2005 NAIP Survey Brian Vanderbilt 801-975-3500 X240

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Initial feedback from Customers New trainee coaches are invited to submit feedback about their early experiences in dealing with New Insights. The statistics.
Advertisements

Rosemary Bookkeeping What to say to the accountant at the year end July 2011.
This first sample can be identify as a good CV because: Each section is highlighted making it easier for reader to differentiate the different sections.
MGISAC North-East Workshop Oct 26, 2009 Imagery for the State The Missouri leaf-off Orthoimagery Project Ray Fox USGS Geospatial Liaison.
Newspaper Photography. Journalism made a drastic change in 1936 with the publication Of “Life Magazine”. It was in “Life” that photos were used to tell.
CS 128/ES Lecture 2b1 Attribute Data and Map Types.
March 25, The Blundellsands Surgery Patient Reference Group Questionnaire Results Monday, March 25 th 2013.
Literacy Through Photography Project Clyde L. Rice, Jr. RE July 29, 2010.
AFAMs and Civil Air Patrol PIOs August CAP Mission Summary CAP Mission Summary Training and Qualification Changes Training and Qualification Changes.
CS 128/ES Lecture 2b1 Attribute Data and Map Types.
NAIP Preview for FSA State Office GIS Specialists February 24, 2010 NAIP 2010.
Sparse Versus Dense Spatial Data R.L. (Bob) Nielsen Professor of Agronomy Purdue University West Lafayette, IN Web:
SE 450 Software Processes & Product Metrics Software Metrics Overview.
Software Development Overview CPSC 315 – Programming Studio Spring 2009.
Software Development Overview CPSC 315 – Programming Studio Spring 2008.
NAIP POST-SEASON MEETING December 6, 2005 ACQUISITION TEAM MEMBERS Contractor:# Planes Great Lakes Aerial – OH1 – PA31 Navajo Woolpert – OH2 – Cessna.
Basics of Good Documentation Document Control Systems
2005 NAIP Post Season Summary Surdex Team 2005 NAIP Post Season Summary 6 December, 2005 Ron Hoffmann, President Craig Molander, SVP Business Development.
Imagery for Supporting FSA Farm Programs Review FSA Requirements for Imagery Identify and Evaluate Possible Alternatives Recommend Plan of Action Objectives.
Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration Mary Moran Contracting Officer, QMACB September 5, 2012 Mary Moran Contracting Officer,
E-Surveys/Tools April 19, About E-Surveys 2.
Student Forum March5, pm - Collaborate Students will share their thoughts on topics including: --experiences with online courses --ways instructors.
Acronis Sales Escalation Process 1. Overview – How will this benefit you? 2 Acronis Customer Central is here to help sales close deals and retain customers.
10 Years of IT Service Management Cornelis A. Winkler Prins senior consultant & partner Service Management Partners, Inc.
SurplusSurplus Surplus Forum January 8, SurplusSurplus Changes at Surplus Presented by Margaret Chambers, Director.
Farm Service Agency National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Pecora Conference November 13, 2002 Denver, Colorado Kent Williams, USDA FSA Aerial Photography.
THE FARMING GAME.
National Agriculture Imagery Program Potential Program Changes USDA Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah December 4-6, 2006 Kent Williams NAIP Program.
FSA State Office NAIP Training Kent Williams Cindy Sessions David Davis Brian Vanderbilt June 15, 2006.
Aerial Services Inc. Brief Overview of NAIP 2005 Participation.
Viking Survey Results Report Team Assignment 11 Team 2-1.
Collecting Data Types, coding, accuracy, file formats and the effect of data loss.
Copyright (c) Cem Kaner. 1 Software Testing 1 CSE 3411 SWE 5411 Assignment #1 Replicate and Edit Bugs.
> The Geospatial Experts 2005 NAIP Post Season Meeting Lessons Learned Jaymes Pardue, Senior Account Manager Paul Currie, Project Manager December 06,
Population distribution of India. Index What is it? What is it? Where is it? Where is it? Regional Map Regional Map Statistics Statistics Population Distribution.
11/19/20081 NAIP 2008: Issues and Enhancements Zack Adkins NAIP 2008 Post Mortem November 19, 2008.
1 An Evaluation of a Digital Camera System for Measuring Smoke Plume Opacity EPA Measurement Technology Workshop 2013 January 29, 2013 Bill Gillespie Virginia.
Interspire Knowledge Manager (Formerly Interspire ActiveKB)
Ortho Imagery Color and IR Coeur d’Alene Tribe Frank Roberts, GIS Manager.
Software Development Overview CPSC 315 – Programming Studio Spring 2013.
North West Group.  Team resources:  7 Cessna Conquest’s  9 ADS40-II SH52 sensors  Used 2008 season (Peak):  7 Conquests  7 ADS40’s  EarthData and.
USDA - FSA Aerial Photography Field Office NAIP 2005 Dec 6, 2005 Christopher Maika Triathlon Ltd. Sales Director, Mapping MDA GSI (Geospatial Services.
NAIP 2010 Presentation to National States Geographic Information Council Kent Williams USDA Farm Service Agency Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO )
Mtivity Client Support System Quick start guide. Mtivity Client Support System We are very pleased to announce the launch of a new Client Support System.
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation Course 1 : June 1 st – 2 nd 2015.
Etiquette Workshop. Basics Try to keep the brief (one screen length, or 25 lines). Check for punctuation, spelling, and grammatical errors.
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation September Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar.
Impact Planning Jeff Greenidge Network Director. Why gather impact data? Demonstrate Validate Maintain.
2005 Program Highlights 151,658 quarter quads under contract 151,658 quarter quads under contract 83% acquired within flying season83% acquired within.
FSA Geospatial Support Kevin Clarke USDA-FSA-APFO USDA Planning Meeting Dec 11-13, 2007.
2006 Index Scanning Project Photo, Line, and Spot Indexes Brian Vanderbilt GIS Specialist USDA Farm Service Agency Aerial Photography Field Office
April 23, 2008 Electronic Certified Payroll Sandia National Laboratories.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda February 11, 2010 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update.
Task 2: [P5] Monitoring & Evaluate Customer Service There are many methods of monitoring and evaluating customer service.  One of the most common methods.
2nd Joint Workshop on Pesticide Indicators Pesticide Usage Survey on Wheat in Hungary Zsuzsanna Szabó Hungarian Central Statistical Office September.
NAIP 2011 Presentation for NSGIC NAIP 2011 Presentation for FSA State GIS Specialists August 31, 2010.
GIS: The Systematic Approach to Precise Farm Management Robert Biffle Precision Agriculture April,
Responding to Invitation to Tenders Michael Fowler Category Manager – Procurement Brian Davies Senior Procurement Officer.
Cloud Computing 10 Cloud Computing 10. Cloud Computing 10 You’ll have heard about the ‘Cloud’ Lots of you will use it! But you need to be clear about.
Component D: Activity D.3: Surveys Department EU Twinning Project.
CALVERLEY PATIENT SURVEY FEEDBACK NOVEMBER ACCESSING YOUR APPOINTMENT Very quick and professional – One could say “Bedside Manner Excellent” On.
Forum to improve your experience entering data into SRDR 1 SRDR is being developed and maintained by the Brown EPC under contract with the Agency for Healthcare.
Development Management Customer Satisfaction Survey 2015/16 Economy, Planning and Employability Services Reported Prepared May 2016.
Software Development Overview
How Can NRCS Clients Use the Conservation Client Gateway
Performance Review Tool Updates College of Engineering
9/21/2017 Thursday.
Institutional Research and Assessment (IR&A) Feedback Survey
ECU Foundation Xtender Application
Software Development Overview
Presentation transcript:

2005 NAIP Survey Brian Vanderbilt X240

Overview Why do a Survey? Why do a Survey? Survey Process Survey Process Survey Results Survey Results

Why do a Survey? Ask the Question “How did APFO do in providing useful NAIP imagery to it’s primary customer?” Ask the Question “How did APFO do in providing useful NAIP imagery to it’s primary customer?” Quantitative Quantitative QQ Exposure Dates During Acquisition PeriodQQ Exposure Dates During Acquisition Period Qualitative Qualitative County/State Survey FeedbackCounty/State Survey Feedback Goal Goal “Do better next year”“Do better next year”

Why do a Survey? A Business Process Contract Award APFO Uses Acquisition Period Dates These Dates Compared To QQ Exposure Dates Statistical Results Calculated And Map Published by 30 Dec Surveys Sent to States & Service Centers Level of NAIP “Success” Evaluated by State Modify the Process And Requirements for Improvement Resulting Modification to Contract

Survey Process Developing the Survey Developing the Survey Scoring the Survey Scoring the Survey Survey Results Survey Results

Survey Process Developing the Survey Developing the Survey Understand FSA programsUnderstand FSA programs Ask questions to derive answers aboutAsk questions to derive answers about Usefulness of imagery Usefulness of imagery Timeliness of imagery Timeliness of imagery Make survey easy to takeMake survey easy to take Allow for textual commentsAllow for textual comments “I can’t tell the difference between corn and soybeans” “I can’t tell the difference between corn and soybeans” “Imagery delivered too late for compliance work” “Imagery delivered too late for compliance work” “This imagery is great compared to 2004” “This imagery is great compared to 2004” Allow for “N/A” or “Unsure” answersAllow for “N/A” or “Unsure” answers

Survey Process Developing the Survey Developing the Survey Sent out to State GIS Coordinators/SpecialistsSent out to State GIS Coordinators/Specialists 2 Attachments 2 Attachments Memo from DirectorMemo from Director Survey in excelSurvey in excel Requested Coordinators/Specialists to forward surveys to county service center reps and to take surveys themselvesRequested Coordinators/Specialists to forward surveys to county service center reps and to take surveys themselves Completed surveys to APFO via by 15 Dec 05Completed surveys to APFO via by 15 Dec 05

Survey Process Scoring the Survey Scoring the Survey Coded to auto-populate excel score sheet forCoded to auto-populate excel score sheet for Questions 1-10 Questions 1-10 Based on FIPS Based on FIPS Questions manually populatedQuestions manually populated Questions considered, but not populated in the score sheetQuestions considered, but not populated in the score sheet Textual comments Textual comments “N/A” and “Unsure” answers not scored“N/A” and “Unsure” answers not scored

Case Studies – Survey Results from Iowa & Oklahoma

Survey Results - Iowa

Q1-Q8 Mean is out of possible 5 points. Q9-10 Mean is out of a possible 10 points. Question by Question Breakdown

Derived from the Raw Data of Counties in IA that have Taken the Survey, 2950 Points were Accrued out of a Possible /3480 = 84.77% Overall Survey Scoring Average

Survey Results - Iowa

Survey Comments Survey Comments I am able to tell the difference between crops but I am not able to identify the crops without a certification map from the producer.I am able to tell the difference between crops but I am not able to identify the crops without a certification map from the producer. If our county had been flown earlier, it would have been much easier to determine oats from alfalfa or mixed hay.If our county had been flown earlier, it would have been much easier to determine oats from alfalfa or mixed hay. The imagery from last year was much better.The imagery from last year was much better. It is very difficult to tell the difference this year between corn and beans. The colors are primarily in the gray tones with just a little difference in a touch of green.It is very difficult to tell the difference this year between corn and beans. The colors are primarily in the gray tones with just a little difference in a touch of green. Our imagery was taken August 6th. We would be better served if the date was 2 or 3 weeks earlier.Our imagery was taken August 6th. We would be better served if the date was 2 or 3 weeks earlier. The color quality was a disappointment as it is hard to distinguish between crops.The color quality was a disappointment as it is hard to distinguish between crops.

Survey Results - Iowa Survey Comments Survey Comments It would be great if the system was faster when working with imagery.It would be great if the system was faster when working with imagery. The imagery for 2005 was not the best quality in our county; not a lot of contrast and color; kind of a gray- green. Last year there was differing colors of green and contrast between crops.The imagery for 2005 was not the best quality in our county; not a lot of contrast and color; kind of a gray- green. Last year there was differing colors of green and contrast between crops. We have 2 major highways going through our County and the imagery has been really helpful with that.We have 2 major highways going through our County and the imagery has been really helpful with that. It makes certification much easier.It makes certification much easier. The 2005 NAIP photos are not as clear as I would like to see. Details are not very clear when zoomed in close.The 2005 NAIP photos are not as clear as I would like to see. Details are not very clear when zoomed in close. The 2005 NAIP imagery was much better than the 2004.The 2005 NAIP imagery was much better than the Our 2003 imagery was not usable due to poor quality. Our 2004 imagery was excellent. Our 2005 imagery is not as good of quality as the 2004, but much better than It lacks color quality making it difficult to determine crop types.Our 2003 imagery was not usable due to poor quality. Our 2004 imagery was excellent. Our 2005 imagery is not as good of quality as the 2004, but much better than It lacks color quality making it difficult to determine crop types.

Survey Results - Oklahoma

Q1-Q8 Mean is out of possible 5 points. Q9-10 Mean is out of a possible 10 points. Question by Question Breakdown

Derived from the Raw Data of Counties in OK that have Taken the Survey, 1562 Points were Accrued out of a Possible /2070 = 75.46% Overall Survey Scoring Average

Survey Results - Oklahoma

Survey Comments Survey Comments The newer color photography makes and acreage report more accurate, because producers seem to orient themselves better using it rather than the old black and white photography.The newer color photography makes and acreage report more accurate, because producers seem to orient themselves better using it rather than the old black and white photography. The quality of the image is excellent, and I know that better imagery costs money, but when we can afford it let's buy the best quality we can afford. It would be better to get closer the surface of the earth without blurring.The quality of the image is excellent, and I know that better imagery costs money, but when we can afford it let's buy the best quality we can afford. It would be better to get closer the surface of the earth without blurring. The NAIP process is good, our problem is not technology but rather the lack of employees needed to utilize the technology. We have the NAIP imagery but have still not begun our 2005 compliance spot checks due to the CDP program, LAP program, NAP activity etc. and no extra help.The NAIP process is good, our problem is not technology but rather the lack of employees needed to utilize the technology. We have the NAIP imagery but have still not begun our 2005 compliance spot checks due to the CDP program, LAP program, NAP activity etc. and no extra help. Having the imagery at 1 meter instead of 2 would help with clarity.Having the imagery at 1 meter instead of 2 would help with clarity. The quality of the 2005 NAIP was not as good as the previous yearThe quality of the 2005 NAIP was not as good as the previous year Need flights flown earlier (mid May); Need the imagery in office timely.Need flights flown earlier (mid May); Need the imagery in office timely.

Survey Results - Oklahoma Survey Comments Survey Comments Have the imagery taken on or very near to the dates that the county requests. If we could have the imagery available in the office earlier we could save a good number of trips to the filed. Determination could be made earlier along with compliance activities.Have the imagery taken on or very near to the dates that the county requests. If we could have the imagery available in the office earlier we could save a good number of trips to the filed. Determination could be made earlier along with compliance activities. The 2005 NAIP was so bad that we were unable to use it for anything, much less for compliance purposes.The 2005 NAIP was so bad that we were unable to use it for anything, much less for compliance purposes. It would be helpful to have our county flown twice a year for compliance.It would be helpful to have our county flown twice a year for compliance. We are very satisfied with the timing and quality of the compliance imagery. Lower marks are due to the problems experienced with ArcMap Compliance software failure.We are very satisfied with the timing and quality of the compliance imagery. Lower marks are due to the problems experienced with ArcMap Compliance software failure. Better training material should be provided to the user.Better training material should be provided to the user. I think late April or early May would be a good time to fly north central Oklahoma winter wheat counties, they may even be good in March?I think late April or early May would be a good time to fly north central Oklahoma winter wheat counties, they may even be good in March? I have been with the agency for 27 years in December, and this is the best improvement to any program area I have seen in that time. I love it.I have been with the agency for 27 years in December, and this is the best improvement to any program area I have seen in that time. I love it.

Questions?