Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Advertisements

Initial Calculations of Intrabeam Scattering life times in ELIC lattices by Betacool code Chaivat Tengsirivattana CASA, Jefferson Lab University of Virginia.
1 LHeC Considerations for a Lepton Hadron Collider Option for the LHC F. Willeke, BNL The 4th Electron Ion Collider Workshop Hampton University,
January 2004 GLC/NLC – X-Band Linear Collider Peter Tenenbaum Beam Dynamics of the IR: The Solenoid, the Crossing Angle, The Crab Cavity, and All That.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Brain Gestorme: Status of the LHeC Ring-Ring / Linac- Ring Basic Parameters I appologise to talk about things you already know...
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Issues.
Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC Vasiliy Morozov for MEIC Study Group Electron Ion Collider Users Meeting, Stony Brook University June 27,
IR Optics and Nonlinear Beam Dynamics Fanglei Lin for MEIC study group at JLab 2 nd Mini-workshop on MEIC IR Design, November 2, 2012.
Ion Collider Ring Design V.S. Morozov for MEIC study group MEIC Collaboration Meeting, JLab October 5-7, 2015.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
ELIC Low Beta Optics with Chromatic Corrections Hisham Kamal Sayed 1,2 Alex Bogacz 1 1 Jefferson Lab 2 Old Dominion University.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 Alex Bogacz EIC14 Workshop, Jefferson Lab, March 20,
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Muon Collider Design Workshop, BNL, December 1-3, 2009.
Progress on Design Studies of a High-Luminosity Ring-Ring Electron-Ion Collider at CEBAF and Its Low to Medium Energy Staging Approach* S. A. Bogacz, P.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz Status and Plans for Linac and RLAs.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 LHeC Workshop, Chavennes-de-Bogis, June 26, 2015 LHeC.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Acceleration in.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz 1 Recirculating Linac Acceleration  End-to-end.
Muon Collider Physics Workshop FNAL November 10-12, 2009 Muon Collider Lattice Design FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY f Y.
Full-Acceptance & 2 nd Detector Region Designs V.S. Morozov on behalf of the JLEIC detector study group JLEIC Collaboration Meeting, JLab March 29-31,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Alex.
JLEIC Electron Collider Ring Design and Polarization
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Ion Collider Ring: Design and Polarization
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
Large Booster and Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
Interaction Region Design for ELIC and Beam-Beam Simulations
Electron Ring Optics Design
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Other issues and concepts under study Conclusions References
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Accelerator and Interaction Region
Low Emittance Lattices
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Betatron Motion with Coupling of Horizontal and Vertical Degrees of Freedom – Part II Alex Bogacz USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011.
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Ion Collider Ring Using Superferric Magnets
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Presentation transcript:

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 Optics for ELIC  Collider Rings and Interaction Region Design Alex Bogacz Center for Advanced Studies of Accelerators

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 ELIC Ring-Ring Collider  Design Choices ‘Figure-8’ Collider Ring Topology Ensures spin preservation and ease of spin manipulation (spin rotators) Removes spin sensitivity to energy for all ion species Arc Optics Features Minimized emittance dilution due to quantum excitations (leptons) Limited synchrotron radiated power (leptons) Small momentum compaction to alleviate bunch lengthening (both species) ‘Aggressive’ Interaction Region (IR) Vertically crossing rings - ‘crab crossing’ Ultra small beta Interaction Point (IP) ‘Dipole second’ IR configuration (D = 0, D’ ≠ 0)

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 ELIC Interaction Region Challenges Unprecedented high Luminosity: 7.8×10 34 [cm -2 s -1 ] (peak luminosity per IP) Enabled by short ion bunches (  z = 5 mm), low beta β* = 5 mm), high rep. rate (1.5 GHz) ‘Crab Crossing’ required to alleviate luminosity reduction and to avoid parasitic beam-beam interaction due to high repetition rate Multiple IRs (4) Chromatic compensation with sextupoles necessary

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 Figure-8 Rings  Vertical ‘Stacking’

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 Figure-8 Rings  Vertical ‘Stacking’

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 Figure-8 Rings  Vertical ‘Stacking’

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 Figure-8 Ring with 80 0 crossing 330 m 150 m 80 deg

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility February 22, 2008 Figure-8 Ion Ring (half)  Lattice at 225 GeV 30 full cells 8 empty cells 3 transition cells Arc dipoles $Lb=210 cm $B=80.6 kG Arc quadrupoles $Lb=100 cm $G= 7.6 kG/cm phase adv./cell (  x = 60 0,  y = 60 0 )

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility February 22, 2008 Figure-8 Ion Ring (half)  Lattice at 225 GeV 30 full cells 8 empty cells 3 transition cells phase adv./cell (  x = 60 0,  y = 60 0 ) Minimum dispersion lattice (periodic) Dispersion suppression via ‘missing’ dipoles (geometrical) Uniform periodicity of Twiss functions (chromatic cancellations) Dispersion pattern ‘tailored’ to chromaticity compensation with sextupole families One family every third cell ( 3 × 60 0 = )

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility February 22, 2008 Figure-8 Electron Ring (half)  Lattice at 9 GeV 28 superperiods (3 cells/superperiod) 22 empty cells Arc dipoles $Lb=300 cm $B=2.7 kG Arc quadrupoles $Lb=30 cm $G= 4.3 kG/cm 22 empty cells phase adv./cell (  x = 120 0,  y = )

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility February 22, 2008 Figure-8 Electron Ring (half)  Lattice at 9 GeV 28 superperiods (3 cells/superperiod) 22 empty cells phase adv./cell (  x = 120 0,  y = ) Equilibrium Emittance (120 0 FODO): Minimized emittance dilution due to quantum excitations (emittance disp. inv. H) Limited (manageable) synchrotron radiated power Synchrotron Radiated Power: 14.3MW (total) 1.85A

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility February 22, 2008 Figure-8 Electron Ring (half)  Lattice at 9 GeV 28 superperiods (3 cells/superperiod) 22 empty cells phase adv./cell (  x = 120 0,  y = ) Momentum Compaction : Quasi isochronous arc to alleviate bunch lengthening Dispersion pattern ‘tailored’ to chromaticity compensation with sextupole families One family every third quad ( 3/2 × = )

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 Figure-8 Rings  Vertical ‘Stacking’ ‘straights’

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 Figure-8 Straights with two IPs Note: dimension of the drawing not to scale 85 m free space to accommodate e/p injection/ejection, SRF cavity, electron cooling, and electron polarimeter spin rotators spin rotator 35 m collision point vertical bend 85 m i i e e arc dipole 20 m 0.75 m arc bend 85 m spin rotator vertical bend 85 m 35 m 0.75 m 35 m vertical bend 20 m y z straight section (330 m) Vertical crossing angle (22.2 mrad) Minimizing crossing angle reduces crab cavity challenges and required R&D IP 70 m 7.6 m FF Crab cavity Match Chrom FODO Match Chrom Crab cavity FODO

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 IP 10cm 1.8m 20.8kG/cm 3m 12KG/cm 0.5m 3.2kG/cm 0.6m 2.55kG/cm 8.4cm 22.2 mrad 1.27 deg 0.2m Vertical intercept 4.5m 3.8m 14.4cm 16.2cm Vertical intercept 22.9cm Vertical intercept 4mm electron ion 5mm IR design with ’interleaved’ FF quads

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, cm 14cm 3cm 1.8m 20.8kG/cm 4.6cm 8.6cm Electron (9GeV) Proton (225GeV) 2.4cm 10cm 2.4cm 3cm 4.8cm B-Field in coil and force collar following talk by Paul Brindza ‘Lambertson quad’ for the final focus

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 ‘Crab Crossing’  Multi-cell SRF cavities KEK B-Factory ‘Crab Cavity’  Squashed cell TM110 B field K. Oide Crab Cavity requirement for 22 mrad crossing: Electron: 1.2 MV – (KEK, single cell, 1.4 MV) Ion: 24 MV (multi-cell cavity, R&D raquired)

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 E ion = 225 GeV  * = 5/5 mm  N = 1.3/0.06  m rad Final Focus Optics  Beam envelopes 380 cm E electron = 9 GeV  * = 5/5 mm  N = 90/3.6  m rad  max = 4.0/2.4 mm  max = 3.1/32 km Quads L[cm]G[kG/cm] cm 350 cm 100 cm  max = 5.0/3.8 mm  max = 4.8/54 km Quads L[cm] G[kG/cm] cm 100 cm 350 cm 50 cm 450 cm 100 cm 350 cm 50 cm 380 cm220 cm 350 cm 100 cm

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 FF doublet IR  Matching to the Ring x,y  x,y * = 5 mm FF doublet FODO matching singlet-doublet E ele = 9 GeV x,y  x,y max = 3.1/32 km 3.8 m

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 FF doublet IR  Matching to the Ring x,y  x,y * = 5 mm FF doublet FODO matching singlet-doublet E ele = 9 GeV x,y  x,y max = 3.1/32 km 3.8 m

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 FF doublet IR  Matching to the Ring x,y  x,y * = 5 mm FF doublet FODO matching singlet-doublet E ele = 9 GeV x,y  x,y max = 3.1/32 km 3.8 m

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 FF doublet IR  Matching to the Ring x,y  x,y * = 5 mm FF doublet FODO matching singlet-doublet E ele = 9 GeV x,y  x,y max = 3.1/32 km 3.8 m

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 IR Beta Chromaticity IR Ions IR elactrons  p/p = 0, ,….., following talk by Hisham Sayed

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 following talk by Pavel Chevtsov ‘Spin rotators’  Electron Ring at 9 GeV full ‘bending’ cells empty ‘straight’ cells Solenoid magnet $Lb=300 cm $B=100 kG

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 ‘Spin rotators’  Electron Ring at 9 GeV full ‘bending’ cells empty ‘straight’ cells Skew Quads $Lb=90 cm $G=0.18 kG/cm decoupled spin rotator module

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23, 2008 Conclusions Compelling case for High Luminosity ELIC Based on present assumptions [cm -2 s -1 ] luminosity collider is feasible … more studies needed… Optics  Conceptual lattice design of major sub-systems Interleaved Interaction Regions for both species Figure-8 Arc lattices Matching between sections Compact ‘Spin rotator’ Optics Still to come…. Chromatic compensations, higher order effects Complete spin matching Optics (IR-to-IR)