Imad Laktineh (in behalf of Enrique Calvo Alamillo) Arlington 11 March 2010.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

CALICE - European DHCAL meeting Ciemat Mechanical Workshop and test of the Stainless steel plate machining for the CALICE-HCAL. Enrique Calvo Alamillo.

Advertisements

Enrique Calvo Alamillo Madrid 1 March Index: 1.Proposal for a DHCAL m3 module. 2.Numerical simulations for a m3 module. 3.Extrapolation of the m3.

Goals : 1- To conceive and build a self-supporting mechanical structure. 2- The concept can be extended to ILD and SiD 3- Keep cost as low as possible.

SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.

Pre-stresses Influence on a Micro Mirror Structure.

CMS ZDC Crane Emergency Payload Removal Procedures This document proposes the viability of using a portable hydraulic actuator Hand crane (Davit crane)

An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue

ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.

01/07/2008HCAL Main Meeting- Mechanical Integration1 ILD HCAL Mechanical Integration HCAL Main Meeting Kirsten Kschioneck, DESY.

Rosier Ph. – IPNO – Detector Dpt. – 27/05/2011APRIME HPS collaboration meeting 1/24 1- Vacuum chamber proposal 1.1- Stainless steel chamber design and.

WA105 General Meeting at CERN 21 & 22-January-2014 Enrique Calvo Alamillo.

Ciemat Mechanical Workshop and test of the Stainless steel plate machining for the CALICE-HCAL. Enrique Calvo/Mary Cruz Fouz Lyon

MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.

GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:

10/11/03 TGC1 Design problem Muon Week, 10 th November 2003 R. Vuillermet on behalf of the Muon Design Team : E. Fernandez, D. Mladenov, P. Minginette,

October 21, 2003LST Mechanical Design Review - SLACN. Yu BaBar IFR Upgrades An FEA Study of the Effects of Adding Brass Plates in the IFR.

Team K-TRON Team Members: Ryan Vroom Geoff Cunningham Trevor McClenathan Brendan Tighe.

Can Bottom Snap-through

1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen

X Meeting of the Future Linear Colliders Spanish Network10-Feb-2014 Enrique Calvo Alamillo.

HGC4ILD - High Granularity Calorimeters for ILD WS 2-Feb-2015 LLR (Paris) 2-Feb-2015 Enrique Calvo Alamillo.

MUON_EDR-06 (Alignment) Enrique Calvo Alamillo February 28-March 1, 2002 Link Mechanics: Status.

Ciemat Mechanical Structure Proposal for a DHCAL m 3 Prototype. Enrique Calvo Alamillo Paris

PMT Support Structure. Final Design. Enrique Calvo Alamillo KOBE - 3 March 2008.

Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:

GROUP NINE Cross-Slope Compensation for Wheelchairs Alexander A. Abraham David Dar Marc C. Moore Advisor: Dr. Mark Richter.

Progress towards a technological prototype for a semi-digital hadron calorimeter based on glass RPCs Nick Lumb Paris, 8 October 2010.

1m 3 SDHCAL Mechanic Structure M.C Fouz 8/10/2010 The 1m 3 prototype Mechanical Structure is financed by: Spanish HEP National Program by the project FPA

IPN Lyon ILD Mechanical structure April 2012 DHCAL Assembly, Tooling, Cooling J.C Ianigro - IPN Lyon -

DHCAL m3 module Ciemat status Enrique Calvo Alamillo EVO meeting 1 July 2010.

Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:

Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu

1 Manufacturing Projects Flexible Manufacturing Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Status report AHCAL Mechanics Karsten Gadow CALICE Collaboration Meeting KEK, Studies of AHCAL absorber structure stability.

The HCAL barrel absorber structure

Engineering design of the V-supports J.Huopana Input from: G.Riddone, A.Samoshkin, R.Nousiainen, D.Gudkov, N.Gazis.

Chapter Nine Bolt Pretension.

IPN Lyon ILD integration April 2015 Jean-Christophe Ianigro & Imad Laktineh - IPN Lyon -

Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.

CMS GRPC detector& cassette I. laktineh. Concepts Two concepts of RE1/1 detectors were developed : 1- One based on gluing glass plates to have large RPC.

1 Proposal of the mechanical support on the Buffer for the 10“ PMTs by Enrique Calvo Alamillo.

Enrique Calvo Alamillo Ds DHCAL m 3 modular structure. 2. Basic modular distribution. 3. Guiding and repositioning system. 4. Detector.

MECH4450 Introduction to Finite Element Methods Chapter 6 Finite Element Analysis of Plane Elasticity.

Meeting at Chooz PMTs Mechanical support on the Buffer. Updates. Enrique Calvo Alamillo

IPN Lyon ILD Mechanical structure February 2015 Design, Integration & Services J.C Ianigro - IPN Lyon -

PMT installation meeting at CIEMAT Enrique Calvo Alamillo Chooz 3 March 2009.

Hcal Geometry and Assembly Videoconference January 2008, 24th.

19-Sept-2012] «BE-RF-PM» TEST MODULES in the LAB DB girders (epucret) for T1 & T4: Optimization of the V-shaped supports Nick Gazis, Dmitry Gudkov, Vadim.

K.Gadow - DESY 1 The HCAL barrel absorber structure Design Status

MESF593 Finite Element Methods

A.Ryazantsev, IHEP-Protvino, RussiaPANDA Russia Workshop at Moscow, May 2015 Status on Barrel Mechanics Andrey Ryazantsev on behalf of the IHEP-Protvino.

Ideas for a Tungsten HCal Prototype CALICE Collaboration Meeting, Lyon September 18, 2009 Christian Grefe CERN, Bonn University.

EUDET HCAL prototype; mechanics Felix Sefkow Work by K.Gadow, K.Kschioneck CALIC collaboration meeting Daegu, Korea, February 20, 2009.

First Wall Panel - Overview

Baby-MIND Modules & Services

Ferrara MECHANICAL SUPPORT for forward tracking detectors Federico Evangelisti INFN - Ferrara GSI – 2-6 march 2009.

SuperB IFR mechanics of IFR prototype – by C. Fanin

Hcal Geometry and Assembly

Status and Progress of NSW HUB and Extension

Enrique Calvo Alamillo DAEGU

Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:

PANDA Yoke of the Magnet

CLIC Common RF-girder study

IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR

SDHCAL Integration Moi j’aime bien SAFARI

Buffer CABLES routing proposal

By Arsalan Jamialahmadi

1.6 Allowable Stress Allowable Load < Failure Load

Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:

Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:

Presentation transcript:

Imad Laktineh (in behalf of Enrique Calvo Alamillo) Arlington 11 March 2010

Index: 1.Proposal for a DHCAL m3 module. 2.Numerical simulations for a m3 module. 3.Extrapolation of the m3 module philosophy for the ILD. 4.Cost for the mechanical structure of the m3 module proposed. 5.Conclusion. Index: 1.Proposal for a DHCAL m3 module. 2.Numerical simulations for a m3 module. 3.Extrapolation of the m3 module philosophy for the ILD. 4.Cost for the mechanical structure of the m3 module proposed. 5.Conclusion.

Mechanical structure assembled, parameters: 44 slots to can implement 44 MICROMEGAS o GRPCs. Structure compose of only 2 different kinds of pieces. Attached between by M8 screws, bolts by layer. plus base support pieces and the manipulation fixations (By 2 bolts of M20), only can be fixed elements to the bar pieces. Can be implemented a cover and/or a piece to positioning the modules. 1.- Proposal for a DHCAL m3 module.

Deformation and stress: Calorimeter supported on the 4 big bolts on the top. Charged with 44 modules of about 50 kg. Max. deformations are about 100 microns. The punctual max. stress it is only 74 Mpa, well away from the elastic limit of the material (stainless steel) 2.- Numerical simulations for a m3 module.

Deformation and stress with several suppositions: fixed on the one lateral side from the M8 bolt. Charged with 44 modules of about 50 kg. The max. reactions on the M8 bolts on the lateral side are: Fx= +/ N Fy= N Fz= +/- 300 N M8 bolt have the elastic limits, function of the material, between about N to N. And the pre-stressed forces are between 8200 N to N. This is the situation more adverse for the M8 bolts. 2.- Numerical simulations for a m3 module.

Deformation and stress with several suppositions: fixed on the one lateral side from the M8 bolt, rotated 90º. Charged with 44 modules of about 50 kg. 2.- Numerical simulations for a m3 module.

Deformation and stress with several suppositions: fixed on base side from the M8 bolt, rotated 90º. Charged with 44 modules of about 50 kg. 2.- Numerical simulations for a m3 module.

Deformation and stress with several suppositions: fixed on top side from the M8 bolt. Charged with 44 modules of about 50 kg. 2.- Numerical simulations for a m3 module.

Distribution propose for different DHCAL modules for the ILD: (Not take into account the modular Length of the GRPC or MICROMEGAS, for this proposal) 3.- Extrapolation of the m3 module philosophy for the ILD. Front view Lateral view

Distribution propose for different DHCAL modules for the ILD: (Not take into account the modular Length of the GRPC or MICROMEGAS, for this proposal) 3.- Extrapolation of the m3 module philosophy for the ILD. Front view Lateral viewFront view

Distribution propose for different DHCAL modules for the ILD: This situation can be solved with a composition of the previous solutions. 3.- Extrapolation of the m3 module philosophy for the ILD.

AISI 304 Piece tipe 1.: ~45 pieces. ~760 eur/piece (finalized) Piece tipe 2.: ~92 pieces. ~55 eur/ piece (Need to do holes/fillet on the milling machine) Bolts. M8x40 inox : ~1000 units. ~240 eur/1000 units Rest of elements: Bolts M20x supports pieces for the top and 4 bases: ~1000 eur/pack Total cost 760x45+55x = eur. Total cost 760x45+55x = eur. AISI 316L cost of the material need to be incremented about 10%. AISI S cost of the material need to be incremented about 40% -100%. 4.- Cost for the mechanical structure of the m3 module proposed.

Structure for a m3 module: Due to the standards thinness of the plates. The prices are much lowers in other kinds of stainless steel (316L or may be 310 or 310S). Only 2 different kinds of pieces to produce. With a minimum of machine operation on each piece. Prices and times much lowers. Very rigid structure, on different scenarios. ‘Auto-portant’ structure. DHCAL for the ILD: Can be adapted the same philosophy to different modules dispositions. Need to be fixed the modular length of the GRPC or MICROMEGAS. 5.- Conclusions.