Exploration Flight and Project Development Office Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) Space Launch Systems WBS 585777.08.50 Payload Fairing Monthly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality
Advertisements

1 System Engineers Toolbox 1 Compliance Automation, Inc. INCOSE: NM Enchantment Chapter By Cheryl Hill August 12, 2009.
Project Management for Your Local Section / Chapter Lee Stogner, PMP
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT
S Y S T E M S E N G I N E E R I N G.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR Project Management.
1 Architecture and Planning Strategies for Addressing Radiation, Space Weather, and Space Climatology Impact on NASA Missions Study Sponsor - NASA Office.
Monitoring, Control & Reporting. The nature of control Develop a structured plan - the “baseline” for control Monitor the plan Assess current and forecast.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 GRC All-Hands Meeting 1 May 2006.
FAA Regulatory Policy for Composite Material Control Presented at 8/8/02 FAA/NASA Workshop (Chicago, IL) Introduction – Importance of stabilizing composite.
Systems Engineering Management
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
AMP – SAMS/MAMS/PIMS 1 GRC Project Manager: MSI/Kevin McPherson Chief Engineer: Alan Linne Safety Mission Assurance Lead: Bipin Patel NASA Customer: SOMD/Brad.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
TEMPO Mission Project July 23, 2013 Project Manager: Alan Little.
Exploration Flight and Project Development Office Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) Space Launch Systems WBS Payload Fairing Monthly.
Project Management Process Overview
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
Best Practices By Gabriel Rodriguez
Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Module 4: Disciplines II.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Robotics & Engineering Design Projective Management Chin-Sung Lin Eleanor Roosevelt High School.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Business & Enterprise Systems The Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and the Integrated Master Schedule.
Hall 180 Cryogenic test facility: Project management: Project Change Request, EVM and Interface Sheet L. Serio.
Develop Project Charter
TREADS Semester Review Dec. 14, Objectives Assess and Communicate Current Design Identify interfaces Approve the System Requirement Specification.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transitioning Toward the Future of Commercial Human Spaceflight COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM AIAA Spring Dinner.
GLAST LAT Project DOE/NASA Review, March 31, GLAST Large Area Telescope: Lowell A. Klaisner Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Project Manager
Constellation Space Transportation Planning Office July 30, 2009.
Working Draft 1 Integrated Baseline Review Sample Out-Brief Project Name.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
The Goal: To Climb Above The Competition Copyright 2005: I Lead Projects, L.L.C. Course Description Project Process Workplates Project Process Workplates.
Configuration Management Romuald Duperrier Head of Systems Engineering Division April 22, 2015.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
The Project Plan Plan Your Work, then Work Your Plan
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Power Upgrade Project SNS September 21-22, TBM Cost Estimate Cost Estimate Schedule Approach Tom Mann October 27, 2005.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
ISS Commercial Resupply Services Michael Suffredini ISS Program Manager June 17 th, 2009 Augustine Committee UPDATED: Corrected page 10 (replaced “first.
Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE National Aeronautics and Space Administration AMS-02 ROAD TO COFR Mike Fohey July 15, 2004.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
PDS4 Project Report PDS MC F2F University of Maryland Dan Crichton March 27,
6/6/ SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLE OVERVIEW Professor Ron Kenett Tel Aviv University School of Engineering.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
Configuration Control (Aliases: change control, change management )
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Millennium Engineering and Integration Company A NEW DOCUMENTATION PROCESS TO STREAMLINE RANGE SAFETY PROCEDURES 0 O. “Rusty” Powell, Allan Smith, Jeff.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Kelvin Nichols, EO50 March 2016 MSFC ISS DTN Project Status.
Managing the Project Lifecycle
Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Jeff Dutton/NASA COR August 26, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Exploration Flight and Project Development Office Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) Space Launch Systems WBS Payload Fairing Monthly Status Joe Roche April (March) 2013

2 Project Mission Statement: Develop and produce cargo payload fairings for the initial and block 1 SLS launch vehicles GRC Scope: Project leadership of a multi center team SE&I Lead Structures Lead Payload Environmental Control Lead Mechanical Systems Lead Ground Systems Lead System Integration & Test Lead (includes major qualification testing) Project Life Cycle Schedule Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) WBS Spacecraft and Payload Office (SPIO) Payload Fairing GRC Project Manager: MXS / Joe Roche GRC Chief Engineer: Cameron Cunningham GRC Safety Mission Assurance Lead: Ron McClanahan NASA Customer: MSFC/SLS/SPIO Key Contractor(s): n/a MilestonesMCRSRR CkptSRRSDRPDRCDRDCREFT-1 LaunchEM-1 LaunchEM-2 Launch Program - Actual/Baseline3/11/1111/11/113/29/12 5/16/133/15/1510/1/1512/1/1512/1/178/1/21 SPIO – Actual/Baseline12/11/114/2 /128/15/125/15/132/15/15TBD

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) WBS SPIO Payload Fairing 3 CostScheduleTechnicalManagement Current MonthGG G G Prior MonthGGGG Summary Status Issues & Help Needed:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) WBS SPIO Payload Fairing 4 Key Accomplishments: - The Payload Fairing team completed defining the potential tasks for the remainder of FY13 and FY14 on March 4 th. Focus for FY13 was directed toward answering the major questions for the use of an existing 5m fairing on the SLS vehicle, specifically the separation and acoustic issues. The FY14 effort focus would be on aligning the project toward an SRR by ensuring that major risks have been identified and technically assessed and viable mitigation strategies have been defined. The FY14 effort will also identify and quantify significant opportunities that could be realized in the manufacturing and integration/operation of the fairing. A summary of the tasks were delivered to SPIO management on March 7 th for review and feedback. Pending SPIO task approval, a new schedule will be developed for base lining. - Completed the draft documentation of the current Composite Fairing configuration in SLS-SPIO-RPT-005 “Payload Fairing Design Description” with all comments and suggestions from the GRC Chief Engineer review incorporated on March 5 th. This document provides a reference to the baseline SPIO Payload Fairing and describes the overall architecture, sub-system concepts, and operational characteristics envisioned to enable cargo launch capabilities for space exploration and science missions. This reference will be used to compare all alternative concepts and subsystem options. The basic configuration definition is necessary to provide the reference for the development of functional and performance design requirements as well as the identification of various internal and external interfaces of the element and cost estimation. The document has been released to the Fairing WBS leads for review and comment. - A risk assessment workshop was conducted on March 7 th to identify and capture the risks for the use of an existing 5m fairing on SLS and the development of a new 8.4m fairing. Risks are being consolidated and reviewed with eventual input into the Risk Management Implementation Tool (RMIT) database for evaluation and tracking.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) WBS SPIO Payload Fairing 5 Key Accomplishments: - A meeting was held with Mr. Bill Hooper, Director of Technology Development at ATK, Mr. Charles Bown, NASA Program Development, Mr. Richard Rynders, Mr. Andy Jackson, Launch Structure, Mr. Marcel Bluth Engineering Technology Manager, Ms. Patricia May, Project Manager, Mr. David Beaman, SPIO Project Manager, and Mr. Joe Roche, Payload Fairing Project Manager on March 13 th at ATK, Utah. The meeting was to assess ATK potential capabilities and manufacturing approaches used on the A350 composite aircraft. An internal effort to investigate the use of the hat stiffened composite construction is being performed with Ruag to assess the benefits of the concept and potential savings in cost and mass. - Completed the initial separation simulation for the Boeing Delta IV 5.1 meter diameter composite fairing with the SLS vehicle on March 14 th. The properties of the fairing for the actual fiber and resin systems in the fabric form used by the manufacturer were incorporated to obtain the stiffness of the structure. The separation simulation analysis was performed to determine if the fairing is able to safely separate from the larger diameter 8.4m SLS vehicle. The simulation results are being post processed and a summary report is being assembled. - A presentation was given to Mr. Dan Dumbacher, Deputy Associate Administrator for Exploration Systems and Development, Mr. Jason Jenkins, and Steve Creech by Mr. David Beaman, SPIO Project Manager and Mr. Joe Roche, Payload Fairing Project Manager on March 11 th. The presentation was a summary of the evaluation data from the Payload Fairing and Adapter Request for Information (RFI) responses. The summary included results for Section 3.0, “Adaption of Existing Available Payload Fairings” (potential existing 5m class fairings), the MSFC evaluation of Section 4.0, “Adaption of Existing Available Payload Adapters”, and Section 5.0, “Development of an 8.4m Meter Fairing” (new 8.4m diameter fairing design). The review was well received with appreciation for the team effort and quality of the package.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) WBS SPIO Payload Fairing 6 Key Accomplishments: - Completed the baseline separation simulation of the Boeing Delta IV composite fairing on March 28th. The model included the as-built material systems and architecture to capture the correct mass and stiffness of the fairing petals and used the heritage separation system as the forcing function. The simulation showed adequate clearance is obtained with the use of the auxiliary separation springs at the base of the fairing. Significant re- contact was indicated when the springs were not employed in the separation event. Further investigation will be conducted to determine the acceleration limit that still clears the Launch Vehicle Spacecraft Adapter (LVSA) and the 8.4m diameter core stage. Sensitivity to other factors such as Angle of Attack (AoA) and Thrust Force dispersions will also be quantified. - The first SpaceX Fairing Deployment test is planned for March 29th at Plum Brook’s Space Power Facility (SPF). The test series will cover a number of separation tests to qualify the unique non-pyrotechnic cold gas separation system under nominal and off-nominal conditions. The planned Electro Magnetic Interference (EMI) qualification test series has been deferred due to inadequate seals installed in the fairing that will affect the test data. An Acoustic qualification test series in the Reverberant Acoustic Test Facility (RATF) located adjacent to the vacuum dome at SPF is scheduled to start after completion of the Deployment test, approximately mid-May..

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) WBS SPIO Payload Fairing 7 30/60/90 day Look-ahead  30 day (April): 5m Fairing: Complete Structural Assessment 5m Fairing: Update Risk Database & Matrix Add secondary tasks to WBS and resource load FY13 Schedule  60 day (May): 5m Fairing: Complete Analysis of Existing Fairings & Separation Analysis Define Cost & Mitigation approaches for 5m Fairing risks assessments 8.4m Fairing: Complete Construction Models & Concept Description Draft Doc PDR kick off  90 day (June): Complete 5m Fairing Assessment Report Draft Complete 8.4m Structural Assessment

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) WBS SPIO Payload Fairing 8 Project is less than 1 month behind planProject is less than 2 months behind planProject is greater than 2 months behind plan Schedule Color Key Milestone Summary Milestones (FY13)BaselineProjectedActualSchedule Variance Program – SRR CheckpointNov 11Nov 12 SPIO – SRR/SDR CheckpointDec 13Dec 9 Program – SRR / SDRMar 12Mar 29 SPIO – SRR (kick off)April 2 SPIO – SDR (kick off)AugustAugust 29 SPIO – SDR (board)OctoberOctober 17 SPIO PDR Kick-offMay 15 SPIO BoardJune 27