OptRx Crop Sensors (Optimum Prescription). Comparison of OptRx and farmer flat rate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GreenSeeker Sensing Technology New Tools for Your Consulting Toolbox
Advertisements

Long-Term Soil P and K Trends in Relation to Nutrient Removal in Corn-Soybean Rotations Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University Joint Meeting NEC-17, NCERA-13,
Economics of Precision Ag Tim Norris – Ag Info Tech, LLC.
FIELD-SCALE N APPLICATION USING CROP REFLECTANCE SENSORS Ken Sudduth and Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology.
High Plains Desert.  North Central Montana  High elevation located on Rocky Mountain Front  4,000 Acre Wheat/Barley/Pea/Fallow  200 Angus Beef Cows.
Nitrogen Network Plot Data Prepared By Bill Copeland.
FIELD CROPS Top graphic from
586 farmer’s fields ( , N Rich or Ramps)
ECON 337: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Associate Professor Lee Schulz Assistant Professor
Hay Storage Systems Hay Production School John W. Worley.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Calibration. Calibration Challenge #1 A label may call for 1 pint of pesticide to be applied over an entire acre (1 pint per acre). An acre is 43,560.
William Edwards, Extension Economist Iowa Farmers’ Decisions about Enrolling in Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE)
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
Prepared By Bill Copeland. VRT Nitrogen Appling more N in high productive areas. And less N in less productive areas. These are often built on one of.
Hay Storage Systems Southeast Hay Convention John W. Worley.
Yield Monitors and Their Applications to Today’s Farmer
Estimating your Cost of Production for Growing Irrigated Corn Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics UW-Madison and UW-Extension Hancock ARS.
Organic Agriculture …… Comparison to the Conventional Agriculture: Still Viable? Craig Chase, Field Specialist Farm & Ag Business Management.
Sensor-based Nitrogen Application – Converting Research to Practicality Brent Rendel Rendel Farms Miami, Oklahoma.
Organic Agriculture …… Making the transition… Craig Chase, Field Specialist Farm & Ag Business Management.
Econ 339X, Spring 2010 ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Hay Storage Systems Hay Production School John W. Worley.
5.4. Costs, revenues, and profitsQuestion 1 Price of wheat4$ / bushel Price of nitrogen0.1$ / lb Fixed costs50$ / acre Other variable costs60$ / acre Review:
Waste Pesticide Program Program costs offset by portion of license fees Usually in June in various Montana locations. Must pre-register!!! Local Extension.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
Development of a Small Remotely Piloted Vehicle for the Collection of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index Readings Dr. Randy R. Price, Goutam Nistala.
Growing the Bottom Line Evaluating Marketing Outlets… Which to choose and how? Craig Chase, Field Specialist Farm & Ag Business Management.
New Minnesota Nitrogen Rate Guidelines.
Equilibrium MARKET DEMAND & SUPPLY $ $ x 200 B U Y E R S PQDQD BUSHELS OF CORN MARKET DEMAND 2,000 4,000.
Fact vs. Myth, What is Holding Precision Agriculture Back Daniel Edmonds Cody Daft Zimbabwe, January 2008.
No-till Oklahoma Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilizer Through Use of Optical Sensors Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
Ag Leader Crop Sensors. May 2008 announced worldwide distribution of Holland Scientific (HS) crop sensor Holland Scientific Crop Sensor Commercializing.
Ethanol. The Production of Ethanol  Grown by farmers.  Shipped to special plants, where it is extracted by chemical process.  Although a new technology,
Ag Leader’s Market Observations for Crop Sensors.
OPTRX SENSORS Experiences from the production ag front.
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
Econ 339X, Spring 2010 ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Risk-Free Farming? Risk-Return Analysis of Soybean Farming under the 2002 Farm Bill Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa.
Part 2: Answers to practical fertilizer management problems Fundamentals of Nutrient Management December 16-17, 2009 West Virginia University Extension.
Chapter 8: Production with Two Inputs or Outputs Agricultural Production Economics: Two Inputs or Two Outputs.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
How the adoption of the N-Rich Strip has changed N Management
Fertility Strategies for Lean Times
Variable Rate Nitrogen
ACRE Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
What is this?.
SOCIAL STUDIES CHAPTER 3 LESSON 1.
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
Long-term Rotations ……
OK Wheat Many farms graze cattle on wheat from fall until the end of February or beginning of March.
Who benefits from Biotechnology?
Corn Algorithm Comparisons, NUE Workshop
ACRE Rain and Hail Agricultural Insurance Johnston, Iowa June 17, 2009
Corn Algorithm Comparisons, NUE Workshop
Crop Insurance Chad Hart Associate Professor
Agricultural Marketing
The Crop Producer’s Risk Management Decisions
Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
The Crop Producer’s Risk Management Decisions
Agricultural Marketing
Allee Demonstration Farm, 50th Anniversary Field Day
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Presentation transcript:

OptRx Crop Sensors (Optimum Prescription)

Comparison of OptRx and farmer flat rate

2008 Field Testing Flat rate = 50 Lbs of N/ac OptRx prescribed passes Flat rate = 50 Lbs of N/ac OptRx prescribed rate and farmer’s flat rate alternated across entire field

$.60 per lb N and $4 per bushel corn Crop sensor rate and farmer’s flat rate alternated across entire field Iowa – Field 1 - $41.00/ac more than flat rate – Field 2 - $24.00/ac more than flat rate – Field 3 - $100.00/ac more than flat rate Missouri – Field 1 - $75.00/ac more than flat rate – Field 2 - $120.00/ac more than flat rate – Field 3 - $15.00/ac more than flat rate Crop Sensor vs. Flat N Rate

$.50 per lb N and $3.50 per bushel corn Crop sensor rate and farmer’s flat rate alternated across entire field Iowa – Field 1 $21.96/ac more than flat rate – Field 2 $47.38/ac more than flat rate – Field 3 $62.82/ac more than flat rate – Field 4 ($1.09)/ac less than flat rate – Field 5 $15.03/ac more than flat rate Crop Sensor vs. Flat N Rate

Missouri – Field 1 $14.09/ac more than flat rate – Field 2 $4.41/ac more than flat rate – Field 3 $7.09/ac more than flat rate – Field 4 $11.32/ac more than flat rate – Field 5 $26.78/ac more than flat rate – Field 6 $33.03/ac more than flat rate – Field 7 $35.27/ac more than flat rate – Field 8 $3.81/ac more than flat rate – Field 9 $2.70/ac more than flat rate – Field 10 $25.89/ac more than flat rate – Field 11 $41.69/ac more than flat rate Crop Sensor vs. Flat N Rate

Missouri – Field 12 $22.19/ac more than flat rate – Field 13 $33.54/ac more than flat rate – Field 14 $45.00/ac more than flat rate Kansas – Field 1 $11.82/ac more than flat rate Louisiana – Field 1 $2.68/ac more than flat rate Crop Sensor vs. Flat N Rate

List Pricing $3000 per sensor $1500 per master module (1 per system) Recommend 5 sensors for 80 foot or wider boom Recommend 3 sensors for less than 80 foot swaths

Obstacles (corn market) Corn farmers generally don’t believe there is anything wrong with their current flat rate N program. – Must prove sensors are better than their current N program – 2 years of good results before they start to trust it Application timeframe – Limited timeframe with toolbar because corn must be at V4/V5. – Longer timeframe with self-propelled applicator because of higher clearance.

How do we convince farmers their flat rate program is deficient? Farmer education Organic matter argument