5/9/02 1 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Federal Government DoD DoC DoT NASA State Government NCSS Industry University Detailed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESWW4, 5-9 th November 2007 Draft Proposal: Space Weather as part of an Optional Space Situational Awareness Programme A.Glover, E. Daly, R. Marsden, A.
Advertisements

A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART II
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Federal Aviation Administration International Flight Inspection Symposium June 24, 2008 James H. Washington Vice President, Acquisition and Business Services.
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
The Next Generation Air Transportation System Future of Airports and Aviation 29 th Annual Airports Conference March 1, 2006.
NASA Commercial Crew Program COMSTAC May 2011 Page 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM COMSTAC May 2011 E. Mango Commercial.
Public Workshop Welcome -to the -. What is the ?
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
California Freight Advisory Committee May 14, 2014.
Connecting People With Information DoD Net-Centric Services Strategy Frank Petroski October 31, 2006.
Federal Aviation Administration Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Briefing to COMSTAC Kelvin Coleman May 16, 2008.
International Space Station: National Laboratory Development Brad Carpenter Space Operations Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters.
6th Framework Programme Thematic Priority Aeronautics and Space.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe Core Presentation ACARE Communications Group March Aug-15 1.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water NextGen Update WMO; CAeMwww.wmo.int WMO.
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
Mary E. Kicza Assistant Administrator for NOAA Satellite and Information Services Responsible for Responsible for providing timely access to global environmental.
AGCC CGSIC ISC Feb US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CIVIL GPS SERVICE INTERFACE COMMITTEE INTERNATIONAL SUB COMMITTEE MEETING Melbourne, Australia,
ENC-GNSS 2006 – Manchester, UK Civil GPS Interface Committee International Sub-Committee May 7, 2006 John E. Augustine Acting Director, Office of Navigation.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 COE CST Overview August 16, 2011 Introduction to the FAA Center of Excellence for Commercial Space Transportation August.
Engaging Contractors in the Environmental Management System (EMS) Department of Energy EMS Workshop: Implementation, Lessons Learned, and Best Practices.
The U. S. National Strategy for Global Supply Chain Security Neema Khatri Office of International Affairs U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4 April 2003
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Concept of Operations for Commercial.
10/31/06 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Civil Aviation.
The Voice of the Industry Water and Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association.
Engaging Freight and Supply Chain Representatives in Public Sector Projects.
11 Aeronautical Information Exchange Model (AIXM) / Weather Information Exchange Model (WXXM) Conference Addressing the NextGen Challenge Charles A. Leader.
National Coalition of Spaceport States Briefing for the Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group (ASTWG) Meeting Kennedy Space Center May 15, 2001 Presented.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 8 – Communications and Commanding Best.
The CSIR Satellite Applications Centre The National Space Policy and the Implications of the Conventions on Space Objects Raoul Hodges Wabile Motswasele.
2/27/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 2/27/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps.
Advanced Range Technology Working Group July 2002 Contact information: Kevin Brown Vice President, Business Development Command and Control Technologies.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
Spaceport Florida Authority Presentation to Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group (ASTWG) May 15, 2001 Keith Witt Director of Spaceport Development.
1 Federal Aviation Administration COE CST Research Road Mapping Workshop #2 August 16, 2011 Research 1 Hierarchy 1 Space Traffic Management and Operations.
CHAPTER 2 Supply Chain Management. Copyright © 2001 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2-2 Supply Chain Management.
Weather Information for Surface Transportation: AASHTO Activities June 13, 2006 WIST Workshop Presented by Leland D. Smithson AASHTO SICOP Coordinator.
Spaceport Architectures Discussion What is a Spaceport? Spaceport Functional Performance—How Are We Doing? A Structured, Generic Model to Envision Spaceport.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
GRID Overview Internet2 Member Meeting Spring 2003 Sandra Redman Information Technology and Systems Center and Information Technology Research Center National.
NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System
ASTWG II January 15-16, 2002 John F. Kennedy Space Center.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 COE CST Overview May 11, 2011 Introduction to the FAA Center of Excellence for Commercial Space Transportation May 11,
Federal Aviation Administration 1 COE CST Overview Presentation Federal Aviation Administration Introduction to the FAA Center of Excellence for Commercial.
Title: U.S. National Strategy to Secure the Flow of Commerce in the Global Supply Chain Presenter’s Name: Sean K. Moon Economy: United States of America.
SPACE Act of 2015 Dr. Sarah J. Nilsson, Esq. A 3 ir Conference January 2016.
Florida Space Transportation Infrastructure Planning Mark Bontrager Vice President, Spaceport Operations.
1 Earth Science Technology Office The Earth Science (ES) Vision: An intelligent Web of Sensors IGARSS 2002 Paper 02_06_08:20 Eduardo Torres-Martinez –
Foundations of Information Systems in Business. System ® System  A system is an interrelated set of business procedures used within one business unit.
Office of Space Flight Spaceport and Range Technology Development Initiative Al Sofge NASA Headquarters May 15, 2001.
ASTWG Vision Team Group Exercise: Initial Summary of Results.
Munich SATNAV, Munich Satellite Navigation Summit February 21-23, 2006 Michael E. Shaw Director, U.S. National Space-Based PNT Coordination Office.
The Spaceport Enterprise Defining and Developing the Concept Kevin Brown Command and Control Technologies Corp. Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group.
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Anne Harlan, Director William J. Hughes Technical Center 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA AST Presentation at ESIL-1 October 26, 2011 List of Recent Papers 2011 Overview of the FAA Center of Excellence for.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
CGSIC International Subcommittee Prague, Czech Republic March 14, 2005 Michael E. Shaw Director, Navigation and Spectrum Policy U.S. Department of Transportation.
Mark Bontrager, VP, Spaceport OperationsJanuary 10, 2016 Spaceport Services Requirements A Spaceport Perspective.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Drones and Autonomous Systems
The Air Traffic Organization: Building Today to Ensure Our Future
Joint Planning and Development Office “Where new ideas are welcome”
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
Presentation transcript:

5/9/02 1 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Federal Government DoD DoC DoT NASA State Government NCSS Industry University Detailed list by Name/Org that contributed *Disclaimer: Ad hoc Committee, organizations listed have participated, but does not reflect Government Opinion

5/9/02 2 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps Vision Future Space System Needs Future Requirements Today's Spaceport System VISION TEAM FOCUS AREA TEAMS ASTWG ADVISORY Resource Allocation Technology Gaps Today’s Technology Future Technology Requirements Technology Trade Study Technology Development Macro Selection Priority Setting Project Implement- ation The ASTWG Technology Planning Process

5/9/02 3 Systems Definition Spaceport System Today’s Macro Space Transportation System Spaceport Environment Spaceport Technology in Context Spaceport System Today’s Macro Space Transportation System Spaceport Environment Spaceport Technology in Context Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps Vision Future Space System Needs Future Requirements Today’s Spaceport System VISION TEAM FOCUS AREA TEAMS ASTWG ADVISORY Resource Allocation Technology Gaps Today’s Technology Future Technology Requirements Technology Trade Study Technology Development Macro Selection Priority Setting Project Implement- ation The ASTWG Technology Planning Process

5/9/02 4 Space Transportation System Today’s Macro Space Transportation System Payload (Human & Non-Human) Mission Accomplish in-flight mission Functions Scientific research Technology Development Support national security initiatives Commercial enterprise Vehicle Mission Deliver payload/crew into space Return payloads/crew from space Functions Propel Navigation and Attitude Life support Abort, rescue Maintain environment (radiation, cleanliness, temperature, etc.) Spaceport Mission Provide infrastructure and services for assured access to/from space Functions Flight Crew/Passenger Processing Payload Processing Element Receipt & Acceptance Vehicle Assembly & Integration Departure Landing/Recovery Turnaround/Pre-flight Concept-Unique Logistics Vehicle Depot Maintenance Traffic & Flight Control Spaceport Support Operations Planning & Management Connecting Infrastructure and Community Support Range Mission Provide for transport of humans and cargo to and from space Ensure public safety during operations Satisfy customer requirements Functions Commanding (terminate/abort flight and control of flight) Perform data analysis and decision making Collect, process, distribute, display, and archive data: Tracking data Telemetry data Surveillance data Weather data Provide communications architecture Coordinate Range Assets Mission and Flight Control Mission Provide for control, monitoring, and coordination of vehicles and payloads in space Provide necessary communications with vehicle in space Functions Provide communications architecture Perform data analysis and decision making Collect, process, distribute, display, and archive data: Tracking data Telemetry data Surveillance data Weather data

5/9/02 5

6 Market/National Goals drive Stakeholders to establish Mission Organizations implement Spaceport Functions Technology creates Components to support evolving Architectures Changes in stakeholder needs change the mission and drives the need for new technologies Mission drives functions Functions drive Component Development ASTWG Facilitating Spaceport Technology Development

5/9/02 7 Systems Definition Spaceport System Today’s Macro Space Transportation System Spaceport Environment Spaceport Technology in Context Spaceport Stakeholder Needs Spaceport Stakeholders’ High Level Needs Spaceport Stakeholder Needs Spaceport Stakeholders’ High Level Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps Vision Future Space System Needs Future Requirements Today’s Spaceport System VISION TEAM FOCUS AREA TEAMS ASTWG ADVISORY Resource Allocation Technology Gaps Today’s Technology Future Technology Requirements Technology Trade Study Technology Development Macro Selection Priority Setting Project Implement- ation The ASTWG Technology Planning Process

5/9/02 8 Stakeholder Group Stakeholders Today’s NeedsFuture Needs Spaceports (Owners & Operators) Launch Vehicle Providers & Developers (Customer) Payload Providers and Developers (Customers) Range Administrators (Oversight) Federal and State Governments (Funding, Research, Promotion, Oversight) Federal Spaceports State Spaceports Commercial Spaceports Developing Spaceports Government Military Civil Other Commercial Government Military Civil Other Commercial Non-Profit Government Military Civil Other U.S. Government State Governments U.S. Spaceport Stakeholders’ High Level Needs Common Needs: Safety, Increased reliability, decreased cost, economic viability, decreased liability, greater flexibility, increased responsiveness International Agreements and Partnerships High Launch rates of certified launch vehicles Opportunities to create viable new spaceports Consistent standards Community relations International Agreements and Partnerships Minimal ground assets Auto checkout Ability to support various customers Multi-mode transportation Certification of Reusables for overland use Minimal Government support International Agreements and Partnerships Facilities, Utilities, and Services Predictable launch dates Competitive prices Standard/consistent services & interfaces Minimal impact to mission International Agreements and Partnerships Vehicles with rapid turnaround times Minimize ground processing costs Competitive prices Increased launch rate Flexibility Standardization & commonality (fuels, interfaces) Regulation changes to support domestic and foreign International Agreements and Partnerships Facilities, Utilities, and Services Predictable launch dates Rapid access to space Standard/consistent services & interfaces International Agreements and Partnerships Large surge launch rate capability Short notice launch and landing world wide Reusability Standardization Facilities, Utilities, and Services Consistent compliance process Increased automation Low turnaround time between launches Optimal allocation of assets (e.g., ground vs. space and manned vs. autonomous) Full integration with FAA ATC, space surveillance network (Global) Economic competitiveness Environmental stewardship Workable, effective regulations Fiscal responsibility National vision and space policy Space technology becomes commercial and practical Regulatory processes that meet public safety and commerce needs Overriding national goal

5/9/02 9 Systems Definition Spaceport System Today’s Macro Space Transportation System Spaceport Environment Spaceport Technology in Context Spaceport Stakeholder Needs Spaceport Stakeholders’ High Level Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps Vision Future Space System Needs Future Requirements Today’s Spaceport System Today’s Spaceport System Functions & Components Today’s Spaceport System Today’s Spaceport System Functions & Components VISION TEAM FOCUS AREA TEAMS ASTWG ADVISORY Resource Allocation Technology Gaps Today’s Technology Future Technology Requirements Technology Trade Study Technology Development Macro Selection Priority Setting Project Implement- ation The ASTWG Technology Planning Process

5/9/02 10 Today’s Spaceport System Functions & Components Flight Crew / Passengers

5/9/02 11 Systems Definition Spaceport System Today’s Macro Space Transportation System Spaceport Environment Spaceport Technology in Context Spaceport Stakeholder Needs Spaceport Stakeholders’ High Level Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps Vision Future Space System Needs Defining the Future Needs Future Space System Needs Defining the Future Needs Future Requirements Today’s Spaceport System Today’s Spaceport System Functions & Components VISION TEAM FOCUS AREA TEAMS ASTWG ADVISORY Resource Allocation Technology Gaps Today’s Technology Future Technology Requirements Technology Trade Study Technology Development Macro Selection Priority Setting Project Implement- ation The ASTWG Technology Planning Process

5/9/02 12 Defining the Future Needs    Aerospace Vehicles  Sounding rockets  Balloons   Aerospace Vehicles   Orbital  Reusable  Expendable        In-Space    Payload  Robotic  Human  Robotic  Human  Robotic  Human  Virtual manned   Established routes Range Infrastructure  Terrestrial  Co-located with spaceport  Terrestrial  Space based  Vehicle based  Space based  Vehicle based  GET NOTES FROM OTHER CHART  Hybrid/Other Reusable Expendable  Hybrid/Other Expendable Reusable Hybrid/Other

5/9/02 13 Systems Definition Spaceport System Today’s Macro Space Transportation System Spaceport Environment Spaceport Technology in Context Spaceport Stakeholder Needs Spaceport Stakeholders’ High Level Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps Vision Future Space System Needs Defining the Future Needs Future Requirements Today’s Spaceport System Today’s Spaceport System Functions & Components VISION TEAM FOCUS AREA TEAMS ASTWG ADVISORY Resource Allocation Technology Gaps Today’s Technology Future Technology Requirements Technology Trade Study Technology Development Macro Selection Priority Setting Project Implement- ation The ASTWG Technology Planning Process

5/9/02 14 Defining the Ideal Spaceport. When you think of advanced spaceports such as those in Star Wars, The Jetsons, 2001: A Space Odyssey, or Star Trek: –What are the characteristics of the ideal spaceport? –What would the ideal spaceport “look like”? –What would the ideal spaceport provide or allow the users to accomplish? Brainstorm, don’t think about specific technologies. See input from ASTWG meeting for ideas

5/9/02 15 Converting the Vision to Objectives. From the vision, what specific objectives, performance criteria, or measures can we use to define where we are and where we want to be?