1 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai A Framework for Design Phase Prediction using Integrated Product and Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Applications of one-class classification
Advertisements

Kin 304 Regression Linear Regression Least Sum of Squares
Web Development Engineering Processes Introduction to Web Development Outsourcing Processes.
Enterprise Engineering Excellence (E3) Valueware Technologies India Pvt Ltd. Going Beyond Compliance.
FTP Biostatistics II Model parameter estimations: Confronting models with measurements.
Stoimen Stoimenov QA Engineer SitefinityLeads, SitefinityTeam6 Telerik QA Academy Telerik QA Academy.
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models Overview Assumptions for Linear Regression Evaluating a Regression Model.
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models. Overview Assumptions for Linear Regression Evaluating a Regression Model.
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models. Overview Standard Error of the Estimate Goodness of Fit Coefficient of Determination Regression Coefficients.
Project Management Outline of Chapters 1-6. Chapter 1 – Project Management Concepts Definition of a project and its attributes Key constraints within.
©2011 Rolls-Royce plc The information in this document is the property of Rolls-Royce plc and may not be copied or communicated to a third party, or used.
1 These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 5/e and are provided with permission by.
Materials Management BUS 3 – 141 Quality and Specification Leveraging Technical Excellence Week of Aug 31, 2010.
1 Chapter 6 Risk Management. 2 Project Risks What can go wrong? What is the likelihood? What will the damage be? What can we do about it?
Slide Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response Systems Business Statistics First Edition.
Xtreme Programming. Software Life Cycle The activities that take place between the time software program is first conceived and the time it is finally.
On Cost-benefit Evaluation Methods of Government- invested IT Projects CNAO's Wuhan Resident Office Haiyan zhang.
Measuring Dollar Savings from Software Process Improvement with COCOMO II Betsy Clark Software Metrics Inc. October 25, 2001 Acknowledgment: This presentation.
General Mining Issues a.j.m.m. (ton) weijters Overfitting Noise and Overfitting Quality of mined models (some figures are based on the ML-introduction.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Quality Management Dr. Ahmet TÜMAY, PMP.
Software Process and Product Metrics
12 Steps to Useful Software Metrics
Using A Defined and Measured Personal Software Process Watts S. Humphrey CS 5391 Article 8.
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science © 2001, Steve Easterbrook CSC444 Lec22 1 Lecture 22: Software Measurement Basics of software measurement.
High Impact Global Product Engineering Solutions ® ©2007 Symphony Service Corp. All Rights Reserved. Symphony Services is a registered trademark of Symphony.
1 These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 5/e and are provided with permission by.
Capability Maturity Model Part One - Overview. History Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First.
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 8 - Canonical Correlation Analysis.
Cost of Quality - COQ MGMT-5060 Operations Management.
Balamurali L Senior SQA Manager Diana Ambrose Senior Lead SQA Arun Kumar V Senior Engineer QA
Why do we … Life cycle processes … simplified !!!.
Software Estimation and Function Point Analysis Presented by Craig Myers MBA 731 November 12, 2007.
Test Metrics. Metrics Framework “Lord Kelvin, a renowned British physicist, is reputed to have said: ‘When you can measure what you are speaking about,
How to Complement ISO 9001:2000 with Six Sigma. ISO 9001:2000 introduces a strong focus on measurement, analysis and improvement. This section will discuss.
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Required for: Full EIA based on Palestinian EIA Policy Category A projects based on World Bank Policy.
Chapter 16 Data Analysis: Testing for Associations.
INDE 6335 ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION SURVEY DESIGN Dr. Christopher A. Chung Dept. of Industrial Engineering.
“How to Measure the Impact of Specific Development Practices on Fielded Defect Density” by Ann Marie Neufelder Presented by: Feride Padgett.
Neural Networks Demystified by Louise Francis Francis Analytics and Actuarial Data Mining, Inc.
Organizational Project Management Maturity Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) PMI-MN Breakfast sessions Improvement Planning.
Statistics for Engineer. Statistics  Deals with  Collection  Presentation  Analysis and use of data to make decision  Solve problems and design.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Linear Discriminant Analysis and Logistic Regression.
1 Prof. Indrajit Mukherjee, School of Management, IIT Bombay Bill Smith’s findings…. Bill Smith’s paper concluded that if product was found defective and.
Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute © 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University Software Process Performance Measures James Over Software Engineering.
Software Engineering Modern Approaches Eric Braude and Michael Bernstein 1.
CMMI ® – The Current State Presented by Gregory Shelton Corporate Vice President Engineering, Technology, Manufacturing & Quality 3 rd Annual CMMI Technology.
Done By: Asila AL-harthi Fatma AL-shehhi Fakhriya AL-Omieri Safaa AL-Mahroqi.
1 P-CMM ® INITIATIVE Overview. 2 B A D C Improving Organisation Organisational Capability Technology ProcessPeople.
LESSON 4.1. MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION 1 Design and Data Analysis in Psychology II Salvador Chacón Moscoso Susana Sanduvete Chaves.
Develop Schedule is the Process of analyzing activity sequences, durations, resource requirements, and schedule constraints to create the project schedule.
L Berkley Davis Copyright 2009 MER301: Engineering Reliability Lecture 8 1 MER301: Engineering Reliability LECTURE 8: Chapter 4: Statistical Inference,
Six Sigma Greenbelt Training
Project Cost Management
ODC Level Performance Models
10.2 Regression If the value of the correlation coefficient is significant, the next step is to determine the equation of the regression line which is.
12 Steps to Useful Software Metrics
Building a Business Case for Systems Engineering
DEFECT PREDICTION : USING MACHINE LEARNING
SFO Technologies Pvt Ltd
Andy Nolan1, Silvia Abrahão2 Paul Clements3,
Sample vs Population comparing mean and standard deviations
LESSON 4.4. MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION. Residual Analysis
I271b Quantitative Methods
Simple Linear Regression
Software Engineering I
The Organizational Impacts on Software Quality and Defect Estimation
Chapter 6 Risk Management
Metrics for process and Projects
Linear Regression Analysis 5th edition Montgomery, Peck & Vining
Presentation transcript:

1 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai A Framework for Design Phase Prediction using Integrated Product and Process Attribute approach Paper presentation by Prof. A. K. Verma Mr. Piyush Mehta Prof. A. Srividya November 2005

2 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Model Premise

3 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Measures: Requirements Analysis End Requirements Analysis Phase End Engineering ThreadDefect Detection Thread ProductProcessDerivedProductProcessDerived Specification Size Total Effort Productivit y Review Coverage Review Effort Defect Density Specification Complexity Total Duration Effort Variance Review Size Review Duration Review Efficiency Specification Defects Total Team Size Size Variance Review Team Size Defect Variance Team Compet ency Duration Variance Review Competency Rework Effort

4 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Design Effort Prediction Models Multiple Regression Model I: Dependent Variable = Design Effort Independent Variables = Specification Size, Specification Defects, Specification Effort Factor Variable = Complexity Design Effort = f (Specification Size, Specification Complexity, Specification Defects, Specification Effort) Multiple Regression Model II: Dependent Variable = Design Effort Independent Variables = Specification Size, Specification Defects, Specification Effort) Design Effort = f (Specification Size, Specification Defects, Specification Effort) Assumption: Team competency is roughly same and is taken into account while calculating Specification Size Artificial Neural Network Model for I and II

5 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Design Duration Prediction Models Multiple Regression Model for design duration prediction: Design Duration = f (Specification Size, Specification Effort, Specification Duration, Specification Team Size, Potential Design Team Size) Assumption: Design Team Size is constraint in the organization and depends on the availability of the resources in the organization Neural Network Model for design duration prediction: Design Duration = f (Specification Size, Specification Effort, Specification Duration, Specification Team Size, Design Team Size)

6 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Design Size Prediction Models Multiple Regression Model for design size prediction: Design Size = f (Specification Size, Specification Complexity, Specification Effort) Assumption: The model will be fitted on the existing project database with the given specification size, specification complexity, specification effort. Specification size has strong relationship with the design size. The complexity drives the design size; highly complex requirements will correspond to higher design size. Neural Network Model for design size prediction: Design Size = f (Specification Size, Specification Complexity, Specification Effort)

7 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Defect Prediction Models Multiple regression model for design defect prediction: Design Defect = f (Design Size, Design Complexity, Design Effort, Specification Defects Density, Team Competency Index, Review Team Size, Review Team Competency, Review Effort) Assumption: It can be observed to see if the team size and team competency are impacting each other. Parameter pruning can be enabled to find out the critical parameters important for predication of design defects. Design size and review effort represents the review pace, instead of review effort the review pace can be used. Artificial Neural Network model for design defect prediction: Design Defect = f (Design Size, Design Complexity, Design Effort, Specification Defects Density, Team Competency Index, Review Team Size, Review Team Competency, Review Effort)

8 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Integrated Product and Process Attribute – Quantitative Model

9 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Benefits of IPPA-QM Model 1.Early prediction leads to better project planning 2.Better project management and early corrective action (in case of deviation) 3.Better decision making capability 4.Understanding of organizational delivery capability 5.Development of project at lower cost, better quality, at an agreed time and schedule with higher customer satisfaction.