Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, 2003-08. All Rights Reserved. STAFF EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PINNACLE CONSULTING & COACHING / TABLE GROUP CONSULTING PARTNERS
Advertisements

Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Project L.O.F.T. Report May 2007 through October 2007 Creating a design to meet stakeholder desires and dissolve our current set of interacting problems.
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Creating a Roadmap for Change: Utilizing School Planning to Reculture Schools Darius S. Adamson, Sr. School Transformation Coach District and School Transformation.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Parents as Partners in Education
Module Two. 
1 January 8,  The mission of the County of Santa Clara is to plan for the needs of a dynamic community, provide quality services, and promote.
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
Steve Meier. What is Strategic Planning Determines Where an organization is going over the next year or more, How it's going to get there How it'll know.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0-
ESD 112 Professional Growth Cycle
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Trigg County Collaboration Roundtable Discussion “ March 17, 2009.
TELL Colorado Post-Survey Webinar Andrew Sioberg New Teacher Center.
1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
Math in the Middle What are we learning about rural mathematics education? Ruth Heaton and Jim Lewis University of Nebraska – Lincoln.
HANCOCK CENTRAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM SEPTEMBER 14, 2012.
Closing the Achievement Gap in Minnesota: Making a Difference through Leadership April 24, 2013.
PRESENTATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Priorities for an Engaged Community of Employees TRU People Make Things Happen.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
Session Materials  Wiki
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0.
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International Center for Leadership in Education SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International.
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance (SINA & DINA) Phase I: Audit Keystone AEA January 28, 2008.
AGENDA  A teacher’s perspective  Barb Schmidt Stevens High School  Acacia Trevillyan South Park Elementary  Review steps to create a quality CFA 
EES Student v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Student Edition.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT v2.2.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Mountain View College ModernThink © Survey Results Analyzed MVC College-wide Forum April 9, 2009 MVC Core Values: Celebration of Student & Employee Success.
The Power of Professional Learning Communities at Work 2009 Hanover County Public Schools Leadership Conference.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
PLC & RTI Tammy Rasmussen Southern Oregon RTI Dean Richards Oregon RTI.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
Page 1 Successful Learning Conditions Survey
PLMLC Leadership Series London Region Day 1 Ellen Walters, YCDSB Shelley Yearley, TLDSB Monday February 28, 2011.
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
School Improvement through Data and Best Practices Anytown Middle School Best Practice Audit Report.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
GSS as a Professional Learning Community. What do we already know about PLC’s?
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Principals & Self Study Coordinators. School Improvement Concepts Collaboration Data –Collect –Analyze –Use!!! Questions What? So What? Now What?
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
Cache County School District Presents:
Learning that deepens knowledge and understanding
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEYTM
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. STAFF EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. While most schools focus on the outcomes they are reaching for, truly successful schools focus on organizational effectiveness and the programs and systems that drive and sustain improvement in the outcomes. The Educational Effectiveness Survey (EES), was developed to assist schools in continuous, sustainable improvement by helping schools understand their strengths and challenges in the areas known to impact the effectiveness of a school. While there is no single solution for all schools, research on effective schools has identified common characteristics of high performing schools (Marzano, 2003). Successful schools and schools engaged in improvement focus on these characteristics to create and improve the system(s) that drive the outcomes. To help schools identify and leverage these drivers and focus on what makes a school successful, the EES quantifies these characteristics. This results report contains a summary of the information your school staff provided on the EES survey form. CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH PERFORMING SCHOOLS: Clear and Shared Focus High Standards and Expectations Effective School Leadership Supportive Learning Environment High Levels of Community and Parent Involvement High Levels of Collaboration and Communication Frequent Monitoring of Teaching and Learning Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Aligned with Standards Focused Professional Development While these characteristics represent a solid basis for looking at the culture of a school, continuing research has indicated that there are several other dynamics that are critical to the conversations, interactions and decisions leading to sustainable transformation. The EES V9.0 is based upon 20 years of research and critical learning on organizational culture, relational trust, the transformation process and the characteristics of high performing schools and districts. School and district transformation is a complex and highly worthwhile process. There are no quick- fixes or pieces of technology that will magically transform your school or district into a high performing system. Your dedication, hard work, and conversations built upon the formative use of data can be critical elements in building strength around leadership, the “instructional core”, and organizational effectiveness. Only as a professional learning community will you make progress toward sustainable, systemic improvement.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. Demographic Charts – Who Took the Survey? Pay attention to the “position” chart – did you include all employees in the survey? If you did not – ask yourselves “why”? Look at length of service – you want to see diversity represented. The new staff bring energy and new ideas and the long term staff provide wisdom, calm and expertise. You need both! The longer a staff member has been in a building, more difficult it is for him/her to change.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. Demographics

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. On the Overall Summary Chart Consider: This is the 10,000 foot view Look at the overall relationship between the characteristics and their bar charts Remember – green is good! The 2 greens (“Almost Always True” and “Often True” are the positive perceptions Ivory (“sometimes true”) is the “land of opportunity” – these people represent the easiest persons to bring to the positive side – give them more information and bring them into the process. If you ignore the ivory – they usually become disconnected and move to the negative Orange and red are the two negative perceptions – often times they reflect “history” – something that happened years ago, or something in a person’s personal life. Don’t spend a lot of time and energy here, it may be out of your ability to influence. Do pay attention to significant amounts of negative! Grey – “No Opinion or N/A”. Ask why? In response to “where should we be?” Ask “where do we want to be?”

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. Overall Summary This chart provides a summary view of the nine characteristics - the 10,000 foot view. The following pages provide the detail for each of these characteristics.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. Comparison – Your school vs. other schools in CEE’s data repository at elem/middle and high school levels Descriptive Statistics: CEE’s Repository of EES-Staff Respondents (as of 22 May, 2008): Total N= 42,535 respondents Buildings: 515 unique (unduplicated) buildings Districts: 96 unique districts This Comparison (EES v7.0 and v8.0 in school years): N= 27,107 Staff Elementary: 50%, Middle School/Jr. HS: 26%, High School 24% Met AYP in Year Survey Administered: YES = 54%