Architecture and institutional issues for AeroMACS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Andy Knill Head of Surveillance and Spectrum Management UK Civil Aviation Authority.
Advertisements

SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
SATELLITE DATA LINK SYSTEM (SDLS)
Slide 1 NEWSKY – NEtWorking the SKY for aeronautical communications Michael Schnell, Sandro Scalise German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Communications.
ICAO Aviation Considerations for Internet Mobility Services ICAO WG N-1 Meeting #5 Montreal, Canada November 7-10, 2005 ACP/SWGN1-5 th meeting FL 502.
Phillipe Renaud and Nikos Fistas
1 Global Satellite CNS Program. 2 Background/status –Supplemental FY 2002 appropriation provided funding to explore secure global satellite CNS for air.
Future Communications Roadmap
Service Technique de la Navigation Aérienne NexSAT: Mission Hypothesis 20 may, 2003 STNA/31 ATM issues at horizon 2015 over ECAC Capacity: - VHF spectrum.
1 BNSC 3 Programme Aviation use of Broadband Satcom Paul Ravenhill Helios Technology.
14/05/2008 Brussels, AP4 Workshop SWIM-SUIT Giuliano dAuria SELEX Sistemi Integrati.
Architecture and institutional issues for AeroMACS.
19/09/2007 Belfast, AIAA Conference SWIM-SUIT Giuliano dAuria SELEX Sistemi Integrati.
SESAR TEN-T day. Content ●SESAR investments and timing ●Network effect ●Validation and certification activities ●Conclusion.
Air-Ground Data Link - DFS Strategy
SC227 – SC214 ISRA – Datalink Interface. PBN Manual, Part A, Chapter On-board performance monitoring and alerting On-board performance.
GAMMA Overview. Key Data Grant Agreement n° Starting date: 1 st September 2013 Duration: 48 months (end date 31 st August 2017) Total Budget:
The Next Generation Air Transportation System “The Near Term and Beyond” Presented by Charles Leader, Director Joint Planning and Development Office.
Air Transport Reporting Form K for ANSPs ICAO Aviation Data Analyses Seminar Middle East (MID) Regional Office October Economic Analysis and Policy.
Flying the A-380 The Case for Bigger Aircraft MIT meets Lufthansa 2003.
Industrial Avionics Working Group 18/04/07 Defining the Safety Case Architecture IAWG Modular Certification.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Users’ Perspective of PBN Achieving Improvements Joël Morin Head, ATM Harmonization.
The IMPACT of the DOT REGULATIONS as to TARMAC DELAYS on AIR CARRIERS AND AIRPORTS Katherine Staton Jackson Walker L.L.P.
Air traffic controllers (ATC) consideration and ATC solutions Session 5 Presentation 4.
Route Planning and Evaluation
Route Optimization Requirements for Operational Use in Aeronautics and Space Exploration Mobile Networks (draft-eddy-nemo-aero-reqs-01) Wes Eddy – Verizon.
Omniran PtP Links across IEEE 802 Bridged Infrastructure Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max
Integrating information towards Digital ATM Mini Global Demonstration Presented By: Thien Ngo Date:August 28, 2013.
An Integration Framework for Sensor Networks and Data Stream Management Systems.
WAEA SFW Connectivity Update – Universal Sheraton - March 25, 2010 Presented by Jonathan Norris VP Cabin Design Office Aircraft Networks, Certification.
OmniRAN Specification – Structuring the effort Document Number: Omniran Date Submitted: Source: Max Riegel
TAMs – Total Airport Management Systems
Start Presentation. A Boeing Company The role of Simulation in installation of Explosive Detection Systems Auckland June 03 Helping our customers increase.
1HONEYWELL - CONFIDENTIAL HTSL Overview AeroMACS Network Model Diagrams.
System Wide Information Management (SWIM). FAA Transition to Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) - System Wide Information Management (SWIM) Initiative.
A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau Agenda Item 1.
Building the Case for Privatization and Deregulation of Urban and Intercity Transportation Systems Clifford Winston The Brookings Institution.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM) Testimony before the National Civil Aviation Review Commission Testimony.
Complex Procedure Development Plan
Scenario on airport works Session 5 Presentation 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
ENAV S.p.A. 1 AENA / ENAV / DFS / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Malmoe, ASAS /ADS-B: SAMPLE ANSPs STRATGIES & EXPECTATIONS.
“THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC CRISIS ON AVIATION SAFETY” CHRISTOS PETROU EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.
1 Thrust 5: Secure Wireless Networking Technologies For future generation wireless packet networks, two most important aspects need to be addressed: QoS.
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
IoT Architecture GISFI # 07, Dec 19-22, 2011, New Delhi Organization: NEC Doc No: GISFI_IoT_
The Global Voice of ATM Building ATM Capacity in the Middle East.
BY Mohd. MUJEEB ULLAH.  The demand for making air traveling more 'pleasant, secure and productive for passengers is one of the winning factors for airlines.
Copyright 2015 WiMAX Forum. All rights reserved AeroMACS Bandplan, User Community April 22, 2015.
Ca-US-ECC Cooperation 2011
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
2017 Safety Forum Runway Incursion scenarios
AeroMACS QOS.
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
AeroMACS Network Model Diagrams
Mini Global Demonstration
Loftur Jónasson, ICAO 11 March 2013
Architecture and institutional issues for AeroMACS
Analysis Capabilities Developed in Support of WTIC Research
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Panel Session 3 WRC-15 Agenda item 1.1
Air Transport Reporting Form K for ANSPs
Department of Civil Aviation Ministry of Information & Communications
ASEAN PBN Routes Objectives:
4D Trajectory Management
Soren Dissing - EUROCONTROL
Safety Data Collection and Analysis at ICAO
Presentation transcript:

Architecture and institutional issues for AeroMACS

Institutional issues for AeroMACS  Network architecture (basic requirements and operational/technical/physical considerations)  The potential services and applications provided by AeroMACS can be grouped into three major categories: ATC/ATM, Airline operations, Airport and/or port authority operations.  The three main categories can be further broken down into i) safety and advisory and then ii) mobile and fixed communications.  Infrastructure can be owned by various parties, i.e.; ANSPs, Service Providers, Airport Owners.  One or more networks can be operational at a given aerodrome HOWEVER Aircraft can only access one network at a time.  Safety services regardless of source, must be available over all networks operating at an aerodrome.  Air traffic control and management services can be physically isolated from airlines and airport/port authority services if required. (However, WiMAX networks have the capability to integrate multiple services while preserving the desired security and quality of service provisions of each.) This provides various AeroMACS scenarios for consideration!

Institutional issues for AeroMACS  Assumptions and Constraints (commercial/policy considerations)  At an aerodrome, multiple (communication) Service Providers may offer AeroMACS services or a single SP may be awarded a contract (by an airport authority) to provide AeroMACS (in which case the network will be considered to be operated by the Airport Authority).  In the case where multiple Service Providers provide service at an aerodrome, individual airlines or even the ANSP may contract with a particular SP but safety-related traffic must be internetworked with the other SPs. This sharing of traffic between SPs is known as “internetworking”.  The issues related to fixed communication are largely spectrum-related and hence, this will be treated the same as mobile traffic.  Where an ANSP provides the AeroMACS service at an aerodrome, SPs may re- sell the service to airlines and others. In this case the terrestrial network connection and any switching/routing will be provided by the SP. Such switching/routing may also include “internetworking” This provides various AeroMACS scenarios for consideration!

Figure 1-ANSP owns AeroMACS ATC ANSP (own AeroMACS) Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport

Figure 2-ANSP owns AeroMACS Service Provider ATC ANSP (own AeroMACS) Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport

Figure 3-ANSP owns AeroMACS Service Provider ATC ANSP (own AeroMACS) Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport

Figure 4-ANSP owns AeroMACS Service Provider #1 Service Provider #2 ATC ANSP (AeroMACS) Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport

Figure 5-ANSP owns AeroMACS Service Provider #1 Service Provider #2 ATC ANSP (AeroMACS) Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport

Figure 6-ANSP owns AeroMACS Service Provider #1Service Provider #2 ATC ANSP (AeroMACS) Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport Internetworking

Figure 7- CSP owns AeroMACS ATC AeroMACS Service Provider 1 ANSP Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport

Figure 8- CSP owns AeroMACS ATC AeroMACS Service Provider 1 ANSP Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport Service Provider #1 Service Provider #2 Internetworking

Figure 9 -CSP owns AeroMACS (Primary) AeroMACS Service Provider #1 (Secondly) AeroMACS Service Provider #2 ANSP Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport Service Provider #1Service Provider #2

Figure 10 -CSP owns AeroMACS AeroMACS Service Provider #1 AeroMACS Service Provider #2 ANSP Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport Service Provider #1 Service Provider #2

Figure 11 -CSP owns AeroMACS AeroMACS Service Provider #1 AeroMACS Service Provider #2 ANSP Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport Service Provider #1Service Provider #2 safety traffic

Figure 12- Airline owns AeroMACS ATC Airline AeroMACS Airline #1 ANSP Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport

Figure 13- Airline owns AeroMACS ATC Airline AeroMACS Airline #1 ANSP Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport Service Provider #1 Service Provider #2 Internetworking

Figure 14 –Airlines own AeroMACS (Primary) AeroMACS Service Provider #1 (Secondary) AeroMACS Service Provider #2 ANSP Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport Service Provider #1Service Provider #2

Figure 15 –Airlines own AeroMACS AeroMACS Service Provider #1 AeroMACS Service Provider #2 ANSP Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport Service Provider #1 Service Provider #2 safety traffic

Figure 16 – Airlines own AeroMACS AeroMACS Service Provider #1 AeroMACS Service Provider #2 ANSP Airline #1 Airline #2 Airport Service Provider #1Service Provider #2 safety traffic

Condition 2- Data category  Within these broad categories, the data communications services and applications can be described as either fixed or mobile, based on the mobility of the end user.  However, because of operational constraints on the international frequency spectrum allocated for AeroMACS, only those services that can directly impact the safety and regularity of flight are candidates for provision by AeroMACS.  Some examples of potential AeroMACS services and applications are listed in next slide which extracted from “Potential AeroMACS Service Categories in U.S. by Mr. Brent Phillips; FAA”

Potential AeroMACS Service Categories in U.S. Potential AeroMACS Services Air TrafficAirlinesAirport Mobile Fixed Mobile Fixed Mobile Fixed ATC Advisory Services Surface CNS Services TBD AOC Services AAC Services Advisory Services Port Authority Ops Safety Services Port Authority Ops Security Services