Creation of Copyrighted Materials Policy (Revision of Current Policy) AUGUST 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intellectual Property Policy and Procedures
Advertisements

Fiscal Guidelines/ Budget and Program Revisions NC Committee on Dropout Prevention Procedures Manual 2010.
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Financial Conflict of Interest July 2012 rev
Copyright Ownership and Rights Management NIH, Harvard and TRLN Kevin L. Smith.
PROGRAM INCOME Announcing a new Program Income web page Ted Mordhorst Assistant Director Post.
1 © Copyright and other Intellectual Property. 2 What is intellectual property? Patents Trade Marks Designs Plant Breeders Rights Copyright Confidential.
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
NIH FINANCIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST REGULATIONS – 2012 Office of Sponsored Programs Research & Graduate Studies.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
1 Developing and implementing successful intellectual property policies for online courses Veronica Diaz, PhD Instructional Technology Manager, Adjunct.
Department of Transportation Support Services Branch ODOT Procurement Office Intergovernmental Agreements 455 Airport Rd. SE, Bldg K Salem, OR
Obtaining Permission to use Copyrighted Materials Insert Date Insert Instructors’ Names / Titles The following slides are based on the work of the UCLA.
Principal Investigator Effort Training Created 07/2010 by Sponsored Projects Administration.
History 2002 – Director of research and sponsored program develops IP policy Fall 2002 – Referral to review the policy February 2003 – Faculty affairs.
Intellectual Property in the Digital Age Series “Don’t I Own My Own Work?” Negotiating to Keep Your Copyright Intellectual Property in the Digital Age:
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Ownership of Intellectual Property: Textbooks and Inventions Frank Lancaster UT Office of the General Counsel Presented at The University of Tennessee.
Policy Characteristics and Best Practices Kimberly Bonner, Esq. And Kimberly B. Kelley, Ph.D. University of Maryland University College Center for Intellectual.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Institutional Leadership for Copyright Administration Presentation to ACCC June 2013.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
Technology Transfer at Rice
Research Week: Copyright, Commercialisation and IP Research Week: Copyright, Commercialisation and IP  opyright for postgraduate students and researchers.
Office of Sponsored Programs Valerie Howard, Director Phone: Fax:
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
Introduction to Intellectual Property: Fall 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS of OCT OWNERSHIP, DURATION.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
B r a z o s R i v e r A u t h o r i t y FERC Encroachments.
Policies and Procedures for Summer Supplements on Federal Awards April
THE ROLE OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND AGREEMENTS IN DETERMINING OWNERSHIP OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN FACULTY CREATED WORKS. Faculty Created.
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
Developing an IP Policy at Smaller Institutions James R. Zanewicz, J.D. Director Office of Technology Development.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Proposed Revisions Copyright Policy WSU Intellectual Property Committee.
Training II: Software, Publications, IP, and Export Control Issues L. Meixler Many researchers tend not to regard software as IP. They often share software.
Know Your Rights! Copyright and Publishing Scholarly Work Rina Elster Pantalony, Director Copyright Advisory Office Columbia University.
Copyright © Harvard Medical School. All Rights Reserved. Outside Activity Report: What Do I Need to Report?
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
Welcome July 2010 SPONSORED PROJECTS INFORMATION NETWORK.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
Stephanie Roof, CRA Proposal Manager Sponsored Projects Administration BALL STATE UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
Ad hoc Copyright Policy Revision Committee Sara Wolf/Jan Thornton Nick Backscheider Betsy Gilbertson Bruce Kuerten Don Mulvaney Robert Norton Andrew Wohrley.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Getting Started: Basic Administrative Requirements Unit 1.
2015 POW Meetings Startup Templates/©Copyright Basics Developed by Wendi Williams Extension Communications Specialist.
Teaching & the TEACH Act Paul Royster Coordinator of Scholarly Communications, UNL Libraries November 20, 2015.
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
Your Rights as a Scholarly Author: Negotiation and Strategy.
Technology Transfer Office
UTS Library 2016 workshop Copyright for Researchers
Technology Commercialization Office
Proposal Routing Overview
UCR PRO Reviewer Placemat
Informational Report Faculty Handbook Review Committee April 5, 2011.
Open Access and Compliance with NIH Public Access Policy
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Creation of Copyrighted Materials Policy (Revision of Current Policy) AUGUST 2015

Committee Members Jan Thornton, Director Office of Innovation Advancement & Commercialization (Co-Chair) Sara Wolf, Educational Foundations, Leadership & Technology (Co-Chair) Betsy Gilbertson, Biggio Center Bruce Kuerten, Director Media Production Group Donald Mulvaney, Animal Sciences Robert Norton, Poultry Science Andrew Wohrley, University Libraries

Charge Review and revise, as appropriate, the current AU Copyright policy

Rationale 1.Current AU Copyright Policy was last updated in Increase in Distance Education efforts 3.Compliance with Federal Law (TEACH Act, for example)

Committee Work to Date 1.Thoroughly reviewed current policy: Inadequate A.Fails to address many common questions B.Extremely out of date C.Fails to address use of copyrighted materials 2.Revised policy into two documents A.Creation of copyrighted materials B.Use of copyrighted materials (a.k.a. “Fair Use” policy at some institutions) 3.Creation Policy completed (pending approval) 4.Use policy still in development 5.Educational Materials Website in development

Creation Policy in a Nutshell (ownership)  “…Auburn University disclaims ownership of works by faculty, staff, doctoral fellows and students, except as defined in the Policy Procedures…” 1.*Assigned Tasks, “where the assignment explicitly states in writing that the work will be owned by Auburn University…” “Absent an explicit written statement of work for hire, the work is presumed to be the property of the author.” 2.*Sponsored Agreements, “…ownership…will be determined by the applicable terms of the funding agreement.” 3.**Patentable Works, “…the University Patent Policy will apply…” 4.*Commitment of Auburn University Resources …

Policy Nutshell (cont.) (ownership) 4.Commitment of Auburn University Resources,  “When Auburn …makes substantial commitment of resources…[it] may be entitled to some…ownership share…”  “…specific determination of ‘substantial resources,’ as well as …contractual details… should be determined…before the work is published or otherwise distributed.”  In other words… Negotiate and specify in writing BEFORE the project is begun (ideally), but certainly before completion and/or distribution of the project.

Policy Nutshell (cont.) (Royalties/Remuneration) 1.If author hasn’t used substantial university resources, the work is the sole property of the author(s). 2.If AU has no ownership and/or investment, … AU makes no claim on the Exclusive Rights of the copyright owner. 3.Where AU has made substantial commitment of resource… [it] may request the reservation of certain exclusive rights or income sharing. This shall be done according to written contract determined prior to publication/distribution. 4.Absent a written contract it shall presumed that the University and the authors are co-owners of the work, and AU is entitled to recoup its contribution before any distribution of royalties.

Questions/Comments?