Workshop Goals Marc Ross LC 2013 27 May, 2013 Accelerator Plenary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
There were 6 talks : 1) EDMS Summary and Plans B. List 2) Timing / Survey Constraints E. Paterson 3) ITER Integration A. Yamamoto 4) Draft Schedule (ILC-Asia)
Advertisements

Discussion on EUROTeV and ILC Nick Walker (DESY) EUROTeV Kick-off Meeting DESY 1 November 2004.
Nick Walker Marc Ross Akira Yamamoto GDE PAC Prague TDR Plans and Scope.
LCC status Lyn Evans 1April 18, 2015PAC Orsay. ILC in Linear Collider Collaboration 2 ICFA Chair: J Mnich Program Adv. Committee PAC – Chair: N. Holtkamp.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
ILC Status Report Mike Harrison AWLC14 1 AWLC14 Fermilab May 2014 Mike Harrison.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Accelerator activities Brian Foster (Uni Hamburg/DESY) 1 B. Foster - Hamburg/DESY - Orsay 11/13.
MEXT Review Process in Japan 2014/7/16 Y. Sugimoto 1.
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting June 30, 2010 Agenda 1.Report from PMs (5 min.) 2.General Report from Group Leaders(15 min.) 3.Special Discussions 1.TDP R&D.
Nick Walker, Brian Foster LAL, Orsay WP2: Coordination with the GDE.
A. Yamamoto, N. Walker, and M. Ross, ILC-GDE Project Managers S. Stapnes, CERN LC Studies Leader LCWS12 - Opening Accelerator Plenary, , 18:00.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
Beam Physics Work D.S List of Workpackages Area packages Main beam electron source (Steffen Doebert) Main beam positron source (Steffen.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto ILC Cost Review, (updated for TB) and Cost Drivers  Future R & D ILC Cost Review (M. Ross,
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
The time line Autumn 2011CERN Council initiated an update exercise to the European Strategy for Particle Physics which was approved by a special Council.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
ATF-II Review by GDE Marc Ross, (SLAC) For GDE Project Managers: Nick Walker and Akira Yamamoto 24 January, th ATF2 Collaboration Meeting.
Recommendations on the scientific programme The PAC endorsed the main lines of the proposed long-term programme. The draft document is expected.
ILC in Japan A 10 minute introduction H.Weerts Argonne National Lab March 24, 2014 University of Chicago.
Status of ILC Project Nick Walker – DESY ILD Meeting – Cracow –
Report from ILC CFS and Cryogenics Workshop
HEPResearchers Set-up JLCB and JLCC ~6 Cite Decision Design ILC Lab. Japan Policy Council Positive Reference from New Prime Minister.
THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FUTURE ACCELERATORS (ICFA) Roy Rubinstein2nd International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics - 4 September
Recent news from CLIC C&S WG and CLIC-ILC WG on General Issues Ph. Lebrun CLIC Project Meeting 1 June 2011.
ML Planning for ILC08 First Pass + SCRF agenda Chris Adolphsen Hitoshi Hayano.
CLIC main activities and goals for 2018 Design and Implementation studies: CDR status: not optimized except at 3 TeV and not adjusted for Higgs discovery,
Activities and news Last meeting: 2015 CERN budget allocations as expected, now distributed on accounts Annual report done, and MTP (Medium Term Plan)
Brief Introduction of KEK Linear Collider Project Office Akira Yamamoto KEK Report provided for ILC-TB Meeting,
Global Design Effort - CFS GDE Plenary Session 1 LCWS10 GDE Plenary Session SB 2009 ILC CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP A. Enomoto, V.
CLIC Workshop, CERN 1 CLIC/ILC Collaboration Report: Marc Ross (Fermilab); for Nick Walker, Akira Yamamoto Project Managers International Linear.
1J. Brau - ILCSC Meeting - Beijing - August 19, 2004 Organizing the Global Experimental Program The ILCSC has asked the Worldwide Study, as its Physics.
SCRF Parallel Sessions at TILC09 GDE 活動報告 3月30日(月)10時~ 3号館7階会議 室 設楽 哲夫.
CFS / Global – 04 Aug, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –ADI meeting 23.07: Parameter tables with low energy / low power operation –BA Workshop Planning CFS participation.
F. Richard LAL/Orsay 1 ELAN in 2006 Annual Meeting.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
SCRF Cavity WebEx Meeting May 17, 2010 Reports from PM (10 min.) – Brief report from ILC-PAC – Industrialization workshop as IPAC satellite meeting, Kyoto,
DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,
Various information - news News from coll. board meeting 1.2 Budget 2013 ECFA LC workshop at DESY end May ICFA and LCC meetings at Triumf European Strategy.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto th ATF2 Project Meeting Accelerator Design and Integration – New Baseline Proposal for ILC – ‘Strawman Baseline.
Global Design Effort Main Linac Technology System Kick-off Meeting Cavity Summary 20 Sept 2007 DESY Marc Ross.
CLIC project 2012 The Conceptual Design Report for CLIC completed – presented in SPC, ECFA and numerous meetings and conferences, also providing basis.
24-July-10 ICHEP-10 Paris Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10 ILC Global Design Effort.
PM Report AS ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design –Marc.
Fred Asiri1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update December.
CLIC Organogram CLIC Collab. Board L.Rivkin MoU with annexes describing coll. efforts (note: in reality more complicated) CLIC SC (Stapnes) Repr. from.
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
Global Collaborations Towards LHC Crab Cavity J. P. Koutchouk Thanks to Rama Calaga and Rogelio Tomas Crab Cavity Validity Requirement Workshop August.
ML-SCRF: Monthly WebEx Meeting April 4, Reports from PMs (20 min.) GDE activity and meeting plan Summary document of SCRF-Baseline Technical Review.
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting March 9, Report from PMs (15 min.) 1.Acknowledgements for completing S1-Global cold/RF test (A. Y.) 2.GDE meeting plan.
PM Report CFS /Gbl ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design.
J.P.DelahayeTILC08: 06/ 03/ 081 CLIC-ILC Collaboration? Following visit of CERN (Nov 07)
July 11, 2008M Ross for PM - ILC GDE - ILCDR08 closeout 1 GDE Program for the ILC Technical Design Phase Marc Ross for: Akira Yamamoto, Nick Walker GDE.
Baseline Technical Review – Central Region Accelerator Systems
ILC Accelerator Activities in Japan
CLIC work program and milestones
LCC L. Evans, Santander, 2nd June 2016
Mike PAC Charge & Agenda ALCW15 Plenaries CERN SPC – September 2014
Input to Strategy currently planned
Introduction Summary of LCWS13/accelerator
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update December 10, 2007 Acknowledgment: Jerry Aarons, Clay Corvin, and Esther Kweon Fred Asiri.
Technical Design Report preparation
ATF2 review R. Tomas ATF2 review web:
CLIC/ILC Collaboration Meeting: Objectives & Organization
Yasuhiro Okada, Executive Director, KEK
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
Presentation transcript:

Workshop Goals Marc Ross LC May, 2013 Accelerator Plenary

This is the first workshop after the formation of the Linear Collider Collaboration (LCC). It is dedicated to the physics potential of future high energy linear electron-positron colliders, especially in view of the new results from the LHC. The status of the detectors and the accelerator designs for both technology options, ILC and CLIC, will be reviewed – 2013: Launching the LCC LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

Both design teams have passed important milestones since LCWS2012 at Arlington. Completion of the ILC-TDR Publishing the CLIC-CDR Upcoming Milestones: ILC: Japan may indicate in late 2013 their intent to bid to host ILC and CLIC: project implementation plan development phase until Regroup ILC and CLIC Working Groups and put together plans for the coming three years – 2013: Launching the LCC LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

We are to further improve collaboration between CLIC and ILC machine experts. LCC plenary accelerator – side (AC) working groups AC1-AC5 have been arranged to meet the challenges set forth by the Collaboration  4 LCWS 2012: Arlington, Texas, USA LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

Future objectives Strongly support the Japanese initiative to construct a linear collider as a staged project in Japan. Prepare CLIC machine and detectors as an option for a future high-energy linear collider at CERN. Further improve collaboration between CLIC and ILC machine experts Move towards a “more normal” structure of collaboration in the detector community to prepare for the construction of two high- performance detectors. LCWS 2012 Arlington Closing Plenary 5

AC 1Injector Systems (Sources, Damping Rings) Wei Gai, Masao Kuriki and Yannis Papaphilippou AC 2Beam Delivery System, Machine-Detector Interface (MDI) Rogelio Tomas, Glen White, Toshiaki Tauchi and Lau Gatignon AC 3Luminosity Performance Andrea Latina, Nikolay Solyak, Kiyoshi Kubo AC 4SCRF Linac Technology Wolf-Dietrich Moeller, Hitoshi Hayano and Rongli Geng AC 5Accelerator Design and Integration Marc Ross, Akira Yamamoto and Olivier Napoly. 6 LC2013 Accelerator Working Groups: LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

1.update the technical status presented in the Design Reports, 2.comment on outstanding issues and 3.develop plans for the coming three year period. For working groups with strong CLIC / ILC commonality: (Injector Systems, Beam Delivery System MDI, Luminosity Performance) 1.develop and optimize a few-year long common CLIC / ILC program 2.evaluate and improve estimated electrical power consumption and efficiency (AD &I) 7 Working Groups General Charge: LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

AC 1: (Injector Systems) 1.review source and damping ring R & D priorities. 2.summarize progress on alternate positron source schemes, such as the high – repetition rate 300 Hz normal-conducting linac based AC 2: (BDS / MDI) 1.review needed beam delivery system and MDI design and R & D work. 2.recent analysis and results from the ATF-II at KEK should be summarized and lessons-learned should be reported AC 3: (Luminosity Performance) 1.reassess the performance claims described in the CLIC / ILC Design Reports with special attention to luminosity estimates and feedback system performance. 2.The working group should participate in the discussion of ATF-II ‘lessons- learned’ and should recommend future work to be undertaken at ATF – II and should consider options for experiments at other facilities. 8 Specific working group goals: LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

AC 4: (SCRF Linac Technology) 1.present plans for strengthening links between the ILC - SCRF group and the EU-XFEL project. Plan a practical working relationship to take advantage of the information generated through the construction project. 2.SCRF linac supporting technology (for example HLRF generation and distribution) studies should be reviewed and progress should be reported. 3.Follow up on recommendations made in the Project Advisory Committee report: develop a program to study and improve coupler and tuner performance and cost. 9 Specific working group goals: LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

AC 5: (Accelerator Design and Integration) 1)CFS a.review outstanding issues, b.compare CLIC and ILC power consumption ‘drivers’ and discuss performance improvements, and c.discuss site studies to be considered following the conclusion of the site selection recommendation activity in Japan. In addition to talking about geological survey results and site prioritization issues, the latter should include discussions of the main campus buildings and laboratory land, and should review the scale of the laboratory in terms of number of employees, visitors, sub-contractors etc.. d.The Installation planning and cost estimate described in the TDR were identified in recent reviews as outstanding issues needing further attention and this should also be discussed in the CFS session. 10 Specific working group goals: LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

AC 5: (Accelerator Design and Integration – Continued) 2)System-wide design status consider issues such as machine protection and timing constraints 3)EDMS, review the aggregate collection of TDR documentation in the Team-Center repository and summarize and report on missing or out-of-date information. 4)Project Implementation and Planning outline in-kind contribution considerations and constraints. The working group should consider hub-lab infrastructure capabilities and review plug-compatibility interface definitions, especially as these must be broadened to include accelerator equipment beyond SCRF 5)Integration. consider system interface definition and propose in-kind contribution definition schemes 11 Specific working group goals: LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

12 ILC Flags in the streets of southern Japan LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

ILC unfolds (from video) 13 ILC - ten LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

14 ILC Symposium in northern, rural, Japan LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

Let’s be healthy at 100! Bring ILC to Tohoku! Expand highway #4 to four lanes! 15 On a building in northern Japan: LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross)

‘ILC – accelerator to create the universe is coming…’ 16 Fun Comics: LC2013 Opening Accelerator Plenary (M. Ross) Dr. M