Project Management An Introduction to Project Management Supervisor :eng. Baraq Juma’a Prepared by: Khaled Mohammad Sawalha Suha Tarek Awwad

 Graduating project consists of two parts :  The first part includes preparing a theoretical research.  The second part includes the application of the principles in construction project management

 Project is the collection of activities, that are related or connected, for developing a product or a service › Characteristics of Projects  Temporary  Unique  Projects have always a customer who uses the results

 Project Management is the application of skills, knowledge, tools and techniques to meet the needs and expectations of stakeholders for a project

 The project is a community police station located in Arrabeh village / Jenin City.  The total area of ms Consists of two floor  Owner: Ministry of Interior Affairs  Supervision: Ministry of Public Works & Housing  Donor: Germany federation GIZ

 Tender implementing Duration 300 calendar days.   Scheduled Duration 235 work days  Commencement order: 27- Feb  Hand over Date: 24-Dec-2011  Bid cost: 3,169,654 NIS

 The project is divided into activities in a process called work breakdown structure. In this project we breakdown it according to the type of level in building, as the following

 In the process of foundations establishment a soil confirmation test is carried out to confirm the bearing capacity of base strata as per design bearing capacity (25ton/MS), the lab reports provided the following:  Pure Clay soil layer with variable depth (3-6 m)  The bearing capacity equal (10ton/Ms)  High swelling & settlement conditions

 Depending on that soil report the contractor asked the supervision representative to suspend the works in the project & consider the new facts in site to redesign the foundation system.  According to the FIDIC 1999[8.8 Suspension of Work]and the previous condition the Supervision decided to suspend the project progress to redesign the foundation system

 two different type that comply with such soil conditions we suggested two alternatives foundation systems:  Pile System  Raft system

Comparison Sheet Amount NISDescriptionNo. 356,535 Summary for Bid(single footing) 1 474,640Summary for Raft2 545,176summary for pile3 118,105Difference between raft& bid

 Work was suspended for 45 days and recommencement order was issued to the contractor followed with a variation order for raft foundation system and 63 day time extension.  As a result of that extension of time and according to FIDIC 1999[20.1 Contractor's Claims] the contractor should be Compensated.

Summary of expenses 1,032 Nis Indirect cost / day 435 Nis Job over head cost/day 1,467 Nis Total cost / day 45 day Total no. of suspension days 66,015 Nis Expenses earned by the contractor as a result of the extension

 Duration of the project has become in this case 298 working days  Total duration=(235) +(18)+(45)=298 day  And the total cost become 3,343,774 NIS  Total Cost = (3,169,654) + (118,105)+(1,467*45) =3,343,774 NIS

After the work schedule and start the implementation, we need to update the project data to compare between the executed project and the planned project and the impact on the schedule. Will now be an update of the project data and follow-up activities during the months from 27 \ Feb. \ 2011 to 12\ Dec \ 2011using the theory of earned value. That can be explained using this value follow-up project in terms of time and cost, sometimes called financial values gained with time and which we can modify the time schedule through the right decisions to shift back the original project if there is a deviation from the previously planned.

CPI EVA SPI Earned value Reporting-Costs : Earned value Reporting-Schedule: Earned value Update project

From this table we calculate the following:  Schedule Performance Index (SPI) =0.98 OR SPI=BCWP/BCWS=2,306,221.29/2,344,862.79=0.98 <1 SPI<1 behind Schedule (Project delayed)  Cost Performance Index (CPI) = 1 we don’t have educate information This means that each day one of the actual duration was obtained only 0.98 of the value of planned, in other words that the productivity of the project is only 0.98 of the planned.