THINKING beyond the canopy Removing technical barriers to include tropical peatlands in the REDD+ mechanism Daniel Murdiyarso, Kristell Hergoualc’h and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Carbon sequestration: Forest and soil objective of the presentation is to give a general picture on possibilities to achieve standard for accounts for.
Advertisements

REDD+ Methodologies for Regional and Local Land- cover Thelma Krug Co-Chair of the IPCC Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Head of INPE´s.
The UN-REDD Programme Measurement, Assessment, Reporting and Verification (MARV) Issues and Options for REDD 10 March 2009 Peter Holmgren.
Experience and problems encountered in first year of LULUCF reporting under Kyoto Protocol in Slovakia Tibor Priwitzer
Key sources of uncertainty in forest carbon inventories Raisa Mäkipää with Mikko Peltoniemi, Suvi Monni, Taru Palosuo, Aleksi Lehtonen & Ilkka Savolainen.
The Carbon Farming Initiative and Agricultural Emissions This presentation was prepared by the University of Melbourne for the Regional Landcare Facilitator.
LULUCF María J. Sanz UNFCCC Secretariat 1-3 April 2008 Bangkok, Thailand AWG-KP 5 In-session workshop on means to reach emission reduction targets.
PEAT SWAMP FORESTS AND PALM OIL by Marcel Silvius & Alex Kaat.
Effects of Forest Thinning on CO 2 Efflux Peter Erb, Trisha Thoms, Jamie Shinn Biogeochemistry 2003: Block 1.
Immediate Changes Carbon Emissions, Tree Mortality Short Term Changes Erosion, Water Quality, Nutrient Availability Long Term Changes Future Flammability,
Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15 December 2009 COP15 December 2009 Reducing carbon emissions from Indonesia’s peat lands COP15.
Sustainable Peatlands for People and Climate SPPCwww.wetlands.org A project implemented by Wetlands International, Deltares, University Gadja Mada, WI-Indonesia,
Topic C2. Carbon stocks assessment in tropical peat swamp forests J Boone Kauffman and Mathew Warren.
Technical Support Unit, National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Programme, IPCC GHG Inventory AFOLU Agriculture, Forests and Other Land Use.
Method of Evaluating Afforestation/Reforestation CDM Project - An Indonesia Case Study - Sumitomo Forestry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan June 5, 2003 Bonn.
The status of science to support REDD+ based mitigation policies of Mexico Bernardus de Jong, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur Fernando Paz, Colegio de Postgraduados.
Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land-Use: Combining two sectors of the IPCC 1996 Guidelines Leandro Buendia Technical Support Unit – IPCC NGGIP.
Arne Grønlund and Daniel P. Rasse Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research Division for Soil and Environment Carbon loss from cultivated.
Module 2.5 Estimation of carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World.
GHG Inventory AFOLU : Agriculture, Forests and Other Land Use.
IPCC Expert Meeting on HWP, Wetlands and Soil N 2 O Geneva, October 2010.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
IMPROVING LUCF GHG INVENTORY and the FAO FRA: the Philippine Case Rodel D. Lasco Environmental Forestry Programme University of the Philippines.
Module 2.3 Estimating emission factors for forest cover change (deforestation and forest degradation) REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen.
Fuel treatment effects on forest carbon and wildfire Malcolm North, Sierra Nevada Research Center,
Difficulties Encountered in Estimating Soil Emissions due to LUCF Gary W. Theseira Forest Research Institute Malaysia Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Wetlands International, Susanna Tol,
Baseline Methodology ARNMB0010 Xiaoquan Zhang and Bernhard Schlamadinger.
UNFCCC and IPCC guidance on measuring and monitoring forest degradation “Moving on From Experimental Approaches to Advancing National Systems for Measuring.
Challenges and options John Couwenberg Hans Joosten Greifswald University Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able.
1 Methodologies of Carbon Estimation By Zahabu, E & Malimbwi, R.E Department of Forest Mensuration and Management (SUA)
This is a presentation on mangrove carbon stocks assessment.
Peat and GHG Science- KFCP REDD+ Demonstration Grahame Applegate Indonesia- Australia Forest Carbon Partnership International Indonesia Peatland Conversation.
Training Materials for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Consultative Group of Experts (CGE) UNFCCC – NAI GHG Inventory Software LULUCF Sector Exercise.
THINKING beyond the canopy Taking Stock for MRV in Central Africa Denis J. Sonwa, Robert Nasi, Richard Eba’a Atyi Center for International Forestry Research.
UN-FCCC Bonn meeting June 2009 Peatlands, carbon and climate change
Peatland Forest Degradation and Emissions in South East Asia Faizal Parish Global Environment Centre Marcel Silvius, Wetlands International Forest Day.
1Jukka Muukkonen Carbon binding and forest asset accounts Forest related issues in greenhouse gas inventory Connections between SEEA2003 forest asset accounts.
Module 2.3 Estimating emission factors for forest cover change (deforestation and forest degradation) REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen.
FOREST SECTOR MITIGATION IN INDIA Ravindranath, Sudha & Sandhya Indian Institute of Science Bangalore.
1 UNFCCC Workshop on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries 30/08-01/9/2006, Rome, Italy Overview of scientific, socio- economic,
Monitoring Tropical forests with L-band radar: lessons from Indonesian Peat Swamps Matt Waldram, Sue Page, Kevin Tansey Geography Department.
LCFS Indirect Land Use Change Expert Workgroup Carbon Emission Factors Subworkgroup July 2010 Update.
A Grand Plan for FIA’s role in a FS National Carbon Accounting System Linda S. Heath USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, FIA Forest Carbon Accounting.
Primary Production in Terrestrial Systems Fundamentals of Ecosystem Ecology Class Cary Institute January 2013 Gary Lovett.
Figure 1. Residue removal effects on corn yields as affected by N rate in 2009 and 2010 for poorly and well-drained soils. Asterisk indicates significant.
Investigating the Carbon Cycle in Terrestrial Ecosystems (ICCTE) Scott Ollinger * -PI, Jana Albrecktova †, Bobby Braswell *, Rita Freuder *, Mary Martin.
Biomass Dynamics of Amazonian Forest Fragments William F. Laurance & Henrique Nascimento Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama Biological Dynamics.
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER: Can the LTER network be leveraged to inform science and policy?
Towards a VCS AFOLU standard for Peatland Rewetting and Conservation Igino.
Tatsushi HEMMI Institute for Global Environmental Strategies COP 9 Decisions related to CDM in forestry sector – An update on implications for Asia IGES-URC.
Status: Criterion 5—Maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles Linda S. Heath James E. Smith USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research.
Topic D3. Database development of IPCC emission factors and activity data for wetlands Randy Kolka and Louis Verchot.
Forest Conversion: Solving the problem for REDD, meeting the biodiversity challenge ECOSYSTEM CLIMATE ALLIANCE.
ROLE OF TROPICAL PEATLANDS IN CARBON GAS EMISSIONS.
1 Biomass carbon accounts in Europe: present and outlook Biomass carbon accounts 01/10/2015 Daniel Desaulty
Carbon sequestration by Forest and soil
Global Carbon Budget. Global Carbon Budget of the carbon dioxide emitted from anthropogenic sources) -Natural sinks of carbon dioxide are the land.
Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able
Soil Biological Communities and Aboveground Resilience
OGWC – Forest C Bev Law Prof. Global Change Biology & Terrestrial Systems Science Oregon State University Oct 6, 2016.
UN-FCCC Bonn meeting June 2009 Peatlands, carbon and climate change
School of Forest Resources and Conservation
Peatlands and the Pulp and Paper Industry in Indonesia
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
QUANTIFYING TROPICAL WETLAND BIOMASS AND CARBON STOCKS
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Results of Workshop Organized by
Can managed forest land provide effective strategies for climate change mitigation ? - examples from Sweden IEA Bioenergy Canberra, March 26-30, 2001.
Don O’Connor NBB Sustainability Workshop September 27, 2018
Presentation transcript:

THINKING beyond the canopy Removing technical barriers to include tropical peatlands in the REDD+ mechanism Daniel Murdiyarso, Kristell Hergoualc’h and Louis Verchot Wetlands International Side Event – UNFCCC COP16 Cancun – Mexico, 2 December 2010

THINKING beyond the canopy Outline  Introduction What are the technical barriers? Why and how they should be removed?  IPCC methodologies Stock-change approach Flux-change approach Combination  Estimating emissions  MRV  Conclusions

THINKING beyond the canopy Activity data 3 Drainage canals

THINKING beyond the canopy  Aboveground biomass  Belowground biomass  Litter  Dead wood  Soil Difficulties & Limits: Peat C stocks  Peat depth up to 20 m  compaction, limited number profiles (full depth of peat deposit) Stock-change approach, C Pools:  Presence logs  bulk density  High water table level  bulk density Estimating C-stocks C loss = C FOREST - C OLU

5 Emission factors C-Stocks (Mg C/ha) Aboveground forest biomass Aboveground oil palm biomass Peat loss due to fires

THINKING beyond the canopy IPCC Guidelines Stock-change approach Flux-change approach Source: IPCC (2006)

THINKING beyond the canopy Transects in PSPs 7 m 25 m River edge Wood debris transects (4 per plot, all plots) A B C D 12 m Plot: Understory/litter sample (2 per plot, all plots) Trees >5 cm dbh measured in 7m radius (all plots) Trees <5 cm dbh measured in 2m radius (all plots) R= 2m 3 soil depth measurements and 1 nutrient core (all plots)

THINKING beyond the canopy Above and belowground C-stocks

THINKING beyond the canopy Basal area and IVI Importance Value Index (%)

THINKING beyond the canopy Peat depth matters

THINKING beyond the canopy Measuring C-flux Flux change approach, C fluxes:  Biomass growth (above- & below- ground, Net Primary Production)  Losses from biomass harvest & burning  Transfer into and out of peat stocks Difficulties & Limits: Biomass  Meteorological techniques: expensive & sophisticated

THINKING beyond the canopy Stock-change approach Methods for estimating C-loss from land conversions After C OLU C loss = C FOREST - C OLU  Before Peat C FOREST

THINKING beyond the canopy Flux-change approach After  C OLU = C IN - C OUT Before Peat  C FOREST = C IN - C OUT C loss = (  C FOREST -  C OLU ) × duration  Methods for estimating C-loss from land conversions

THINKING beyond the canopy Combination of both methods C loss = (C Abvgrd biomass FOREST - C Abvgrd biomass LU ) + (  C peat FOREST -  C peat OLU ) × duration  Before  C peat FOREST = C IN peat – C OUT peat C Above-ground biomass FOREST After  C peat OLU = C IN peat – C OUT peat C Above-ground biomass LU Methods for estimating C-loss from land conversions

THINKING beyond the canopy C-fluxes into and out of the peat Total soil respiration = Heterotrophic soil respiration + root respiration Heterotrophic soil respiration = peat oxidation = peat decomposition Litterfall Root mortality Heterotrophic soil respiration Land clearing fire CH 4 Soluble & physical removal

THINKING beyond the canopy Emissions accounting Before L 7.4 R 1.5 S RH 6.9 CH S&PR 1  C peat FOREST = C IN peat – C OUT peat = 8.9 – 7.9 = 1.0 Mg C ha -1 y -1 After L 1.5 R 3.6 S RH 9.3 F 4.5 S&PR 1 CH 4 –  C peat OP = C IN peat – C OUT peat = 5.0 – 14.8 = Mg C ha -1 y -1

THINKING beyond the canopy After  C peat OLU = C IN peat – C OUT peat Before  C peat FOREST= C IN peat – C OUT peat C Above-ground biomass FOREST C Above-ground biomass OLU C loss = (C Abvgrd biomass FOREST - C Abvgrd biomass LU ) + (  C peat FOREST -  C peat LU ) × duration  C loss = (C Abvgrd biomass FOREST - C Abvgrd biomass LU ) + (1.0 – (-9.8)) × 25  C loss = (C Abvgrd biomass FOREST - C Abvgrd biomass LU )  C loss = ( )  C loss = 428 Mg C ha -1 over 25 years  Emissions accounting

THINKING beyond the canopy Conclusions  Important gaps knowledge of C cycle in tropical peatlands e.g. peat swamp forests and Acacia plantations  Estimates show very high C- stocks and C-loss  Peat swamp forest conversion into oil palm plantation: 63% total C loss from the peat  C-pools and their fates associated with land cover change and fire incidence are greatly needed in order to make sound policy decisions relating to carbon financing through REDD+ mechanism

THINKING beyond the canopy CIFOR advances human well-being, environmental conservation, and equity by conducting research to inform policies and practices that affect forests in developing countries. Thank you