College of American Pathologists 1 New Directions in LAP Robert R. Rickert, MD, FCAP Chair, Accreditation Committee Laboratory Accreditation Program Copyright.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

How to Work with Government Building & Maintaining Relationships.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Quality Management Training Quality circles Bench Mark Kaizen.
TurnKey Project Management Services Capabilities Briefing.
Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
MODULE B - PROCESS B1.ASME Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment:
MODULE B - PROCESS B1. ASME Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity Assessment:
Update on Goals 1 and 2 Curricular Domain Curricular Domain – accomplishments to date Developed baseline information about current level of faculty.
SITUATION RESPONSE FLOW CHART SUPERVISORS’S ACTIONS SITUATION OCCURS Direct observation, complainant reports, third party reports Document initial knowledge.
QA Programs for Local Health Departments
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
Leading Teams.
Eligibility for Accommodations & Required Disability Documentation Revisions to Section Catalog.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
Laboratory Personnel Dr/Ehsan Moahmen Rizk.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
Collaborative Laboratory Safety Inspections (CLIP) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Jonathan Moore, Associate Radiation Safety Officer.
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Katherine Kingston EDLD May 15, 2011 This presentation will see just how well Galena Park ISD’s technology plan compares with the National.
Personnel. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety The.
Ofsted framework 2012 Feedback from inspections carried out under the new framework and implications for clerks and governing bodies Clerks briefings April.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
JCAHO UPDATE June The Bureau of Primary Health Care is continuing to encourage Community Health Centers to be JCAHO accredited. JCAHO’s new focus.
1 Onboarding Basics for Pathways Programs. Onboarding Onboarding is an on-going process which starts before an employee ever comes on board and lasts.
How To Prepare For A CIP Audit Scott Barker CISSP, CISA CIP Compliance Workshop Baltimore, MD August 19-20, 2009.
Software Inspections. Defect Removal Efficiency The number of defects found prior to releasing a product divided by The number of defects found prior.
Conservation Districts Supervisor Accreditation Module 9: Employer/Employee Relations.
Implementing universal Lynch Syndrome screening in a large healthcare system.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES FIRST THINGS FIRST Invitation of a mission Information meeting self-assessment.
What do these changes mean for Agreement State Programs?
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Completing Independent Assessments Robert Flaharty & John Horan January 17, 2013 OP Assessor Workshop.
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
Specialty Practice Pathologist Patient cap.org v. # Advocacy Workshop for Engaged Pathologists Mike Giuliani, Senior Director, Legislation and Political.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing for Accreditation and the Pre-Assessment Options.
The TNI National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Board Update Daniel Hickman, NELAP Board Chair.
Nuclear Security Culture William Tobey Workshop on Strengthening the Culture of Nuclear Safety and Security, Sao Paulo, Brazil August 25-26, 2014.
CLMA MN Chapter Winter Meeting 2011 February 11, 2011 College of American Pathologists David J. Blomberg, MD.
1 Copyright © 2011 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 7 Health Care Regulatory and Certifying Agencies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES FIRST THINGS FIRST Invitation of a mission Information meeting self-assessment.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
Aviation Security Training Module 3 Conducting an Exercise 1.
Plans of Correction (PoC) Donna Tiberi, RN Standards Interpretation p: e: 1.
Safety Audits An essential tool for active safety management April 2015 Dr Emer Bell Integrated Risk Solutions.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
Governor Support Service Training Governor Workshop 31 st March 2016 As a service we have a responsibility to enable all governors to access appropriate,
First Aid & Survival Skills
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Personnel.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Probation and Pretrial Accreditation What is it and how do we get started? Florida Corrections Accreditation Commission July 7, 2016.
The ORR/RA Pre-Visit and Other Prior Planning Items May 2005 Revision
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
AAHRPP Accreditation Welcome to the University of Georgia’s presentation for accreditation of the human research protection program (HRPP). This presentation.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Presentation transcript:

College of American Pathologists 1 New Directions in LAP Robert R. Rickert, MD, FCAP Chair, Accreditation Committee Laboratory Accreditation Program Copyright © 2004 College of American Pathologists (CAP). All rights are reserved. Participants are permitted to duplicate the materials for educational use only within their own institution. These materials may not be used for commercial purposes or altered in any way.

College of American Pathologists 2 Learning Objectives Describe the most recent changes to the CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program Describe how laboratories can be prepared for unannounced inspections

College of American Pathologists 3 The LAP Mission The CAP Laboratory Accreditation Program improves patient safety by advancing the quality of pathology and laboratory services through education, standard setting, and ensuring that laboratories meet or exceed regulatory requirements.

College of American Pathologists 4 Drivers for Change Regulatory Public environment Internal comprehensive review of program

College of American Pathologists 5 LAP Initiatives Enhance inspection consistency and effectiveness Strengthen procedures to monitor labs for sustained compliance Increase role of lab personnel in accreditation process Strengthen public confidence

College of American Pathologists 6 Enhanced Consistency and Effectiveness Inspection tools in checklists Mandatory training for all inspectors Standardized assignment process

College of American Pathologists 7 Enhanced Inspection Tools Provide written guidance to inspector within the checklist concerning: –How to conduct the inspection –How to cite/write deficiencies Best practices now available to all inspectors –Focus more on observation and discussion with testing personnel

College of American Pathologists 8 Mandatory Inspector Training All inspectors must complete training within two years prior to inspecting Monitoring for team leaders begins with assignments accepted after July 1, 2006 Team leader’s responsibility to ensure training of team members Update training every two years

College of American Pathologists 9 Team Leader Training Options Comprehensive Online Team Leader Self-Study Full day Inspector Training Seminar –With “Managing a Successful Inspection” breakout Team Leader Workshop PLUS Team Leader Online Practice

College of American Pathologists 10 Inspector Selection & Assignment Project Expedite team selection and assignment Improve quality of inspections by selecting the best team Based on defined criteria: –Appropriate team size and composition –Trained and experienced inspection team –Timely assignments –Reduce the potential for real or perceived conflicts of interest

College of American Pathologists 11 Strengthen Procedures to Monitor Labs Intensified scrutiny of PT More requests for off-cycle documentation More non-routine inspections Structured communication with CMS, JCAHO

College of American Pathologists 12 Increase Role of Lab Personnel in Inspection Inspectors will spend more time at bench –Observe that practice matches policy –Talk with bench technologists Increased communications within lab with unannounced inspections Pre-inspection video

College of American Pathologists 13 Laboratory Accreditation Video Mailed with reapplications beginning January 2006 Explains CAP accreditation process Encourages active participation of all lab personnel Encourages interaction with inspectors Should be viewed by all lab employees

College of American Pathologists 14 Strengthen Public Confidence Unannounced inspections Focus on patient safety goals

College of American Pathologists 15 Unannounced Inspections Have been used for non-routine inspection Are being performed for all CAP-inspected labs in US, Canada, Puerto Rico, except: –Initial inspection –Reproductive - RLAP –Forensic Drug Testing – FDT Not used for international labs

College of American Pathologists 16 Unannounced Inspections What the Process Means Lab not notified of inspectors’ identities No contact between inspector and lab –All communication through CAP Inspector chooses date –Notifies CAP but does not notify lab Coordinated inspections (e.g., AABB) also unannounced

College of American Pathologists 17 How Does It Work? Inspector assignments ~1 year prior to Anniversary Date Reapplication 9 months prior to AD Inspection “window” begins 6 months prior to anniversary date Lab declares < 10 “blackout” dates –Same dates for labs inspected together –May not be changed

College of American Pathologists 18 Advantages for Inspectors Earlier assignment - more time to prepare Easier for team leader to choose a convenient inspection date Current knowledge of inspection process still applicable

College of American Pathologists 19 Advantages for Lab Lab focuses on continuous compliance –Avoids “once-every-two years” syndrome –Less stressful for lab personnel –More consistent with best lab practices Lab in state of constant readiness for inspection by any agency Current knowledge of laboratory quality programs still applicable

College of American Pathologists 20 What We’ve Learned - Labs Major anticipated issues not a problem –Availability of key staff –Access to documentation –Conference/work rooms/Meal planning Training of back-up staff essential Checklist “notebooks” very helpful No increase in number of deficiencies –But housekeeping and safety issues

College of American Pathologists 21 What We’ve Learned-Teams Team needs to prepare Team arrive minutes earlier –Getting through security –Gives lab time to notify key staff and find documentation Team should bring photo ID/ security forms No increase in number of inspectors

College of American Pathologists 22 Summary: Key Points CAP is pioneer in lab accreditation CAP is committed to raising the quality of lab testing Goal of the overall program initiatives is to be more: –Consistent –Objective –Efficient –Effective