible and ineligible SCH. s Step 5: Adjust the subsidy model for approved exceptions s Step 6: Classify student enrollments as eligible or ineligible for subsidy. s Step 7: The processing in this step has been distributed to other steps. s Step 8: Summarize course enrollments by campus and subsidy model for both eligible and ineligible SCH.

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 14 State Share of Instruction Processing s Step 9: Apply the Law Caps. s Step 10: Apply the Doctoral Caps. This process will not be implemented. s Step 11: Apply the Baccalaureate Limit rule. s Step 12: Apply medical 5 percent repeater rule. This process is not yet implemented. s Step 13: Apply medical class cohort excess rule. This process is not yet implemented. s Step 14: Apply medical buffering rule. s Step 9: Apply the Law Caps. s Step 10: Apply the Doctoral Caps. This process will not be implemented. s Step 11: Apply the Baccalaureate Limit rule. s Step 12: Apply medical 5 percent repeater rule. This process is not yet implemented. s Step 13: Apply medical class cohort excess rule. This process is not yet implemented. s Step 14: Apply medical buffering rule.

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 15 Baccalaureate Limit 20% Resident Credit Center

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 16 State Share of Instruction Processing s Step 15: Enter Journal Entry transactions. s Step 16: This processing has been combined with Step 18. s Step 17: Submit to institutions for further review. s Step 18: Summarize the Subsidy FTE for all terms of the fiscal year calculated so far. Instructional Subsidy s Final Step: Fund based on the higher of the two- or five-year moving average s Step 15: Enter Journal Entry transactions. s Step 16: This processing has been combined with Step 18. s Step 17: Submit to institutions for further review. s Step 18: Summarize the Subsidy FTE for all terms of the fiscal year calculated so far. Instructional Subsidy s Final Step: Fund based on the higher of the two- or five-year moving average

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 17 Two- or five-year Moving Average

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 18 Two- or five-year Moving Average

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS, 19 Websites s s s s

Understanding State Share of Instruction and Resource Analysis Jay Johnson Assistant Director, Higher Education Information (HEI) (614) Jay Johnson Assistant Director, Higher Education Information (HEI) (614) OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS HEI Users Conference March 23, 2001