Effective supergravity descriptions of superstring cosmology Antoine Van Proeyen K.U. Leuven Barcelona, IRGAC, July 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can Integrable Cosmologies fit into Gauged Supergravity? Can Integrable Cosmologies fit into Gauged Supergravity? Pietro Frè University of Torino & Embassy.
Advertisements

Brane-World Inflation
Type IIB Supergravity, D3 branes and ALE manifolds
Summing planar diagrams
Non-perturbative effects in string theory compactifications Sergey Alexandrov Laboratoire Charles Coulomb Université Montpellier 2 in collaboration with.
Cosmic Billiards are fully integrable: Tits Satake projections and Kac Moody extensions Talk by Pietro Frè at Corfu 2005”
11 3d CFT and Multi M2-brane Theory on M. Ali-Akbari School of physics, IPM, Iran [JHEP 0903:148,2009] Fifth Crete regional meeting in string theory Kolymbari,
The Topological G 2 String Asad Naqvi (University of Amsterdam) (in progress) with Jan de Boer and Assaf Shomer hep-th/0506nnn.
Pietro Fré Dubna July 2003 ] exp[ / Solv H
Multi-Brane Recombination and Standard Model Flux Vacua Jason Kumar Texas A&M University w/ James D. Wells (University of Michigan) hep-th/ ,
Gauged Supergravities in Different Frames Dr. Mario Trigiante (Politecnico di Torino) F.Cordaro, P.Frè, L.Gualtieri, P.Termonia, M.T Wit, Samtleben,
D=6 supergravity with R 2 terms Antoine Van Proeyen K.U. Leuven Dubna, 16 December 2011 collaboration with F. Coomans, E. Bergshoeff and E. Sezgin.
BRANE SOLUTIONS AND RG FLOW UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CAMPINA GRANDE September 2006 FRANCISCO A. BRITO.
Anomaly cancellations on heterotic 5-branes ( 前編 ) 矢田 雅哉.
Lattice Spinor Gravity Lattice Spinor Gravity. Quantum gravity Quantum field theory Quantum field theory Functional integral formulation Functional integral.
Rigid SUSY in Curved Superspace Nathan Seiberg IAS Festuccia and NS Thank: Jafferis, Komargodski, Rocek, Shih.
Boundaries in Rigid and Local Susy Dmitry V. Belyaev and Peter van Nieuwenhuizen.
Lecture 4. Before Christmas… 1.2 SUSY Algebra (N=1) From the Haag, Lopuszanski and Sohnius extension of the Coleman-Mandula theorem we need to introduce.
Happy 120 th birthday. Mimeograph Constraining Goldstinos with Constrained Superfields Nathan Seiberg IAS Confronting Challenges in Theoretical Physics.
De Sitter in Supergravity and String Theory Diederik Roest (RUG) THEP national seminar November 20, 2009.
Supersymmetry and Gauge Symmetry Breaking from Intersecting Branes A. Giveon, D.K. hep-th/
SHIFT SYMMETRY and INFLATION in SUPERGRAVITY Ph. Brax and J. Martin hep/th to appear in PRD.
Planar diagrams in light-cone gauge hep-th/ M. Kruczenski Purdue University Based on:
Supersymmetry in Particle Physics
Quintessence from time evolution of fundamental mass scale.
Masses For Gauge Bosons. A few basics on Lagrangians Euler-Lagrange equation then give you the equations of motion:
Superconformal symmetry and higher-derivative Lagrangians Antoine Van Proeyen KU Leuven Mc Gill university, workshop in honour of Marc Grisaru April 19,
Cosmological Vacuum Selection and Meta-Stable Susy Breaking Ioannis Dalianis IFT-University of Warsaw.
Dynamical solutions in intersecting brane systems Kunihito Uzawa Osaka City University Advanced Mathematical Institute.
Higher Derivative Scalars in Supergravity Jean-Luc Lehners Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics Albert Einstein Institute Based on work with.
D-term Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking K. Fujiwara and, H.I. and M. Sakaguchi arXiv: hep-th/ , P. T. P. 113 arXiv: hep-th/ , N. P. B 723 H.
AdS 4 £ CP 3 superspace Dmitri Sorokin INFN, Sezione di Padova ArXiv: Jaume Gomis, Linus Wulff and D.S. SQS’09, Dubna, 30 July 2009 ArXiv:
The embedding-tensor formalism with fields and antifields. Antoine Van Proeyen K.U. Leuven Moscow, 4th Sakharov conf., May 21, 2009.
Solvable Lie Algebras in Supergravity and Superstrings Pietro Fré Bonn February 2002 An algebraic characterization of superstring dualities.
Super Virasoro Algebras from Chiral Supergravity Ibaraki Univ. Yoshifumi Hyakutake Based on arXiv:1211xxxx + work in progress.
Constraining SUSY GUTs and Inflation with Cosmology Collaboration : M. Sakellariadou, R. Jeannerot. References : Jeannerot, J. R., Sakellariadou (2003)
Dark Energy In Hybrid Inflation Seongcheol Kim (KAIST) Based on Phys. Rev. D75: (2007)
Mirage Mediation of SUSY Breaking K. S. Jeong KIAS 25 May, 2007 Based on hep-ph/ , hep-ph/
Domain-wall/QFT correspondence Wen-Yu Wen Academia Sinica Feb 24, 2006 A Bridge Connecting Gravity and Gauge Theory.
Matrix Cosmology Miao Li Institute of Theoretical Physics Chinese Academy of Science.
The Geometry of Moduli Space and Trace Anomalies. A.Schwimmer (with J.Gomis,P-S.Nazgoul,Z.Komargodski, N.Seiberg,S.Theisen)
Non-Supersymmetric Attractors Sandip Trivedi Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India Madrid, June ‘07.
Gaugings and other Supergravity Tools for p brane Physics Pietro Fré Lectures at the RTN School, Paris 2001 IHS.
Introduction to Strings Yoshihisa Kitazawa KEK Nasu lecture 9/25/06.
Lecture 6 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A AA.
Meta-stable Supersymmetry Breaking in an N=1 Perturbed Seiberg-Witten Theory Shin Sasaki (Univ. of Helsinki, Helsinki Inst. of Physics) Phys. Rev. D76.
Is the four-dimensional effective theory effective? YITP Hideo Kodama HK and Kunihito Uzawa, JHEP0507:061(2005) HK and Kunihito Uzawa, hep-th/
2 Time Physics and Field theory
Maximal super Yang-Mills theories on curved background with off-shell supercharges 総合研究大学院大学 藤塚 理史 共同研究者: 吉田 豊 氏 (KEK), 本多 正純 氏 ( 総研大 /KEK) based on M.
3. Supersymmetry.
Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ)
Dmitri Sorokin, INFN Padova Section based on arXiv: with I. Bandos, L. Martucci and M. Tonin VII Round Table Italy-Russia, Dubna, November.
1 Superstring vertex operators in type IIB matrix model arXiv: [hep-th], [hep-th] Satoshi Nagaoka (KEK) with Yoshihisa Kitazawa (KEK &
1 Dynamical SUSY Breaking in Meta-Stable Vacua Ken Intriligator, UCSD & IAS SUSY 2006, 6/14/2006 KI, Nathan Seiberg, and David Shih hep-th/
Torsional heterotic geometries Katrin Becker ``14th Itzykson Meeting'' IPHT, Saclay, June 19, 2009.
Moduli stabilization, SUSY breaking and the Higgs sector Tatsuo Kobayashi 1. Introduction 2. KKLT scenario 3 . Generalized KKLT scenario 4. TeV scale mirage.
The nonperturbative analyses for lower dimensional non-linear sigma models Etsuko Itou (Osaka University) 1.Introduction 2.The WRG equation for NLσM 3.Fixed.
Seiberg Duality James Barnard University of Durham.
Lecture 7. Tuesday… Superfield content of the MSSM Gauge group is that of SM: StrongWeakhypercharge Vector superfields of the MSSM.
P-Term Cosmology A.C. Davis (with C. Burrage) ,
ArXiv: (hep-th) Toshiaki Fujimori (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Minoru Eto, Sven Bjarke Gudnason, Kenichi Konishi, Muneto Nitta, Keisuke Ohashi.
1 Marginal Deformations and Penrose limits with continuous spectrum Toni Mateos Imperial College London Universitat de Barcelona, December 22, 2005.
Intro to SUSY II: SUSY QFT Archil Kobakhidze PRE-SUSY 2016 SCHOOL 27 JUNE -1 JULY 2016, MELBOURNE.
Can Integrable Cosmologies fit into Gauged Supergravity?
Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ)
STRING THEORY AND M-THEORY: A Modern Introduction
Supersymmetry Breaking Vacua in Geometrically Realized Gauge Theories
Exceptional Flux Compactifications
Fun with the supercurrent I: FI-terms
Yutaka Sakamura (Osaka Univ.)
Presentation transcript:

Effective supergravity descriptions of superstring cosmology Antoine Van Proeyen K.U. Leuven Barcelona, IRGAC, July 2006

From strings to supergravity n Landscape of vacua of string theories is a landscape of supergravities n The basic string theories have a supergravity as field theory approximation. n Also after the choice of a compact manifold one is left with an effective lower dimensional supergravity with number of supersymmetries determined by the Killing spinors of the compact manifold n Fluxes and non-perturbative effects lead to gauged supergravities n Not every supergravity is interpretable in terms of strings and branes (yet).

Plan 1. Cosmology, supergravity and cosmic strings, or the problem of uplifting terms 2. Supergravities: catalogue, geometries, gauged supergravities 3. N=1 and N=2 supergravities: multiplets, potential 4. Superconformal methods: or: Symplification of supergravity by using a parent rigid supersymmetric theory 5. Examples cosmic string in N=1 and N=2 other embeddings of manifolds producing (meta)stable de Sitter vacua 6. Final remarks

Old conflict of supergravity with cosmology: the cosmological constant ‘The world record of discrepancy of theory and experiment’. n The smallness of the cosmological constant already lead to the statement ‘The world record of discrepancy of theory and experiment’. Indeed, any model contains the Planck mass, i.e eV versus cosmol.constant eV n But a main problem is now: the sign of the cosmological constant. n Supersymmetry is not preserved for any solution with positive cosmological constant. Why ?

Supersymmetry with (anti) de Sitter n Preserved Susy: must be in a superalgebra Nahm superalgebras: bosonic part is (A)dS £ R n AdS: compact R- symmetry group: dS: non-compact R ! pseudo-SUSY needs negative kinetic energies

Supergravity n Supergravity is the field theory corresponding to superstring theory. n For calculations it is useful to find an effective supergravity description n Needs ‘uplifting’ terms’, e.g. in KKLT mechanism n Other example: effective theory of cosmic string

Cosmic string solution r    D = g  D = 0 Abrikosov, Nielsen, Olesen BPS solution: ½ susy

The cosmic string model n A supergravity model for the final state after the D3-brane – anti-D3-brane annihilation : a D1 string n ‘FI term’ represents brane-antibrane energy. In general: a positive term in the potential P. Binétruy, G. Dvali, R. Kallosh and AVP, ‘FI terms in supergravity and cosmology’, hep-th/ AVP, Supergravity with Fayet- Iliopoulos terms and R-symmetry, hep- th/

Cosmic string solution r    D = g  D = 0 Abrikosov, Nielsen, Olesen BPS solution: ½ susy   represents energy of D3 brane system tachyon ↔ field  G. Dvali, R. Kallosh and AVP, hep-th/ Effective supergravity description:

2. Supergravities d M 10IIAIIBI 9N=2N=1 8N=2N=1 7N=4N=2 6(2,2)(2,1)(1,1)(2,0)(1,0) 5N=8N=6N=4N=2 4N=8N=6N=5N=4N=3N=2N=1 SUGRA SUGRA/SUSY SUGRA SUGRA/SUSY See discussion in AVP, hep-th/ Dimensions and # of supersymmetries

What is determined by specifying dmension d and N (i.e.Q) ? What remains to be determined ? n 32 ≥ Q > 8: Once the field content is determined: kinetic terms determined. Gauge group and its action on scalars to be determined. Potential depends on this gauging n Q = 8: kinetic terms to be determined Gauge group and its action on scalars to be determined. Potential depends on this gauging n Q = 4: (d=4, N=1): potential depends moreover on a superpotential function W.

n With > 8 susys: symmetric spaces The map of geometries n 4 susys: Kähler: U(1) part in isotropy group n 8 susys: very special, special Kähler and quaternionic-Kähler SU(2)=USp(2) part in holonomy group U(1) part in holonomy group

Gauge group n Number of generators = number of vectors. n This includes as well vectors in supergravity multiplet and those in vector multiplets (cannot be distinguished in general) n The gauge group is arbitrary, but to have positive kinetic terms gives restrictions on possible non-compact gauge groups.

Gauged supergravity for applications n Essential progress: stabilisation of moduli by supergravity potentials n N=1: superpotential produced by fluxes -e.g. Gukov-Vafa-Witten result for CY in IIB -Analogous result in heterotic string -Or understand from

Structure of the action n (D=4) with fields of spin 2, 1, 0, 3/2, 1/2 n Kinetic terms determined by some matrices. They describe the geometry n Gauged supergravity: What are the covariant derivatives ? The field strenghts can be non-abelian. Potential V ? If these (from a higher-dimensional theory) get scalar values, these terms produce new contributions to the potential V.

3. N=1 and N=2 supergravities Multiplets with spin · 2 N=1 N=2 graviton m.(2, )graviton m.(2,,,1) vector mult.(1, )vector mult.(1,,,0,0) (special) Kähler geometry chiral mult.(, 0,0) Kähler geometry hypermult.(,,0,0,0,0) quaternionic- Kähler

Bosonic terms Multiplets with spin · 2 N=1 N=2 graviton m.(2, )graviton m.(2,,,1) vector mult.(1, )vector mult.(1,,,0,0) chiral mult.(, 0,0)hypermult.(,,0,0,0,0) 

Potentials In N=1 determined by the holomorphic superpotential W(  ) and by the gauging (action of gauge group on scalar manifold) -Isometries of Kähler manifold of the scalar manifold can be gauged by vectors of the vector multiplets In N ¸ 2 only determined by gauging (action of gauge group on hypermultiplets and vector multiplet scalars) -Vector multiplet scalars are in adjoint of gauge group. -Hypermultiplets: isometries can be gauged by the vectors of the vector multiplets

N=1 Potential n General fact in supergravity V =  fermions (  fermion) (metric) (  fermion) F-term D-term  gravitino  gaugino  chiral fermions depends on superpotential W, and on K (M P -2 corrections) Fayet-Iliopoulos term   depends on gauge transformations and on K + arbitrary constant   (for U(1) factors)

N=2 Potential P I analogous to D  in N=1: moment maps associated to isometries in manifolds with a symplectic structure. FI terms FI terms are undetermined constants in D or P V =  fermions (  fermion) (metric) (  fermion)  gravitino  hyperino  gaugino Killing vectors on quaternionic-Kähler manifold X I (z) symplectic representation of scalars of vector multiplets

4. Superconformal methods n Superconformal idea, illustration Poincaré gravity n Superconformal formulation for N=1, d=4 n R-symmetry in the conformal approach n The potential or: Simplification of supergravity by using a parent rigid supersymmetric theory

The idea of superconformal methods n Difference susy- sugra: the concept of multiplets is clear in susy, they are mixed in supergravity n Superfields are an easy conceptual tool n Gravity can be obtained by starting with conformal symmetry and gauge fixing. n Before gauge fixing: everything looks like in rigid supersymmetry + covariantizations

Poincaré gravity by gauge fixing scalar field (compensator) conformal gravity: See: negative signature of scalars ! Thus: if more physical scalars: start with (– ) n First action is conformal invariant, Scalar field had scale transformation  (x)=  D (x)  (x)  choice determines M P dilatational gauge fixing

Superconformal formulation for N=1, d=4 n superconformal group includes dilatations and U(1) R-symmetry n Super-Poincaré gravity = Weyl multiplet: includes (auxiliary) U(1) gauge field + compensating chiral multiplet n Corresponding scalar is called ‘conformon’: Y n Fixing value gives rise to M P : n U(1) is gauge fixed by fixing the imaginary part of Y, e.g. Y=Y *

Superconformal methods for N=1 d=4 (n+1) – dimensional Kähler manifold with conformal symmetry (a closed homothetic Killing vector k i ) (implies a U(1) generated by k j J j i ) Gauge fix dilatations and U(1) n-dimensional Hodge-Kähler manifold

R-symmetry in conformal approach n R-group is part of the superconformal group. n Should then be gauge-fixed n Isometries act also on compensating scalars n The moment map is the transformation of the compensating scalars under the isometry In conformal formulation: R £ Isom Gauge fixing of R : R £ Isom ! Isom. But the remaining isometries have contribution from R-symmetry

Potential (in example d=4, N=1) n F-term potential is unified by including the extra chiral multiplet: n D-term potential: is unified as FI is the gauge transformation of the compensating scalar:

5. Examples cosmic string in N=1 and N=2 other embeddings of manifolds producing stable de Sitter vacua

N=1 supergravity for cosmic string n N=1 supergravity consists of : -pure supergravity: spin 2 + spin 3/2 (“gravitino”) -gauge multiplets: spin 1 + spin ½ (“gaugino”) vectors gauge an arbitrary gauge group -chiral multiplets: complex spin 0 + spin ½ in representation of gauge group n For cosmic string setup: -supergravity -1 vector multiplet : gauges U(1) (symmetry Higgsed by tachyon) -1 chiral multiplet with complex scalar: open string tachyon: phase transformation under U(1)

Cosmic string solution  1 chiral multiplet (scalar  ) charged under U(1) of a vector multiplet (W  ), and a FI term  r    D = g  D = 0 C = r  C = r( 1-  M P -2 ) leads to deficit angle Abrikosov, Nielsen, Olesen BPS solution: ½ susy

Amount of supersymmetry n FI term would give complete susy breaking n Cosmic string: ½ susy preservation n Supersymmetry completely restored far from string: FI-term compensated by value of scalar field.

Embedding in N=2 Augmenting the supersymmetry

Consistent reduction of N=2 to N=1 n Trivial in supersymmetry: any N=2 can be written in terms of N=1 multiplets → one can easily put some multiplets to zero. n Not in supergravity as there is no (3/2,1) multiplet n This is non-linearily coupled to all other multiplets Multiplets with spin · 2 N=1 N=2 graviton m.(2, )graviton m.(2,,,1) vector mult.(1, )vector mult.(1,,,0,0) chiral mult.(, 0,0)hypermult.(,,0,0,0,0)

Consistent truncation and geodesic motion n Sigma models: scalars of N=2 theory -e.o.m.: geodesic motion -consistent truncation: geodesic submanifold: any geodesic in the submanifold is a geodesic of the ambient manifold n Consistent truncation N=2 consistent truncations have been considered in details in papers of L. Andrianopoli, R. D’Auria and S. Ferrara, 2001

The truncation of N=2 The quaternionic-Kähler manifold M QK must admit a completely geodesic Kähler-Hodge submanifold M KH : M KH ½ M QK n for the 1-dimensional quaternionic-Kähler: Multiplets with spin · 2 N=1 N=2 graviton m.(2, )graviton m.(2,,,1) vector mult.(1, )vector mult.(1,,,0,0) chiral mult.(, 0,0)hypermult.(,,0,0,0,0)

P-terms to D-terms n Triplet P-terms of N=2 are complex F-terms and real D-terms of N=1 n Projection to N=1 should be ‘aligned’ such that only D-terms remain to get a BPS string solution Ana Achúcarro, Alessio Celi, Mboyo Esole, Joris Van den Bergh and AVP, D-term cosmic strings from N=2 supergravity, hep-th/

Embeddings more general n What we have seen: only a part of the scalar manifold is non-trivial in the solution. n In this way a simple model can still be useful in a more complicated theory: the subsector that is relevant for a solution is the same as for a more complicated theory n Such situations have been considered recently for more general special geometries (N=2 theories) in a recent paper: ‘Tits-Satake projections of homogeneous special geometries’, P. Fré, F. Gargiulo, J. Rosseel, K. Rulik, M. Trigiante and AVP

(meta)stable de Sitter vacua n N=1: many possibilities, see especially KKLT-like constructions in A. Achúcarro, B. de Carlos, J.A. Casas and L. Doplicher, De Sitter vacua from uplifting D-terms in effective supergravities from realistic strings, hep-th/ n N=2 much more restrictive. Remember: potential only related to gauging.

Stable de Sitter vacua from N=2 supergravity n A few models have been found in d=5, N=2 (Q=8) that allow de Sitter vacua where the potential has a minimum at the critical point B. Cosemans, G. Smet, P. Frè, M. Trigiante, AVP, n A few years ago similar models where found for d=4, N=2 n These are exceptional: apart from these constructions all de Sitter extrema in theories with 8 or more supersymmetries are at most saddle points of the potential

Main ingredients n - Symplectic transformations (dualities) from the standard formulation in d=4 - Tensor multiplets (2-forms dual to vector multiplets) in d=5, allowing gaugings that are not possible for vector multiplets n Non-compact gauging n Fayet-Iliopoulos terms (again the uplifting!)

6. Final remarks n There is a landscape of possibilities in supergravity, but supergravity gives also many restrictions. n For consistency, a good string theory vacuum should also have a valid supergravity approximation. n For cosmology, the supergravity theory gives computable quantities. n We have illustrated here some general rules, but also some examples that show both the possibilities and the restrictions of supergravity theories.