TOULMIN ARGUMENT LSC-CyFair English Department English 1301.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Classical and Toulmin, Models Junior AP English September 23, 2008.
Advertisements

Writing an Argument Essay Plan your choices carefully before you jump in!
Using reasons and evidence to support arguments
OCTOBER 25, 2010 PLEASE TAKE YOUR PAPERS FROM THE FOLDERS. (DO NOT LEAVE THEM, TAKE THEM WITH YOU.) YOUR MIDTERM WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU ON WEDNESDAY.
Toulmin Analysis and Rogerian Argument. The Toulmin Model of Argumentation.
Toulmin Argument Developing a Credible Argument. Claim Represents a controversial, debatable, and defendable position A CLAIM IS NOT –Merely an observation:
When learning written argument, it is always helpful to observe how others.
Chapter Seventeen: Persuasive Speaking. Ch17: Persuasive Speaking Copyright © 2006 Wadsworth 2.
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Toulmin’s argument model
An Introduction to Argumentative Writing
 An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid.  Arguments seek to make people.
Argumentation Models Toulmin, S. (1969). The Uses of Argument, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press and
Persuasion and writing winning proposals Logos, ethos, pathos.
The Toulmin Model. Who was Stephen Toulmin?  March 1922 – December 2009  Author, Educator, Philosopher  Created theories to deal with practical issues.
Toulmin model of argument
Argument in the AP English Language Classroom
Building on the Classical Argument P.A. McCabe-Remmell Department of English University of South Florida.
PROCESS How to Evaluate an Argument. Step #1 What is the subject?
The Common Core and Argument Writing. Persuasion vs. Argument Ethos (author credibility) Pathos (emotional appeals) Persuasion Logos (logical appeals)
Creating an Academic Argument By Sarah Matthey Dissertation Editor.
The Toulmin Model.
Terms of Logic and Types of Argument AP English Language and Composition.
1 Reasoning Chapter 8. 2 Forms of Proof Logos = Logical evidence Logos = Logical evidence Ethos = Ethics/Credibility Ethos = Ethics/Credibility Pathos.
Toulmin Argument Format
Toulmin’s Model of Argument. 6 Parts Data/ Evidence  The facts or evidence used to prove the argument Claim  The statement being argued (a thesis) Warrants.
Analyzing Visual Arguments Visual arguments use images to engage viewers and persuade them to accept a particular idea or point of view. Advertisements.
Argumentative vs. Analytical Writing An Introduction to Terms and Concepts.
A classical look at the art of public speaking.  Webster’s: “The art of speaking or writing effectively.”  Aristotle: “The ability, in each particular.
Argument. 1. What is rhetoric? What is argument?  Is rhetoric the use of language to mislead or manipulate? or is it “ the use of language as a symbolic.
Elements of Debate Hence, for all practical purposes, the term proof means those items of evidence and reasoning which tend to make an audience agree with.
 Who is your reader?  Do you have more than one reader?  Why does the reader need your information?  Are you trying to persuade the reader to take.
Argument What is required?. Argument – the essentials Claim – a statement that expresses a point of view on a debatable topic “the exact wording of the.
Elements of Argument Logic vs. Rhetoric. Syllogism Major Premise: Advertising of things harmful to our health should be legally banned. Minor Premise:
The Toulmin Model in Brief “The heart of moral experience does not lie in a mastery of general rules and theoretical principles, however sound and well.
The Toulmin Argument The everyday argument.  The most basic components are:  Evidence  Warrants  A claim Components.
Informative Synthesis  Purpose: to convey information through summarizing in a clear, concise, organized manner (154)  Use source material to support.
The Open Prompt: Timing 1-3 minutes reading and working the prompt. 3 minutes deciding on a position minutes planning the support of your position.
Structures of Reasoning Models of Argumentation. Review Syllogism All syllogisms have 3 parts: Major Premise- Minor Premise Conclusion Categorical Syllogism:
ARGUMENT. Purposes of Argument ► To inform ► To convince ► To explore ► To make decisions.
Toulmin Argument Model Argumentation Basics 101
The Basics of Argumentation and the Toulmin Model
Toulmin Method of Logic
according to Stephen Toulmin
What is an argument? Is it a quarrel?
Analyzing Visual Arguments
Everything is an Argument.
College Composition-Honors A
Toulmin’s Argument Model
Elements of an Argument
…or, “Stop your lippy attitude.”
John Tacapan Faculty Long Beach City College
What is an ARGUMENT? An argument is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid. Arguments seek.
Argument English III Fall 2014.
Toulmin Model AP Lang. & Comp. Ch. 3
What is Persuasive Writing?
Chapter 17: Persuasive Speeches
Writing Prompt Pick one of the pictures on the table and identify what argument is presented through the use of the image. Explain what leads you to this.
The Toulmin Model of Argument
Pre-test Toulmin terms.
Toulmin and Classical Argumentation
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
Argumentation and Persuasion
Everything is an Argument.
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
S.M.E.L.L. Method For argument analysis.
How to Build a Strong Argument
Rhetoric Notes.
PERSUASION.
September 25, 2017 AP English 3 Mr. Bell
Presentation transcript:

TOULMIN ARGUMENT LSC-CyFair English Department English 1301

Stephen Toulmin  “If we are to set our arguments out with complete logical candor, and understood properly the nature of ‘the logical process’, surely we shall need to employ a pattern of argument no less sophisticated than is required in the law.”  P. 96, The Uses of Argument, 1958

Toulmin Argument Terms-CDWB  (C)=“claim or conclusion whose merits we are seeking to establish”  (D)=data, “facts we appeal to as foundation for the claim”  (W)=warrants, “general, hypothetical statements, which can act as bridges, and authorise the sort of step to which our particular argument commits us”  (B)=backing, “assurances, without which the warrants themselves would possess neither authority nor currency”

Toulmin Argument Terms  (Q)=“qualifiers, indicating the strength conferred by the warrant on this step”  (R)=“conditions of rebuttal, indicating general circumstances in which the general authority of the warrant would have to be set aside”

Diagram  “Data are appealed to explicitly, warrants implicitly”

Defining Argument  Opinion—stance on an issue based on beliefs, intuition, emotion, “gut reaction”, personal desires  Argument—stance on an issue using reasonable evidence, logical thinking, responsible communication

Argument Terminology  Issue—debatable topic  Claim—stance on issue  Grounds  Reason—explains claim  Evidence—data for reasons  Warrant—assumption support claim and reason  Backing—support for warrant

Issue  Question  Claim  Reason  Issue  Phones on college campuses  Claim  Phones negatively impact college classes  Reason 1  Phones distract students in class  Reason 2  Phones allow cheating in class

Evidence  Survey of students: how often they check their phones in class:   phone-usage-college-1578.html phone-usage-college-1578.html  Anecdotal evidence of phones disrupting class

Warrants & Backing  Reason 1: Phones disrupt  Warrant=disruption is a problem  Backing=research study that shows importance of concentration for learning  Reason 2: Phones allow cheating  Warrant=cheating is not be allowed  Backing=story of how cheating caused student to fail