Draft Policies for the Bay Area’s Implementation of SB 375 ACT February 24, 2009 Ted Droettboom ABAG/BAAQMD/BCDC/MTC Joint Policy Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Item #16 California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Advertisements

Urban Sprawl and GHG Pollution—SB 375 NCEL Presentation Kip Lipper-CA Senate September 8, 2008 Portland, OR.
Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Overview and Considering Greenhouse Gas Emissions in MTC’s 2035 RTP Joan Sollenberger, Chief Lisa Klein Division of.
Caroline Rodier Research Associate Mineta Transportation Institute 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Columbus, Ohio May.
1 Beyond What If? The Next Phase of the TPB Scenario Study Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning Presentation to the Greater Washington 2050.
Metro Vision 2035 Regional Growth Scenarios. Scenario Workshop.
Citrus County Planning Division Evaluation and Appraisal Report Citrus County Comprehensive Plan.
Helping Shape the Future of the National Capital Region: COG’s Climate Change and Greater Washington 2050 Initiatives Stuart Freudberg Director, Dept.
1 BASSTEGG - Sketch Planning Charrette/GIS Models for Predicting Household Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) and Greenhouse Gas (CO 2 ) Emissions Chuck Purvis.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
URBAN SERVICE INNOVATIONS Public Transit : The One Bay Area Project May 15 th, 2013 PA 800 Robin Havens.
Public Workshops July 12, 2011 | Napa July 14, 2011 | St. Helena WELCOME!
Douglas P. Carstens Chatten-Brown & Carstens LLP, Hermosa Beach L EGAL A SPECTS OF C LIMATE C HANGE & U SING CEQA TO S UPPORT B ETTER P ROJECTS.
First Discussion of Climate Change Steering Committee Recommendations to COG Board of Directors Agenda Item #6 February 27, 2008.
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
California's Global Warming Act Presented by: Jila Priebe Statewide Transit Planning & Research Branch Division of Mass Transportation California Department.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Climate Policy Development Tom Peterson The Center For Climate Strategies August 25, 2005.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Housing Element Update Workshop The City of Fillmore is Currently Updating its Housing Element  State law mandates the Housing Element be included.
Partnership for Urban South Hampshire Sustainable Growth.
Developing a Sustainable Communities Strategy For the Bay Area Ezra Rapport, ABAG Executive Director Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Greater Washington 2050 Planning Tools Task Force May 29 th 2009 Harriet Tregoning and Alan Imhoff Regional Targets & Indicators.
The RHNA and Sustainable Communities Strategy Joe Carreras, Program Manager, Housing and RHNA Southern California Association of Governments October 2010.
1 Southern California Association of Governments Irvine, December 9, 2008 OCBC Infrastructure Committee SB 375 Presentation Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director,
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report Presentation for the Bowie City Council Stuart A. Freudberg Director, Environmental Programs Metropolitan.
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
ARB GHG Target-Setting Principles MTC Planning Committee July 9, 2010
Land Use Sector Strategies: Draft GGRA Plan Baltimore Regional Transportation Board Interagency Consultation Group April 4, 2012.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report Presentation for the Potomac Watershed Roundtable Stuart A. Freudberg Director, Environmental Programs Metropolitan.
Climate Change Steering Committee’s Draft Climate Change Report September 5, 2008 Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council.
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital Region.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Latham & Watkins operates as a limited liability partnership worldwide with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in the United.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
AB 32 and SB Implementation Process and Issues Presentation to Ventura County Civic Alliance Southern California Association of Governments October.
SB 375: CREATING GREAT COMMUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
San Joaquin Valley Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS) Update July 25,
May 22, Overview of Presentation Proposed sustainable communities strategies (SCSs) for the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) Status of ARB staff’s review.
1 Climate & Transportation: Change is Coming Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission December 2010.
Sustainable Communities Strategies 101: An Introduction to California’s New Planning Law SCANPH conference October 1, 2010.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Successful SB 375 Implementation: What Could it mean for California? Amanda Eaken Natural Resources Defense Council California Transportation Commission.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
California Energy Commission Global Climate Change: Trends and Policy Issues Susan J. Brown California Energy Commission March 3, 2005.
CEQA and Climate Change Evaluating & Addressing GHG Emissions from Projects Barbara Lee, CAPCOA.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
Transportation 2035: S.F. Bay Area Targeting Health through Environment Metropolitan Transportation Commission Therese W. McMillan, Deputy Executive Director,
1. Freight Transport System Facilities: Seaports Airports Rail yards Distribution centers Warehouses High traffic roads Border crossings 2 Modes:
City of Burlingame Housing Element Update Community Workshop # 2 | May 20, 2014.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Vehicle Efficiency Committee Report Summary John Boesel Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop.
Overview of Sustainability Policy Issues CMAP Board of Directors October 10, 2007.
Sausalito City Council May 7, 2013 Plan Bay Area Draft EIR.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Recommended Methods for Assessing VMT
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Presentation transcript:

Draft Policies for the Bay Area’s Implementation of SB 375 ACT February 24, 2009 Ted Droettboom ABAG/BAAQMD/BCDC/MTC Joint Policy Committee

Outline 1. Premise:How transportation and land use affect climate change. 1. Premise: How transportation and land use affect climate change. 2. Progress: How the Bay Area’s plans respond. 3. Prescriptions and Policies: How SB 375 changes the rules and how we propose to put it all together for the Bay Area.

Premise: Big Footprint/Big Impact Bay Area’s impact on the globe: Bay Area’s impact on the globe: Per capita carbon footprint 3 times the world average Per capita carbon footprint 3 times the world average Impact on Bay Area: Impact on Bay Area: Rising sea levels Rising sea levels More hot, smoggy days More hot, smoggy days Vanishing Sierra snow pack; water shortages Vanishing Sierra snow pack; water shortages More wild fires with particulate-matter pollution More wild fires with particulate-matter pollution

Premise: Transportation is Critical Green House Gases Compared Sources: USEIA, BAAQMD Transportation: 14% Transportation: 41% World Bay Area

Premise: Emission Standards Necessary but Not Sufficient

Premise: Location Matters Don Weden 1 gallon = 20 lbs. of CO 2

Growing Cooler: Compared to sprawl, compact development results in a 20 to 40 percent reduction in VMT and hence in CO 2 Premise: Location Matters

Premise: Location Matters Micro Climates Bay Area Temperature Gradient: As much as a degree per mile

Progress: Performance-based Regional Transportation Plan Target: Reduce CO 2 40% below 1990 levels by 2035 * Low fuel economy ** High fuel economy

Progress: Alternative Growth Patterns

Change in CO 2

Progress: FOCUS PDAs Nearly 60 jurisdictions Nearly 60 jurisdictions Over 100 areas Over 100 areas About 400,000 new housing units by 2035 About 400,000 new housing units by 2035 About 3% of region’s land area About 3% of region’s land area About 50% of projected regional growth About 50% of projected regional growth Priority Development Area Criteria: In existing communityIn existing community Near transitNear transit Planning more housingPlanning more housing >100 acres>100 acres

Prescription: SB 375

CO 2 Targets CO 2 Targets Models Models Sustainable Communities Strategy Sustainable Communities Strategy Alternative Planning Strategy Alternative Planning Strategy RHNA Integration RHNA Integration CEQA Assistance CEQA Assistance Prescription: SB 375 Basics

For 2020 and 2035 For 2020 and 2035 For cars and light trucks only For cars and light trucks only Adopted by CARB by September 30, 2010 Adopted by CARB by September 30, 2010 CARB must consider methodology recommended by broad-based advisory committee (RTAC) CARB must consider methodology recommended by broad-based advisory committee (RTAC) Regions may recommend targets Regions may recommend targets Prescription: CO 2 Targets for the Region

Policy: CO 2 Targets for the Region Participate fully in target-setting process Participate fully in target-setting process Seek targets that do not limit and do challenge Seek targets that do not limit and do challenge Seek unambiguous and accurate metrics to assess target achievement (e.g., VMT) Seek unambiguous and accurate metrics to assess target achievement (e.g., VMT)

New state guidelines will require that models account for: New state guidelines will require that models account for: The relationship among land-use density, automobile ownership, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) The relationship among land-use density, automobile ownership, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) The impact of enhanced transit service on vehicle ownership and VMT The impact of enhanced transit service on vehicle ownership and VMT Induced travel and development likely to result from highway and rail expansion Induced travel and development likely to result from highway and rail expansion Mode splits among automobile, transit, carpool, bicycle and pedestrian trips Mode splits among automobile, transit, carpool, bicycle and pedestrian trips Speed and frequency, days, and hours of operation of transit service Speed and frequency, days, and hours of operation of transit service Models required to be usable and understandable by the public Models required to be usable and understandable by the public Prescription: Models

Policy: Models Work together to construct integrated and transparent models which facilitate technical, decision-maker and public understanding of how land-use and transportation decisions can be coordinated to reduce CO 2 Work together to construct integrated and transparent models which facilitate technical, decision-maker and public understanding of how land-use and transportation decisions can be coordinated to reduce CO 2

Prescription: Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Forecast development pattern, accommodating all regional housing demand Forecast development pattern, accommodating all regional housing demand Integrated with transportation network and transportation policies and measures Integrated with transportation network and transportation policies and measures To achieve, to the extent practicable, CO 2 targets To achieve, to the extent practicable, CO 2 targets While also complying with federal requirements for RTPs (i.e., realistically attainable) While also complying with federal requirements for RTPs (i.e., realistically attainable) Part of (2013) Regional Transportation Plan (which must be internally consistent) Part of (2013) Regional Transportation Plan (which must be internally consistent) Not binding on local government land-use authority Not binding on local government land-use authority

Prescription: Alternative Planning Strategy (APS) Prepared if SCS is unable to meet targets Prepared if SCS is unable to meet targets Like SCS, but unconstrained by Federal realism requirement Like SCS, but unconstrained by Federal realism requirement Not part of the Regional Transportation Plan Not part of the Regional Transportation Plan Like SCS, must be reviewed by CARB, which certifies whether targets have been met or not Like SCS, must be reviewed by CARB, which certifies whether targets have been met or not Two purposes: Two purposes: Provides access to CEQA assistance Provides access to CEQA assistance Provides feedback to State on requirements for additional authorities and measures Provides feedback to State on requirements for additional authorities and measures

Policy: SCS/APS Achieve targets through the SCS Achieve targets through the SCS Use APS only as a last resort Use APS only as a last resort Assist SCS target achievement by: Assist SCS target achievement by: Partnering broadly Partnering broadly Directing TLC to PDAs no later than FY Directing TLC to PDAs no later than FY Programming funds jointly Programming funds jointly Prioritizing new funds for SCS achievement Prioritizing new funds for SCS achievement Advocating for state incentives Advocating for state incentives Seeking reasonable realism tests Seeking reasonable realism tests Advocating for pricing and related transportation authorities Advocating for pricing and related transportation authorities

8-year RHNA/Housing Element cycle, coterminous with every second Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) 8-year RHNA/Housing Element cycle, coterminous with every second Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) RHNA must be consistent with SCS RHNA must be consistent with SCS Housing elements must be adopted 18 months after adoption of the RTP Housing elements must be adopted 18 months after adoption of the RTP Zoning to implement housing element (including minimum densities and development standards) must be in place within three years of adoption of housing element Zoning to implement housing element (including minimum densities and development standards) must be in place within three years of adoption of housing element Prescription: RHNA Integration

Policy: RHNA Integration Develop SCS, RTP and RHNA together through a single and integrated cross- agency work program Develop SCS, RTP and RHNA together through a single and integrated cross- agency work program Report first to the JPC and then to responsible boards and commissions Report first to the JPC and then to responsible boards and commissions Form JPC subcommittees with expanded membership to facilitate broad vetting Form JPC subcommittees with expanded membership to facilitate broad vetting Reference interdependencies in all documents Reference interdependencies in all documents

Streamlining SCS- or APS-consistent residential or mixed-use projects Streamlining SCS- or APS-consistent residential or mixed-use projects Not required to deal with growth-inducing impacts, global warming impacts, or regional transportation impacts if incorporate mitigation from previous environmental review Not required to deal with growth-inducing impacts, global warming impacts, or regional transportation impacts if incorporate mitigation from previous environmental review Do not have to propose a lower-density alternative to deal with local traffic impacts Do not have to propose a lower-density alternative to deal with local traffic impacts Exempting Transit Priority Projects, subject to a number of conditions Exempting Transit Priority Projects, subject to a number of conditions Prescription: CEQA Assistance

Conditions for TPP Exemption: Be consistent with the general use designations, density, building intensity, and other policies of the adopted and approved SCS or APS, be at least 50 percent residential and, if the project contains between 26 and 50 percent non-residential use, have an FAR of at least 0.75; provide a minimum net residential density of at least 20 units an acre; and be within ½ mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor (15-minutepeak-period headways). A TPP will be totally exempt from CEQA if: It is no larger than 8 acres and not more than 200 units; It is no larger than 8 acres and not more than 200 units; It can be served by existing utilities and has paid all applicable in-lieu and development It can be served by existing utilities and has paid all applicable in-lieu and developmentfees; It does not have a significant effect on historical or environmental resources (e.g. natural It does not have a significant effect on historical or environmental resources (e.g. naturalhabitat); It has remediated any environmental hazards to applicable standards and is not subject to It has remediated any environmental hazards to applicable standards and is not subject to significant and defined catastrophic risks; It is not located on developed open space; It is not located on developed open space; Its buildings are 15 percent more energy efficient than required by California law and it is Its buildings are 15 percent more energy efficient than required by California law and it is designed to achieve 25 percent less water usage than the average household use in the region; It does not result in the net loss of affordable housing units in the area; It does not result in the net loss of affordable housing units in the area; It does not include any single-story building that exceeds 75,000 square feet; It does not include any single-story building that exceeds 75,000 square feet; It incorporates mitigation measures from previous environmental impact reports; It incorporates mitigation measures from previous environmental impact reports; It does not conflict with nearby industrial uses. It does not conflict with nearby industrial uses. AND if it meets at least one of following three requirements: 1. At least 20 percent of the housing units will be sold to families of moderate income, or not less than 10 percent of the housing will be rented to families of low income, or not less than 5 percent of the housing will be rented to families of very low income AND the developer commits to the continued availability of the non-market units (55 years for rental units, 30 years for ownership units); OR 2. The developer pays in-lieu fees equivalent to costs of meeting the first requirement; OR 3. The project provides public open space equal to or greater than five acres per 1,000

Policy: CEQA Assistance Develop a functional design for SCS, APS and associated EIR(s) to maximize appropriate and responsible CEQA relief Develop a functional design for SCS, APS and associated EIR(s) to maximize appropriate and responsible CEQA relief

Vet all regional-agency policies affecting the location and intensity of development or the location and capacity of transportation infrastructure through the JPC Vet all regional-agency policies affecting the location and intensity of development or the location and capacity of transportation infrastructure through the JPC Consult with neighboring regions to facilitate consistency of assumptions and policies Consult with neighboring regions to facilitate consistency of assumptions and policies Policy: Regional and Interregional Alignment

Our Challenge To achieve actual CO 2 reductions, not just forecast results and paper plans

The Job Location Challenge

More Information The Joint Policy Committee