1 Mid Day Meal Scheme Ministry of HRD Government of India MDM-PAB Meeting – Karnataka On

Review of Implementation of MDMS in Karnataka (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to ) Part-I Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Questions?  What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children- wise, in terms of No. of meal served?  What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on as well as ?  How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?  What is the level of lifting?  How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level?  How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost?  How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served? …… contd Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Contd ….., Questions?  How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?  What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices? Part –II  What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2008 to 2009?  How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data? Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Benchmarks  Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served)  Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%)  Availability of foodgrains [ to ]: 85% (+ or – 10%)  Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 75% (+ or – 10%)  Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed.  Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous.  State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines.  Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Approval Vs Achievement (No. of Meals ) No. of Meal (in Crore) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (Primary + Upper Primary) Down by 0.14%

Non-Coverage : Number of Meals ( PY + U PY) Sl. No. Districts Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for ( In Cr.) Meals actually served during to ( In Cr.) Short-served No. of meals % Low 1 Davangere % 2 Mangalore(DK) % 3 Mysore % Excess 4 Bijapur % 5 Tumkur % 6 Chitradurga % Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals.

Approval Vs Achievement: (Avg no. of children during to ) No. of children (In lakh) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (5% less)

Non-coverage : No. of Children availing MDM (Primary) Sl. No. DistrictsTarget as per MDM-PAB Approval for Average No. of children availing MDM during to Difference No. of children % LOW 1 Davangere % 2Mangalore(DK) % 3 Mysore % 4 Chikkamagalur % 5 Uttara kannada % 6 Bellary % 1 Davangere % Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals.

Sl. No. DistrictsTarget as per MDM-PAB Approval for Average No. of children availing MDM during to Difference No. of children % LOW 1 Davangere % 2 Bidar % 3 Mangalore(DK) % 4 Uttara kannada % 5 Raichur % 6 Bellary % 7 Mysore % 8 Mandya % EXCESS 9 Bijapur % Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals. Non-coverage : No. of Children availing MDM (Up. Primary)

Approval Vs Achievement (No. of Working Days as on ) No. of working days Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 4.6% excess

Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative) Foodgrains (in MTs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India *: Including unspent balance as on

Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise) Foodgrains (in MTs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India *: Including unspent balance as on

Analysis: Foodgrains Availability ( to ) Foodgrains (in MTs) 100% 65% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Foodgrains Utilisation ( to ) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Benchmark : 75% 1.45 Lakh MTs 1.04 Lakh MTs 0.94 Lakh MTs

Foodgrains Utilization– Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation ( to ) Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.) Benchmark :75% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Rs Cr. Rs Cr.

Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise) % Utilisation Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India State average: 65%(FG) & 71%(CC) Benchmark: 75%

Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Qty of Food grains Sl. NoDistrict No. of Meals served [In Cr.] Expected consumption of Food grains (MTs) Actual Consumption of Food grains (MTs) Deficit in % Defeat Consumption 1 Gulbarga % 2 Haveri % 3 Bangalore (U) % 4 Gadag %

MME Utilisation ( to ) Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Transport Assistance Utilisation ( to ) Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (100%) (63%)

Achievement during (Kitchen Sheds) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Achievement during (Kitchen Devices) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Performance Score card – A Summary Sl. No. ComponentAchievementBenchmark 1. Foodgrains Availability 72%85% 2. Foodgrains Utilisation 65%75% 3. Cooking Cost Utilisation 75% 4. MME Utilisation 100% 5. Kitchen Shed construction 43%100% 6. Kitchen Devices procurement 100% 7 QPRs received 2nos.3 nos. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Analysis of State’s Proposal for Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) (Down by 0.51%) (Down by 4.08%) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (Proposed) Q-1Q-2

Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during (UPPER PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India *:SSA= Govt+LB+GA (Proposed) Q-1 Q-2

No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Sl. No YearAs per DISE Data As per MDM Sanctions Not available Not available 236 (State’s claim for )

Thank You Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India