Problem Solving Team (PST)  Elkmont High School  Pilot Program  Response to Instruction  2010-2011 School Year.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

The Role of the Literacy Coach In a Primary School: A Collaborative Model International Reading Association Annual Conference Atlanta, 2008 Presenters.
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
PST Procedure Ardmore High School. Who Is On The PST? Permanent Members ◦ Principal, assistant principal, counselors Teachers ◦ All core teachers ◦ Elective.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Reading Intervention “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” -Margaret Fuller-
Does this look like your RTI team?. Maybe this looks like your team!
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
0 1 Response to Intervention is NOT: Just a Special Education initiative Only for students with disabilities Only for beginning reading A new way to.
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Response to Intervention Making it Work in Jessamine County Michelle Gadberry, Psy. S. Assistant Director of Special Programs.
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
Webinar 3 Core Instruction (Tier 1). Assessments: – Screening – Evaluating effectiveness of core instruction Research-based/Evidence-based Instructional.
Thank you for joining us for Small Group Instruction The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
October 18, It is the largest federal assistance program for our nation’s schools. The purpose of Title I is to ensure that all children have a.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
RtII: Data Analysis Teaming. Goals of Today’s Session  Compare and contrast types of collaborative teams Building-wide teams Grade-level teams Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
How to Teach Students Rules and Expectations for Behavior Under Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) Answers to 12 most common questions about.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
HELP!!! Support Team-Triage Section 504Special EdELLG & T Most Common Structure Reading Program A Other effective/ affective intervention systems Classroom.
RTI Implantation Guide Overview Fall Before we begin… Student Intervention Planning is not a pre-referral process. It is the process of collaborating.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
The Role of the Teacher. Basically, the state believes that teachers, along with the school district, are responsible for students that fail. If a student.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Response to Instruction & Problem Solving Teams Summer 2010.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
MTSS/CPST/RTI. District Priority Good News Griffin’s on Top of It!
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Overview Check for Understanding - Activity Collaboration/Discussion WASD Oct RtII is: [Student] Reponse to Instruction and Intervention:
Presented by Dr. Quentina Pruitt Staff Development Specialist.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Tier 2 & Tier 3 Meetings. MTSS Focus Team The purpose of the MTSS Focus Team: To analyze school-wide and class-wide data for attendance, behavior, and.
Morgan County Schools Response to Instruction
Response to Intervention
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Response to Intervention = RTI
EXPLORING THE LEARNING SAFETY NET
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Problem Solving Team (PST)  Elkmont High School  Pilot Program  Response to Instruction  School Year

Tiers of Instruction Tier I Whole Group & Small Group ALL Students Tier II Strategic Intervention Tier III Intensive Intervention

Tier I, II, III Documentation  Lesson plans are documentation for Tier I instruction.  The plans must include the skills taught and assessments used to decide mastery.  Tier II documentation – ClassWorks, small group, counseling session individual or group (counselor and resource teachers), Harcourt, Nova Net, Intervention Central, etc., etc., etc., etc.  Tier III documentation – Same as above but more frequency and intensity or additional interventions.

Provide HQ Core Instruction – Including Whole Group and Small Group Conduct Universal Screenings (DIBELS, STAR Reading and Math, Standardized Testing Results, Core Instructional Program Benchmark Assessment Results) If Mastery of Skills is not achieved after Tier II interventions refer to PST Team Tier I Instruction is for All Students

Who is Responsible for Tier II Intervention?  Classroom teachers are the primary instructors  Resource staff will assist as needed  Special Ed, P.E., Music, Art, Speech, Media Specialist, Inclusion Aide  Instruction may be given in the general education classroom, skills lab, and/or computer lab

PST Referral Process  Teacher is in contact with parent prior to referral. Document phone calls: date, time, summary of talking points; notes, letters, etc.  Students with 504 plans or IEP’s are not referred to PST  It is recommended that the teacher contact the parent of referral to PST.

Step 1  Contact PST Chairperson  Complete PST Referral Form  Meeting scheduled (Monthly-elementary; End of 9 week grading period – secondary) Step 2  Attend meeting with the team  Bring completed documentation packet to Chairperson for team to review  Packet will include referral form and required documents  Team will create intervention plan Step 3  Implement Intervention Plan strategies  Progress monitor to gage effectiveness  Midpoint check by PST – monthly meeting/elementary; progress report time/secondary  Continue plan after days; amend plan, or refer for testing What is the PST Process?

Who is the Problem Solving Team? Specialists (Counselor, Title I, ELL, Literacy and/or Instructional Coach, Sp. Ed.) Administration Classroom Teacher(s) - Parent (optional)

Roles of PST Members  Administrator – Supervision and resource  Chairperson – Send reminders of scheduled meetings; conduct meeting; maintain PST files; provide CO with any documents needed  Secretary – Keep minutes of the meetings  Counselor – maintain tracking log; provide SDE with tracking log  Time Keeper (All team members) – Ensure that time is budgeted efficiently.  Data Manager (Referring teacher) – Present and explain Tier I and Tier II documentation, implement Tier III plan, progress monitor. All team members serve as consultants, resources, and intervention specialists.

When To Schedule Meetings  Secondary – End of each 9-week grading period.  Secondary teachers meet during their planning period. ALL teachers that have planning are the PST members.  Elementary – One day per month; 80 minutes; 40 minutes reading data meeting; 40 minutes PST. ALL grade level teachers that meet during the 80 minutes are PST members.  Elementary – One day per month; minute grade level data meeting to address primarily Tier II math students.

 Academically At Risk (Math and Reading)  Students below proficiency levels on standardized tests  Students failing academic subjects  Behaviorally At Risk  Chronic discipline problems  Chronic social/emotional concerns  Chronic absenteeism/tardies  Environmental concerns What are possible reasons for referral to the PST?

Triangular Data – PST Referral Classroom Data DIBELS SAT ARMT ClassWorks AHSGE Common Assessments Classroom Data and at least Two Standardized Tests

Formative Assessments What are they? When should we use them? How should we use them?

What are formative assessments?  Formative assessments are the different ways that we assess daily whether or not a student is progressing in his/her learning  Formative assessments are not assessments of learning, they are assessments for learning.

What Formative Assessments Are Not  They are not graded assignments  They are not conducted after a unit or chapter of learning  They are not used to see how much learning has taken place

What is the purpose of formative assessments?  They serve as practice for the students  They check for students’ understanding  They guide a teacher’s decision making about future instruction  They provide feedback to students so they can improve their performance  They help teachers’ differentiated instruction

National Forum of Assessment  Assessment systems should include opportunities for both group work and individual work  Teachers can monitor group work to check for problems or misconceptions which can be addressed immediately  Teachers can monitor individual work to pinpoint the specific needs of each student  The opportunity to work with others before working individually can lead students toward mastery  When you evaluate an individual student’s work, it doesn’t always have to be graded, but some feedback must be given

What to do After Formative Assessments Have Been Given  Both teachers and students use assessments as sources of information  Assessments must be followed by explicit corrective instruction  Give students second chances to demonstrate success

Tiering after Assessing  Give corrective feedback to those who did not master the concept/skill  The corrective feedback and additional instruction needs to be presented in a new way, and students need to engage in different learning experiences that are appropriate for them  Give enrichment activities to those who did master the skill  Fair is not always equal; fair is getting what you need

Examples of Formative Assessments  Summaries  Reflections  Lists, Charts, and Graphic Organizers  Visual Representation of Information  Discussions  Collaborative Activities  Exit Cards

Progress Monitoring Data Sources Core Instructional Program Assessments Reading Fluency: Fluency Passages Reading Comprehension: Maze or Cloze Passages Behavior: Behavior Contract, Recording Form, or Report Card Math Concept Application: Applications Probes Math Computation: Computation Probes Phonological Processing: Nonsense Word Fluency or Phoneme Segmentation Word Decoding: Word Probes (Fry List, etc.) Easily Generate Probes at central.org

Steps Taken by EHS to Begin the PST  Grade level meetings/elementary and planning periods/secondary– PowerPoint was used to explain components of RTI.  Teachers were trained in eduTrax.  Forms were developed to document Tier II and Tier III instruction, mid-point check, anecdotal notes, and referral plan.  Monthly meetings/elementary and 9-week meetings/secondary were scheduled for PST.

Steps Taken… Continued  Monthly grade level meetings/elementary were scheduled beginning in January to assess data for Tier II instruction in math.  Formative assessment PowerPoint was designed by reading coach and disseminated to K-12 faculty.  Formative assessment occurs daily and is used for flexible grouping in elementary and secondary.  Teachers’ lesson plans show skills being taught to each group level.

Steps Taken… Continued  Secondary – Lesson Plans – Targeted planning for Reading and Math Skills and Small groups at least two times/week in English and Math classes.  Secondary – Identifying Student Tiers (Benchmark, Strategic, and Intensive).  CARE Program – No Zeroes – Requires students to complete assignments.  Reading Skills in secondary science and social studies classes.

Time Allotments - Elementary  Elementary – Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday grade level teachers have 80 minutes common planning.  Monday and Friday – teachers have 40 minutes common planning.  Monday and Friday – 40 minutes math intervention K-6. Small group instruction with flexible grouping for math intervention.  Monday – Friday – 60 minutes for math. Teachers have whole group and small group instruction.  Elementary and Secondary teachers meet monthly with the PST team.

Time Allotments – Elementary Continued  Reading block – 90 minutes, teachers have whole group instruction as well as small group.  Reading skills are incorporated across the curriculum.  Reading Coach works primarily with K-3. However, the coaching cycle has been used in upper elementary as well as some secondary classes.

Professional Development - RTI  Differentiated Instruction  Pearson Training  NAEP Training – 4 th grade  Coaching Cycle  eduTrax Training  ClassWorks Training

Helping ALL students succeed! PST – Elkmont High School Problem Solving Team