Numerically constrained one-dimensional interaction of a propagating planar shock wave Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joint Mathematics Meetings Hynes Convention Center, Boston, MA
Advertisements

INVISCID BURGERS’ EQUATION  1) sound speed in nonlinear acoustics  2) nonlinear distorsion of the wave profile  3) weak shock theory  4) the acoustical.
Analysis of Oblique Shocks P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi A Mild, Efficient and Compact Compressor ….
An Analysis of Hiemenz Flow E. Kaufman and E. Gutierrez-Miravete Department of Engineering and Science Rensselaer at Hartford.
Optimization of an Axial Nose-Tip Cavity for Delaying Ablation Onset in Hypersonic Flow Sidra I. Silton and David B. Goldstein Center for Aeromechanics.
Effect of Different Nose Profiles on Subsonic Pressure Coefficients
Inward-Turning Inlets for Low-Boom / Low-Drag Applications Chuck Trefny John Slater Sam Otto NASA Glenn Research Center 8th Annual Shock Wave/Boundary.
Inertial Confinement Fusion Related Experimental Investigation of a Twice-Shocked Spherical Density Inhomogeneity. Nick Haehn, Chris Weber, Jason Oakley,
Gas Dynamics ESA 341 Chapter 3
Dr Kamarul Arifin B. Ahmad PPK Aeroangkasa
1/36 Gridless Method for Solving Moving Boundary Problems Wang Hong Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskyklä
Computations of Fluid Dynamics using the Interface Tracking Method Zhiliang Xu Department of Mathematics University of Notre.
Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics Stony Brook University (March.
Two-Dimensional Gas Dynamics
1 CFD Analysis Process. 2 1.Formulate the Flow Problem 2.Model the Geometry 3.Model the Flow (Computational) Domain 4.Generate the Grid 5.Specify the.
If the shock wave tries to move to right with velocity u 1 relative to the upstream and the gas motion upstream with velocity u 1 to the left  the shock.
The Faculty of the Division of Graduate Studies
Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
ICHS4, San Francisco, September E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport
M. Vandenboomgaerde* and C. Aymard CEA, DAM, DIF IWPCTM12, Moscow, July /14 [1] Submitted to Phys. Fluids * Analytical.
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
Fig.6 Next Generation Airplane ( ■ Design of Next Generation Airplanes - Lightweight airframe - High aspect ratio.
1 Linear Stability of Detonations with Reversible Chemical Reactions Shannon Browne Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories California Institute of Technology.
A particle-gridless hybrid methods for incompressible flows
School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Modeling of Compressor and Combustor Flows Suresh Menon, Lakshmi N. Sankar Won Wook Kim S. Pannala, S.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Euler Equations Andrey Andreyev Advisor: James Baeder Mid.
Numerical Investigation into Potential Flow Around High-speed Hydrofoil Assisted Craft ZHONGYU YANG supervised by Prof G.E HEARN and.
School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Computational Analysis of Stall and Separation Control in Axial & Centrifugal Compressors Alex Stein Saeid NiaziLakshmi.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Moving Normal Shocks -1 School of Aerospace Engineering Copyright © 2001 by Jerry M. Seitzman. All rights reserved. AE3450 Moving Normal Shocks So far,
RPI Master’s Project Proposal Noel A. Modesto-Madera September 28, 2010 Numerical Investigation of Supersonic Flow Over a Blunt Body.
The figure shows that the minimum area which can occur in a given isentropic duct flow is the sonic, or critical throat area. Choking For γ=1.4, this reduces.
Modelling and Open Loop Simulation of Reentry Trajectory for RLV Missions Ashok Joshi and K. Sivan Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute.
1 Non-neutral Plasma Shock HU Xiwei (胡希伟) 工 HU Xiwei (胡希伟) HE Yong (何勇) HE Yong (何勇) Hu Yemin (胡业民) Hu Yemin (胡业民) Huazhong University of Science and.
J.-Ph. Braeunig CEA DAM Ile-de-FrancePage 1 Jean-Philippe Braeunig CEA DAM Île-de-France, Bruyères-le-Châtel, LRC CEA-ENS Cachan
SPECIALIST MATHS Differential Equations Week 1. Differential Equations The solution to a differential equations is a function that obeys it. Types of.
1 Reduced-Order Modeling in the Frequency Domain for Actuated Flows Guy Ben-Dov* and Arne J. Pearlstein Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering.
1 Direct Numerical Simulation of Compressible Turbulent Flows with Weighted Non-Linear Compact Schemes Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Aerospace Engineering.
Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Release from Varying Diameter Exit
Compressible Vortex Rings in a Shock Tube with Helium Driver
CIS888.11V/EE894R/ME894V A Case Study in Computational Science & Engineering We will apply several numerical methods to find a steady state solution of.
Computational Fluid Dynamics Applied to the Analysis of 10-mm Hydrocyclone Solids Separation Performance S. A. Grady, M. M. Abdullah, and G. D. Wesson.
Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras
Chapter 3. Instability of the free plane and near – wall plane jet
Mach Train and Pseudo-shock By: Ehsan Roohi
1 Zonal Boundary Conditions. 2 Some Basics The flow domain is divided into zones and grids are generated within each zone. The flow equations are solved.
Steps in Development of 2 D Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Classical Method Recommended by Schlichting.……
1 Application of Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory Limiting to Compact Interpolation Schemes Debojyoti Ghosh Graduate Research Assistant Alfred Gessow.
School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Simulation of Centrifugal Compressor Stall and Surge Saeid NiaziAlex SteinLakshmi N. Sankar School of Aerospace.
Reflection of Oblique Shocks P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi A Train of Waves ….. Where to End ???
M. Khalili1, M. Larsson2, B. Müller1
Application of Compact- Reconstruction WENO Schemes to the Navier-Stokes Equations Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Aerospace Engineering Department University.
Investigation of supersonic and hypersonic laminar shock/boundary-layer interactions R.O. Bura, Y.F.Yao, G.T. Roberts and N.D. Sandham School of Engineering.
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Hamdache Abderrazaq 1*, Belkacem Mohamed 1, Hannoun Nourredine 2
4th Global Engineering, Science and Technology Conference
Design and analysis of Parabolic nozzle using MOC and CFD
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
Investigation of Flow in a Model of Human Respiratory Tract
Project 8: Development and Validation of Bleed Models for Control of Supersonic Shock-Wave Interactions with Boundary Layers.
CI2 – Inviscid Strong Vortex-Shock Wave Interaction
Hyperbolic Equations IVP: u(x,0) = f(x), - < x <  IBVP:
E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi
Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M
High Accuracy Schemes for Inviscid Traffic Models
Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M
Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Release from Varying Diameter Exit
Anthony D. Fick & Dr. Ali Borhan Governing Equations
Presentation transcript:

Numerically constrained one-dimensional interaction of a propagating planar shock wave Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Mumbai , INDIA A. Chatterjee

1D problem – numerically constrained interaction of a propagating planar shock wave Shock Wave x1x1 x2x2 x sw u(x, t)u c (x, t) Rightward planar propagating shock wave u c (x, t) : arbitrary imposed flowfield downstream of shock wave constrains development of flowfield (u(x,t)) behind propagating shock wave x sw : current position of shock wave

Algorithm: Proposed algorithm : Unsteady 1D Euler equations in [x 1, x 2 ] : x 1 < x < x 2 x 1 < x sw ( t + t )< x 2 (t + t ) = Position of shock wave in [x 1, x 2 ] at obtained from a pressure based sensor x sw ( t + t ) H [u(x, t)] = Explicit solution in [x 1, x 2 ] at (t + t ) u c (x,t) = constraining flowfield downstream of moving shock wave (3 rd order ENO and 2 nd order TVD Runge-Kutta) u( x, t+ t) = H [u(x, t)] x < x sw ( t + t ) u c (x, x > x sw ( t + t ) (t + t )t

Test Case: Constrained Interaction of Planar (rightward) Propagating Shock wave Unsteady interaction of Mach 3 shock wave with Sine entropy wave (Shu & Osher) Initial Conditions: V(x,0) = V l x < - 4 Vr x  - 4 V l  l  u l,p l )=( , , ) Vr  r  u r,p r )=(1+ 0.2sin(5x), 0, 1)  x [-5 : 5] Validation:

= H [u (x, t)] u( t + t ) Without Constrain (regular solution) With Constrain in [-5 : 5] u( x, t+ t) = H [u(x, t)] ( t + t ) x  x sw Solution Methodologies:  c (x, )  u c (x, ), p c (x, ) ) = ( 1+0.2sin(5x), 0, 1 ) t + t ( t + t ) x > x sw

Shock/entropy wave interaction( time=1.8) Numerical Validation:

Shock/entropy wave interaction( time=1.8) Numerical Validation:

Application: 2D Shock-vortex interaction problem An initially planar shock wave interacts with a 2D compressible vortex superposed on ambient resulting in creation of acoustic waves and secondary shock structures. U  (r) = r1r1 B Ar + r 0 < r < r 1 r U max r 1  r  r 2 Experimental Condition: (Dosanjh & Weeks, 1965) M s = 1.29 U max = 177 m/s (M v =0.52) r 1 = cm r 2 = 1.75 cm ( Compressible vortex model ) Strong interaction with secondary shock formation

Application: a possible “constrained numerical experiment”: Solving numerically a reduced model of complex unsteady shock wave phenomenon with appropriate constrains Demonstrate role of purely translational motion of an initially planar shock wave in secondary shock structure formation when interacting with 2D compressible vortex Planar shock wave interact with 1D flow field (u c ) u c represents initial flowfield along vortex model normal to shock wave. x1x1 x2x2 u c (x) x sw

Computational Domain : [ 0, 20] Initial position of shock = cm Properties behind the shock : R-H condition No. of cells : 900 equally spaced u c constraining flowfield ahead of shock centered at 10.0 cm u c controls development of the flowfield behind shock wave (example of an arbitrary constraining flowfield) Ignores shock wave (and vortex) deformation Application …..

u c downstream of normal shock Velocity distribution along horizontal lines (cases 1 to 4) Case 1 & 2 : y  0.45 Case 3 & 4 : y  1.25 Vortex center y=0.0

Results: Pressure Profiles (Case 1) T 1 = Start of the simulation T 6 = Shock wave almost out of domain Pressure Profiles (Case 2) Case 1 & 2 :  1.25 (farther from vortex center) generation of acoustic waves

Results: Case 3 & 4 :  0.45 (near vortex center) Pressure Profiles (Case 3) Pressure Profiles (Case 4) generation of upstream moving shocklet

An algorithm proposed for constrained one dimensional interaction of a planar propagating shock wave. Validated for 1D shock-entropy wave interaction. Constraining flowfield can be “arbitrary”. Allows setting up a “constrained numerical experiment” otherwise not possible. Conclusions: