Www.pugh-scarpa.com Gwynne Pugh, FAIA, ASCE, LEED A.P. P UGH + S CARPA A RCHITECTS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation to CHA/CHIP Work Groups August 17, 2012 Meredith Bossin Planning & Development Review.
Advertisements

New Urbanism. What is it? Urban design movement originating in the late 80s – early 90s. Aims to reform all aspects of real estate development. Involves:
July 19, Horizon West Area 28,000 Gross Acres Six (6) Planned Villages / Communities Includes one (1) Town Center ~41,000 Planned Households.
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Presentation Outline What is a Healthy Neighborhood? Planning Trends and Impacts on Health Planning Tools for Healthy Communities.
Sustainable Orange County Built Environment Subcommittee August 19, 2013.
The National Context for Smart Mobility John V. Thomas, PhD US EPA Smart Growth Program.
 Awarded Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Grant for integrated land use and transportation planning efforts ( )  Consultant.
Twinbrook Sector Plan A New Community in the Technology Corridor
Built Environment in Relation to Obesity and Physical Activity Fuzhong Li, Ph.D. Oregon Research Institute Part II.
TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT (TND) ARTICLE City of Columbus
Community Happiness Index Gwendolyn Hallsmith, Director Department of Planning and Community Development City of Montpelier.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
LEED ND Rating System of Green Business Council – Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design One of many GBC systems – Building Design & Construction.
UrbanFootprint Module 3: Analysis Modules Materials prepared with funding support from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, and the.
URBAN SERVICE INNOVATIONS Public Transit : The One Bay Area Project May 15 th, 2013 PA 800 Robin Havens.
LEED for Neighborhood Development Strategic Economics Brownbag March 20, 2009.
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester May 21, 2012.
SUSTAINABILITY TEAM | May 19, 2010 Illinois APA, September 24, 2010.
Official Plan Review - Phase II CITIZEN REFERENCE PANEL.
Energy Policy and Smart Growth American Planning Association 2003 Legislative and Policy Conference May 11-13, 2003.
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
Urban Design Goals: Produce a high quality living environment for all residents. Clarify and enhance the relationship between new housing development and.
Draft Zoning Code Planning Commission Work Session June 20, 2007.
A Sustainable Future for Treasure Island Commission on the Environment November 28, 2006.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
Greater Washington 2050 Planning Tools Task Force May 29 th 2009 Harriet Tregoning and Alan Imhoff Regional Targets & Indicators.
Santa Monica Sustainable City Plan Purpose The Sustainable City Plan was created to enhance our resources, prevent harm to the natural environment and.
1 Southern California Association of Governments Irvine, December 9, 2008 OCBC Infrastructure Committee SB 375 Presentation Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director,
Mueller Redevelopment
Where the Home Is Matters Planning for Healthy and Equitable Communities Julie West, MPH Jim Krieger, MD, MPH Public Health – Seattle & King County May.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
AYU FARHANA CHUAR YEJUAN FARAH HANIN MOHD NAIN NAJIHAH AZMI SITI NADIAH ABDUL RAHMAN SURAYA HANI MOHD YUSOF.
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
Scenario S: Preferred Alternative. Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation.
Compact Housing Sustaining Communities and the Environment.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Pedestrians are the lost measure of a community, they set the scale for both the center and edge of our neighborhoods. --Peter Calthorpe The Next American.
Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.
Smart Growth Land Use and Transportation Infrastructure Paul Beyer – Director of Smart Growth, NYS Department of State.
Regenerative Stormwater Conveyence: An Integrated Approach to Sustainable Stormwater Planning on Linear Projects 2009 IOCET Adapting to Change Presented.
Village of Villa Park Comprehensive Plan Update CPAC Meeting December 2 nd, 2008.
Planning and Sustainability Paul Farmer American Planning Association M6: Protecting the Urban Environment and Historical and Cultural Heritage.
Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities.
Railroad Ave eBART Station Area Specific Plan TOD MarketPlace, September 29, 2006 C I T Y O F P I T T S B U R G.
Using what we've got: Creating Community in the Street.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Compact Housing Sustaining Communities and the Environment.
C ENTRAL E STUARY P LAN A V ISION F OR O AKLAND’S W ATERFRONT Central Estuary Plan A VISION FOR OAKLAND’S WATERFRONT Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment.
Transportation Possible Goal Provide convenient alternative transportation options to dramatically reduce our City’s fuel consumption. Example Actions.
Module 5: Solutions – Sustainable Urban Communities MPP 655: Policy Making for Sustainable Urban Communities 1MPP Module 5.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
Transit Oriented Development: Prospects for action on climate change February 16, 2011 Presented to NYMTC David King Columbia University.
TEMPLE CITY MID-CENTURY PLAN GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (GPAC) MEETING 11 | August 3, 2015.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
Reducing GHG emissions from Transportation using Smart Growth
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Transit-Oriented Affordable Housing
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017.
Louisville Metro Comprehensive Plan
A Vision for the District: Perspectives from the City
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Presentation transcript:

Gwynne Pugh, FAIA, ASCE, LEED A.P. P UGH + S CARPA A RCHITECTS

What is Sustainability?

The Triple-Bottom Line

Regenerative Less Energy RequiredMore Energy Required Restorative Sustainable Green Conventional Practice Relative Improvement (LEED, GB Tool, Green Globe, etc.) Neutral – “100% less bad” (McDonough) Humans PARTICIPATING AS nature – Co-evolution of the Whole System Humans DOING THINGS TO nature – assisting the evolution of Sub-Systems “One step better than breaking the law” (Croxton) Technologies / Techniques Fragmented Living Systems Understanding Whole System Regenerating System Degenerating System Trajectory of Environmentally Responsible Design © All rights reserved. Integrative Design Collaborative and Regenesis Contact Bill Reed, for permission to use

THE ISSUES 1.AB 32/ SB375 puts focus on transportation / vmt and energy efficiency 2.Federal dollars increasingly favoring or requiring emission reduction and neighborhood efficiency 3.Traditional revenue generators are no longer viable 4.Growing grass roots demand for livability

SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS: 1. Are in the right place 2. Facilitate non-motorized forms of mobility, principally walking and biking 3. Have a dense street grid with multiple connections both within the neighborhood and at its border 4. Have a diversity of uses, enabling daily needs to be met on foot 5. Provide housing types for multiple income levels and stages in life 6. Make provisions for the local production and/or procurement of healthy food 7. Reuse and adapt existing buildings while preserving historic ones 8. Provide opportunities for buildings to share energy and water infrastructure 9. Incentivize or require buildings to consume fewer natural resources

ARE IN THE RIGHT PLACE Infill or Adjacent to existing development of no less than 7 du/acre, or Have adequate transit service, or Within 1/2 mile walk distance of at least seven distinct neighborhood services, and Do not encroach on sensitive habitat and avoid areas prone to flooding

–1. infill –2. adequate transit service –3. adjacent to existing development

FACILITATE NON-MOTORIZED FORMS OF MOBILITY, PRINCIPALLY WALKING AND BIKING A network of bicycle lanes (or streets with auto speeds slow enough for safe biking) that connect to major job centers or transit hubs and provisions for safe and secure bike parking and storage Buildings facades and entrances that face streets or public spaces (but not parking lots) Continuous sidewalks Streets that are narrow enough to comfortably cross and slow down automobile traffic On-street parking Limited building setbacks Street trees at intervals no greater than 40 ft.

HAVE A DENSE STREET GRID WITH MULTIPLE CONNECTIONS BOTH WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND AT ITS BORDER External connections at a minimum of every 800 feet Internal connectivity of at least 150 intersections/square mile (intersections that lead to cul-de-sacs don’t count!)

external connections at a minimum of every 800 feet internal connectivity of at least 150 intersections per sq mile Manhattan 152 Santa Monica 316 Portland 442

HAVE A DIVERSITY OF USES, ENABLING DAILY NEEDS TO BE MET ON FOOT Within 1/2 mile walk distance of at least seven distinct neighborhood services that are located in clusters of at least three services

half-mile walk distance of seven neighborhood services

PROVIDE HOUSING TYPES FOR MULTIPLE INCOME LEVELS AND STAGES IN LIFE Have enough architectural diversity to serve students and young singles, families with children, empty-nesters, and the elderly Have at least 20% of rental units or 10% of for-sale units for households making 80% or less of AMI

RESIDENTIAL DIVERSITY Individual / Family Special Needs Senior First-time buyers Sweat Equity Workforce –architectural diversity –economic diversity

MAKE PROVISIONS FOR THE LOCAL PRODUCTION AND/OR PROCUREMENT OF HEALTHY FOOD Prohibit CC&Rs and discourage zoning that ban the growing of produce Set aside at least 60 sf of community gardening space (in a walkable location) for every dwelling unit Identify space for regular farmers markets and encourage their development

prohibit regulation that bans growing of produce set aside community gardening space identify space for regular farmers markets

REUSE AND ADAPT EXISTING BUILDINGS WHILE PRESERVING HISTORIC ONES During redevelopment, set a goal of preserving at least 20% of existing building stock Discourage zoning obstacles to adaptive reuse except for strategic economic situations (e.g. preservation of jobs) Preserve all historic buildings, defined as listed or eligible to be listed as historic landmarks

discourage zoning obstacles to adaptive reuse

PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUILDINGS TO SHARE ENERGY AND WATER INFRASTRUCTURE Make investments in localized stormwater and district energy infrastructure so that the burden of pursuing best practices (principally stormwater infiltration and efficient or renewable Power generation) can be shared and economies of scale exploited

investment in localized stormwater

INCENTIVIZE OR REQUIRE BUILDINGS TO CONSUME FEWER NATURAL RESOURCES Require buildings in which agency has an investment, to get certified through a credible, third-party green building program Incentivize buildings in areas over which agency has jurisdiction, to get certified

incentivize buildings in jurisdiction to get certified

Denver, Colorado Existing conditions

Denver, Colorado Mixed-use buildings on one block

Denver, Colorado Public street improvements: street trees, street lamps, decorative traffic signals, bulbouts

Denver, Colorado Commissioned by Colfax on the Hill Additional mixed-use development, remodeling of existing buildings

40% are commute About same share are errands, visiting, etc. Where are PM peak trips going? Other External-to- Internal Other Internal-to- External Recreation College School Not Home Based Home-Based Other Work

LUCE targets specific programs to address all types of trips. Employer TDM Districts Parking cashout Safe routes to school Parking programs Transit passes Transit investments Walking Bike facilities Parking programs Different programs target different trips

Less than 10% mode shift citywide necessary to achieve NNNT goal How do we achieve No Net New Trips? Existing PM trips = 60, Plan in 2030 = 8% increase LUCE in 2030 = 1% decrease.

THE 4D ADJUSTMENT PROCESS – SUPPLY SIDE  Density - residential and non- residential development per acre;  Diversity - mix of residential, retail and employment land uses on the site;  Design - connectivity and walkability of the site’s transportation networks; and  Destination Accessibility - location relative to major regional attractions, as infill sites generate fewer and shorter vehicle trips than fringe area development.

 Parking policies  Reduced minimum parking requirements  Unbundled parking  Public parking pricing  Transportation System Improvements  Bikes  Pedestrians  Transit  Transportation Demand Management  Subsidized transit passes  Parking cashout  Car sharing  Bike sharing  Mode Shift Policies  Safe routes to schools  Carpooling  Telecommuting  Transportation Management Associations DEMAND SIDE ADJUSTMENTS

Location: 4 Ds Residential parking Commercial parking management Transit pass program Safe routes to schools Transit improvements Bike improvements Pedestrian improvements Carpooling/Telecommuting Parking cashout Transportation Management Assns HOW WE ACHIEVE NO NET NEW TRIPS Up to 17% commute trip reduction in TDM zones. Up to 5% non- commute trip reduction

41 DRAFT EIR FINDINGS – GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE GHG Emissions in Annual Metric Tons AB 32 Target Sustainable City Plan Target