Dr. Susan Lowes Teachers College/Columbia University August 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project-Based vs. Text-Based
Advertisements

When Students Can’t Read…
A Framework for Looking at Group Work in Asynchronous Online Courses Dr. Susan Lowes Teachers College/Columbia University VSS, November 2009.
A didactic plan for a communicative translation class Dr. Constanza Gerding Salas Leipzig Universität - Universidad de Concepción May 2012.
Co-Teaching? What’s That?
Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
IVg IVc IVa Teachers know the ways in which learning takes place, and they know the appropriate levels of intellectual, physical, social, and emotional.
Access Point One: Purpose and Modeling Access Point Two: Close and Scaffolded Reading Instruction Access Point Three: Collaborative Conversations Access.
Tell me, I forget. Show me, I remember. Involve me, I understand. -Ancient Chinese Proverb.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Slide 1 Building Students’ Teamwork Skills for Successful Integrated Projects Paula M. (Penni) Hudis, Ph.D., Director Pathway and Curriculum Development.
Group Work and Grading How should we assess individual learning? Ideas from Susan M. Brookhart and Kagan.
Effective Math Questioning
CSC 212 – Data Structures Prof. Matthew Hertz WTC 207D /
UbD backwards Mapping Resources. What is Curriculum Development? Curriculum development is the allocation of time and resources to making a plan for teaching.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Promoting an Alcohol Free Lifestyle Lesson Plan
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Student Centered Learning
Write to Learn K-3 Partner Share With your partner discuss your current understanding and use of writing to learn.
Module 1 Unit 2 Project: writing an advice letter --By Zhou Zhenghu No
MCLP Social Studies Content Literacy Network Session 3 March 15, :30-5:00.
CISIP Writing Framework Approaches to Teaching and Learning Science and Writing.
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Section 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades K-5: Focus on Content Standards.
TEN LESSONS LEARNED FROM TEN YEARS OF RESEARCH ON K-12 ONLINE TEACHING AND LEARNING Dr. Susan Lowes Director, Research and Evaluation Institute for Learning.
Created By: Ms. Leah Wendt.  1. Teachers know the subjects they are teaching. The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures.
“Understand Why” rather than “Remember How”
August 2010 Mary Moss So, You Want to Plan a Module… A Guide for NYC iSchool Teachers.
Your Name Grading and Reporting on Student Learning What is it? A system of assessing and reporting that describes student progress in relation to standards.
Electronic Portfolios Preparing Our Students for the 21 st Century The Future.
Curriculum development Importance of development - Creating a set of rules - Planning ahead of time - Implementation of the Stage 6 syllabus - The end.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
A free-to-share educational resource designed and presented by Stephen Nalder.
“The great end of education is to discipline rather than furnish the mind; to train it to the use of its own powers, rather than fill it with the accumulation.
Project Based Learning What, Why & How. Objectives for Today Have you experience the beginning of a project (= Making your own project) Analyze your experience,
Interesting Ways to Use Google Apps for Teaching Math Inspired by the work
PBL for the 21 st century. Begin with the end in mind Knowledge of science, history, literature, languages, etc. Time management Strong work ethic Respectful.
Science Fair Parent Night. What we don’t want -
MJM22 Digital Practice and Pedagogy Week 9 Collaboration Tools.
Using wiki-based collaborative writing to develop writing skills James Baggesen Senior Teacher ICT British Council Madrid Adults Centre.
Our Community: THINGS ARE JUST NOT THE SAME!. UNIT SUMMARY: Children are often under the impression that the way things are in their world is the way.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
CER and Annotating Text District Learning Day August 6, 2015.
Technology Mediated Learning (TML).  All Students are processed:  in year groupings  at the same rate  through the same pre-set curriculum  through.
Teaching Academic Vocabulary Focus on: Activities 10/29/2015.
Identifying Assessments
LITERACY-BASED DISTRICT-WIDE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Aiken County Public School District January 15, 2016 LEADERS IN LITERACY CONFERENCE.
Intentional - Purposeful - Explicit NOT SCRIPT Don’t need more prescription but more precision. Precision requires: 1.Teachers know students 2.Teachers.
Course design by M.E. Ellen Graber Curriculum design and EFL/ESL.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Standards That Count: Reading, Discussion, Writing, and Presentation.
Formative Assessment and Feedback to Improve Writing CONVENING III, SECTION I.
What is Action Research? Action research is a process in which participants examine their own educational practice systematically and carefully, using.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
A305: Week 5 Deep Learning in the Long Run. Goals for Today (+ Section) Understand/analyze/reflect: What conditions or experiences are needed to build.
JIGSAW METHOD OF TEACHING. The purpose of Jigsaw is to develop teamwork and cooperative learning skills within all students. In addition it helps.
CHOOSE APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTION STRATEGIES AND RESOURCES
A Guaranteed, Viable, and Engaging Curriculum
The Principia Upper School English Teacher
Socratic Seminar This PowerPoint is meant to be used with either teachers or students schoolwide to assist in implementing Socratic Seminar. It is written.
Mrs. Bly Eng 4 – Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell
Instructional Learning Cycle:
Take Action! Strategies for Active Learning in the Classroom
Kagan Basic Principles (PIES)
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Susan Lowes Teachers College/Columbia University August 2012

 Because collaboration is known to help learning.  Because it is a skill needed in the workplace.  iNACOL Standards for Quality Online Courses, under Instructional Design:  “The course provides multiple opportunities for students to be actively engaged in the content that includes meaningful and authentic learning experiences such as collaborative learning groups …”  iNACOL Standards for Quality Online Teaching:  “The teacher plans, designs and incorporates strategies to encourage active learning, interaction, participation and collaboration in the online environment.”  Two elements in that standard:  Engage students in “team problem-solving”  Promote learning through group interaction

 To look at groups working online and ask:  Question 1: How do groups manage themselves in an online environment?  Question 2: How is knowledge collectively built? How do groups establish common frames of reference, resolve discrepancies in understanding, and come to a joint understanding?  Question 3: What do such 21 st -century skills as critical thinking and teamwork look like in online environment?  To take analytical approaches from f2f group work and see how/if they adapt to analyzing group work online  To contribute to the design of online learning that leads to high levels of engagement and critical thinking

Three types of collaboration Two instructional design models

 Parallel  No monitoring of others’ contributions  No interchange of ideas  Final product is a cumulation of individual contributions  Associative  Some monitoring of others’ contributions  Some interchange of ideas  Final product is still a cumulation of individual contributions  Collaborative  Monitoring of others’ contributions  Interchange of ideas  Final project jointly created

 Cumulative  Tasks can be simultaneous  No need for interaction  No coordination necessary  Jigsaw  Tasks can be simultaneous or sequential  Each student works on one piece  All the pieces are needed to create the whole BUT some jigsaw projects are really coordinated cumulative projects

DATA  Four sections of an Economics course  Prompt: Three questions, each on a different aspect of the same topic, each with five sub-questions, plus one summative question, to be done as a team activity.  Students were to jointly create a document with the answers.  Data source: Discussion forum. FINDINGS  In every case, they split the questions and sub-questions.  Results were therefore Cumulative.  Analysis focused on how the groups organized themselves.

 If students can take a project apart, they do.  In this case, the designer believed the activity necessitated synergistic collaboration, BUT the students were able to (and did) use a parallel or (at best) an associative style.  If designers want group projects to be synergistic, they need to design them so that the problem-solving style cannot be parallel.  If students are really to hash out things together, they need time, so group projects should last more than a week but should be scaffolded so that the students don’t wait until the last minute to do the work.

DATA  7 groups in two sections of a Psychology course.  Groups were 3-4 members.  In 4 of 7 groups, at least one member went missing.  They used a discussion forum to get going and Google Presentations to create the final product.  Chose to analyze the two most highly rated by the teacher, one from each section. (Note that the grading rubric says nothing about collaboration.)  Data sources: Discussion forum and final product.

PROMPT  Brainstorm (in discussion forum) what social and cultural factors influence memory.  Research this topic and gather articles and other resources.  Create and publish a Google Doc presentation. DIFFERENCES  Project lasted three weeks.  Prompt was scaffolded.  Used Google Presentations.

 In 3 out of 7 groups, one person threw out some ideas, which were occasionally discussed for a few turns but were mostly short-circuited and none “brainstormed” in the traditional sense: ▪ FIRST POST: I think that some cultural matter influence memory.. like.. for example, people remember things that they see, that doesn't usually happen. Like seeing a unicorn. You may always remember that (except for the fact that it can't happen). […] ▪ RESPONSE: yeah! i think that's really good:) But i think we should divide up the roles and stuff first though. Like who's doing what and etc and then later we can combine?  In 2 out of 7 groups, members shared a few resources with each other: ▪ FIRST POST: I found an article about social factors influencing memory.  And 2 groups went directly to organization: ▪ FIRST POST: Hey guys, I was wondering where we wanted to start on this project, how we wanted to split up the work and exactly how we were going to go about this?

 But because they used Google Presentations, could look not just as how organized themselves (as seen through the discussion forum) but how the project itself evolved (as seen in the document itself).  Used these to create “discourse maps” for each group.

DISCOURSE MAP: SPLIT THE WORK DISCOURSE MAP: SHARE THE WORK Saki Creates title slide Saki Creates Cultural slide Saki Creates Social slide Saki Creates Conclusion slide Mohammed Adds to Conclusion slide Saki Creates Social subslide Brittany Adds text to Cultural slide Saki Adds text to Social slide Saki Creates Social subslides Saki Adds text to Social subslides Julie Creates Cultural subslide Julie Adds text to Cultural subslide Mohammed Adds text to Social subslide Julie Creates Cultural subslides Julie Adds text to Cultural subslides Mohammed Creates Social subslide Mohammed Adds text to Social subslide Mohammed Adds to Conclusion Julie Edits and organizes Mohammed Adds to Social subslides Mohammed Edits and organizes Brie Creates title slide Brie Creates Social slide Brie Creates Cultural slide Cora Adds text to Social slide Cora Adds text to Cultural slide Karen Creates Intro slide Karen Adds text to Intro slide Karen Creates Cultural subslides Karen Creates Social subslides Karen Adds text to Social subslides Helen Adds text to Intro slide Helen Adds text to Social slides Helen Adds text to Cultural slides Chana Adds text to Cultural slides Chana Adds text to Social slides Cora Creates Cultural subslides Cora Adds to Cultural subslides Helen Edits and organizes Framing (beginning and end) Cultural Social Set up

 Why did one group operate differently from the others?  Do students learn equally when their work is parallel and cumulative as opposed to synergistic and (truly) jigsaw?  If we want to provide them with a framework for thinking about a problem, then how do we design projects that prevent them from exercising their natural desire to work in parallel and cumulate results?

 Brigid Barron, “Achieving Coordination in Collaborative Problem-Solving Groups,” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 9 (4), 2000:  Kathleen Hogan, Bonnie K. Nastasi, and Michael Pressley, “Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions,” Cognition and Instruction 17 (4), 2000:  Contact information:  Dr. Susan Lowes 