Γ+ d → p + p + π - Analysis Meeting Jan10, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulation of Neutrino Factory beam and quasielastic scattering off electrons in the near detector Yordan Karadzhov University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Advertisements

Simulation of the spark rate in a Micromegas detector with Geant4 Sébastien Procureur CEA-Saclay.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Particle flux simulations Sergei Striganov Fermilab June 11, 2008.
Count rate estimates from TDR Assuming beam intenisties from previous slide and acc *rec from SIM LH2 case [counts/24h] p [GeV/c] beam momentum Solid.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
Zhihong Ye Hampton University Feb. 16 th 2010, APS Meeting, Washington DC Data Analysis Strategy to Obtain High Precision Missing Mass Spectra For E
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
G EANT 4 energy loss of protons, electrons and magnetic monopole M. Vladymyrov.
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1..
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.
Under the Direction of Dr. Tanja Horn 01 Conceptual Studies for the π 0 Hadronic Calorimeter project date 8/19/2011 Rob Macedo and Katya Gilbo Catholic.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Tracking Studies of Phase Rotation Using a Scaling FFAG Ajit Kurup FFAG07 12 th – 17 th April 2007.
S PIN A SYMMETRIES ON THE N UCLEON E XPERIMENT ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Experiment Nuclear Physics Group Meeting Hampton University May 11, 2009.
 4 He(e,e'p)X, April 13 and April 14, 2011, 16 hours Measured P miss at to 1.0 GeV/c, x b = 1.24, Q 2 = 2 (GeV/c) 2 Extension of SRC 2 body data.
Spasimir Balev /CERN/ mrad 3 LKr simulation: – very slow, so only events with interesting topology are fully simulated: –  + with.
Kinematics of  + n   p   0  p reaction Susumu Oda 2007/04/10-19.
Exclusive π 0 electroproduction in the resonance region. Nikolay Markov, Maurizio Ungaro, Kyungseon Joo University of Connecticut Hadron spectroscopy meeting.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Status of Scaling FFAG Phase Rotation ICOOL Simulations Ajit Kurup ISS Machine Group Meeting 27 th July 2006.
A search for deeply-bound kaonic nuclear states in (in-flight K -, N) reaction Hiroaki Ohnishi RIKEN.
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details,
1 Pion production in np collisions at 1.25AGeV A.Kurilkin, P.Kurilkin, V.Ladygin, A.Ierusalimov, T.Vasiliev, LHEP-JINR, Dubna, Russia For the HADES collaboration.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Light nuclei production in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC Md. Rihan Haque, for the STAR Collaboration Abstract Light nuclei (anti-nuclei) can be produced.
Study of γd --> K + Λn through 3-track detected events with the NKS2 HONDA Kazuhisa Tohoku University.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
In the rest frame of the spin-½ particle: spin up electron spin down electron ?? Is the E=  mc 2 unphysical? Meaningless? Can we enforce  B always be.
Some remarks on (mis)identification: separation of pions from electrons Answer the question of the feasibility of p_bar p  e + e - Answer the question.
Resolution and radiative corrections A first order estimate for pbar p  e + e - T. H. IPN Orsay 05/10/2011 GDR PH-QCD meeting on « The nucleon structure.
ITEP meeting S.Kiselev1 RQMD: p+C  γ X at T=5.13 GeV 2-arms FLINT  Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow  Acceptance  Input info  Multiplicities 
HLAB meeting paper 2011/1/18 T.Gogami CLAS ( CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer ) Clam shell is open.
Status of the FOPI pp Beamtime -Motivation -Particle Reconstruction -Inclusive Reconstruction -Exclusive Reconstruction with kinematical Refit -Summary.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
Fiber target simulation for S-2S experiment Toshiyuki Gogami 2015/10/15.
Kaons in the SPL Superbeam Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de L’accélérateur Linéaire.
SANE Collaboration ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hampton University January 12, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio at High Q 2 by Using The.
Radiation Shielding Assessment for MuCool Experimental Enclosure C. Johnstone 1), I. Rakhno 2) 1) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Slow particles reconstruction R.Hołyński, A.Olszewski, P. Sawicki, A. Trzupek, B.Wosiek, K.Woźniak Algorithm description Large dE hits Angular cuts on.
If information seems to be missing, make any reasonable assumptions. 1.A target has an areal density of 2.3 g/cm 2 and a thickness of 0.8 inch. What is.
Energy Loss Simulation for the CDF Run II W Mass Measurement Tom Riddick University College London.
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
1 Simulation, Formatter & Analysis Kyo Tsukada Tohoku Univ.
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Norihito Muramatsu RCNP, Osaka University Mini-Workshop on Kaon Experiments and Detectors, 5-7 Nov 2004, Mikata Search for Pentaquark In Low Energy Kaon.
QM2002 (July / / Nantes / France)Susumu SATO (JSPS) for the PHENIX collaboration page 1 Susumu SATO Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,
Basic of Detector Atsushi Taketani 竹谷篤 RIKEN Nishina Center Detector Team RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center.
Basic of Detector Atsushi Taketani 竹谷篤 RIKEN Nishina Center Detector Team RIKEN Brookhaven Research Center.
Electromagnetic Physics Working Group discussion
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
Search for exotic baryon resonances in pp collisions at the CERN SPS
Future Plan of the Neutral Kaon Spectrometer 2 (NKS2) Experiment
GAMOS tutorial Shielding Exercises
Inside the Tevatron Main Ring
L*(1520) Photoproduction off Proton and Neutron from CLAS eg3 data set
Photoproduction of charged pions on deuteron
Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan
J-PARC K1.8BRビームラインにおける 液体3He標的への K- ビーム照射実験(3)
SksMinus status 08 HB meeting 2008/7/10 白鳥昂太郎.
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
SksMinus simulation program
Antoine Cazes Université Claude Bernard Lyon-I December 16th, 2008
Update of
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Presentation transcript:

γ+ d → p + p + π - Analysis Meeting Jan10, 2008

Contents Energy deposit Correction Select/Cut Conditions

Energy Deposit Correction Motivation: get more accurate kinematics p/pi energy loss in IH  for proton, 0.5~6 for pion

Energy deposit correction Event Select with loose cut Particle E/p from DC Energy deposit Correction Event Select with tight cut Analysis W/ Correction Energy Deposit Correction Method

Event Select

Appendix-3 Event Select Condition Time: |IH-TagF| <2.5nsec; 2TrVertex: Track Distance<1.5 cm; 3TrVertex: Triangle length<3.0 cm; 3TrVerPos: -3<X<2, -1.64<Y<1.44, -1<Z<1 (cm); Mass: 0.8<ppiMM <1.17, 1.66<LVTarM<2.1 (GeV/c 2 ); LVTarMom: 119.6<Px<80.4, <Py<96.3, -50<Px<50 (MeV/c);

Appendix-2 Fig. Effect of Energy Deposit

Appendix-3 Simulation Set GENETYPE: 3BPS pp  - /4BPS pp  -  0 Gamma E:0.8~1.1 GeV (uniform); Beam Size: YZ-Plane Gaussian distribution w/ σ=0.5 cm; Target: LD 2 w/ -3.61<X<0.39 cm Event #:1e6; SDCRES: 150μm ; CDCRES: 200μm ; HDTRES: 0.2 cm; OHZRES: 2.0 cm; DCEFF: 99%; DCEFFREG: 1.2;

Appendix-4 MaterialDepth (cm) Density ( g/cm 3 ) TargetLiquid D 2 Φ4.8× Target Cell FilmUpilex-S75×2e Super-Insulator Aluminized Mylar50e-4×21.39 Mylar6e-4×15(?)1.39 Target Out Cell WallCFRP IHPolyvinyltolunene SDC WindowMylar200×2e Straw CellAluminized Mylar30×6e SDC GasAr+Ethane(50:50) e-3 CDC inner WindowCFRP500e TotalNormal to IH material TABLE I. Materials of NKS2 on the Particles’ Trajectory (inside CDC)

That’s All.