1 Feedback from the executive committee meeting Benno Willke GEO meeting, Glasgow October 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michele Punturo on behalf of the ET team GA # A short introduction to the project.
Advertisements

Andrea Paoli AdV 1 st Project Review Cascina, November 3 rd, 2008 IME – infrastructure modifications for environmental noise reduction.
VIRGO: WHERE WE COME FROM WHERE WE ARE GOING GIOVANNI LOSURDO - INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Project Leader for the Virgo Collaboration (and the LIGO Scientific.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
1 st Feedback from the Gravitational-waves working group Harald Lück Valencia, November 2006.
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors David Shoemaker NSF Operations Review Hanford, 26 February 2001.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
Towards a Design Study Proposal for a 3rd Generation Interferometric Gravitational- wave Detector Harald Lück London, October 26th 2006.
Report From Joint Run Planning Committee R. Passaquieti & F. Raab - LSC / VIRGO Collaboration Meeting rd July 2007 – LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G M LIGO R&D1 LSC Publication Policy Update LIGO Publication Policy guides collaboration on issues of authorship rights, protocols and guidelines.
GW Detectors noise and sensitivity
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
LIGO-G W News From Joint Run Planning Committee Roberto Passaquieti & Fred Raab 23May2007.
March 17, 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1/12 Virgo Status B. Mours.
SUSPENSION DESIGN FOR ADVANCED LIGO: Update on GEO Activities Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow for the GEO 600 suspension team LSC Meeting, Louisiana,
Conceptual Design for Advanced LIGO Suspensions Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University for the GEO suspension team +contribution.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
E.T. Design Study & European roadmaps Michele Punturo/Harald Lück.
Advanced VIRGO WG1: Status VIRGO, Cascina Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
Novemebr 5, 2006LSC meeting1 Virgo Update Prospects on detector performance and running schedules B. Mours.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
Summary and plans for the WG1 activity H.Grote – AEI Hannover G.Losurdo – INFN Firenze/Urbino Explorer Nautilus Virgo.
Lisbon, 8 January Research and Development for Gravitational Wave Detectors Raffaele Flaminio CNRS/LMA Lyon.
G Consideration of HAM SAS for Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker LIGO Excomm 30 April 07.
SUSPENSION DESIGN FOR ADVANCED LIGO: Update on GEO Activities Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow for the GEO 600 suspension team LSC Meeting, Hanford.
1 GEO outlook Benno Willke (presented by Bernard Schutz) LSC meeting, MIT Nov 2006.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.
Status of GEO600 Benno Willke for the GEO600 team Aspen Meeting Aspen CO, January 2005 LIGO-G Z.
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC Virgo meeting, Caltech, March 2008 LIGO G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
RedGreenBlue Discussion topics LIGO-G v1 Benno Willke, David Shoemaker.
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
A proposal for additional Low Frequency Gravitational Wave Interferometric Detectors at LIGO Riccardo DeSalvo California Institute of Technology Globular.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Report Barry Barish LSC Meeting - Hanford 14 Aug 01.
1 LESSONS FROM VIRGO+ May 17th 2010 E. Calloni for the Virgo collaboration.
LIGO- G D E7: An Instrument-builder’s Perspective Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting Upper Limits Plenary Session 22 May 2002 LIGO Livingston.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
LIGO-G Z The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Peter R. Saulson NSB Site Visit LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
Advanced Virgo: Optical Simulation and Design Advanced Virgo review Andreas Freise for the OSD Subsystem.
LIGO - G M LIGO Laboratory and LSC Background on Major Collaborative Efforts Gary Sanders LIGO Lyon Virgo-LIGO Discussion 8 January 2001.
LIGO-G ZRai Weiss LSC Session on Scientific Monitoring March 21, 2006 Committee formed by Peter Saulson to: Consider the value and effectiveness.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
Advanced Towards Advanced Virgo Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LIGO- G M LIGO Status Stan Whitcomb Oversight Committee 20 October 2004.
THE NEXT GENERATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS (*) Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze – Virgo collaboration (*) GROUND BASED, INTERFEROMETRIC.
Lessons to be learned from the ET design study Michele Punturo INFN Perugia ET-0005A-16 Dawn Meeting
Brennan Hughey MIT Kavli Institute Postdoc Symposium
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
ILIAS-GWA WP1 BUILDING UP THE EUROPEAN GW COMMUNITY
Prospects and plans : LIGO interferometers Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory LSC meeting, MIT Nov 4-5, 2006.
Commission II meeting – 7 March 2009
Update on the Advanced LIGO PSL Program
Signal recycling R&D at LAL: Influence in Virgo
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Jim Hough for the GEO collaboration
GEO HF Limits/Goals/Options…
R&D Highlights Seismic Isolation Suspensions ISC/40m
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
Virgo Update – LSC meeting
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Hanford 15 August 2005
WG3 Activities M.Punturo & H.Lueck WG3 - 4th ILIAS GW meeting.
Lessons Learned from Commissioning of Advanced Detectors
with coherent WaveBurst pipeline
The views of Virgo collaboration groups on upgraded/advanced Virgo
Presentation transcript:

1 Feedback from the executive committee meeting Benno Willke GEO meeting, Glasgow October 2006

2 GEO600 – future  as GEO in its current sensitivity does not contribute much to the S5 data analysis we decided to stop S5 24/7 mode now  we support the proposal made by the commissioning group which should lead to a new decision point in March when we know more:  could excess noise Hz and above 500Hz be found and reduced  what are the prospects of further improvements in the sensitivity  how close are we to H2  can LIGO commit to run H2 in coincidence with GEO in 2008  commissioning team works full time on this  main goal of commissioning: to take data providing coverage while H1 and L1 are down (2008)

3 GEO600 – future  we do not define a sensitivity goal / best effort  we do not produce veto lists for S5 but follow the required steps to have the veto pipelines available if required  we should try to better understand the low frequency glitches and reduce them  when enhanced detectors are in science mode we take GEO down for conversion into a high frequency detector GEO-HF

4 GEO instrument-research groups  to better coordinate experimental work in GEO and, in particular, to better support the different projects (GEO600, Advanced LIGO, LSC, GEO prototypes, Advanced Virgo, ILIAS)  the GEO research groups will be subsystem base and not project based  the goal is that each groups covers all aspects of the subsystem from R&D to commissioning (including proposal writing if applicable)  we will start with the following groups  seismic isolation and suspension (Sheila)  simulations (Andreas)  optical layout (NN)  controls (NN)  detector and prototype diagnostic (NN)

5 road map  we started a roadmap discussion  GEO600 commissioning and data taking in 2008 and AdvLIGO (lasers/suspension) are the two projects with highest priority  in parallel the GEO research groups start the design work for GEO-HF, Prototype work etc. and help with EU design study proposal  group members who are part of the commissioning team invest only very limited amount of time in research groups until the detector is ready for the data-taking period in 2008 