To make ByteStream Data There is a plan that the High Level Trigger (HLT) software uses the offline framework (Athena). HLT group wants to read in ByteStream.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.

Advertisements

Tests of CAEN 1190 Multi-hit TDCs Simona Malace Brad Sawatzky and Brian Moffit JLab Hall C Summer Workshop Aug , JLab.

Athena on Cosmic Ray Data March 31, 2005 LNF Maura Barone.

June 19, 2002 A Software Skeleton for the Full Front-End Crate Test at BNL Goal: to provide a working data acquisition (DAQ) system for the coming full.

Current status of LVL1 Muon-Endcap Trigger simulation Tadashi MAENO ( CERN ) for the developers of TGC simulation code TDAQ-week in LISBON ( 23th Oct.

20 Feb LVL1 muon trigger simulation meeting1 the OO codes for endcap muon trigger simulation Hisaya Kurashige KOBE Univ.

HiT – Higgs and Top (Thursday, June 22, 2000) 1.News - Boaz/Meenakshi 2.Trigger Simulator Status – who?? 3.Proposal for a HiT workshop – Meenakshi/Boaz.

TB analysis update Gwen & Alessandra VELO Group Meeting, Monday October 6 th first fits of the landaus header correction algorithms irradiated RD50: status.

1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.

Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Monitoring and Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 4 June, 2009.

1 Raw Event : ByteStream implementation Muon Workshop, April 2002 A. Nisati, for the Muon Trigger group.

CLEO’s User Centric Data Access System Christopher D. Jones Cornell University.

The Pixel Detector ByteStream Converter M.Cobal (1), L. Santi (2) (1) University of Udine and INFN Trieste, Italy (2) University of Trieste and INFN Trieste,

Algorithm / Data-flow Interface

Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.

AHCAL electronics. Status and Outlook Peter Göttlicher for the AHCAL developers CALICE meeting UT Arlington, March 11th, 2010.

Framework for Raw Data Thomas Kuhr Offline Week 29/06/2004.

Databases E. Leonardi, P. Valente. Conditions DB Conditions=Dynamic parameters non-event time-varying Conditions database (CondDB) General definition:

G.Corti, P.Robbe LHCb Software Week - 19 June 2009 FSR in Gauss: Generator’s statistics - What type of object is going in the FSR ? - How are the objects.

Detector Diagnostics Calibration Analysis Ped/LED/Laser RadDam Analysis Detector Optimization Lumi Detector Performance Monitoring DQM On/Offline Prompt.

24/06/03 ATLAS WeekAlexandre Solodkov1 Status of TileCal software.

Multistep Runs with ROD Crate DAQ Murrough Landon, QMUL Outline: Overview Implementation Comparison with existing setup Readout Status ModuleServices API.

AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.

GDB Meeting - 10 June 2003 ATLAS Offline Software David R. Quarrie Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

DØ Algorithms Meeting March 9, Leslie Groer Columbia UniversityCalorimeter Online Software Status 1  Examines  Crate Unpacking  Calibration 

HBD electronics status All the ADC and XMIT boards are installed. –Top 3 crates are for the ADC, XMIT boards –Bottom crate is for test pulse boards/future.

Offline and Monitoring Software for the EMEC+HEC Combined Run Combined Test Beam and LArg Software and Performance 11 September 2002 Rob McPherson University.

GLAST LAT Offline SoftwareCore review, Jan. 17, 2001 Review of the “Core” software: Introduction Environment: THB, Thomas, Ian, Heather Geometry: Joanne.

Raw data for … 105/04/2002 CAT meeting Witek Krasny(CERN) …the LAR-calorimeter Witek Krasny (CERN)

SCT Bytestream Hacking Bruce Gallop RAL High mu upgrade - 16 th May 2012.

Claudio Grandi INFN-Bologna CHEP 2000Abstract B 029 Object Oriented simulation of the Level 1 Trigger system of a CMS muon chamber Claudio Grandi INFN-Bologna.

9 Oct, 2001 “High speed” FEB-ROD Testing at BNL Kin Yip Short report for our FEB-ROD system at BNL taking data at ~ 100 kHz: Data Integrity Noise Continuity.

4/9/2007RPC converter1/18 RPC bytestream converter: Brainstorming a summary of discussions involving M.Bianco, G.Cataldi, G.Chiodini, E.Gorini, A.Guida,

S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.

Combined HEC/EMEC testbeam data can be read and analyzed within the ATLAS Athena framework A “cookbook” gives an introduction for how to access the data.

Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,

ARCHITECTURE. PRR November x 32 PADs Up to 26 or 3 x 17 MANU BOARD. PATCH BUS Translator Board. FEE DETECTOR Up to 100 PATCH BUS per detector. MANU.

- GMA Athena (24mar03 - CHEP La Jolla, CA) GMA Instrumentation of the Athena Framework using NetLogger Dan Gunter, Wim Lavrijsen,

Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.

Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Soft QCD WG Meeting 29/04/2013.

RpcPrepRawData 1 The conversion from the online RPC data structure (trigger-driven) to offline RpcPrepRawData is not trivial: generally, one online hit.

Straw VME Data Monitoring M. Koval Straw WG meeting

Status report for LVL2 e/  ESD/AOD Aims and constraints Tracking status Calorimetry status (Monika) Monika Wielers Ricardo Gonçalo.

Marco Cattaneo, 6-Apr Issues identified in sub-detector OO software reviews Calorimeters:18th February Tracking:24th March Rich:31st March.

Report from TRD on Raw Data Christoph Blume ALICE Offline Week, October, 2006.

Raw Data Format zhangxiaomei. Raw Event data Format Event Header Subdetector1 Header Subdetector1 Data Subdetector2 Header Subdetector2 Data Other Subdetector.

27/02/04 ATLAS weekTileCal Athena tutorial, part 21 TileCal Athena tutorial Part 2: Reading GEANT hits from ZEBRA and POOL Reading HLT and testbeam ByteStream.

Current Status of RICH LVL-1 Trigger Module Takashi Matsumoto and Ken Oyama Presentation Outline Topics Geometry of Trigger Tile Required function of RICH.

Framework support for Accelerators Sami Kama. Introduction Current Status Future Accelerator use modes Symmetric resource Asymmetric resource 09/11/2015.

AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.

ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.

Using direct photons for L1Calo monitoring + looking at data09 Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting February 18, 2010.

Some topics for discussion 31/03/2016 P. Hristov 1.

1/5/09 Jiri Masik1 Event Filter Tracking in the Inner Detector Jiri Masik EFID Trigger related work –Trigger bytestream –Event display.

Mar 05 - hvdsOffline / HLT1  Athena SW Infrastructure  programming + applying tools wrt. dependencies between packages  developing + testing extra ideas.

1 Calice TB Review DESY 15/6/06D.R. Ward David Ward Post mortem on May’06 DESY running. What’s still needed for DESY analysis? What’s needed for CERN data.

1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.

4 Dec., 2001 Software Week Data flow in the LArG Reconstruction software chain Updated status for various reconstruction algorithm LAr Converters and miscellaneous.

10/8/ HMPID offline status D. Di Bari, A. Mastroserio, L.Molnar, G. Volpe HMPID Group Alice Offline Week.

David Adams ATLAS Hybrid Event Store Integration with Athena/StoreGate David Adams BNL March 5, 2002 ATLAS Software Week Event Data Model and Detector.

ATLAS Pre-Production ROD Status SCT Version

Project definition and organization milestones & work-plan

CMS High Level Trigger Configuration Management

Bernard Andrieu (LPNHE,Paris)

CRU Weekly Meeting Discussion on Trigger

Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST

CMS Persistent Event Structure

Raw Event Conversion Service in BOSS framework

LVL2 Missing Et Trigger Status

Use Of GAUDI framework in Online Environment

Presentation transcript:

To make ByteStream Data There is a plan that the High Level Trigger (HLT) software uses the offline framework (Athena). HLT group wants to read in ByteStream data, convert them into Athena Objects and run their algorithms. They want to measure the efficiency of the conversion from ByteStream to Athena objects. As a result, we need to produce a fraction of the Monte Carlo data in the ByteStream format. To do so, we need to know the exact mapping between ROD, ROB/ROC etc.

The scheme Transient Data Store ByteStream – Raw Data format HLT/Athena Algorithms header trailer ByteStreamCnv

In principle, perhaps, LArRawChannelCollection should correspond to ROB (?). At the moment, we have LArRawChannelCollection Feedthrough no. in LArHardwareID ROD and FEB Channel : 1  1   ROD Channel

Data format and the mapping In order to modify LArRawChannelContainer to what it really should be, we need to know the mappings between FEB channel (feedthrough no./FEB slot/channel no.) and ROD – ROB - ROC. We do this only because the HLT group and upper management “ask” us to produce the Monte Carlo in the RawData (ByteStream) format. If somebody wants to do this, he/she is more than welcome to take up this job. The ROD Demo Board has defined the data format which has been used. It is probably close to what we want but... Eg. The PU in the RODDemo only holds half a FEB and the final PU in the final ROD probably holds 2 PU’s. Apart from that, we still need to know how the exact mapping in ROD- ROB-ROC. It will be nice if somebody can give it to us.

ROD Demo Board has defined the data format … Beginning of fragment (0x00000B0F) Header 1Start of header marker (0xEEEEEEEE) 1Header size (0x08) 1Format version number 1Source Identifier 1Level 1 ID 1Bunch crossing ID 1Level 1 Trigger Type 1Detector Event Type Detecto r Data Status word 1No of PUPU MaskDetector Format Version Number Processing Unit 1 1Fixed Block #0 1Fixed Block #1 1Fixed Block #2 1Variable Block #3 1Variable Block #4 1Variable Block #5 Processing Unit 2 1Fixed Block #0 1Fixed Block #1 1Fixed Block #2 1Variable Block #3