Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 9 September 2011 Enhanced Direct Access – The approach of the Global Fund. Katja Roll External Relations and Partnerships

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Overview Key Themes The Model of the Global Fund Governance at the country – CCM Grant Implementation arrangements – PR Experience with Multi-Stakeholder Engagement

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 The Global Fund Mandate and Model Created in 2002 to finance the scale up of prevention, treatment and care programs against the three diseases Global Fund model is based on country ownership, multi-stakeholder engagement and performance-based funding Total pledges available = US$ 30.6 billion To date, USD 22.4 billion approved, USD 14 billion disbursed Grants in 150 countries of which 90% are low and low-middle income countries Approximately 1/3 of granted resources is being channelled through civil society organisations

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 The Global Fund Evolution of Funding ( )

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 The Global Fund Contributions Top 10 Public Donors ( ) Total contributions from public donors ( ): US$ 18.1 billion (95% of the total)

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 The Global Fund Key Actors The Global Fund Board The Global Fund Secretariat The Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM) The Technical Review Panel The Principal Recipient (PR) Sub Recipients The Local Fund Agent (LFA) The Global Fund Trustee The Office of Inspector General (OIG) Technical Partners

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Donor Voting Block:  Germany, Canada, Switzerland  European Commission (Belgium, Portugal, Finland)  France, Spain  Italy  Japan  Point Seven  United Kingdom, Australia  United States of America  Private Foundations  Private Sector Implementing Voting Block:  Eastern Europe  Eastern Mediterranean  Eastern and Southern Africa  Latin America and the Caribbean  South East Asia  Western and Central Africa  Western Pacific  Developed Country NGO  Developing Country NGO  NGO rep of communities living with the diseases Non-voting Board Members  World Health Organization  World Bank  UNAIDS  Global Fund  Partners (RBM, Stop TB, UNITAID)  Board Designated Non-Voting Swiss Member 10 Governance at the global level Composition of the international Board

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Governance at the country level The Country Coordinating Mechanism Why a (new) mechanism? Kofi Annan 2000: Need new mechanism because no other funding model existed that: –Could move resources fast and efficiently (i.e. NOT UN, not WB) –Was unencumbered by excessive politics (i.e. bilateral efforts) –Integrated both public and private efforts (i.e. donors either funded NGOs directly or government directly, but couldn’t seem to bring the two together)

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Coordinate the development and submission of national proposals Nominate the Principal Recipient Oversee implementation of approved grants including assessment of Principal Recipient’s performance Approve any reprogramming and submit requests for continuation of funding Ensure linkages and consistency between Global Fund grants and other national health and development programs Governance at the country level The CCM: Roles and Responsibilities

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Transparent selection process for non-government sector Membership of affected communities Transparent proposal solicitation and review Transparent process for PR nomination Broad stakeholder input in proposal and oversight plan Conflict of interest policy Governance at the country level The CCM: Eligibility Criteria

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Governance at the country level The CCM: Composition – Global Perspective Composition by Sector Strong recommendation that CCMs have 40% representation of non-governmental bodies.

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Governance at the country level The CCM: Leadership by sector Chair Distribution Vice Chair Distribution

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Grant Implementation The Principle Recipient = Lead Implementer Signs a grant agreement with the Global Fund Is legally responsible for the implementation of the approved proposal Receives disbursement from the Global Fund’s Trustee Is responsible for disbursed funds – including funding disbursed to/through Sub-Recipients Reports on results to the Global Fund (through Local Fund Agent) Reports on progress to the CCM

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Requirements and Assessment and Scrutiny of PRs 1) Capacity Description in the proposal 2) PR Assessment (after proposal approval)  Is done by the Local Fund Agent (LFA)  Looks into the following areas: –Financial Management and Systems –Program Management –Sub-recipient Management –Pharmaceutical and Health Product Management and –Monitoring and Evaluation. 3) Conditions Precedent and management actions 4) Progress against agreed programmatic targets and conditions precedents decides upon disbursement

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Multiple Implementer Dual-Track Financing (DTF) Recommendation that each proposal includes a government Principal Recipient (PR) and a non government Principal Recipient. If a proposal does not include both government and non-government PRs, it should contain an explanation of the reason Globally approximately 35% of GF resources are implemented by PRs from the non-government sector - Round 8: 48% of proposals with DTF - Round 9: 41% of proposals with DTF - Round 10: 32% of proposals with DTF Engagement of local civil society PRs is increasing across all the regions

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 10 September 2011 Performance Experience Principal Recipient Rating by Sector Civil Society PRs show very good results!

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 9 September 2011 Thank you very much. Especially for questions and comments.