Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Advertisements

Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
March 14-15, 2007ECloud Feedback, IUCF1 Electron-Cloud Effects in Fermilab Booster K.Y. Ng Fermilab Electron-Cloud Feedback Workshop IUCF, Indiana March.
Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
Review of Electron Cloud R&D at KEKB 1.Diagnostics 1.Beam Size Blow-up 2.Beam Instabilities 3.Electron Density 4.SEY (Secondary Electron Yield) 2.Mitigation.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Latest ILC DR wiggler simulations M. Pivi, T. Raubenheimer, L. Wang (SLAC) July, 2005.
Using Tune Shifts to Evaluate Electron Cloud Effects on Beam Dynamics at CesrTA Jennifer Chu Mentors: Dr. David Kreinick and Dr. Gerry Dugan 8/11/2011REU.
E-Cloud Effects in the Proposed CERN PS2 Synchrotron M. Venturini, M. Furman, and J-L Vay (LBNL) ECLOUD10 Workshshop, Oct Cornell University Work.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update T. Demma, INFN-LNF.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - This presentation limited to resolving drift/dipole weighting question -
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction ECLOUD Simulations for the DAFNE wiggler ECLOUD Simulations for build up in presence.
25-26 June, 2009 CesrTA Workshop CTA09 Electron Cloud Single-Bunch Instability Modeling using CMAD M. Pivi CesrTA CTA09 Workshop June 2009.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Simulation of Beam Instabilities in SPring-8 T. Nakamura JASRI / SPring-8
March 23, 2010 CMAD a tracking and e-cloud beam instability parallel code (M.Pivi SLAC) Taking MAD(X) optics file at input, thus tracking the beam in a.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
FCC electron cloud study plan K. Ohmi (KEK) Mar FCC electron cloud study meeting CERN.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Effect of nonlinearity on Head-Tail instability 3/18/04.
Lecture 25 - E. Wilson - 12/15/ Slide 1 Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
Physics of electron cloud build up Principle of the multi-bunch multipacting. No need to be on resonance, wide ranges of parameters allow for the electron.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Motivation and Overview David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Nov 17, 2009 Webex Assessing the 3.2 km Ring feasibility: Simulation parameters for electron cloud Build-up and Instability estimation LC DR Electron Cloud.
Recent Electron-Cloud Mitigation Studies at KEK E-cloud mitigation mini-workshop on November at CERN Kyo Shibata (for KEKB Group)
INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance) M. Zobov.
Electron cloud effects in Cesr-TF and KEKB K. Ohmi KEK 29 Feb 2008 LEPP, Cornell univ.
Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang.
Electron cloud beam dynamics G. Dugan, Cornell University CesrTA Advisory Committee 9/11/12.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Updates of EC Studies at KEKB 1.EC studies at KEKB 2.Recent results 1.Clearing Electrode 2.Groove surface 3.TiN coating 4.Measurement of EC in solenoid.
3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.
Measurement of the Electron Cloud Density in a Solenoid Field and a Quadrupole Field K. Kanazawa and H. Fukuma KEK June 2009 CTA09 1.
Two-Stream Phenomena in CLIC G. Rumolo and D. Schulte for the ACE, 3 September 2008 * thanks to W. Bruns, R. Tomás, SPSU Working Team General introduction.
Two beam instabilities in low emittance rings Lotta Mether, G.Rumolo, G.Iadarola, H.Bartosik Low Emittance Rings Workshop INFN-LNF, Frascati September.
Coupled bunch Instabilities at ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University Refer to.
Recent Studies on Electron Cloud at KEKB 1.EC studies at KEKB 2.Recent results –Clearing Electrode –Groove surface –EC measurement in Q and solenoid field.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
T. Agoh (KEK) Introduction CSR emitted in wiggler
Electron Cloud Effects in SuperB
Electron cloud and ion effects in SuperKEKB
Observations and Predictions for DAFNE and SuperB
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Impedance model and collective effects
FCC-ee: coupling impedances and collective effects
Ecloud in quadrupole & Sextupole
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update
E-cloud instability at CESR TA
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Collective effects in CEPC
SuperB General Meeting June , Perugia (Italy)
A Head-Tail Simulation Code for Electron Cloud
Study of Fast Ions in CESR
ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort
Impedance analysis for collimator and beam screen in LHC and Resistive Wall Instability Liu Yu Dong.
Electron Cloud Build-up in ilcDR
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
Frank Zimmermann, Factories’03
Presentation transcript:

Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar

1.Positron beam emits synchrotron radiation 2.Electrons are produced at the chamber wall by photoemission 3.The electrons are attracted and interact with the positron beam 4.The electrons are absorbed at the chamber wall after several 10 ns o Secondary electrons are emitted according the circumferences 5.The electrons are supplied continuously for multi-bunch operation with a narrow spacing Electron cloud is built up Electron cloud built-up K.Ohmi, Phys.Rev.Lett,75,1526 (1995) e-e- γ Secondary e - e + beam y x

Wake field is left behind in the electron cloud by advanced bunches The wake field induced by the electron cloud affect backward bunches Coherent instability occurs when there is resonance between the wake field and the backward bunches Coupled bunch instability Single bunch instability Coherent instability due to electron cloud e-e-

Coupled bunch instability The wake field causes correlations among bunches Threshold is determined by balance with some damping effects Independent of emittance, momentum compaction Depends on electron cloud density, distribution and motion e-e-

Single bunch instability The wake filed causes correlations among positrons within a single bunch Threshold is determined by the balance with Landau damping due to the momentum compaction factor Depends on emittance Depends on only local electron cloud density e+e+ e+e+ e-e-

The list of parameters UnitSuperKEKBSuperB E+/E-GeV4/7 I+/I-Amp3.6/2.62.7/2.7 Np× /4.53 Nbun I bunch mA1.4/1.01.6/1.6 β x,y avem12 νsνs Hz0.012 εxεx nm3.2/1.72.8/1.6 εyεy pm12.8/8.27/4 σxσx mm0.20/ /0.13 σyσy μm12.3/9.99.1/6.9 σzσz mm6/55/5 Lm

Number of the produced electrons(1) Number of the photons emitted by one positron per unit meter SuperKEKB-LER γ=8000, L=3016 → Y γ =0.17 m -1 Bunch population SuperKEKB-LER design (3.6A) Np=10 11 The quantum efficiency for photoelectrons (n p.e. /n γ ) Energy distribution 10±5 eV α= 1/137 (fine structure const.)

Number of the produced electrons(2) Number of electrons produced by one positron per unit meter SuperKEKB-LER Y p.e = Y ϒ η = m -1 Number of electrons produced by one bunch per unit meter Maximum secondary emission yield

Analysises for coupled bunch instabilities

Increase of electron density  e with multi-bunch (simulation results)  2,max =1.2 Y p,e N p = 1.7×10 9 (  =0.1) Y p,e N p = 1.7×10 8 (  =0.01) Y p,e N p = 1.7×10 7 (  =0.001) Y p,e N p = 1.7×10 7 (  =0.001)  2,max =1.2  2,max =1.1  2,max =1.0

Theηshould be reduced to 0.001! Electron density  e as functions of quantum efficiencies (  and  2,max )  2,max =1.2 Y p,e N p = 1.7×10 7 (  =0.001) η=0.003 w/ antechamber (a simulation result) ρ eth =1.1 ✕ m -3 The analytical value of the threshold in the case of SBI Together with solenoid it is expected to reduce the actual η to (Suetsugu)

Effect of antechamber ©Suetsugu

Electron distribution and electric potential with  2,max =1.2 Antechamber Cylindrical chamber

Electron distribution and electric potential with  2,max =0 Antechamber Cylindrical chamber

Reduction factor for the averaged electron density The ratio of the densities at the beam pipe of ante-chamber and cylindrical-chamber The ratio ≈ 0.03 for δ 2,max =0  The antechamber reduces η in 3% effectively!

Wake field induced by electron cloud and beam stability(1) Coasting beam model We assume a homogenous stream of the beam We can apply this model even for bunches if ω e σ z /c>>1 The position of the center of mass in the transverse direction : y s

Wake field induced by electron cloud and beam stability(2) EOM for the beam and the cloud n b,c : line density of each particle r b,c : classical radius of each particle F becomes linear near the beam y s the betatron oscillation

Wake field induced by electron cloud and beam stability(3) The eq. for the cloud can be solved as The eq. for the beam becomes wake force wake field  tune shift Δω β

Wake field induced by electron cloud and beam stability(4) Fourier trans. of the eq. for the beam leads Growth rate of instability = Im ω

Wake field for bunch correlation Y 1e N p =1.7×10 9 m -1 (  =0.1)1.7×10 8 m -1 (  =0.01)1.7×10 7 m -1 (  =0.001)

Unstable modes and growth rate Y 1e N p =1.7×10 9 m -1 (  =0.1)1.7×10 8 m -1 (  =0.01)1.7×10 7 m -1 (  =0.001)

Growth rate as a function of η We evaluate the growth rate associated with the unstable modes as a function of η –The growth rate is 0.02 for η=0.001 (Note that η=0.001 corresponds to the threshold of the SBI when η is evaluated as the function of the electron density) –not so severe that the growth could be suppressed by the feedback from the empirical point of view  The CBI could be avoided below the threshold of the SBI

Analysis for single bunch instabilities

Stability condition for the single bunch instability Landau damping Coherence of the transverse oscillation is weakened by the longitudinal oscillation associated with momentum compaction The stability condition for ω e σ z /c>1 Balance of growth and Landau damping

Threshold of the single bunch instability Threshold of the electron cloud density Q nl depends on the nonlinear interaction K characterizes cloud size effect and pinching ω e σ z /c>10 for low emittance rings We use K=ω e σ z /c and Q nl =7 for analytical estimation

Threshold for SuperKEKB and SuperB UnitSuperKEKBSuperB Lm γ8000 I+/I-Amp3.6/2.62.7/2.7 Np× I bunch mA1.4/1.01.6/1.6 β x,y avem12 νsνs Hz0.012 σxσx mm0.20/ /0.13 σyσy μm12.3/9.99.1/6.9 σzσz mm6/55/5 Q77 ω e σ z /c10.9 radiation damping time ms(turn)30(3000)20(4600) ρ e threshold×10 11 m

Simulation with Particle In Cell Method for the single bunch instability Electron clouds are put at several positions in a ring Beam-cloud interaction is calculated by solving two- dimensional Poisson equation on the transverse plane A bunch is sliced into pieces along the longitudinal direction e+e+ e-e- large enough for describing the oscillations

Simulations for instability threshold for SuperKEKB Profiles of the beam size η y =0.2η y =0 ρ e,th ≈2.4×10 11 m -3 ρ e,th ≈2.2×10 11 m -3

Bunch and e-cloud profiles at 4000 turn Coherent motions for SuperKEKB η y =0.2η y =0

FFT spectra below and above the threshold Unstable modes of the instability for SuperKEKB stable unstable η y =0.2η y =0

Simulations for instability threshold for SuperB Profiles of the beam size η y =0η y =0.2 ρ e,th ≈4.4×10 11 m -3 ρ e,th ≈2.6×10 11 m -3

Bunch and e-cloud profiles at 4000 turn Coherent motions for SuperB η y =0.2η y =0

FFT spectra below and above the threshold Unstable modes of the instability for SuperB stable unstable η y =0.2η y =0

Summary Multi-bunch numerical simulation The effective quantum efficiency η should be reduced to The antechember alone seems not to be sufficient for achieving η=0.001, but together with solenoid it is expected to cure the situation (Suetsugu) The CBI seems not to be severe with η=0.001 Single bunch numerical simulation The threshold of the electron cloud density for the stability has been estimated for SuperKEKB, SuperB