Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange June 22, 2004 Sam Karp, Director Health Information Technology California HealthCare Foundation NHII 2004 Cornerstones.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manatt manatt | phelps | phillips New York State Health Information Technology Summit Initiative Overview and Update Rachel Block, Project Director United.
Advertisements

| Implications for Health Information Exchange – MetroChicago January 2011.
The U.S. Health Information Technology Agenda – and the Web John W. Loonsk, MD Director of Interoperability and Standards Office of the National Coordinator.
A Plan for a Sustainable Community Behavioral Health Information Network Western States Health-e Connection Summit & Trade Show September 10, 2013.
Welcome to Game Lets start the Game. An electronic health record (EHR) is a digital version of a patient’s paper chart. EHRs are real-time, patient-centered.
Community of Interest for Patient Identifiers AGENDA 1.NHII’s Unique Health Information Identification Requirements - Soloman I. Appavu, SIG Leader 2.Identification.
Leveraging a Single Platform - Connecting a Statewide Healthcare Ecosystem Michigan Association of Health Plans Rick Murdock Executive Director Michigan.
Better Outcomes. Delivered. Organization Overview January 2013 Copyright © 2013 Indiana Health Information Exchange, Inc.
Rationale for Independent Health Record Banks William A. Yasnoff, MD, PhD, FACMI Managing Partner, NHII Advisors William A. Yasnoff, MD, PhD, FACMI Managing.
EHR Implementations: Revolutionising Health Information Management
A San Diego Health Information Exchange San Diego Health Care Association April 26 th, 2012 Jami Young, MPA San Diego Beacon Project Manager.
John Wieler Management Information Systems In a Healthcare Setting.
AHCCCS/ASU Clinical Data Project March 17 th, 2009 Arizona Health Care Cost Containment Health System Medicaid Transformation Grant Program.
Chapter 2 Electronic Health Records
Building Public Health / Clinical Health Information Exchanges: The Minnesota Experience Marty LaVenture, MPH, PhD Director, Center for Health Informatics.
Inter-institutional Data Sharing, Standards and Legal Arthur Davidson, MD, MSPH Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Washington, DC June 9, 2005.
January 2012 Bill Beighe, CIO CaleConnect BOD CalHIPSO BOD.
Electronic Health Records Based on Alliance for Health Reform Toolkit on Health Information Technology Narrated by Leonel V. Baliton.
HIE Implementation in Michigan for Improved Health As approved by the Michigan Health Information Technology Commission on March 4, 2009.
by Joint Commission International (JCI)
County of San Diego Acute & Long-Term Care Integration Project (ALTCI) — Information Technology Assessment Findings and Recommendations June 22, 2005.
Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Florida Center for Health Information and Policy Analysis The First Central Florida Electronic Medical Records.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, the AT&T logo and all other AT&T marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual.
1 Get Ready to RHIO Health Information Exchanges and Emergency Preparedness Jeff Odell, Senior Vice President MedVirginia x227
Results from eHI & CHIME Survey Use of Data and Analytics by Providers Jennifer Covich Chief Executive Officer August 30, 2012.
June 9, 2005AHRQ Annual Meeting A. John Blair, III, MD President and Chief Executive Officer Taconic IPA, Inc. Fishkill, NY The Taconic Case Study.
0 Presentation to: Health IT HIPPA Workshop Presented by: Stacey Harris, Director of Health IT Innovation September 26, 2014 Division of Health Information.
  BEHIMS is a web based, completely integrated filmless and paperless ERP system designed to manage the administrative, financial and clinical aspects.
CRISP Health Information Exchange Spring What is CRISP? CRISP (Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients) is Maryland’s statewide.
Health Information Technology The Texas Landscape Presentation to TASSCC 2010 Nora Belcher Texas e-Health Alliance August 3, 2010.
Chapter 6 – Data Handling and EPR. Electronic Health Record Systems: Government Initiatives and Public/Private Partnerships EHR is systematic collection.
Why? Between 44,000 – 98,000 people die each year in the United States as the result of medical errors. This exceeds the number attributable to the 8 th.
ONCHIT – 3 NHIN Prototype and other Initiatives for Kentucky Kentucky e-Health Network Claudine Beron February 21, 2006.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
The Status of Health IT in British Columbia Elaine McKnight.
Initiative Overview Santa Cruz – Community Chronic Care Network Stage 4 Project Summary and Objectives: The Santa Cruz County Diabetes Mellitus Registry.
The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange Ronald A. Paulus, M.D., M.B.A. President, CareScience.
Technology Models for Building Health Information Infrastructure II Mike Epplen VP Product Management Quovadx Inc.
Patient Confidentiality and Electronic Medical Records Ann J. Olsen, MBA, MA Information Security Officer and Director, Information Management Planning.
Health Information Sharing: Case Studies for Interoperability Beverly Kennedy, President First Data Corp Healthcare.
September, 2005Cardio - June 2007 IHE for Regional Health Information Networks Cardiology Uses.
Better, Smarter, Healthier: Delivery System Reform U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1.
Final Project – Health Information Exchange: Technology, Challenges & Opportunities Group 3 Gary Brown, Michelle Burke, Kazi Russell MMI 402 Fall 2013.
The Nation’s First Statewide Health Information Exchange AcademyHealth National Health Policy Conference State Health Research and Policy Interest Group.
Community Clinical Data Exchange – By the Numbers Healthcare Information Technology 2003 January 14, 2003 James Kalamas.
ORGANIZING IT SERVICES AND PERSONNEL (PART 1) Lecture 7.
This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator.
Copyright © 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 5 Electronic Health Records.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange October 22, 2004 Sam Karp, Director Health Information Technology California HealthCare Foundation A Regional Health.
BENEFITS OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH INFORMATION. Health IT Video from HealthIT.gov (Please wait for the video to load and click on the arrow to play)
The U. S. Health Care System Challenges, Opportunities and Solutions Fifth National HIPAA Summit Clinical Data Standards and the Creation of an Interconnected,
How Including HIPAA Transaction Sets in RHIO Architecture can Help Fund Clinical Information Exchange Fred Richards, CTO/Co-Founder April 10, 2006.
LBHA Functions Draft for NTBHA Board Presentation February 10, 2016.
S ecure A rchitecture F or E xchanging Health Information in Central Massachusetts Larry Garber, M.D. Peggy Preusse, R.N. June 9 th, 2005.
The Electronic Personal Health Record (ePHR) Beth Friedmann CS Spring 2007.
PATIENT CARE NETWORK OF OKLAHOMA (PCNOK) Oklahoma Healthcare Authority ABD Care Coordination RFI Response August 17, 2015.
Pennsylvania Health Information Exchange NJHIMSS - DVHIMSS Enabling Healthcare Transformation Through Information Technology September, 2010.
Health Information Exchange: Alaska’s Health Pipeline Alaska Bar Association Health Law Section February 2, 2012 Carolyn Heyman-Layne.
REDESIGNING ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (IHSDNs Attributes # 7, 8, 9,10, 11, 12, 13) (IHSDNs Attributes # 7, 8, 9,10, 11, 12, 13) July , 2015.
Jim Bland Executive Director, CRIX International
Lesson 1- Introduction to Electronic Health Records
Health Information Security and Privacy Collaborative (HISPC) Overview
Ministry of Health Montenegro ERASMUS+ KA2 PROJECT:
Managing Clinical Information: EHR Terms and Architecture
Regional Health Information Exchange: Getting There
Electronic Health Record Update
Patient Safety Institute
Lesson 1- Introduction to Electronic Health Records
President and Chief Executive Officer
Presentation transcript:

Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange June 22, 2004 Sam Karp, Director Health Information Technology California HealthCare Foundation NHII 2004 Cornerstones for Electronic Healthcare

Community Buy-in 1.The Vision 2.Organizing Principles & Framework 3.Technology Approach 4.Business Case 5.Lessons Learned

 A simple and secure way to electronically access patient data, across organizations  A public utility available to all physicians, caregivers and consumers  An experiment to determine whether a community would share the cost of a regional IT infrastructure The Santa Barbara Vision

 Santa Barbara Regional Health Authority  Santa Barbara Public Health Department  Santa Barbara Medical Foundation Clinic  Cottage Health System  Marion Medical Center (CHW)  MidCoast IPA  Lompoc Valley Community HCO  Santa Barbara Medical Society  Unilab/Quest Diagnostics  University of California at Santa Barbara Key Participating Organizations

Organizing Principles 1.Oversight and governance without regard to size or financial leverage of any organization 2.Collaboration in care delivery with explicit aim of improving health status of all residents 3.Available to all caregivers and consumers 4.Compliance with current State and Federal patient privacy regulations 5.Share operating cost and promote health information technology standards

Organizational Framework Sansum Lompoc CHO UCSB UniLab Medical Society Pueblo Radiology Marian CHW Hospital Cottage Hospital MidCoast IPA Public Health Dept. SBRHA CDE Organizational Model Hub and Spoke Governance Model Public/Private Collaboration

Clinician Requirements Available where and when needed  Access regardless of location  Real time data at the point of care Single, secure access point  One log-in to CDE and hospital portals Easy to use and well-supported  Simple access screens and patient lists  Adequate training, support and maintenance

Technology Approach

Managed Peer-to-Peer Model  Distributed clinical data repositories  No clinical records centrally stored  Mitigates data ownership issues  Lowers operating costs

Technology Approach Identity Correlation System  Centralized Master Patient Index (MPI)  Intelligently matches similar records Information Locator Service  Links to patient records in participants’ systems  Demographic data of all patients in system Access & Security Management  Authenticates user  Enables access only to allowed data  Monitors and records access requests

Physician Portal  Clinical records access  Browser-based  Retrieve records from anywhere in system  Manage consent process Consumer Portal  Personal information  Browser-based  Clinical information access reports  Medications Web Portals Care Data Exchange Network Components CDE Infrastructure Information Location Service  Links to patient clinical records in participants’ systems  No clinical records stored at CDE central site  Demographic data of all patients in system Jon John Smith ?=?= Access & Security Management  Controls login  Enables access only to allowed data  Monitors and records access requests Identity Correlation  Correlates patient identities from different sources  Intelligently matches similar records Hospitals Diagnostic Services Payors Patient Demographics Policyholder Demographics Patient Demographics Pharmacy Records Radiology Studies Lab Records Eligibility and Authorization Lab Records Radiology Studies Data Interfaces

Business Case Questions we set out to answer  What are the quantifiable economics for community clinical data exchange?  How do these economics impact the success of the project? Methodology used  Interviewed health care system constituents  Reviewed academic literature  Estimated costs and benefits  Built financial model to value data exchange

Value Based on Tangible Costs/Benefits CostsBenefits Implementation Initial startup costs (year 1) for defined community Cost Drivers  Hardware  Software  Development  Installation  Training Support Annualized costs for maintenance of CDE from years 2-5 (assumes a 5-year CDE life cycle)  Maintenance contracts for hardware/software  Application support  Ongoing help desk/systems administrator Web Enablement Benefits to individual constituent of bringing own information online Benefit Drivers  Lab savings  Radiology savings  Staff savings  Fewer readmissions Network Benefits Benefits to individual constituent of different health care constituents joining the network  Fewer medical errors  Enhanced lab revenue from proper coding  Test duplication avoidance  Staff savings

Three Hypothetical Communities Were Modeled *Low penetration is ~33% institution participation and 15% physician usage adoption **High penetration is ~66% institution participation and 35% physician usage adoption ***Given low numbers in community, penetration percentages for institution participation not applicable Constituent type Low*High** Total number in community Medium  Major hospital  Diagnostic imaging center  Independent laboratory  PBMs  Major physician groups  Physicians , Large  Major hospital  Diagnostic imaging center  Independent laboratory  PBMs  Major physician groups  Physicians , ,750 Penetration Small***  Major hospital  Diagnostic imaging center  Independent laboratory  PBMs  Major physician groups  Physicians

Value Increased w/Community Size & Penetration *Includes annual support costs and amortized implementation costs over 5 years Medium Large LowHigh Penetration Community size $U.S. annual $800,000 $900,000 Costs* Benefits $490,000 $180,000 Costs* Benefits $780,000 $600,000 Costs* Benefits Net($310,000)Net($180,000) Net$100,000 $1,400,000 $2,600,000 Costs* Benefits Net$1,200,000 $1,000,000 $1,300,000 Costs* Benefits Net$300,000 $2,200,000 $7,900,000 Costs* Benefits Net$5,700,000 Value Small

Business Case Findings 1.Quantifiable economic value; meaningful when sizable network in place 2.Substantial first-mover disadvantage 3.Hospitals most likely organizers of care data exchange 4.Quantifiable quality and service benefits could substantially increase value

Current Status  User Acceptance Testing (UAT) and independent security audit underway  Final interfaces being completed  Implementation with broad physician recruitment and training to begin in Fall 2004  Quality and service assessment commissioned

Lessons Learned  Buy-in is earned; not achieved through theoretical construct  Big Bang vs “radical” incrementalism  Technology is complex