Exploring Earth Science MST Inquiry Unit for the 5 th grade Eric C. Powell ED 7204T.NET1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cultural collections By Gaye Go to the task. Stay tuned for more fun!
Advertisements

Marva Ellis Rhonda Penny Ann Schwab Eva Thierens Education 7204T Dr. OConner-Petruso Spring 2012 The Earths Atmosphere.
Differentiation in the Art Classroom
Differentiated Instruction with Technology LACUE, 2006 Mary Moore Terri Carpenter.
What Makes Water so Special? MST-NYC Inquiry Unit Professor Petruso-O’Connor Pedagogy II Spring 2013 By: Marta Osorio & Olunife Ojediran.
What Makes Water So Special? By: Marta Osorio & Olunife Ojediran 4 th Grade MST Inquiry Unit.
MST Inquiry Unit Model Cause & Impact of Natural Events: Hurricanes Grade 4 Lesson #1 “Hurricanes: What & Where?” Objectives: > Describe criteria > Compare.
Dalila Ortiz, Gisella McCool, Elisa Francani, Dawn Toth, Lorraine Vazquez Properties of Matter.
Transformation of the World Presented by Mr. Edward Rodriguez, Ms. Rachel Schenk, Ms. Jacqueline Samayoa, Mrs. Elyssa Lazo.
Interactions of Air, Water, and Land: Table of Contents Lesson #Lesson NameBloom’s Taxonomy LevelGardener’s Multiple Intelligence(s)Additive 1 Water You.
L IFE CYCLE OF A F LOWERING PLANT By Saima Naureen, Kay Jeffrey, & Inna Shenker Ed. 7204T Spring 2011 Prof. O’Connor-Petruso.
INTERDEPENDENCE OF LIVING THINGS IN THEIR ECOSYSTEMS BY Millicent Howard MST INQUIRY UNIT CBSE 7204T.NET1 – DR. S. O’CONNOR-PETRUSO Advanced Study of Pedagogy.
Curriculum Design Planning for instruction. Agenda  Review Bloom’s  Review M.I.  Differentiation.
MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES * Verbal / linguistic learners Logical / mathematical learners Visual / spatial learners Body / kinesthetic learners Musical / rhythmic.
Designing and Planning Instruction Focus on the content, not the technology.
EDU 7204T – Pedagogy and Curriculum II Dr. O’Connor-Petruso, Spring 2011 MST Inquiry Unit Presentation Created by: Kathleen Fanning & Andrea Krasne Due:
 Biogeochemical Cycles are the “interactions between organisms and their environment” › - New World Encyclopedia, 2008.
Special Education Plan Multiple Intelligence n Not all students learn the same way. n “So long as materials are taught and assessed in only one way,
Electricity and Magnetism. Table of contents Title Slides Rationale………………………….……………………………………………………3 MST Unit Overview…..……..……………..……………….…………………………4.
Lesson Planning. Teachers Need Lesson Plans So that they know that they are teaching the curriculum standards required by the county and state So that.
Animal, Plants, and Humans
By Valbona Hasandjekaj, Marta Kheyfets and Carol Bowen CBSE 7204 – Spring 2014.
MST Inquiry Unit Dionisia Rigby, Shavonne Townsend, Danielle Paterson, Michelle Smith CBSE 7204T.NET1 Advanced Study of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Childhood.
United States Animals By Alfonsina C. Crisostomo And Melinda Moya.
How to use Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences to Differentiate Activities Summer 2008 Wendy Carpenter Science Instructional.
What Would we do Without Water? Grade 4 MST Inquiry Unit by Aislinn Forbes, Julie Jackson & Janine Miller.
DALILA ORTIZ, GISELLA MCCOOL, ELISA FRANCANI, DAWN TOTH, LORRAINE VAZQUEZ Properties of Matter.
Exploring Plants and Animals By: Khrisy Cambos Sima Spector Aria Bacchus Justin Weibert.
{ ELECTRICITY!!!!!! Its Properties, Types of Electrical Circuits and Safety Precautions for Everyday Life Its Properties, Types of Electrical Circuits.
MST-NYC Inquiry Unit By : Evelyn Pulido And Tatyana Sumner Spring 2012 Professor Petruso-O’Connor Pedagogy II.
Plants & Animals By: Charelene Gonzalez-Perez Shanequa Jennings Quviala Akhtar Maria Del Valle.
HOW DO NATURAL EVENTS AFFECT OUR WORLD?
Lesson 1 and Lesson 2 (Oil Spills & Global Warming) *4 th Grade* By: Bithy M, Kalon L, Barbara G.
ETE 335 Elementary Social Studies Lesson Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences.
All About Animals Created by L.Crespo & A. Halsey.
Felicia Baptiste Kathia Darius Melissa Higgins BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES.
Beramiesha Thompson Laura Salman Dianna Baritot MST Inquiry Unit Plan – Summer 2010 Professor O’Connor-Petruso.
Designing and Planning Instruction Focus on the content, not the technology.
Special Education Plan Hamilton High School Multiple Intelligence n Not all students learn the same way. n “So long as materials are taught and assessed.
Why different Teaching- Learning & Assessment? Hakim Usoof University of Colombo School of Computing.
Constructive Alignment Hakim Usoof University of Colombo School of Computing.
“A set of skills allowing individuals to find and resolve genuine problems they face.” By Shannon Everett modified by Anne Heitman.
Special Education Plan Hamilton High School Multiple Intelligence n Not all students learn the same way. n “So long as materials are taught and assessed.
Living Things Created by Kathryn Somma and Arlene Goubourne Ed 7204: Pedagogy and Curriculum Fall 2011 Dr. O’Connor Petruso.
INTERACTIONS OF AIR, WATER AND LAND BLACK DIAMONDS: MERLINDA LIHAREVIC, NATHALY AREVALO, JAMILAH HUNTER, ROBERT DELBIANCO GRADE 4.
 Only differentiated if designed with learning differences in mind  Presents activities clearly focused on learning goals or academic standards  Presents.
INTELLIGENCE. WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE? ______________ = the measure of skills or knowledge you have already learned ______________ = the measure of skills.
DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES: Integrated Matrix. Differentiation Is a teacher’s response to learner’s needs Guided by general principles of differentiation.
Plants and Animals; A Living and Breathing World Joy Thompson, Catherine Arias, Tahseen Muhammad, Diana Mendez, Elizabeth Ervey and Jeanine Labiner.
Christa Gates EDU 505. Introduction: You will learn how frogs and toads are similar and how they are different. You will become familiar with the anatomy.
Mathematical Discoveries Jill Waichunas Elgin High School Algebra 1-2 District U-46.
Student Page Top Introduction Task Process Evaluation Conclusion Teacher page Credits Earth Man Says…”It’s a beautiful world, I say, let’s keep it that.
Multimedia Workshop Week 1- May 30, 2016 Jamie Wolek Heritage Middle School Rates and Proportional Relationships.
Anna Avetisian, Argie Leonardos, Anna Shevchuk. For internal use only 5 th Grade Science Unit: Processes that Shape the Land Lesson # 1 – Earths Composition.
Exploring Plants and Animals By: Khrisy Cambos Sima Spector Aria Bacchus Justin Weinblatt.
Multiple Intelligences Welcome to the Celebration!
Heacox Chapter 4 How Do You Teach?. Planning for Challenge and Variety Matrix + Models= Differentiation Two Familiar Models Bloom’s taxonomy Gardner’s.
Backwards Design, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Multiple Intelligences
MST INQUIRY UNIT 5 Straight As
Multiple Intelligences
Gardner & Sternberg U11 – Testing and Individual Differences
Chapter 10 General Psychology Perspectives
Animals use their senses for survival
Sara Abelsky, Beata Cherepakhina, & Emily Shen
Buggy-Bug Lesson Plan Day 1.
Gardener: Multiple Intelligences By: Laura & Kristin
MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES
Differentiated Instruction Reaching to all our students
Professional Learning Team Workshop #4
Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences
Presentation transcript:

Exploring Earth Science MST Inquiry Unit for the 5 th grade Eric C. Powell ED 7204T.NET1

Table of Contents Lesson # Lesson Title Bloom’s Taxonomy Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Activities Included In Lesson 1 Elements of Earth Science KnowledgeLinguisticWeb-based scavenger hunt 2 Classifying Speci- mens Comprehen- sion Visual-Spatial Interpersonal Venn diagram Manipulative task: Grouping objects 3 It’s A Clay, Clay World! ApplicationBodily-Kinesthetic Interpersonal Naturalistic Manipulative task: Modeling clay 4 SoilAnalysisLogical- Mathematical Line graph/Bar graph/Pictograph 5 Erosion Synthesis Interpersonal Naturalistic Bodily-Kinesthetic Compare/contrast chart 6 Plate Tectonics EvaluationIntrapersonal Spatial Existential Filamentality site

Lesson 1Summary  Objectives: SWBAT describe the difference between rocks and minerals, describe a function of soil, define “erosion”, define “plate tectonics”  Bloom’s Taxonomy: Knowledge  Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences: Linguistic  Additives: Web-based scavenger hunt  Assessment: Students will be assessed through a quantifiable rubric in accord with the stated objectives

Lesson 1Assessment Rubric Assessment Rubric Behavioral Objective Target 3 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory 1 Student Rating 1) To describe the difference between rocks and minerals Student able to accurately describe the differences between rocks and minerals using examples. Student mostly able to describe the differences between rocks and minerals. No examples used. Student unable to describe the differences between rocks and minerals or utilize examples. 2) To describe a function of soil Student able to accurately describe a function of soil using examples. Student mostly able to describe a function of soil. No examples used. Student unable to describe a function of soil or utilize examples. 3) To define “erosion” Student able to accurately define “erosion” using examples. Student mostly able to define “erosion.” No examples used. Student unable to define “erosion” or utilize examples. 4) To define “plate tectonics” Student able to accurately define “plate tectonics” using examples. Student mostly able to define “plate tectonics.” No examples used. Student unable to define “plate tectonics” or utilize examples.

Lesson 2 Summary  Objectives: SWBAT compare and contrast various rock forms and minerals, differentiate between various rock forms and minerals  Bloom’s Taxonomy: Comprehension  Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences: Visual- Spatial, Interpersonal  Additives: Manipulative task - Grouping objects; Venn diagram  Assessment: Students will be assessed through a quantifiable rubric in accord with the stated objectives

Lesson 2 Assessment Rubric Assessment Rubric Behavioral Objective Target 3 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory 1 Student Rating 1) To compare and contrast various rock forms and minerals Student able to accurately describe the similarities and differences between various rock forms and minerals using examples. Student mostly able to describe similarities and differences between various rock forms and minerals. No examples used. Student unable to describe the similarities and differences between various rock forms and minerals or utilize examples. 2) To differentiate between various rock forms and minerals Student able to accurately differentiate between various rock forms and minerals using examples Student mostly able to differentiate between various rock forms and minerals. No examples used. Student unable to differentiate between various rock forms and minerals or utilize examples.

Lesson 3 Summary  Objectives: SWBAT examine a topographic feature, construct a clay topographic feature, define and explain “topography”  Bloom’s Taxonomy: Application  Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences: Bodily- Kinesthetic, Interpersonal, Naturalistic  Additives: Manipulative task - Modeling clay  Assessment: Students will be assessed through a quantifiable rubric in accord with the stated objectives

Lesson 3 Assessment Rubric Assessment Rubric Behavioral Objective Target 3 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory 1 Student Rating 1) To examine a topographic feature Student able to examine a topographic feature using the internet. Student mostly able to examine a topographic feature using the internet. Assistance needed for examination and/or internet use. Student unable to examine a topographic feature using the internet. 2) To construct a clay topographic feature Student able to construct a clay topographic feature. Student mostly able to construct a clay topographic feature. No markings utilized. Student unable to construct a clay topographic feature. 3) To define and explain “topography” Student able to accurately define and explain “topography” using examples. Student mostly able to define and explain “topography.” No examples used. Student unable to define and explain “topography” or utilize examples.

Lesson 4 Summary  Objectives: SWBAT compare and contrast different soil types, make predictions, create a graph illustrating soil and water mixtures  Bloom’s Taxonomy: Analysis  Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences: Logical- Mathematical  Additives: Line graph/Bar graph/Pictograph  Assessment: Students will be assessed through a quantifiable rubric in accord with the stated objectives

Lesson 4 Assessment Rubric Assessment Rubric Behavioral Objective Target 3 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory 1 Student Rating 1) To compare and contrast different soil types Student able to accurately compare and contrast different soil types using examples. Student mostly able to compare and contrast different soil types. No examples used. Student unable to compare and contrast different soil types or utilize examples. 2) To make predictions Student able to accurately make predictions. Student mostly able to make predictions. More details are needed. Student unable or unwilling to make predictions. 3) To create a graph illustrating soil and water mixtures Student able to create a graph illustrating soil and water mixtures. Student mostly able to create a graph illustrating soil and water mixtures. Graph missing some labels and/or details. Student unable to create a graph illustrating soil and water mixtures.

Lesson 5 Summary  Objectives: SWBAT define erosion, compare and contrast differing varieties of erosion  Bloom’s Taxonomy: Synthesis  Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences: Interpersonal, Naturalistic, Bodily-Kinesthetic  Additives: Compare/contrast chart  Assessment: Students will be assessed through a quantifiable rubric in accord with the stated objectives

Lesson 5 Assessment Rubric Assessment Rubric Behavioral Objective Target 3 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory 1 Student Rating 1) To define “erosion” Student able to accurately define “erosion” using examples. Student mostly able to define “erosion.” No examples used. Student unable to define “erosion” or utilize examples. 2) To compare and contrast differing varieties of erosion Student able to accurately compare and contrast differing varieties of erosion using examples. Student mostly able to compare and contrast differing varieties of erosion, No examples used. Student unable to compare and contrast differing varieties of erosion or utilize examples.

Lesson 6 Summary  Objectives: SWBAT describe and define plate tectonics, convey information discovered through World Wide Web investigations  Bloom’s Taxonomy: Evaluation  Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences: Intrapersonal, Spatial, Existential  Additives: Filamentality Web Site  Assessment: Students will be assessed through a quantifiable rubric in accord with the stated objectives

Lesson 6 Assessment Rubric Assessment Rubric Behavioral Objective Target 3 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory 1 Student Rating 1) To describe and define “plate tectonics” Student able to accurately describe and define “plate tectonics” using examples. Student mostly able to describe and define “plate tectonics.” No examples used. Student unable to describe or define “plate tectonics” or utilize examples. 2) To convey information discovered through World Wide Web investigations Student able to accurately convey information discovered through World Wide Web investigations using examples. Student mostly able to convey information discovered through World Wide Web investigations. No examples used. Student unable to convey information discovered through World Wide Web investigations.

Corresponding Web Pages  Elements of Earth Science Scavenger Hunt (Lesson 1): tearthscmr.html  Earth Science Fun on the World Wide Web (Lesson 6): arthscmr.html