Focusing the question Janet Harris Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group ESQUIRE Qualitative Systematic Review Workshop University of Sheffield 6.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic.
Advertisements

Technology Appraisal of Medical Devices at NICE – Methods and Practice Mark Sculpher Professor of Health Economics Centre for Health Economics University.
Finding an Evidence- Based Program. Objectives Know how to use your needs assessment and program goals and objectives to help you select your program.
Protocol Development.
Shared Decision Making – a strategic framework for commissioners 2 May 2012.
Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of health behavior interventions based on TTM.
Theme 6. Cochrane Reviews: innovative reviews and methodology.
Shared decision making and Australian general practitioner training Dr Ronald McCoy, Education Strategy Senior Advisor, Royal Australian College of General.
99.98% of the time patients are on their own “The diabetes self-management regimen is one of the most challenging of any for chronic illness.” 0.02% of.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies
Reading the Dental Literature
K U Leuven Systematic Review Workshop 4-6 June 2012
Recruitment to Trials. Background Recruitment of participants is a VERY important issue. The general consensus is that most trials under recuit.
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergencies (SAFE) Trial An evaluation of the costs and benefits of computerised on-scene decision support for emergency.
Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Clinical Practice October 2014 Dawn Stacey RN, PhD Research Chair in Knowledge Translation to Patients Full Professor,
Critical Appraisal of an Article by Dr. I. Selvaraj B. SC. ,M. B. B. S
C ONSUMER PARTICIPATION IN T HE C OCHRANE C OLLABORATION : A COMPARISON OF MODELS Gill Gyte Dell Horey 20 October 2011.
Gender-based health and weight loss beliefs in knee osteoarthritis patients.
Making all research results publically available: the cry of systematic reviewers.
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
1 Evidence and the next stage of health care reform: Why consumer engagement is so important Steven D. Pearson, MD, MSc President, Institute for Clinical.
Cancer Care Ontario A Organizational Overview S Orientation Workshop July 16, 2014 Sheila M Densham, BA, TEACH Health Promotion Coordinator.
Medication Adherence The following module is designed as a basic overview of medication adherence for providers of healthcare, particularly those in a.
Systematic Reviews.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Exploring the Concept of Evidence-Based Practice Dr Tina Harris Lead Midwife for Education Adapted from a presentation originally developed by Dr Susan.
1 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 13 Building an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
The University of Sydney Sydney School of Public Health Qualitative Health Research Collaboration (QHeRC) 23 rd Feb 2010 Sian Smith Research Fellow, Screening.
Chapter 3 Deciding What to Study Choosing a Topic and Stating the Problem.
EBC course 10 April 2003 Critical Appraisal of the Clinical Literature: The Big Picture Cynthia R. Long, PhD Associate Professor Palmer Center for Chiropractic.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Landmark Trials: Recommendations for Interpretation and Presentation Julianna Burzynski, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS Heme/Onc Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 11/29/07.
Wipanee Phupakdi, MD September 15, Overview  Define EBM  Learn steps in EBM process  Identify parts of a well-built clinical question  Discuss.
EBM Conference (Day 2). Funding Bias “He who pays, Calls the Tune” Some Facts (& Myths) Is industry research more likely to be published No Is industry.
META-ANALYSIS, RESEARCH SYNTHESES AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON.
Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.
Community wide interventions for physical activity Clinical
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
Focusing the question Janet Harris
1 Health and Disease in Populations 2002 Session 8 – 21/03/02 Randomised controlled trials 1 Dr Jenny Kurinczuk.
Workshop A. Development of complex interventions Rob Anderson, PCMD Nicky Britten, PCMD.
Workshop 18 th May 2010, Brussels Applying the Value+ model on patient involvement in HTA processes.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2012.
Protocol Launch Meeting and Research Skills Course September 16 th 2015, RCS England Searching the Literature.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
Focusing the question Janet Harris Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group ESQUIRE Qualitative Systematic Review Workshop University of Sheffield 2.
Promoting Patient Involvement in Medication Decisions David H. Hickam, MD, MPH Professor, Dept. of Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland,
Issues and challenges to scoping and focusing the question ESQUIRE Qualitative Systematic Review Workshop University of Sheffield 8 September 2011 Janet.
Developing your research question Fiona Alderdice and Mike Clarke.
Critical Appraisal of a Paper Feedback. Critical Appraisal Full Reference –Authors (Surname & Abbreviations) –Year of publication –Full Title –Journal.
Drug Utilization Review & Drug Utilization Evaluation: An Overview
What are the most effective treatment approaches to use to reduce fatigue for people with Multiple Sclerosis? A critical appraisal of the literature Samantha.
Best Practice Systematic Review
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
Evidence-based Medicine
Rachel Morell1, Simon Rosenbaum1,2 and Belinda J Parmenter1
Effective evidence-based occupational therapy
MeOTa fall conference October 22, 2016
Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing
Systematic Review (Advanced_Course_Module_6_Appendix)
Writing Cochrane Protocol Cochrane Thailand Workshop 2017
MECIR: the bits that reviewers keep getting wrong!
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Cervical Cancer and Screening Dr Ghufran Jassim MBBS,MD, MSc, PhD 8/30/2017.
What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic. Ask What is a review?
Meta-analysis, systematic reviews and research syntheses
Systematic Review (Advanced Course: Module 6 Appendix)
Evidence-Based Public Health
Presentation transcript:

Focusing the question Janet Harris Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group ESQUIRE Qualitative Systematic Review Workshop University of Sheffield 6 September 2011

Aims for this session Overview of question types in qualitative systematic reviewing Formulating a qualitative question: a worked example Over to you!

Question types Informing questions Enhancing questions Extending questions Supplementing questions

Informing questions are used during development of an effectiveness question The effectiveness PICO is used as a starting point The qualitative questions scope the background information for each element of the PICO The information produced Provides clarity on the scope of the Question, helping to refine the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes for the effectiveness question Provides useful information for developing Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Starting point for development of search Strategy

Informing questions: Example P: Women aged 45 or over I: Written invitation to cervical screening C: Written invitation plus follow up reminder O: Attendance at screening When reviewing search results, we ask: Are there factors, identified from a qualitative background search, that affect the formulation of the question? -Socioeconomic group -Level of education -Ethnicity -Can you think of other factors?

Enhancing questions use the results of related studies to add to interpretation of review results They identify qualitative studies that are closely linked to the studies included in the effectiveness review Either embedded within included trials, that explain how the process of conducting the study and other factors may have affected results Or ‘sibling studies’) that were conducted alongside included trials Or independently conducted similar qualitative

Enhancing questions P: In women eligible for breast cancer screening, what are attitudes toward I: A written invitation to cervical screening [C: A written invitation plus follow up reminder] [O: In terms of influencing their decision to attend for screening] Qualitative data embedded within randomised trials explores acceptability of written invitations (process evaluation) A qualitative study of patient satisfaction with the cervical screening service is conducted alongside the trial Qualitative studies exploring patient satisfaction with invitations to cervical screening are located for the similar populations (P), interventions (I)

Extending questions are used to explore specific issues arising from the review findings These issues are usually noted in the Discussion and Authors’ Conclusions section of an effectiveness review The qualitative data can be used to retrospectively review issues with the population, intervention, comparison, and/or outcomes They help to explain effects/results of the effectiveness review in terms of external validity

Extending questions: Example Ide ntify issues identified in review Bonfill et al issues noted in the Discussion and Authors’ Conclusions section: Information complimenting attendance for screening was missing in the great majority of studies Participation probably depends on the women’s satisfaction but no data was included in any of the studies Further reviews comparing the effective interventions and studies that include women’s satisfaction and equity issues are needed.

Extending question: Example Question: What is women’s satisfaction with invitations to screening? Search on broad screening terms for studies not directly related to the review Identify factors that influence satisfaction Ask if there are preferences for variations in the intervention Consider whether these factors or preferences cut across different populations/settings Use findings to explain effects/results of the effectiveness review in terms of external validity e.g. What how can information from the review and extending question help me to modify invitations to local screening services?

Supplementing questions explore aspects that are not about effectiveness These questions aim to place effectiveness in the broader context of lived experience May be used to develop theory or refine theory related to an effectiveness intervention

Supplementing question: Example 1 What are womens’ attitudes toward breast cancer screening and treatment? The question moves beyond invitations to the wider context of whether women Believe breast cancer is a risk for them Think screening does any good, or just creates anxiety Think that treatment for breast cancer makes a difference Have cultural values or religious beliefs that represent barriers to screening and treatment

Supplementing questions can be formulated In response to a specific review In response to a topic e.g. Screening In response to a more general issue that affects people’s attitudes toward health e.g. education, faith etc

Supplementing question: Example 2 What are patients’ experiences of taking medication? Pound et al, 2005 Resisting medicines: A synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking Worried about harm, dependence, masking other symptoms Significant impact on identity, posed problems in terms of disclosure and stigma Modified regimens – symptomatic or strategic medicine taking, or adjusting doses to minimise unwanted consequences Desire to minimise the intake, echoed in some peoples’ use of non- pharmacological treatments to either supplant or supplement Few discussed regimen changes with their doctors. ‘We conclude that the main reason why people do not take their medicines as prescribed is not because of failings in patients, doctors or systems, but because of concerns about the medicines.’

A structure for formulated questions Cochrane Reviews use PATIENT-INTERVENTION- COMPARISON-OUTCOME (PICO) structure Within qualitative evidence syntheses the following may be more appropriate: SETTING PERSPECTIVE INTERVENTION/INTEREST COMPARISON EVALUATION

Let us consider SPICE S Setting – Where? In what context? P Perspective – For who? I Intervention (Phenomenon of Interest)– What? C Comparison – What else? E Evaluation – How well? What result?

Time for some practice! You have been commissioned to look at whether peer support helps people to self-manage chronic condition such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and asthma. What type of qualitative question(s) can you formulate? Informing Enhancing Extending Supplementing

More practice... Read the summary handout of Lewin et al (2010)