ARMD – Next Steps Next Steps. Why a WG There is a problem People want to work to solve the problem Scope of problem is defined Work items are defined.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECMP for 802.1Qxx Proposal for PAR and 5 Criteria Version 2 16 people from ECMP ad-hoc committee.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 E-VPN and Data Center R. Aggarwal
A Unified LISP Mapping Database for L2 and L3 Network Virtualization Overlays Draft-hertoghs-nvo3-lisp-unfied- control-plane Yves Hertoghs.
Network Virtualization Overlay Control Protocol Requirements draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp-00 Lawrence Kreeger, Dinesh Dutt, Thomas Narten, David Black,
Recommendations for IPv6 in 3GPP Standards draft-wasserman-3gpp-advice-00.txt IPv6-3GPP Design Team Salt Lake City IETF December 2001.
IP over ETH over IEEE draft-riegel-16ng-ip-over-eth-over Max Riegel
Mobility Jennifer Rexford COS 461: Computer Networks Lectures: MW 10-10:50am in Architecture N101
Virtualization and Cloud Computing. Definition Virtualization is the ability to run multiple operating systems on a single physical system and share the.
The Case for Enterprise Ready Virtual Private Clouds Timothy Wood, Alexandre Gerber *, K.K. Ramakrishnan *, Jacobus van der Merwe *, and Prashant Shenoy.
Scaling IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Ben Mack-Crane
Address Configuration in Adhoc Networks in IPv4. By Meenakshi Sundaram V.
Ethernet and switches selected topics 1. Agenda Scaling ethernet infrastructure VLANs 2.
Portland: A Scalable Fault-Tolerant Layer 2 Data Center Network Fabric Offense Kai Chen Shih-Chi Chen.
PortLand Presented by Muhammad Sadeeq and Ling Su.
COS 461: Computer Networks
Server Assisted TRILL Edge Linda Dunbar
Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks (ACTN) BoF
Virtual Subnet : A L3VPN-based Subnet Extension Solution draft-xu-virtual-subnet-10 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Susan Hares (Huawei) Yongbing Fan.
IETF 90: VNF PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKING METHODOLOGY Contributors: Sarah Muhammad Durrani: Mike Chen:
Omniran PtP Links across IEEE 802 Bridged Infrastructure Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max
DYNAMIC HOST CONFIGURATION PROTOCOL (DHCP) BY: SAMHITA KAW IS 373.
Query Health Business Working Group Kick-Off September 8, 2011.
Additional SugarCRM details for complete, functional, and portable deployment.
Using LISP for Secure Hybrid Cloud Extension draft-freitasbellagamba-lisp-hybrid-cloud-use-case-00 Santiago Freitas Patrice Bellagamba Yves Hertoghs IETF.
The Network Layer. Network Projects Must utilize sockets programming –Client and Server –Any platform Please submit one page proposal Can work individually.
© NOKIADEFAULT.PPT / / AO page: 1 IP in LANs.
Directory Assisted RBridge Edge draft-dunbar-trill-directory-assisted-edge-05 Update Linda Dunbar: Donald
IPv6 Home Networking Architecture - update IETF homenet WG Interim meeting Philadelphia, 6 th Oct 2011 draft-chown-homenet-arch-00.
TRansparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) March 11 th 2010 David Bond University of New Hampshire: InterOperability.
Chapter 9: Novell NetWare
Remote Access Chapter 4. Learning Objectives Understand implications of IEEE 802.1x and how it is used Understand VPN technology and its uses for securing.
MPTCP – Multipath TCP WG Meeting Toronto, IETF-90, 21 st July 2014 Philip Eardley Yoshifumi Nishida 1.
SANE: A Protection Architecture for Enterprise Networks
Draft-bitar-nvo3-vpn-applicability-00.txt Page - 1 Cloud Networking: Framework and VPN Applicability draft-bitar-nvo3-vpn-applicability-00.txt Nabil Bitar.
Virtual Subnet: A Scalable Cloud Data Center Interconnect Solution draft-xu-virtual-subnet-06 Xiaohu Xu IETF82, TAIWAN.
1 DHCP Authentication Discussion INTAREA meeting, 70th IETF Vancouver, Canada Jari Arkko and Ralph Droms.
IETF 51, IPv6 WG1 Multilink Subnets draft-thaler-ipngwg-multilink-subnets-01.txt Dave Thaler
IP Addresses Universal address regardless of layer 2 architecture Each address is that of an interface, not necessarily a host A host may have more than.
HIP research group 1 HIP-RG meeting IETF 79 November 9, 2010 Andrei Gurtov and Tom Henderson
BCP for ARP/ND Scaling for Large Data Centers
Guidance for Running Multiple IPv6 Prefixes (draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes-02) Bing Liu, Sheng Jiang (Speaker), Yang Bo IETF91
CONEX BoF. Welcome to CONEX! Chairs: –Leslie Daigle –Philip Eardley Scribe Note well.
SLRRP BoF 62 nd IETF Scott Barvick Marshall Rose
Dissuasion, Working Group Scope and Deliverables Lou Berger Pat Thaler
( Address Resolution Protocol )
1 VLANs Relates to Lab 6. Short module on basics of VLAN switching.
GEONET Brainstorming Document. Content Purpose of the document Brainstorming process / plan Proposed charter Assumptions Use cases Problem description.
Network Virtualization Overlay Control Protocol Requirements draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp Lawrence Kreeger, Dinesh Dutt, Thomas Narten, David Black, Murari.
1/13 draft-carpenter-nvo3-addressing-00 Brian Carpenter Sheng Jiang IETF 84 Jul/Aug 2012 Layer 3 Addressing Considerations for Network Virtualization Overlays.
Layer 2 Control Protocol BoF (L2CP) IETF 65, Dallas, TX Wojciech Dec Matthew Bocci
Re-cap & Next Steps Mahalingam Mani. The WG Now and from Now The main deliverables have progressed close to completion for this charter Problem statement.
GEONET Brainstorming Document. Content Purpose of the document Brainstorming process / plan Proposed charter Assumptions Use cases Problem description.
VS (Virtual Subnet) draft-xu-virtual-subnet-03 Xiaohu Xu IETF 79, Beijing.
Recent Progress in Routing Standardization An IETF update for UKNOF 23 Old Dog Consulting Adrian
Client-server communication Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
Scaling the Address Resolution Protocol for Large Data Centers (SARP) draft-nachum-sarp-04 Youval NachumMarvell Linda DunbarHuawei Ilan YerushalmiMarvell.
Chapter 21 Address Mapping
Affinity Depending on the application and client requirements of your Network Load Balancing cluster, you can be required to select an Affinity setting.
Thierry Ernst (INRIA and WIDE) Hesham Soliman (Ericsson)
Link Model Analysis for based Networks
Chris Meullion Preston Burden Dwight Philpotts John C. Jones-Walker
DCI using TRILL Kingston Smiler, Mohammed Umair, Shaji Ravindranathan,
TRILL MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN
CONEX BoF.
ESS Mesh Deployment Usage Model
2018/11/16 Scalable Address Resolution for Data Center and Cloud Computing Problem Statements Linda Dunbar Sue Hares
Concept of VLAN (Virtual LAN) and Benefits
ESS Mesh Deployment Usage Model
EVPN a very short introduction
Connecting to the Network
Presentation transcript:

ARMD – Next Steps Next Steps

Why a WG There is a problem People want to work to solve the problem Scope of problem is defined Work items are defined Schedule is defined Charter on the web Scan for ARMD

ARMD Problem statement Large Data Center and Multi-Site Data Centers have Server virtualization introduces massive amount of hosts in a data center Next Gen or Cloud Data Center have to handle massive amount of subnets (or Closed User Groups) The topology of subnet changes as virtual machines migrate from one location to another Traditional VLAN partitions no longer solve problem

ARP issues 100s Virtual hosts on physical Servers – Sending ARPs – On many VLANs and subnets Data Centers in single or multiple sites – Multiple sites connected by any type of network technology (L2VPN, L3VPN, 802.1aq Ethernet, TRILL Ethernet) using any type of encapsulation – VM allocation and movement managed centrally or distributed

Problems and Questions Issues – Massive #s of hosts – Massive # of client subnets – VM moving Questions – Can we count on the Gratuitous ARP? In VMs? – How do we minimize flooding of ARP? – What changes need to occur to ARP or Proxy ARP? – Should we focus on v4 or v6 or both? – Can we use the simple solution? – Is there a common ARP for Ethernet (802.1aq, Trill, L2VPN, L3VPN)?

ARP Extensions Extensions to existing Protocols No requirement any behavior changes on hosts, applications, or Virtual Machines being deployed in the market. – Note: Some solutions suggest Do not break DHCP, or any other broadcast/multicast mechanism used by applications. Extensions to ARP and IPv6 ND if possible Retain Common ARP / ND concept Common protocol across all multiple environments Adaption in specific protocols (L2VPN, L3VPN, 802.1aq, Trill) Will be family of protocols At Least ARP

ARMD – Work Parallel Work Plan Clarify problem Problem statement for ARP, NDS Security impact Survey Existing Work Survey existing solutions GAP analysis Security analysis Protocol design Architecture Protocols Management

Clarifying Problem Problem statement – Discussion earlier – Stated in Charter Questions: – Is this a real problem? – Does the charter statement summarize problem? – Is Security necessary? Who is willing to help refine problem statements?

Analysis for ARMD (1) Look for GAPs within Data Center – IPv4 ARP – IPv6 ND or autoconfiguration Survey existing Work – Survey NHRP (RFC2332) & SCSP (RFC 2334) and application to Ethernet – TRILL work as potential solution – Other existing work from Research (MOOSE), or deployments Consider proposals – Should consider variety of solutions, including directory based, proxy based, or cache based solutions. – Network or host based

Analysis for ARMD (2) Analyze Security – Include analysis of security concerns of IPv4 ARP requests from malicious users. Evaluating potential security solutions and conclude if the security threat can justify solutions. – Analysis Security for ND ARMD assumes the direct links to individual hosts and virtual machines are IEEE802.3 Ethernet links. – Should consider scenarios of one Ethernet network being interconnected by another network, which can be L2VPN, pure IP, Ethernet, or others. Should consider a performance analysis of proposed solutions.

Question Is Analysis necessary for these protocols? Is this the right type of Analysis? Who is willing to help with analysis documents? – Existing v4 /v6 work? – Security analysis? – New proposal summary?

Protocol Protocol Documents – Architecture comments – V4 protocol Extensions & protocols – V6 protocol Extensions & protocols – Management Questions – Do we need architecture document? – Are multiple solutions needed or acceptable? – Is Coordination with Ethernet solutions (L2VPN, 802.1aq, TRILL, Mac-in-Mac) acceptable?

Main 3 Question Does the community think that given the charter revisions discussed during the BOF (subject to review and finalization on the mailing list), a WG should be formed? This work is interesting, but refinement of scope is still requierd? Who thinks a working group should not be formed?

Open Mike time