Full Structural Models Kline Chapter 10 Brown Chapter 5 (157-211)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 What is? Structural Equation Modeling (A Very Brief Introduction) Patrick Sturgis University of Surrey.
Advertisements

The STARTS Model David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Structural Equation Modeling. What is SEM Swiss Army Knife of Statistics Can replicate virtually any model from “canned” stats packages (some limitations.
SEM PURPOSE Model phenomena from observed or theoretical stances
Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling
Separating Wheat from Chaff: Interpreting Results from Contemporary Analytic Methods Rod McCloy Gary Lautenschlager.
Soc 3306a: Path Analysis Using Multiple Regression and Path Analysis to Model Causality.
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
Section 4.2 Fitting Curves and Surfaces by Least Squares.
Econ Prof. Buckles1 Multiple Regression Analysis y =  0 +  1 x 1 +  2 x  k x k + u 4. Further Issues.
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 11 - Structural Equation Modeling.
1Prof. Dr. Rainer Stachuletz Multiple Regression Analysis y =  0 +  1 x 1 +  2 x  k x k + u 4. Further Issues.
“Ghost Chasing”: Demystifying Latent Variables and SEM
Before doing comparative research with SEM … Prof. Jarosław Górniak Institute of Sociology Jagiellonian University Krakow.
G Lecture 111 SEM analogue of General Linear Model Fitting structure of mean vector in SEM Numerical Example Growth models in SEM Willett and Sayer.
Structural Equation Modeling Intro to SEM Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Stages in Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling Continued: Lecture 2 Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Path Analysis. Figure 1 Exogenous Variables Causally influenced only by variables outside of the model. SES and IQ in Figure 1. The two-headed arrow.
Introduction to CFA. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Upon completing this chapter, you should be able to do the following: Distinguish between exploratory factor.
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
Soc 3306a Lecture 8: Multivariate 1 Using Multiple Regression and Path Analysis to Model Causality.
PLS-SEM: Introduction and Overview
Issues in structural equation modeling Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.
2 nd Order CFA Byrne Chapter 5. 2 nd Order Models The idea of a 2 nd order model (sometimes called a bi-factor model) is: – You have some latent variables.
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) With Latent Variables James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
SEM: Basics Byrne Chapter 1 Tabachnick SEM
1 Psych 5510/6510 Chapter 10. Interactions and Polynomial Regression: Models with Products of Continuous Predictors Spring, 2009.
1 Exploratory & Confirmatory Factor Analysis Alan C. Acock OSU Summer Institute, 2009.
Estimation Kline Chapter 7 (skip , appendices)
Advanced Correlational Analyses D/RS 1013 Factor Analysis.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Construct Validity: MTMM ● Assessed via convergent and divergent evidence ● Convergent – Measures of the.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 12: Wrap Up: Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions for SEM.
1 Javier Aparicio División de Estudios Políticos, CIDE Primavera Regresión.
2nd Order CFA Hierarchical Latent Models
Multigroup Models Byrne Chapter 7 Brown Chapter 7.
Controlling for Baseline
Multigroup Models Beaujean Chapter 4 Brown Chapter 7.
G Lecture 7 Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Latent Growth Modeling Byrne Chapter 11. Latent Growth Modeling Measuring change over repeated time measurements – Gives you more information than a repeated.
The Product Rule Complete the warm-up on your notesheet.
G Lecture 81 Comparing Measurement Models across Groups Reducing Bias with Hybrid Models Setting the Scale of Latent Variables Thinking about Hybrid.
CFA: Basics Beaujean Chapter 3. Other readings Kline 9 – a good reference, but lumps this entire section into one chapter.
SEM: Basics Byrne Chapter 1 Tabachnick SEM
MTMM Byrne Chapter 10. MTMM Multi-trait multi-method – Traits – the latent factors you are trying to measure – Methods – the way you are measuring the.
SEM Basics 2 Byrne Chapter 2 Kline pg 7-15, 50-51, ,
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Item Factor Analysis Item Response Theory Beaujean Chapter 6.
Estimation Kline Chapter 7 (skip , appendices)
ALISON BOWLING CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS. REVIEW OF EFA Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Explores the data All measured variables are related to every.
How to Fool Yourself with SEM James G. Anderson, Ph.D Purdue University.
CFA Model Revision Byrne Chapter 4 Brown Chapter 5.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Final Lecture: Multiple-Group Models, a Word about Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions.
Chapter 17 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)  Relatively new statistical technique used to test theoretical or causal.
Division Brought to you by powerpointpros.com. Lesson Menu Click on the links below to start with a specific topic. What is Division? Using Division Practice.
Regression. Why Regression? Everything we’ve done in this class has been regression: When you have categorical IVs and continuous DVs, the ANOVA framework.
CFA: Basics Byrne Chapter 3 Brown Chapter 3 (40-53)
Full Structural Models Byrne Chapter 6 Kline Chapter 10 (stop 288, but the reporting section at the end is good to mark for later)
Advanced Statistical Methods: Continuous Variables
Chapter 15 Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Analysis of Covariance ANCOVA
Structural Equation Modeling
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) With Latent Variables
Structural Equation Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Full Structural Models Kline Chapter 10 Brown Chapter 5 ( )

Full SEM You have to have: – Measurement model: the CFA part – Structural part: the relationship between the latents

Full SEM Reminder: – Reflective indicators / effects indicators We assume factors cause the indicators, so the arrows go out. – Formative indicators / cause indicators When we use items to predict a latent (arrows go into the latent).

Full SEM Example of formative indicator – Income, education level, and occupation all predict your SES – Stress caused by outside factors Other names: – Composite causes – MIMIC – multiple indicators, multiple causes models

Measurement Model Identification Reminder Identification rules of thumb: – Latent variables should have four indicators – Latent variables have three indicators AND Error variances do not covary – Latent variables have two indicators AND Error variances do not covary Loadings are set to equal each other.

Structural Model Identification Scaling is also required to identify the structural part 2+ emitted paths rule – Composite variable must have have direct effects on two other endogenous variables

Things to Consider Parceling – When you have large structural models, they can be very complex to fit to a Full SEM if each latent variable has lots of indicators (items). – Parceling occurs when you creating subsets of items to be able to get the model to run and to balance out the number of indicators on each latent.

Things to Consider Parceling – At the moment, this topic is still pretty controversial. Many fall into the: this is bad don’t do it camp.

Things to Consider How to model? – Test each CFA piece separately to make sure they run.*** – Slowly add structural paths to see if you can get the full model to work. If not, try parceling. – Drop non-significant paths. ***if your CFA is bad, the full model will be bad too.

Things to Consider As you add the structural components, you should not see a big change in the loadings to the indicators – If you do, it means the model is not invariant (a fancy word for doesn’t change) – Called interpretational confounding

When to Stop? We’ve discussed lots of tricks to explore models and improve them. When do you quit? – Based on theory – Fit indices do not greatly improve – Parsimony

Let’s Try It! Full SEM (traditional) Full SEM with composite variables

Kline_9_family

Kline 10 risk