1 Atmospheric variations as observed by the BUST Barometric effect M.Berkova, V.Yanke, L.Dorman, V.Petkov, M.Kostyuk, R.Novoseltseva, Yu.Novoseltsev, P.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Investigation of daily variations of cosmic ray fluxes in the beginning of 24 th solar activity cycle Ashot Chilingarian, Bagrat Mailyan IHY-ISWI Regional.
Advertisements

Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
Hybrid Extensive Air Shower Detector Array at the University of Puebla to Study Cosmic Rays (EAS-UAP) O. Martínez a, E. Moreno a, G. Pérez a, H. Salazar.
Use of floating surface detector stations for the calibration of a deep-sea neutrino telescope G. Bourlis, N. A. B. Gizani, A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis,
A.U. Kudzhaev, D.D. Dzhappuev, V.V. Alekseenko, A.B. Chernyev, N.F. Klimenko, A.S. Lidvansky, A.B. Chernyev, N.F. Klimenko, A.S. Lidvansky, V.B. Petkov.
ОПАСНОСТИ МАГНИТНЫХ БУРЬ И ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ МИРОВОЙ СЕТИ НЕЙТРОННЫХ МОНИТОРОВ И МЮОННЫХ ТЕЛЕСКОПОВ ДЛЯ ПРЕДСКАЗАНИЯ ПОДХОДА К ЗЕМЛЕ МОЩНЫХ МЕЖПЛАНЕТНЫХ.
1 Seasonal variations of the muon flux seen by the muon detector BUST 1 Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation RAN of.
Variations of the high energy muon flux and space-time structure of the temperature profile in the atmosphere M.G. Kostyuk 1, V.B. Petkov 1, R.V. Novoseltseva.
05, July, 2012, Moscow Session: SH ID: rd European Cosmic Ray Symposium Registration of Forbush decrease 2012/03/08 with a global net of the thermal.
Analysis of Parameters of Bright Events in Variations of Secondary Particles of Cosmic Rays during Thunderstorms N.S. Khaerdinov & A. S. Lidvansky Institute.
Size and Energy Spectra of incident cosmic radiation obtained by the MAKET - ANI surface array on mountain Aragats. (Final results from MAKET-ANI detector)‏
A new approach to EAS investigations in energy region eV R.P.Kokoulin for DECOR Collaboration Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Russia.
TAUP Conference, Sendai September The primary spectrum in the transition region between direct and indirect measurements (10 TeV – 10 PeV)
Snow effect and practical questions of how to take it into account Korotkov V.*, Berkova M.*, Basalayev M.*, Belov A.*, Eroshenko E.*, Yudachin K.* and.
Atmospheric shower simulation studies with CORSIKA Physics Department Atreidis George ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI.
Events 1. Figure 4 shows: Left panel – Negative values ​​ of the electric field and data of high energy neutrons (upper panel), thermal neutrons (lower.
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
Yakutsk results: spectrum and anisotropy M.I. Pravdin for Yukutsk Collaboration Yu.G. Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy, 31 Lenin.
Effect of air fluorescence properties on the reconstructed energy of UHECR José Ramón Vázquez, María Monasor, Fernando Arqueros Universidad Complutense.
1 The results of the study of dp-elastic scattering at the energies from 500 to 1000 MeV/nucleon A.A Terekhin et al. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,
1 IGY The ALERT signal of ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays: physics basis, the ways of realization and development Anashin V., Belov A.,
Spectra of the Thunderstorm Correlated Electron and Gamma-Ray Measured at Aragats Bagrat Mailyan and Ashot Chilingarian.
Neutron ‘thunder’ accompanying an extensive air shower Erlykin A.D. P.N.Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Properties of giant air showers and the problem of energy estimation of initial particles M.I. Pravdin for Yukutsk Collaboration Yu.G. Shafer Institute.
27-Day Variations Of The Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity And Anisotropy In Different Solar Magnetic Cycles ( ) M.V. Alania, A. Gil, K. Iskra, R.
AGASA Results Masahiro Teshima for AGASA collaboration
XXXI International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC 2009 Lodz, Poland, July 7-15, 2009 Time structure of the Extensive Air Shower front with the ARGO-YBJ experiment.
Methods for describing the field of ionospheric waves and spatial signal processing in the diagnosis of inhomogeneous ionosphere Mikhail V. Tinin Irkutsk.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Variations of Cosmic Rays during Thunderstorms N.S. Khaerdinov & A. S. Lidvansky Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
Total photoabsorption on quasi free nucleons at 600 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, A.Ignatov, A.Lapik, A.Mushkarenkov, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL collaboratiion.
Study of the Atmospheric Muon and Neutrinos for the IceCube Observatory Ryan Birdsall Paolo Desiati, Patrick Berghaus,
Yu.V. Stenkin, Moscow'20111 The PRISMA project Yuri V. Stenkin Institute for Nuclear Res. of RAS, Moscow, Russia.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
1 Seasonal variations of the m flux seen by the muon super telescope MuSTAnG Ganeva 1 M., Peglow 1 S., Hippler 1 R., Berkova.
“The Cosmic Ray composition in the knee region and the hadronic interaction models” G. Navarra INFN and University, Torino, Italy For the EAS-TOP Collaboration.
Study of high energy cosmic rays by different components of back scattered radiation generated in the lunar regolith N. N. Kalmykov 1, A. A. Konstantinov.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
1 A wind effect of neutron component of cosmic rays at stations with strong wind Eroshenko E., Kobelev P., Belov A., Guschina R., Smirnov D., Yanke V.,
1 TEMPERATURE EFFECT OF MUON COMPONENT AND PRACTICAL QUESTIONS OF ITS ACCOUNT IN REAL TIME Berkova 1,2 M., Belov 1 A., Eroshenko 1 E., Yanke 1 V. 1 Institute.
What we do know about cosmic rays at energies above eV? A.A.Petrukhin Contents 4 th Round Table, December , Introduction. 2. How these.
The identification of the fluctuation effects related to the turbulence and “permanent” layers in the atmosphere of Venus from radio occultation data V.N.Gubenko.
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays – New Approach A.A.Petrukhin Moscow Engineering Physics Institute C o n t e n t s 1.Problems of UHECR 2.Possible solution.
Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Darjeeling, December 2009 Extensive Air Showers and Astroparticle Physics Observations and.
Influence of diffractive interactions on cosmic rays air showers ABSTRACT: A comparative study of commonly used hadronic collision simulation packages.
QUARKS-2010, Kolomna1 Study of the Energy Spectrum and the Composition of the Primary Cosmic Radiation at Super-high Energies.
Simultaneous photo-production measurement of the  and  mesons on the nucleons at the range 680 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL.
1 Temperature effect of the muon component of cosmic ray and practical possibilities of its accounting Berkova M., Belov A., Smirnov D., Eroshenko E.,
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
A Northern Sky Survey for Both TeV CR anisotropy and  -ray Sources with Tibet Air Shower Array Hongbo Hu For Tibet AS  collaboration.
Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
NuMI MINOS Seasonal Variations in the MINOS Far Detector Eric W. Grashorn University of Minnesota Thursday, 5 July, 2007.
Space-time structure of signals in scintillation detectors of EAS L.G. Dedenko, G.F. Fedorova, T.M. Roganova and D.A. Podgrudkov.
10/20/11SESAPS111 Correlation study of atmospheric weather and cosmic ray flux variation Kanishka Dayananda Georgia State University.
Periodic Variations in Muon Flux at Project GRAND Thomas A. Catanach, John Poirier ICRC August 2011.
Long-term environmental effects on the ARGO-YBJ RPC array studied with the Detector Control System P. CAMARRI 1, R. CARDARELLI 1, L. PALUMMO 1, C. VIGORITO.
An analytically solvable model of a nuclear cascade in the atmosphere M. G. Kostyuk BNO INR RAS Using sufficiently accurate uniform (that is, suitable.
The “Carpet-2” multipurpose air shower array of the Baksan Neutrino Observatory INR of RAS A.U. Kudzhaev Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy.
Update on Muon Flux Underground Using Geant4 Simulation
2-8 July 2017 KBR, Terskol (BNO); KChR, Nizhnij Arkhyz (SAO)
Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
A.S. Lidvansky, M.N. Khaerdinov, N.S. Khaerdinov
Insight of 3D imaging using SiRO
Investigations of CME in muon flux detected in hodoscopic mode
35th ICRC, Busan, Korea, July 2017
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Charge Ratio by Using a Cosmic Ray Telescope Soheila Abdollahi (Imam Khomeini International University, Sharif University.
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
N.S. Khaerdinov & A. S. Lidvansky
Presentation transcript:

1 Atmospheric variations as observed by the BUST Barometric effect M.Berkova, V.Yanke, L.Dorman, V.Petkov, M.Kostyuk, R.Novoseltseva, Yu.Novoseltsev, P. Striganov, M.Boliev Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation RAS of N.V. Pushkov (IZMIRAN), Russia Instutute for Nuclear Research RAS, Russia ICRC id 0275

The barometric effect of muons is described in detail in [Dorman, 1972]. According to the theory, it is assumed that the barometric effect of high energy muons is negligible, as its absolute value decreases with increasing the threshold energy of the registered particles. BUT: [Humble et al., 1979] - large seasonal variations of the barometric coefficient. According to the Poatina’s data from 1972 to 1976, taking into account only the pressure change, the barometric coefficient b = (-0,047 ± 0,0016) %/mb was obtained by using linear regression, while a theoretical value was (-0,007) %/mb. The authors concluded that the discrepancy of the observed and theoretical barometric coefficients may be caused by unaccounted muons from kaons, as well as the unaccounted impact of temperature of the upper atmosphere layers above 100 mb. [Lyons et al., 1981] a significant negative correlation between pressure and temperature of the upper atmosphere for Poatina was defined. The authors got b from (-0,0214 ± 0,0020) to (-0,0257 ± 0,0019) %/mb. These values ​​ are several times higher than the theoretical ones. [Yasue, 1981] - for the underground telescope Matsushiro (250 m.w.e. in depth) a barometric coefficient was obtained as b = (-0,045 ± 0,005) %/mb that is five times more than the theoretically expected value. [Sagisaka, 1986] - barometric coefficients for a large number of underground detectors at different depths were presented. For the deepest detectors Matushiro (250 mwe in depth) and Poatina (365 mwe in depth) the barometric coefficients were significantly more than theoretically calculated values: b = (-0,027 ± 0.004) %/mb for Matushiro [S. Sagisaka, 1983] and b = (-0,047 ± 0.002) %/mb for Poatina [Fenton, 1975], [Humble, 1979], [Lyons, 1981]. [Tolkacheva, 2011] - a large value of the barometric coefficient for groups of muons (the registered events corresponded to the primary particles energies of ~ 10^15 eV) determined at the DECOR installation (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute). With the double linear regression (taking into account variations of pressure and temperature at the same time) for groups of muons the barometric coefficient was obtained as b = (-0,314 ± 0.002) %/mb. The observed effect was explained by a change of the spatial distribution function for muons in extensive air showers 1.L.I.Dorman. Meteorological effects of cosmic ray. M.: Nauka, p. 2.J.E.Humble, A.G.Fenton, K.B.Fenton and P.R.A.Lyons: Proc. of the XVI ICRC, Vol. 4 (Kyoto, 1979), p P.R.A.Lyons, A.G.Fenton and K.B.Fenton. 17th ICRC, Paris, 1981, Conference Papers. Vol. 4. p S.Yasue, S.Mori and S.Sagisaka. 17th ICRC, Paris, 1981, Conference Papers. Vol. 4, p S.Sagisaka. Nuovo Cimento, 1986, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp S. Sagisaka, S. Yasue, S. Mori, K. Chino and M. Ichinose: Proc. of the XVIII ICRC, Vol. 10 (Bangalore, 1983), p A.G.Fenton and K.B.Fenton: Proc. of he XIV ICRC, Vol. 4 (Munchen, 1975), p N.V.Tolkacheva, A.G.Bogdanov, A.N.Dmitrieva, R.P.Kokoulin, V.V.Shutenko. Bull. of the RAS: Physics, 2011, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp The barometric effect of high energy muons 2

3 The Baksan Underground Scintillation Detector of the Institute for Nuclear Research RAS is located in the Caucasus mountains (43.28o N and 42.69o E) inside the mine of 24×24×16 m3 under the Andyrcha mountain. There is 350 m of rock vertical depth (850 mwe) over the telescope. The BUST is parallelepiped of 16.7×16.7×11.1 m3 consisting of 8 planes (4 inner and 4 outer) of detectors (each of 70×70×30 сm3) with liquid scintillater. The observatory level is 1700 m above sea level, average pressure is 820 mb. The BUST 1.E.N.Alekseev, V.V.Alekseenko, Yu.M.Andreev et al. Bull. of the RAS: Physics, 1980, Vol. 44, p. 609.

4 Because of the complex topography over the installation (according to angles and directions) one can obtain results to a depth > 6000 g/cm2. So the BUST’s experimental data cover a wide range of threshold energies ( TeV) and zenith angles (0° - 90° ). The main contribution to the count rate (~ 80%) comes from zenith angles 0° - 60°. The BUST / Data and Energy 1.A.V.Voevodsky, A.L.Tsyabuk, A.E.Chudakov. Phys. of Atom. Nucl., Vol.50. Iss. 12, p. 143, V.I.Gurentsov. Preprint П-0379, Moscow, 1984 Dependence of the threshold energies on the azimuthal angles for the full range of zenith angles in steps of 5° for the BUST: the vertical v0 (0°<θ<34°) – red curves; the interval 01 (34°<θ<48°) – green curves; the interval 02 (48°<θ<60°) – orange curves; the interval 03 (60°<θ<71°) – blue curves; the interval 04 (71°<θ<80°) – grey curves; the interval 05 (80°<θ<90°) – a brown curve. From V.I.Gurentsov, 1984 Format of the primary 15-minute data zenith anglesEth 0°<θ<34°230 GeV 34°<θ<48°280 GeV 48°<θ<60°380 GeV 60°<θ<71°850 GeV 71°<θ<80°1700 GeV 80°<θ<90°> 7000 GeV

Barometric effect as observed by the BUST BUST, vertical 2003 – 2012: Uncorrected for P and T data Pressure To determine the barometric coefficient several months with the highest amplitude of pressure changes (~ 20 mb) were selected. Using the hourly data, barometric coefficients for all the intervals of zenith angles were obtained for each month by a simple linear regression: 5 Correlation between the hourly BUST data (vertical) and pressure for December 2006 b = (-0,0526 ± ) %/mb ρ = - 0,28

Barometric effect as observed by the BUST (by hourly data for selected months and by annual data) 6 To avoid a possible influence of temperature effect on the correlation between pressure and the telescope’s data the linear regression was performed on the average annual data for 10 years. In this approach an influence of daily and annual temperature variations was excluded as they are averaged over such a long interval.

Barometric effect as observed by the BUST (by hourly data for all months) 7 In order to minimize errors in the determination of the barometric coefficient for the BUST, due to the small statistics in the case of a few months selection, and to improve the validity of the barometric coefficients, the barometric coefficients for all 120 months of the period under consideration were obtained by using hourly data. The results with a positive correlation and with a correlation coefficient less than 0.1 ​​ were excluded from the obtained values. The remaining values ​​ were averaged with as

Barometric effect as observed by the BUST (by hourly data for all months) 8 The dependence of the average barometric coefficients on energy for the epochs of (ten colored thin lines). Blue points correspond to the average values of the barometric coefficients for the whole period under consideration The markers correspond to energy of muons from the vertical and five intervals of zenith angles.

Calculation of EAS muons from barometric coefficients Increase of the absolute values ​​ of the barometric coefficients can be explained that single muons are mainly observed up to energies of secondary particles of about 100 GeV. And at higher energies the contribution of muon groups of extensive air showers is more significant. Barometric coefficient for the frequency of extensive air showers depends weakly on the parameters of showers, and it is close to the barometric coefficient for nucleon component. intensity of single muons barometric coefficient of single muons intensity of EAS muons total intensity barometric coefficient of EAS muons 9

Barometric effect of high-energy muons S.Sagisaka. Nuovo cimento, 1986, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp L.I.Dorman. Meteorological effects of cosmic rays. M.: Science, p N.V.Tolkacheva, A.G.Bogdanov, A.N.Dmitrieva, R.P.Kokoulin, V.V.Shutenko. Bull. of the RAS: Physics, 2011, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp V.A.Kozyarivsky, A.S.Lidvansky, V.B.Petkov, T.I.Tulupova. 2004, arXiv:astro-ph/ arXiv:astro-ph/ Barometric coefficients for different underground detectors (left scale) – black points 0-14 [Sagisaka, 1986], and for EAS arrays – points [Dorman, 1972]. The solid and dashed curves - calculation for the level of 1013 mb and 600 mb, respectively [Sagisaka, 1986]. The barometric coefficients for the hourly data obtained in this work - red points Point 28 – barometric coefficient for group of muons [Tolkacheva, 2011], and point 29 - for the Andyrchi air shower array [Kozyarivsky, 2004]. A line nm64 - the barometric coefficients for the neutron cosmic ray component. Gray icons of EAS and gray curve - the contribution of muon groups to the total intensity (right scale). 10

Conclusions Barometric coefficients obtained for the BUST are more than an order of magnitude higher than the theoretically predicted values for these energies. Barometric effect observed according to the BUST can be explained by the fact that for the secondary particles with energies > 100 GeV a contribution of muon groups of extensive air showers is becoming more significant. The share of muon groups of extensive air showers increases with the energy of the registered particles. And the share of muon groups of EAS can be estimated by the experimental barometric coefficient for high-energy muons, registered by the underground detectors. According to the obtained values ​​ of the barometric coefficients the primary data of the six intervals of zenith angles of the BUST telescope have been corrected for the barometric effect.