Educator Effectiveness Evaluation MERA Fall 2013 Conference November 25-26, 2013 Frankenmuth, Michigan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educator Evaluation Systems & Effectiveness Labels Venessa Keesler, Ph.D. Office of Evaluation, Strategic Research and Accountability Michigan Department.
Advertisements

The Role of the Principal Going Forward. What Leon School District is Required to Do Florida Department of Educations Supports that might impact you What.
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Educator Effectiveness System November 5, Agenda – Town Hall Meeting Community Builder/Video (OPTIONAL) Today, we will be presenting an overview.
Teacher Evaluation and Pay for Performance Michigan Education Association Spring 2011.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Iowa Department of Education Teacher Leadership & Compensation Task Force Iowa Department of Education.
Highlights from the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A State Activities Funds August 2014.
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluations Current Law, Changes for the School Year, and Resource Links.
Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness Toward an Improvement-Focused System of Educator Evaluation Jennifer Hammond OCTE Meeting November 7, 2013.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
The 2013 Legislative Session and You – Statute Changes Affecting Schools Iowa Department of Education.
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
PUSD Compensation Project Overview Governing Board Meeting March 14, 2013.
“Teachers do make a difference…” - Jere Brophy, 1979.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Principals’ Council Meetings May  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Mississippi Student Services Coordinators Appraisal Rubric (M-SSAR)
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Legislative Update and Educator Effectiveness Laura Preston, Legislative Advocate 2015 Negotiators Symposium January 15, 2015.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Michigan Tenure Law Update By Glenn Maleyko Director of Human Resources Dearborn Public Schools August 25th, 2011 General Administrators meeting.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Collaboration Grants Design 101 Salem November 21 st, 2013.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.
1 Educator Evaluation Overview Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Florida’s Proposal November 14,
1 Components Preparation  Traditional higher education  Alternative certification  District-based preparation Sourcing  Marketing  Recruitment  Screening.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Student Achievement. AchieveNJ for Teachers Nothing impacts student learning in schools more than teachers. All New Jersey students deserve great teachers,
Introduction to the Pennsylvania Kindergarten Entry Inventory.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
TEACHER EVALUATION TEACHER TENURE TEACHER MENTORING New Educational Laws and What They Mean for Us.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Educator Evaluation Mary K. Bradley, Associate Director for School Operations Mark J. Weinberg, Director of Academic Performance & Accountability The Center.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
 Mark D. Reckase.  Student achievement is a result of the interaction of the student and the educational environment including each teacher.  Teachers.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
State Board of Education Progress Update
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Michigan’s Educator Evaluations
Presentation transcript:

Educator Effectiveness Evaluation MERA Fall 2013 Conference November 25-26, 2013 Frankenmuth, Michigan

2 Overview Michigan State Law requires evaluation of  Teachers  School administrators Evaluation systems  Established and implemented locally  Ratings reported to state Legislature to review recommendations made by Michigan Council on Educator Effectiveness (MCEE)

3 Why Educator Evaluations? Educator Evaluations Feedback and Aligned Professional Development Improved Instructional Practices Increased Student Achievement

4 Current Model Evaluate teachers and administrators annually Student growth included in evaluation Four evaluation ratings  Ineffective  Minimally effective  Effective  Highly effective

Survey: Growth Measures Other ways growth data are measured include: Combination of data from multiple assessments, pre/post test data, combination of local, state, and national measures, benchmark testing, and several sources as agreed upon in the professional growth plan Number of districts

Statewide Evaluation LabelNumberPercent Ineffective % Minimally Effective1, % Effective70, % Highly Effective21, % IMPORTANT NOTES: Based on the labels as determined by the local evaluation system; rigor of label designation is not consistent across districts THERE is differentiation in label reporting  now, 22% of teachers are reported as “highly effective”  moving away from a satisfactory/unsatisfactory system We do not believe that 1% of teachers labeled as “ineffective” is unreasonable in the first year

Survey: Decisions Informed Others types of decisions include: Assignment to committees or roles beyond the classroom, classroom support and assistance, layoff/recall/transfer, mentoring, staff placement, scheduling, setting improvement goals, and merit pay Number of districts

8 MCEE Recommendation Overview More comparable system across schools and districts  Use of analogous observation tools  More similar weighting of evaluation components Greater emphasis on value added growth models Training and support for implementation Stronger consequences for ineffective educators

9 MCEE Recommendation Overview Professional Practice (50%) Student Growth/VAM (50%) Professional Provisional Ineffective 3 consecutive = advanced role (teachers only) 3 consecutive = may be evaluated biennially 3 consecutive = counseled out of role 2 consecutive = terminated from role in LEA

10 Timeline on MCEE Recommendation school year  Legislation and RFP/contract development school year  Systems and training development school year  Implementation of the new statewide system Continue existing local systems until

11 Key Take Aways Support districts in refining system  Observations  Growth measures Promote the use of evaluation data in decision making  Professional development  Rewards and recognition  Career planning

12 Michigan Department of Education Educator Evaluations Website MI School Data Portal Michigan Council on Educator Effectiveness Website Resources

13 Office of Evaluation, Strategic Research, and Accountability Contact