CPF – QA and R&R. CPF Cycle UNDAF Road Map UNDAF Country Analysis UNDAF Strategic prioritization UNDAF M&E UNDAF results matrix CPF CYCLECPF CYCLE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU CORIN Supporting Cross-border Cooperation BiH – Croatia/Serbia/Montenegro Europeaid/122730/C/SER/BA ________________________ Topical Training for JMC.
Advertisements

Re-positioning the UN in a new aid environment. The UN response to the challenges of a new aid environment 1.Putting national strategies and plans at.
Regional Adviser on Human Rights and the Law, UNDP Regional Center WCA
Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix.
Aligning climate technology actions with national priorities Training workshop for National Designated Entities (NDEs) in Africa Nairobi, Kenya 5-7 March.
Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 2 – Prioritize and set outcomes.
“Act” Delivering through projects (Part 1). Effective Country Programme = Effective Projects.
The concepts/mechanisms/tools for developing a Joint Programme: Critical issues and UNDG Joint Programme Guidance and formats.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
TRENDS IN DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEMS FOR AIDS RESPONSE Kevin Kelly Inaugural SAMEA Conference March 2007, Johannesburg.
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
Session 1: Context. Group exercise UN common programming principles.
HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION This presentation contains a complete overview of all aspects of Response Monitoring Presenting.
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Monitoring Session 6 (cont.)
Overview of UNDAF process and new guidance package March 2010 u nite and deliver effective support for countries.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
“Act” Delivering through projects. Effective Country Programme = Effective Projects What is important for effective delivery of FAO’s projects?
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
What makes a successful development project? Kristin Olsen IOD PARC
The 2007 CCA-UNDAF Guidelines. Summary of key changes (see summary in guidelines, page iii) focus on national ownership clarity on principles and resources.
SESSION 1: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.
SESSION1. INTRODUCTION. Session 1 “Objectives of the ECP workshop” Richard Moon.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
Presentation 1 – Overview Mr Han. Programming Resource Mobilization Delivery/Impact RM – an essential component RM is KEY to delivering on the CPF.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Project Monitoring & Reporting
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
UNDAF for Beginners. 2 2 Strategic programme framework Describes the collective response and support of the UN System to national development priorities.
M&E in the GEF Carlo Carugi Senior Evaluation Officer Expanded Constituency Workshop Dakar, Senegal - July 2011.
DANIDA’s Experience of Results Managing for Development Results Peter Ellehøj – Quality Assurance Department November 2011.
SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.
Strategically Mobilizing Resources. What is Resource Mobilization?
Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 7 – Monitor & Evaluate.
December 4, 2015 UNAIDS Introduction to UN Team on AIDS in Mozambique (UNTAM) UNTAM Retreat 2-3 April Namaacha.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
IFAD Reform towards a better development effectiveness How can we all do better? Mohamed Tounessi Bamba Zoumana Virginia Cameroon Retreat 4-5 November.
Session 1: ACT – Project cycle
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.
PLANNING CYCLE An Overview. CONTENT Expected achievements Expected achievements Why IWRM Planning? Why IWRM Planning? Why a strategic approach? Why a.
WP3 Harmonization & Integration J. Lauterjung & WP 3 Group.
CPF and RM - Getting support. An overview Quality assurance and support mechanism Available guidelines and tools Communication tools and database.
Country Programming Framework and Resource mobilization.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE WCO COUNTRY COOPERATION STRATEGY Presentation to the DPGH Meeting Irish Aid 1 st April, 2015.
SESSION 3: SETTING PRIORITIES – COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND OPTIONS ANALYSIS.
FAO Turkey Partnership Programme (FTPP) FAO Final Evaluation of the FTPP Summary for FTPP Programming Meeting, 14 December
Day 2 Session 1: Starting the CPF. Phase 1 – Starting Institutional Arrangements Government and FAO agreement Formal government request NOT mandatory.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
“Act” Delivering through projects (Part 1). Effective Country Programme = Effective Projects Delivery.
Key Components of a successful Proposal OAS / IACML Workshop on Technical Assistance. San José, Costa Rica May 8, 2007 By: José Luis Alvarez R. Consultant.
NMTPF for Azerbaijan NMTPF development process The NMTPF in Azerbaijan was formulated in 2009 with the request of the Government of Azerbaijan,
Results Matrix (LFM) and Results-Based Budget (RBB) Mariangela Bagnardi.
Overview of the Project Cycle Phases What’s new. “Act” Delivering through projects (Part 1)
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions How the ILO works at a national level.
Pipeline Management Introducing the ATLAS pipeline management module
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
First East and Central Africa Regional IPC Workshop 11 to 13 October 2016 IGAD/IPC Regional Strategic Engagement, Institutionalization and Work planning.
The Hope Foundation Presentation on Pre-Funding Appraisal For Partners and New Applicant Organisations.
Session 2: Prioritization criteria – group activity
SESSION 1: CP CONTEXT.
Regional support mechanism
GCF business model.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Programme Approach for FTFP and FTFP II
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Presentation transcript:

CPF – QA and R&R

CPF Cycle UNDAF Road Map UNDAF Country Analysis UNDAF Strategic prioritization UNDAF M&E UNDAF results matrix CPF CYCLECPF CYCLE

Quality Assurance – when and who 3 CPF formulation process QA at entry Actors: CPF focal point – at closest DO level QA Review at exit – Actors: CPF focal point at RO level ADG/RR certification Governme nt approval Self-assessment along the process Review by the Government, other national stakeholders and resource partners CPF endorsement process I draft - Strategic II draft - Final Draft Concept note CPF Quality Assurance and Support Process Final CPF draft QA during formulation process Actors: Technical officers at SRO/RO/HQs level Field programme support and monitoring officer (SRO)/Senior Field Programme Officer (RO) CPF focal points at SRO/RO/HQs

Recap: Quality Assurance criteria  Relevance Alignment and strategic fit (Gvt, UNDAF, FAO SF/ORs/RRs) Comparative advantages and partnership  Feasibility Are the proposed Outcomes achievable and measurable Are the proposed Outputs and type of interventions valid and logically linked, contributing to CPF outcomes  Sustainability Are the intended Outcomes sustainable (financially, capacities, etc) Are the risks identified, and mitigation strategies put in place 1

Discussion – QA towards harmonized approach Checklist Roles & responsibilities at CO/SRO/RO/HQ