Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority June 8, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Plan Update Public Meeting Monticello High School September 21, :00 pm.
Advertisements

Scoping Meeting Yuba Goldfields 200-Year Flood Protection Project Environmental Impact Report June 23, 2014.
City Council Hearing March 3, 2008 SIERRA POINT BIOTECH PROJECT.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG and Taking Care of People! Ecosystem Restoration Along the Los Angeles River: Creativity within Concrete Dan.
1 Ocean View Shoreline Project Update Overview for Norfolk City Council January 7, 2014.
City of St Helena Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Project April 28, 2015 St. Helena City Council Meeting.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS APPROACH CHANNEL EIS/EIR Major Robert Dion and Cameron Sessions Project Managers.
FloodSAFE – how one local agency works to keep its levees and public safe Ann Draper, Assistant Operating Officer National Levee Safety Summit, St. Louis.
TRLIA Certification of Environmental Impact Report and Selection of Project for Feather River TRLIA Board Meeting: February 6, 2007 Briefer: Paul Brunner,
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Mitigation Plan Public Meeting November 2, 2006.
Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.
Breaching the Mahar Regional School Dam Presentation to Ralph C. Mahar Regional School Committee GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. February 9, 2011.
California’s Central Valley Flood System Improvement Framework California Levees Roundtable March 27, 2009 California Levees Roundtable March 27, 2009.
Ross Valley Flood Protection and Watershed Program Flood Zone 9 Advisory Board April 16, 2015 Flow Reduction Study Preliminary Results 1.
Acquisition of Flood Control Easements Triangle High-Ground Area City of West Sacramento, Yolo Co. Meeting of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation
California Geotechnical Levee Evaluation Program SAME/ASCE Midwest Levee Conference, June Mike Inamine California Department of Water Resources.
Proposed Benefit Assessment District Overview Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority (TRLIA) TRLIA.ORG March 10,
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority (TRLIA) Briefer: Mary Jane Griego, TRLIA Board Member Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority March, 2007.
1 Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority April 21, 2006 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Regarding Satisfaction of Permit Special Condition.
NRCS NRCS Watershed Program In Texas. Water Resources AuthoritiesAuthorities Project ActivitiesProject Activities RehabilitationRehabilitation FundingFunding.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 4E APPLICATION NO
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Final Environmental Impact Report Amendment of SMUD’s Sphere of Influence and SMUD Yolo Annexation.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board August 9, 2013 Presented by: Michael Mierzwa California Department of Water Resources DWR’s Involvement in Flood.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Preparations for Flood Season DFM Flood Maintenance Office Presented By: Noel Lerner, Former Chief Flood.
Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan PUBLIC MEETINGS April 5-7, 2010 Rochester, Montesano, and Chehalis.
Integrated Regional Water Management MAY 22, 2015 TRACIE BILLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES 1.
2014 IRWM Drought Grants Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June Tracie L. Billington Department of Water Resources Financial Assistance Branch.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project June 2006.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Lake County Watershed Management Board Funding Program Mike Prusila, CFM, Watershed Planner.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Mitigation Plan Public Meeting November 2, 2006.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Channel Rehabilitation Projects TAMWG - June ‘04 Trinity River at Hocker Flat 1/16/2003.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 6B APPLICATION NO
Lee County Water Resource Initiative: Community Sustainability Committee June 16, 2010 Kurt Harclerode Operations Manager Lee County Natural Resources.
Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition Project – Design and Permitting Status Update City Council Workshop August 25, 2015.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Boise River Feasibility Study Ellen Berggren, PMP Outreach Coordinator/ Project Manager Idaho Governor’s Roadless.
Yuba County Comprehensive Flood Protection Program
Presented to: Central Valley Flood Protection Board August 23, 2013 Sacramento Area Levee Accreditation Key Results from Encroachment Analysis.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 9A CVFPB MEETING – October 25, 2013.
Take & Incidental Take Permit Take: means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect or attempt to engage in such conduct.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority February 26, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Subcommittee Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 7D Methylmercury Open Water Workplan.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Informational Briefing Presented By Board Staff and CH2MHill Consultants Model Funded.
2 West Sacramento, California Project General Reevaluation Report Letter of Support for the West Sacramento General Reevaluation Report Agenda Item 4G:
US Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento DistrictIntroductionIntroduction Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Phase II Supplemental Authorization –
Tempe Town Lake Downstream Dam Replacement NEW DAM ALTERNATIVES SELECTION January 5, 2012.
2 American River Common Features General Re-evaluation Report Request for Board Approval of Letter Requesting Consideration of Locally Preferred Plan (LPP)
APPLICATION NO LEVEE DISTRICT No. 1 Of SUTTER COUNTY STAR BEND SETBACK LEVEE SUTTER COUNTY April 17, 2009.
Update to Proposition 1E – Early Implementation Project (EIP) Application and Local Share Reclamation Board Sub-Committee Meeting September 11, 2007.
Gregory Canyon Landfill San Diego County LEA Gary Erbeck, Director California Integrated Waste Management Board Hearing December 14-15, 2004.
MORE WATER Phase I Reconnaissance Report C. Mel Lytle, Ph.D. Water Resource Coordinator San Joaquin County Public Works Board of Directors Update February.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Temecula Valley Recycled Water Pipeline Joe Mouawad Sr. Director of Engineering September 2, 2015.
West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency November 10, 2011 Update on Current Levee Construction Projects and on the Southport Sacramento River Levee Early.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 1 The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Application and Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Training.
City of Stockton Levee Flood Protection Status Report January 29, 2008 Agenda Item 4.03.
May 14, Planning Commission Planning Commission May 14, 2015.
STOCKTON DELTA WATER SUPPLY PROJECT (DWSP) Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Certification Hearing November 8, 2005 Mark J. Madison, Director Municipal.
Central Valley Flood Protection Plan Senate Bill 5 Amendments
Chromium 6 Regulation Corrective Action Plan October 6, 2015
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority June 8, 2007
Continuing Authorities Program
Overview of the Reissuance of 401 Water Quality General Certifications
Final Environmental Impact Report
Sacramento Environmental Commission January 2019.
K Street, Sacramento – 1861/1862 Flood
Presentation transcript:

Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority June 8, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Proposed Feather River Setback Levee

2 Project Goals Achieving at least a 200 year level of public safety flood protection for south Yuba County with regional, system, and environmental benefits; Achieving at least a 200 year level of public safety flood protection for south Yuba County with regional, system, and environmental benefits; Completing the remaining major public safety flood protection elements in 2007 and 2008; and Completing the remaining major public safety flood protection elements in 2007 and 2008; and Achieving a fair and equitable State-local cost share with the local cost share generated through continued development. Achieving a fair and equitable State-local cost share with the local cost share generated through continued development.

3 Overview History of the Setback Levee History of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Design, permitting, and construction schedule Design, permitting, and construction schedule Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Presentation of Setback Alignment Presentation of Setback Alignment

4 Overview History of the Setback Levee History of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Design, permitting, and construction schedule Design, permitting, and construction schedule Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Presentation of Setback Alignment Presentation of Setback Alignment

5 History of the Setback Levee In 2003 the Yuba County Water Agency completed a Proposition 13 funded feasibility study/programmatic EIR identifying as feasible the Feather River Setback Levee. In 2003 the Yuba County Water Agency completed a Proposition 13 funded feasibility study/programmatic EIR identifying as feasible the Feather River Setback Levee. In April 2005 the prior Reclamation Board approved the approach for Phases 1-3. In April 2005 the prior Reclamation Board approved the approach for Phases 1-3. Phases 1-3 are now substantially complete. Phases 1-3 are now substantially complete. The public-private partnership has been essential to public safety success in Yuba County, has resulted in $135 million in flood protection improvements, and has been superior to the unacceptable public safety risk that would be caused by the delay of waiting for the federal Yuba Basin Project. The public-private partnership has been essential to public safety success in Yuba County, has resulted in $135 million in flood protection improvements, and has been superior to the unacceptable public safety risk that would be caused by the delay of waiting for the federal Yuba Basin Project.

6 History of the Setback Levee (continued) In May 2006 the Reclamation Board approved an approach for Phase 4 Feather River (strengthen-in- place) and Yuba River. In May 2006 the Reclamation Board approved an approach for Phase 4 Feather River (strengthen-in- place) and Yuba River. In August 2006 the first Landowner Capital Call was made to fund construction of Phase 4 Yuba River repairs. In August 2006 the first Landowner Capital Call was made to fund construction of Phase 4 Yuba River repairs. Phase 4 Yuba River repairs are now substantially complete. Phase 4 Yuba River repairs are now substantially complete. In November 2006, following Propositions 84 and 1E, Three Rivers rescheduled the second Capital Call as allowed under the Second Implementation Agreement. In November 2006, following Propositions 84 and 1E, Three Rivers rescheduled the second Capital Call as allowed under the Second Implementation Agreement.

7 History of the Setback Levee (continued) Three Rivers sought and received conceptual support of Setback Levee from DWR. Three Rivers sought and received conceptual support of Setback Levee from DWR. Three Rivers received written support for Setback Levee from Sutter County, Levee District 1, Friends of the River, SYRCL, Sierra Club, Yuba County Water Agency, SAFCA, and others. Three Rivers received written support for Setback Levee from Sutter County, Levee District 1, Friends of the River, SYRCL, Sierra Club, Yuba County Water Agency, SAFCA, and others. In February 2007, after extensive due diligence, Three Rivers certified the EIR and selected the Setback Levee. In February 2007, after extensive due diligence, Three Rivers certified the EIR and selected the Setback Levee. In May of 2007 the Army Corps of Engineers certified Three Rivers’ completed construction. In May of 2007 the Army Corps of Engineers certified Three Rivers’ completed construction. In May, Three Rivers also set a second capital call of $9.1 million and that money has been deposited into escrow. In May, Three Rivers also set a second capital call of $9.1 million and that money has been deposited into escrow.

8 Achieves 200 Year Protection Approx. 13 miles Segments 1 & 3 strengthen-in-place Segment 2 setback with new levee construction Phase 4 - Feather River including Setback Levee

9 Overview History of the Setback Levee History of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Design, permitting, and construction schedule Design, permitting, and construction schedule Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Presentation of Setback Alignment Presentation of Setback Alignment

10 Benefits of the Setback Levee 1.Provides superior flood protection for south Yuba County. 2.Provides regional flood protection benefits for Sutter County, Yuba City, Marysville, and Linda. 3.Proposed Setback is consistent with FloodSAFE California and is the most significant structural change to the system likely to be constructed in the next few years. 4.Creates up to 1550 acres of habitat for restoration and mitigation.

11 1. Superior Flood Protection Built to current engineering standards Built to current engineering standards Built with suitable soils (current levee soil is too sandy) Built with suitable soils (current levee soil is too sandy) Removes river choke point and widens floodway Removes river choke point and widens floodway Built away from old river channels Built away from old river channels Eliminates significant erosion sites Eliminates significant erosion sites Achieves greater than 200-year protection in certain reaches Achieves greater than 200-year protection in certain reaches

12 2. Regional Flood Protection Benefits Channel widening creates lower water surface elevations: Channel widening creates lower water surface elevations: Water surface reduction benefits to Marysville and Yuba City (RM 27.0) of 1.3 feet for 100 year and 1.5 feet for 200 year. Water surface reduction benefits to Marysville and Yuba City (RM 27.0) of 1.3 feet for 100 year and 1.5 feet for 200 year. Maximum water surface reduction (RM23.5) of 2.7 for 100 year and 3.0 for 200 year. Maximum water surface reduction (RM23.5) of 2.7 for 100 year and 3.0 for 200 year. Because of the regulated nature of the Feather River and the addition of 1550 acres to the floodway, there are no downstream hydraulic impacts. Because of the regulated nature of the Feather River and the addition of 1550 acres to the floodway, there are no downstream hydraulic impacts. Regional support letters have been received. Regional support letters have been received.

13 Water Surface Elevations Compared to Recent Flood Events WSE = Water Surface ElevationPLM = Project Levee Mile Sources 1/ Sacramento River Flood Control System Evaluation, Initial Appraisal Report, Marysville/Yuba City Area, January 1990, Plates 4 & 7 2/ MBK H&H Report for Alternatives Analysis Report, December 2006, Figures 3 & 15 3/ MBK H&H Report for Alternatives Analysis Report, December 2006, Table 7 Table Developed 2/21/07

14 3. Setback is consistent with FloodSAFE California Proposed project meets or exceeds all of the California FloodSAFE criteria. Proposed project meets or exceeds all of the California FloodSAFE criteria. California FloodSAFE acknowledges that system changes must be made to reduce endless erosion and O&M battle and costs. California FloodSAFE acknowledges that system changes must be made to reduce endless erosion and O&M battle and costs. Proposed project is regularly mentioned by DWR as the type of project that DWR wants to fund. Proposed project is regularly mentioned by DWR as the type of project that DWR wants to fund.

15 4. Creates up to 1550 acres of habitat for restoration and mitigation The 1550 acres could be used for: The 1550 acres could be used for: Mitigation banking Mitigation banking Habitat restoration and enhancement Habitat restoration and enhancement State owned land leased back for agricultural use State owned land leased back for agricultural use Adds a significant increment to the existing riparian corridor along the Feather River. Adds a significant increment to the existing riparian corridor along the Feather River. Three Rivers will assure that adequate agreements are in place for Three Rivers and/or DWR to perform necessary maintenance in the restoration area. Three Rivers will assure that adequate agreements are in place for Three Rivers and/or DWR to perform necessary maintenance in the restoration area.

16 Overview History of the Setback Levee History of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Design, permitting, and construction schedule Design, permitting, and construction schedule Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Presentation of Setback Alignment Presentation of Setback Alignment

17 Design, Permitting, and Construction Schedule Segments 1 and 3 are out for bid. Segments 1 and 3 are out for bid. Segment 2 design is underway. Segment 2 design is underway. Phase 4 Feather River strengthen-in-place and setback levee construction to start in Phase 4 Feather River strengthen-in-place and setback levee construction to start in Voluntary and eminent domain land acquisition to be handled in stages in advance of construction. Voluntary and eminent domain land acquisition to be handled in stages in advance of construction.

18 Design, Permitting, and Construction Schedule

19 Overview History of the Setback Levee History of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Design, permitting, and construction schedule Design, permitting, and construction schedule Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Presentation of Setback Alignment Presentation of Setback Alignment

20 Interplay with Existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement As with Bear River Setback Levee, multiple funding sources are required to fund a more extensive project with regional, system, and environmental benefits. As with Bear River Setback Levee, multiple funding sources are required to fund a more extensive project with regional, system, and environmental benefits. Because Three Rivers selected the Setback Levee, Three Rivers and the Landowners are meeting to discuss an amendment to the Funding Agreement to address the changed scope of the project. Because Three Rivers selected the Setback Levee, Three Rivers and the Landowners are meeting to discuss an amendment to the Funding Agreement to address the changed scope of the project. In addition to the Landowners, to achieve the Feather River Setback Levee, the State will need to provide timely funding to meet project milestones. In addition to the Landowners, to achieve the Feather River Setback Levee, the State will need to provide timely funding to meet project milestones.

21 Overview History of the Setback Levee History of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Benefits of the Setback Levee Design, permitting, and construction schedule Design, permitting, and construction schedule Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Interplay with existing Implementation Agreement and Funding Agreement Presentation of Setback Alignment Presentation of Setback Alignment