Realistic Calculations of Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Cross sections T.S. Kosmas Realistic Calculations of Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Cross sections T.S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spectroscopy at the Particle Threshold H. Lenske 1.
Advertisements

Valence shell excitations in even-even spherical nuclei within microscopic model Ch. Stoyanov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Sofia,
Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams
Gamow-Teller Transitions for Light Nuclei by the Deformed Quasi-particle RPA(DQRPA) Soongsil University, Korea Eun Ja HA and Myung-Ki CHEOUN HNP.
John Daoutidis October 5 th 2009 Technical University Munich Title Continuum Relativistic Random Phase Approximation in Spherical Nuclei.
International Workshop on Fundamental Symmetries: From Nuclei and Neutrinos to the Universe ECT*, Trento, June 2007 Charged-Current Neutrino-Nucleus.
(and some things about the weak interaction)
Double beta decay nuclear matrix elements in deformed nuclei O. Moreno, R. Álvarez-Rodríguez, P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra F. Šimkovic, A. Faessler.
Degree of polarization of  produced in quasielastic charge current neutrino-nucleus scattering Krzysztof M. Graczyk Jaroslaw Nowak Institute of Theoretical.
R Measurement at charm resonant region Haiming HU BES Collaboration Charm 2007 Cornell University Ithaca, NY. US.
Single Particle Energies
Unharmony within the Thematic Melodies of Twentieth Century Physics X.S.Chen, X.F.Lu Dept. of Phys., Sichuan Univ. W.M.Sun, Fan Wang NJU and PMO Joint.
Some questions on quantum anomalies Roman Pasechnik Moscow State University, Moscow & Bogoliubov Lab of Theoretical Physics, JINR, Dubna 46-th Cracow School.
NPSC-2003Gabriela Popa Microscopic interpretation of the excited K  = 0 +, 2 + bands of deformed nuclei Gabriela Popa Rochester Institute of Technology.
0νββ nuclear matrix elements within QRPA and its variants W. A. Kamiński 1, A. Bobyk 1 A. Faessler 2 F. Šimkovic 2,3, P. Bene š 4 1 Dept. of Theor. Phys.,
The Weak Production of Hypernuclei D.D. van Niekerk (M.Sc. project) B.I.S. van der Ventel G.C. Hillhouse Department of Physics Stellenbosch University.
Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
P461 - nuclear decays1 General Comments on Decays Use Fermi Golden rule (from perturbation theory) rate proportional to cross section or 1/lifetime the.
Nuclear de-excitation Outline of approach… Source of radiation Propagation of radiation field Detection of radiation ?? nucleus.
 -decay theory. The decay rate Fermi’s Golden Rule density of final states (b) transition (decay) rate (c) transition matrix element (a) Turn off any.
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS
Charge-Changing Neutrino Scattering from the Deuteron J. W. Van Orden ODU/Jlab Collaborators: T. W. Donnelly and Oscar Morino MIT W. P. Ford University.
Nucleon Optical Potential in Brueckner Theory Wasi Haider Department of Physics, AMU, Aligarh, India. E Mail:
1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay using TITAN ◆ Nuclear matrix elements.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Cross section for potential scattering
Incoherent pair background processes with full polarizations at the ILC Anthony Hartin JAI, Oxford University Physics, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble.
XII Nuclear Physics Workshop Maria and Pierre Curie: Nuclear Structure Physics and Low-Energy Reactions, Sept , Kazimierz Dolny, Poland Self-Consistent.
Effects of self-consistence violations in HF based RPA calculations for giant resonances Shalom Shlomo Texas A&M University.
Lecture 20: More on the deuteron 18/11/ Analysis so far: (N.B., see Krane, Chapter 4) Quantum numbers: (J , T) = (1 +, 0) favor a 3 S 1 configuration.
Coulomb corrections to R-correlation in the polarized neutron decay Alexey Pak University of Alberta, 2005 Lake Louise Winter Institute 2005, February.
Monday, Jan. 27, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 27, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino-Nucleon DIS 2.Formalism of -N DIS.
‘‘Inelastic Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Cross sections at low and intermediate energies’’ T.S. Kosmas ‘‘Inelastic Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Cross sections.
Lecture 16: Beta Decay Spectrum 29/10/2003 (and related processes...) Goals: understand the shape of the energy spectrum total decay rate sheds.
Nuclear deformation in deep inelastic collisions of U + U.
Isospin mixing and parity- violating electron scattering O. Moreno, P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra and J. M. Udías (IEM-CSIC Madrid and UCM Madrid) T.
Duality: Recent and Future Results Ioana Niculescu James Madison University Hall C “Summer” Workshop.
Inelastic scattering When the scattering is not elastic (new particles are produced) the energy and direction of the scattered electron are independent.
Dott. Antonio Botrugno Ph.D. course UNIVERSITY OF LECCE (ITALY) DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS.
Jim Stewart DESY Measurement of Quark Polarizations in Transversely and Longitudinally Polarized Nucleons at HERMES for the Hermes collaboration Introduction.
Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly.
NEUTRON SKIN AND GIANT RESONANCES Shalom Shlomo Cyclotron Institute Texas A&M University.
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
Study on ν-A Reaction Cross Sections within CRPA Jeong-Yeon LEE and Yeong-Duk KIM Sejong University, KOREA.
July 29-30, 2010, Dresden 1 Forbidden Beta Transitions in Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Kazuo Muto Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
L.D. Blokhintsev a, A.N. Safronov a, and A.A. Safronov b a Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia b Moscow State.
Lecture 18: Total Rate for Beta Decay (etc...) 6/11/2003
Variational approach to isospin symmetry breaking in medium mass nuclei A. PETROVICI Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania.
The radiative neutron capture on 3 He ( 3 He+n→ 4 He+  ) in effective field theory Young-Ho Song Seoul National University in collaboration with T.-S.
PROPERTIES OF HIGH-ENERGY ISOSCALAR MONOPOLE EXCITATIONS IN MEDIUM-HEAVY MASS SPHERICAL NUCLEI M. L. Gorelik 1), S. Shlomo 2), B. A. Tulupov 3), M. H.
1 Diffractive heavy quark production in AA collisions at the LHC at NLO* Mairon Melo Machado GFPAE – IF – UFRGS
Spin dependence in exclusive ρ o production at COMPASS Andrzej Sandacz Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw On behalf of the Collaboration  ρ.
Research of high energy collective states at high excitation energy in nuclei N. Alamanos, J. Arvieux, B. Berthier, B. Bonin, G. Bruge, M. Buenerd, J.
Variational Multiparticle-Multihole Configuration Mixing Method with the D1S Gogny force INPC2007, Tokyo, 06/06/2007 Nathalie Pillet (CEA Bruyères-le-Châtel,
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Few-Body Models of Light Nuclei The 8th APCTP-BLTP JINR Joint Workshop June 29 – July 4, 2014, Jeju, Korea S. N. Ershov.
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
Lecture 4 – Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
Possible Ambiguities of Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in Quasi-elastic Region K. S. Kim School of Liberal Arts and Science, Korea Aerospace University, Korea.
PV Electron Scattering
Handout 3 : Interaction by Particle Exchange and QED
Structure and dynamics from the time-dependent Hartree-Fock model
Quasielastic Scattering at MiniBooNE Energies
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
Medium polarization effects and transfer reactions in halo nuclei
Wigner–Eckart theorem Dirac-Fock equation (the differential equation)
Kazuo MUTO Tokyo Institute of Technology
V.V. Sargsyan, G.G. Adamian, N.V.Antonenko
Presentation transcript:

Realistic Calculations of Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Cross sections T.S. Kosmas Realistic Calculations of Neutrino-Nucleus Reaction Cross sections T.S. Kosmas Division of Theoretical Physics, University of Ioannina, Greece Collaborators: P. Divari, V. Chasioti, K. Balasi, V. Tsakstara, G. Karathanou, K. Kosta MEDEX’07 International workshop on DBD and Neutrino Physics Prague, Czech Republic, June 11 – 14, 2007

Outline Introduction Cross Section Formalism 1. Multipole operators ( Donnelly-Walecka method ) 2. Compact expressions for all basic reduced matrix elements Applications – Results 1. Exclusive and inclusive neutrino-nucleus reactions 2. Differential, integrated, and total cross sections for the nuclei : 40 Ar, 56 Fe, 98 Mo, 16 O 40 Ar, 56 Fe, 98 Mo, 16 O 3. Dominance of specific multipole states – channels 4. Nuclear response to SN ν (flux averaged cross sections) Summary and ConclusionsSummary and Conclusions

 Charged-current reactions (l= electron, muon, tau)  Neutral-current reactions Introduction There are four types of neutrino-nucleus reactions to be studied :

1-body semi-leptonic electroweak processes in nuclei Donnely-Walecka method provides a unified description of semi- leptonic 1-body processes in nuclei

The Effective Interaction Hamiltonian ( leptonic current ME ) Matrix Elements between initial and final Nuclear states are needed for obtaining a partial transition rate : The effective interaction Hamiltonian reads (momentum transfer)

One-nucleon matrix elements (hadronic current) Polar-Vector current: 2). Assuming CVC theory Axial-Vector current: 1). Neglecting second class currents : 3). Use of dipole-type q-dependent form factors 4. Static parameters, q=0, for nucleon form factors (i) Polar-Vector (i) Axial-Vector

Non-relativistic reduction of Hadronic Currents The nuclear current is obtained from that of free nucleons, i.e. The free nucleon currents, in non-relativistic reduction, are written α = +, -, charged-current processes, 0, neutral-current processes

Multipole Expansion – Tensor Operators The ME of the Effective Hamiltonian reads Apply multipole expansion of Donnely-Walecka in the quantities : The result is (for J-projected nuclear states) :

The basic multipole operators are defined as (V – A Theory) The multipole operators, which contain Polar Vector + Axial Vector part, The multipole operators are : Coulomb, Longitudinal, Tranverse-Electric, Transverse-Magnetic for Polar-Vector and Axial-Vector components

Nucleon-level hadronic current for neutrino processes For charged-current ν -nucleus processes For neutral-current ν -nucleus processes The form factors, for neutral-current processes, are given by The effective nucleon level Hamiltonian takes the form

Kinematical factors for neutrino currents Summing over final and averaging over initial spin states gives

Neutral-Current ν–Nucleus Cross sections In Donnely-Walecka method [PRC 6 (1972)719, NPA 201(1973)81] ============================================================================================================== where The Coulomb-Longitudinal (1 st sum), and Transverse (2 nd sum) are:

The seven basic single-particle operators Normal Parity Operators Abnormal Parity Operators

Compact expressions for the basic reduced ME For H.O. bases w-fs, all basic reduced ME take the compact forms The Polynomials of even terms in q have constant coefficients as Advantages of the above Formalism : (i)The coefficients P are calculated once (reduction of computer time) (ii)They can be used for phenomenological description of ME (iii)They are useful for other bases sets (expansion in H.O. wavefunctions) Chasioti, Kosmas, Czec.J. Phys.

Polynomial Coefficients of all basic reduced ME

Nuclear Matrix Elements - The Nuclear Model Q RPA (QRPA) The initial and final states, |J i >, |J f >, in the ME 2 are determined by using the Quasi-particle RPA (QRPA) 1). Interactions: Woods Saxon+Coulomb correction (Field) Bonn-C Potential (two-body residual interaction) 2). Parameters: 2). Parameters: In the BCS level: the pairing parameters g n pair, g p pair In the QRPA level: the strength parameters g pp, g ph j1, j2 run over single-particle levels of the model space (coupled to J) D(j1, j2; J) one-body transition densities determined by our model 3). Testing the reliability of the Method : Low-lying nuclear excitations (up to about 5 MeVLow-lying nuclear excitations (up to about 5 MeV) magnetic momentsmagnetic moments (separate spin, orbital contributions)

Particle-hole, g ph, and particle-particle g pp parameters for 16 O, 40 Ar, 56 Fe, 98 Mo H.O. size-parameter, b, model space and pairing parameters, n, p pairs for 16 O, 40 Ar, 56 Fe, 98 Mo

experimentaltheoretical Low-lying Nuclear Spectra (up to about 5 MeV) 98 Mo

experimentaltheoretical Low-lying Nuclear Spectra (up to about 5 MeV) 40 Ar

State-by-state calculations of multipole contributions to dσ/dΩ 56 Fe

Angular dependence of the differential cross-section 56 Fe

Total Cross section: Coherent & Incoherent contributions g. s. g. s. f_ exc 56 Fe

Dominance of Axial-Vector contributions in σ 56 Fe

Dominance of Axial-Vector contributions in σ _tot 40 Ar

Dominance of Axial-Vector contributions in σ 16 O

Dominance of Axial-Vector contributions in σ 98 Mo

State-by-state calculations of dσ/dΩ 40 Ar

Total Cross section: Coherent + Incoherent contributions 40 Ar

State-by-state calculations of dσ/dΩ 16 O

Coherent and Incoherent

State-by-state calculations of dσ/dΩ 98 Mo

Angular dependence of the differential cross-section 98 Mo

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the excited states J=2+, J=3 -

Coherent and Incoherent 98 Mo

Nuclear response to the SN- ν for various targets Assuming Fermi-Dirac distribution for the SN- ν spectra Using our results, we calculated for various ν –nucleus reaction channels normalized to unity as α = 0, < Τ < 8 Results of Toivanen-Kolbe-Langanke-Pinedo-Vogel, NPA 694(01)395 56Fe ===========================================================

Flux averaged Cross Sections for SN- ν α = 0, < Τ < 8 (in MeV) A= _A V= _V 56 Fe

Flux averaged Cross Sections for SN- ν A= V= α = 0, 3 16O16O16O16O 2.5 < Τ < 8 (in MeV)

SUMMARY-CONCLUSIONS Using H.O. wave-functions, we have improved the Donnelly-Walecka formalism : compact analytic expressions for all one-particle reduced ME as products (Polynomial) x (Exponential) both functions of q. Using QRPA, we performed state-by-state calculations for inelastic ν –nucleus neutral-current processes (J-projected states) for currently interesting nuclei. The QRPA method has been tested on the reproducibility of : a) the low-lying nuclear spectrum (up to about 5 MeV) b) the nuclear magnetic moments Total differential cross sections are evaluated by summing-over-partial-rates. For integrated-total cross-sections we used numerical integration. 56 Fe, 16 O Our results are in good agreement with previous calculations (Kolbe-Langanke, case of 56 Fe, and Gent-group, 16 O ). We have studied the response of the nuclei in SN- ν spectra for Temperatures in the range : 2.5 < T < 8 and degeneracy-parameter α values : α = 0, 3 Acknowledgments: Acknowledgments: I wish to acknowledge financial support from the ΠΕΝΕΔ-03/807, Hellenic G.S.R.T. project to participate and speak in the present workshop.