COMPETITION (Chapter 13)
COMPETITION: INTRASPECIFIC versus INTERSPECIFIC
13 Leafhopper Demonstrating Intraspecific Competition in Animals
Fig in Molles 2008 Number of Leafhoppers (per cage) Number of Leafhoppers (per cage) Demonstrating Intraspecific Competition in Animals
10 Alfalfa Demonstrating IntraspecificCompetition in Plants
Fig in Molles /2 Thinning Rule (Sometimes) Demonstrating Intraspecific Competition in Plants
COMPETITION: INTERFERENCE vs. RESOURCE Interference Competition Resource Competition
Trenched (Treatment)Untrenched (Control) 7 8 Demonstrating Resource Competition
Trenched Untrenched Demonstrating Resource Competition (Results)
Demonstrating Interference Competition.36m 2 Plots, Stocked with Sliced Carrots and Potatos Density: 50 IsopodsDensity: 100 Isopods
Demonstrating Interference Competition Fig in Molles 2008
INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION Giant Kelp (Macrocystis) Bull Kelp (Nereocystis)
Galium saxatile Galium pumilum 6 7 Demonstrating Interspecific Competition in Plants
Tansley (1917) Demonstrating Interspecific Competition in Plants
Understanding Interspecific Competition in Context of Niche Giant Kelp (Macrocystis) Bull Kelp (Nereocystis)
Graphical Depiction of Giant Kelp Niche (Three Axes) Nutrients Light Carbon Dioxide
15 Giant Kelp Niche: Other Abiotic Factors? N – Dimensional Hypervolume: Hypothetical Space that Represents ALL N Physical Factors that Influence Growth, Survival and Reproduction
Range of physical conditions in which a given species can live in the absence of negative interactions with other species FUNDAMENTAL NICHE Nutrients Light Carbon Dioxide
16 15 Negative Interactions with Other Species
NICHE OVERLAP Fundamental Niches of Giant Kelp, Bull Kelp in One Dimension Giant Kelp Bull Kelp Light Intensity
Photosynthesis Rate ADJUSTMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL NICHE IN PRESENCE OF COMPETITOR Giant KelpBull Kelp Giant Kelp Bull Kelp Light Intensity
Range of physical conditions in which a given species can live in the presence of negative interactions with other species REALIZED NICHE Photosynthesis Rate Giant Kelp Bull Kelp Light Intensity
Fig in Molles 2008 Consequences of Interspecific Competition
Fundamental and Realized Niche of Chthalamus
Two Species with Same or Very Similar Niche: Is Coexistence Possible? Resource Utilization
Competitive Exclusion Principle: (G.F. Gause) Two Species with Identical Niches CAN NOT Coexist Indefinitely
Mathematical Modeling of Interspecific Competition I (Begin with Logistic Rate Equations for N 1, N 2 ) Note: These equations incorporate effects of intraspecific competition
Mathematical Modeling of Interspecific Competition II (Incorporate Interspecific Competition)
Mathematical Modeling of Interspecific Competition III (Assume Equilibrium Conditions)
Mathematical Modeling of Interspecific Competition IV (Determine Equations for Zero-Change Isoclines)
Fig in Molles 2008 Mathematical Modeling of Interspecific Competition V (Species 1 Strong Competitor, Species 2 Weak Competitor)
Mathematical Modeling of Interspecific Competition VI (Species 1 Weak Competitor, Species 2 Strong Competitor)
Mathematical Modeling of Interspecific Competition VII (Both Species are Strong Competitors) N2N2
Mathematical Modeling of Interspecific Competition VII (Both Species are Weak Competitors)
Competitive Exclusion Principle: (G.F. Gause) Two Species with Identical Niches CAN NOT Coexist Indefinitely (i.e., Two Strong Competitors for the Same Resource CAN NOT Co-Exist Indefinitely)
Paramecium aurelia 1 Paramecium caudatum 2 3 Testing Competitive Exclusion Principle
Fig in Molles 2008 Paramecium Species: Grown Separately (Gause 1934) Testing Competitive Exclusion Principle
Fig in Ricklefs and Miller 2000 Paramecium Species: Grown Together (Gause 1934) Testing Competitive Exclusion Principle
Tribolium confusum Tribolium castaneum 4 5 Testing Competitive Exclusion Principle
Fig in Molles 2008 Flour Beetle Species: Grown Separately (Park 1954) Testing Competitive Exclusion Principle
Fig in Molles 2008 Flour Beetle Species Grown Together (Gause 1934) Interspecific Competition in Animals: Consequences
Wide-Leaf Cattail (Typha latifolia) Narrow-Leaf Cattail (Typha angustifolia) CATTAIL COMPETITION
Wide-Leaf Cattail (Typha latifolia) Narrow-Leaf Cattail (Typha angustifolia) Cattail Species Grown Together
Wide-Leaf Cattail (Typha latifolia) Narrow-Leaf Cattail Removed
Narrow-Leaf Cattail (Typha angustifolia) Wide-Leaf Cattail Removed
Balanus 9 Chthamalus 10
Zonation in Barnacle Communities
Fig in Molles 2006 Balanus Removal: Middle Intertidal Zone Chthamalus Survivorship
9 Dipodomys (Kangaroo Rat) 10 Perognathus (Pocket Mouse) Large Granivores Small Granivores Insectivores Onychomys DESERT RODENTS
24 Study Plots: Chihuahuan Desert near Portal AZ
Fig in Molles 2006 Experiment: Removal of Large Granivores (Heske et al. 1994)
Geospiza fortis (Medium Ground-Finch) Darwin’s Finches Geospiza fuliginosa (Small Ground-Finch) 13 EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITION
Fig in Molles 2006 Allopatric versus Sympatric Populations G. fortis G. fuliginosa G. fortis, G. fuliginosa
G. fortis G. fuliginosa G. fortis, G. fuliginosa CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT: BEAK DEPTH