Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations — Montney Shale Case Histories Yohanes ASKABE Department of Petroleum.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title Petrophysical Analysis of Fluid Substitution in Gas Bearing Reservoirs to Define Velocity Profiles – Application of Gassmann and Krief Models Digital.
Advertisements

Analytical Solutions for a Composite, Cylindrical Reservoir with a Power-Law Permeability Distribution in the Inner Cylinder Ryan Sawyer Broussard Department.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Sacramento Model Derivation of Initial Parameters.
1 Miller Similarity and Scaling of Capillary Properties How to get the most out of your lab dollar by cheating with physics.
SPE PP A Method for Probabilistic Forecasting of Oil Rates in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Julio César Muñoz Blanco y Rafael Paz Palenzuela, CBM.
Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Unconventional Reservoirs
Well Testing — Historical Perspectives
Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves —
Imbibition Assisted Recovery
Analysis of Production Data
Analysis of Layered Gas Reservoir Performance Using a Quasi-Analytical Solution for Rate and Pressure Behavior I Nengah Suabdi Department of Petroleum.
Evaluation of Reservoir Performance Using Decline Type Curves Improve Reservoir Description - Area Central Norte (ACN) Region, El Tordillo Field Argentina.
SPE Analysis and Interpretation of
Hydrologic Characterization of Fractured Rocks for DFN Models.
Oil Field Manager ~ Presentation
Measuring Effective Wellbore Permeability Sarah Gasda, Princeton University Michael Celia, Princeton University Jan Nordbotten, Univ. of Bergen.
Preliminary Reservoir Model MC252 6-July DRAFT Outline Modelling approach & purpose Input Data & Model −Rock & Fluid Properties −Layering −Aquifer.
Chapter 1 RESERVOIR.
Gas Buildup Analysis GasBU uses standard buildup tests from individual wells and performs a buildup analysis using various methods. The program allows.
Thesis Defense College Station, TX (USA) — 05 September 2013 Landon RISER Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX.
Principal Investigators: Ding Zhu and A. D. Hill
Optimizing In Fill Well Drilling - Wamsutter Field
Semi-Analytical Rate Relations for Oil and Gas Flow
Schlumberger Public Scope and Application of Pressure Transient Tests in CBM and Shale Gas reservoirs Baijayanta Ghosh Reservoir Domain Champion Testing.
1 Study of Pressure Front Propagation in a Reservoir from a Producing Well by Hsieh, B.Z., Chilingar, G.V., Lin, Z.S. May 4, 2007.
improvement of analysis Vertical Oil Exploration Wells (Case Study)
Pseudopressure Function
OIL RECOVERY MECHANISMS AND THE MATERIAL BALANCE EQUATION
Reserve Evaluation for Enhance Oil Recovery Purposes Using Dynamic Reserve Evaluation Model Woodside Research Facility GPO Box U 1987 Perth West Australia.
Modelling Unconventional Wells with Resolve and Reveal Juan Biörklund (Gauloise Energía) and Georg Ziegler (Wintershall Holding)
Calgary Petroleum Club – February 19, 2013 “Production Performance Unique Type Curve for Horizontal, Multi-Stage Frac'd Gas Wells: WHY, HOW and WHEN!”
Analytical Solution of the Diffusivity Equation. FAQReferencesSummaryInfo Learning Objectives Introduction Analytical Solution Linear Systems Radial Systems.
Production Analysis of Western Canadian Unconventional Light Oil Plays (SPE ) C.R. Clarkson and P.K. Pedersen T O C © TOC, 2011.
Dr.Mostafa Mahmoud Kinawy
Michael Fay VP, Software Development. Well Production Forecasting Requirements For efficiency, the method should be simple (e.g. no simulation or complex.
Produced Water Reinjection Performance Joint Industry Project TerraTek, Inc. Triangle Engineering Taurus Reservoir Solutions (DE&S) E-first Technologies.
Boyd Russell A Practical Guide to Unconventional Petroleum Evaluation Petroleum Club November 28, 2012 R eservoir E valuation P roduction O ptimization.
OIL AND GAS EVALUATIONS PROBABLE & POSSIBLE RESERVES WHAT WILL THE INVESTOR THINK? February 15, 2010 FORREST A. GARB & ASSOCIATES, INC. INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM.
Produced Water Reinjection Performance Joint Industry Project TerraTek, Inc. Triangle Engineering Taurus Reservoir Solutions (DE&S) E-first Technologies.
Final Presentation College Station, TX (USA) — 11 August 2015 Chulhwan SONG Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX.
Title: SHAPE OPTIMIZATION OF AXISYMMETRIC CAVITATOR IN PARTIALY CAVITATING FLOW Department of Mechanical Engineering Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Presented.
Tom Beebe Project Manager
Capillary Pressure Brooks and Corey Type Curve
A Semianalytical p/z Technique Abnormally Pressured Gas Reservoirs
History Matching Flowmeter Data in the Ghawar Field
Case Study : History Matching of Well by Predictive Material Balance Term Project : Advanced Reservoir Engineering Presented By, Namit J Jaiswal B.E (Chemical)
Abnormally Pressured Gas Reservoirs
27 May, 2011 — College Station, TX Study of Nonideal and Secondary Fractures O.M. Olorode Slide — 1/18 A Numerical Study of Nonideal and Secondary Fractures.
Diffusivity Equations for Flow in Porous Media PETE 613 (2005A) Slide — 1 T.A. Blasingame, Texas A&M U. Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University.
Yohanes ASKABE Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Slide — 1/80 Rate-Decline.
Production Analysis of Eagle Ford Shale Gas Wells using Time-Rate Relations Avery DAVIS Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College.
Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Antu Xie Modelling Concepts for Fracture.
SPE What Factors Control Shale Gas Production Decline Trend: A Comprehensive Analysis and Investigation HanYi Wang, The University of Texas at Austin.
Final Presentation College Station, TX (USA) — 11 August 2015 Chulhwan SONG Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX.
Chapter 5 Well Testing (III)
Chapter 5 Pressure Transient Testing (I)
Brooks-Corey MICP Model Parameters Determination
SPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES
GMS Geostatistical Realizations CMG-STARS Results
Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves —
MS Thesis Defense — Fall 2016
Masters of Science Thesis Defense
Upscaling of 4D Seismic Data
Introduction to Effective Permeability and Relative Permeability
Capillary Pressure Brooks and Corey Type Curve
Gas Condensate Blockage
Gas Condensate Blockage
Capillary Pressure: Reservoir Seal Capillary Pressure / Saturation Relationship (Sw* Model) .
SPEGC Northside Study Group “Unconventional Reservoir Horizontal, Multi-Stage Completion Design Optimization” Presented by Stephen Schubarth President.
Presentation transcript:

Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations — Montney Shale Case Histories Yohanes ASKABE Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) Status Presentation College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 1/38 (Alt.) Rate-Decline Relations for Unconventional Reservoirs and Development of Parametric Correlations for Estimation of Reservoir Properties

● Objectives ● Introduction ● Rate-Time Models: — PLE Model — Logistic Growth Model (LGM) — Duong Model ● Models performance analysis ● Modified rate decline models ● A Parametric correlation study ● Methodology: — Analysis of time-rate model parameters — Correlation of time-rate model parameters with reservoir/well parameters — Development of Parametric Correlations ● Conclusions and Recommendations Outline: Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 2/38

■ Ilk et al., (2011) have demonstrated that rate-time parameters can be correlated with reservoir/well parameters using limited well data from unconventional reservoirs. ■ Theoretical verification and analysis of large number of high quality field data is necessary to test and verify the parametric correlations that correlate reservoir/well parameters with time-rate model parameters. ■ This study will provide the opportunity to investigate performance of modern time-rate models in matching and forecasting rate-time data from unconventional reservoirs. The models considered are: — PLE Model — Logistic Growth Model (LGM) — Duong Model Objectives/ Problem Statement: Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 3/38

■ Modern time-rate models (PLE) have been shown to provide accurate EUR estimates and forecast future production when bottomhole flowing pressure (p wf ) is constant. ■ Time-Rate model Constraints: — Constant Bottomhole Pressure (p wf ) — Constant Completion Parameters (Well lateral length, x f....) ■ Time-Rate model parameters can be correlated with reservoir/well parameters (k, kx f, EUR) ■ A diagnostic Approach — Diagnostic Plots — Data Driven matching process Introduction Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 4/38 'qdb' type diagnostic plot— discussed below

● Time-Rate Analysis: Base Definitions ■ Based on the "Loss Ratio" concept (Arps, 1945). ■ Loss Ratio: ■ Loss Ratio Derivative: ● Approach ■ Continuous evaluation of D(t) and b(t) relations provide a diagnostic method for matching time-rate data. ■ Diagnostic relations are used to derive empirical models. Governing Relations: Time-Rate Definitions Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 5/38

● History: ■ SPE (Ilk et al., 2008) ■ Derived from data (D(t) and b(t)) ■ Analogous to Stretched-Exponential, but derived independently ■ Has a terminal term for boundary-dominated flow (D ∞ ) ● Governing Relations: ■ Rate-Time relation: ■ PLE Loss Ratio relation: ■ PLE Loss Ratio Derivative relation: Time-Rate Analysis: Power Law Exponential Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 6/38

● History: ■ SPE (Duong, 2011) ■ Based on extended linear/bilinear flow regime ■ Derived from transient behavior of unconventional-fractured reservoirs ■ Relation extracted from straight line behavior of q/G p vs. Time (Log-Log) plot ● Governing Relations: ■ Duong Rate-Time relation: ■ Duong Loss Ratio relation: ■ Duong Loss Ratio Derivative relation: Time-Rate Analysis: Duong Model Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 7/38

● History ■ SPE (Clark et al., 2011) ■ Adopted from population growth models ■ Modified form of hyperbolic logistic growth models ● Governing Relations: ■ LGM Cumulative and Rate-Time relation: ■ LGM Loss Ratio relation: ■ LGM Loss Ratio Derivative relation: Time-Rate Analysis: Logistic Growth Model (LGM) Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 8/38

● PLE Model ■ Transient ■ Transitional and ■ boundary-dominated flow regimes. ● LGM Model ■ Transient and ■ Transitional flow regimes. ● Duong Model ■ Transient flow regimes. ● Well 1: k = 2000 nD Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 9/38 Theoretical Consideration: Time-rate analysis

● Well 1: k = 2000 nD ● PLE ■ Excellent time-rate data match. ■ Accurate estimate of EUR is possible. ● LGM and Duong Models ■ Excellent match during Transient flow regimes. ■ Lack boundary conditions. ■ EUR is overestimated. Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 10/38 Theoretical Consideration: Time-rate analysis

● PLE, LGM and Duong Models. ■ All models match transient flow-regimes very well. ■ In the absence of boundary-dominated flow, all models provide reliable EUR estimate. ● Well 2: k = 50 nD Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 11/38 Theoretical Consideration: Time-rate analysis

● Well 2: k = 50nD ● In the absence of boundary-dominated flow, PLE, LGM and Duong Models can: ■ match transient flow regimes very well and ■ provide good estimate of EUR. Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 12/38 Theoretical Consideration: Time-rate analysis

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories ● Modified Time-Rate Relations Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 13/40

● Modified Duong Model ■ With boundary parameter, D DNG ■ Boundary-dominated flow can be modeled. ■ Derivation is based on loss-ratio definition. The modified form of loss-ratio relation is given by: ■ It is derived by assuming constant loss-ratio during boundary- dominated flow regimes. ■ New time-rate relation can be derived from the loss-ratio relation. It is given by: ■ Cumulative production relation can not be derived. Numerical methods are necessary. Slide — 14/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Modified Time-Rate Models: Duong Model – (MODEL 1)

● Modified Duong Model ■ The loss-ratio derivative is given by: ● Modified Duong Model ■ Boundary-dominated flows can be modeled. ■ EUR estimates are constrained. ■ Exponential decline characterizes boundary-dominated flow. Slide — 15/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories (Cont.) Modified Time-Rate Models: Duong Model - (MODEL 1)

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 16/38 Modified Duong Model: 'qdb' type diagnostic plot. (MODEL 1) ● Derived based on loss-ratio derivation of Duong Model. ● Modified Duong Model ■ Boundary-dominated flows can be modeled. ■ EUR estimates are constrained. ■ Exponential decline characterizes boundary- dominated flow. Added Constant

● Modified Duong Model ■ With boundary parameter D DNG ■ Boundary-dominated flow can be modeled. ■ Based on q/G p Vs. time diagnostic plot. ■ New q/Gp model-relation: ■ New time-rate relation: ■ New Cumulative production relation: Slide — 17/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Modified Time-Rate Models: Duong Model - (MODEL 2)

● Cont. (Model parameters) ■ The loss-ratio relation is given by: ■ The loss-ratio derivative is given by: Slide — 18/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Modified Time-Rate Models: Duong Model - (MODEL 2)

Slide — 19/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Modified Time-Rate Models: Duong Model – (MODEL 2) ● q/G p vs. Time — Diagnostic Plot ● On log-log plot of q/Gp vs. time: ■ Transient flow can be characterized by a power- law relation, and ■ Boundary-dominated flow can be characterized by an exponential decline relation. ■ q/Gp data can be matched with the following relation:

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 20/40

● Duong Model Slide — 21/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Modified Time-Rate Models: Duong Model (Cont.) ● Modified Duong Model - (Model-2)

Slide — 22/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Duong Model: Diagnostic Plot (Cont.)- Montney Shale Wells vs. time Diagnostic Plot ● m – Duong parameter describes rock-types, stimulation practices and fracture properties.

Slide — 23/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Modified Time-Rate Models: Duong Model - (MODEL 2) ● Numerical Simulation Case, k=8µD. ● Model shows excellent data match for all flow regimes.

Slide — 24/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Modified Time-Rate Models: Models Comparison ● Model Comparison ■ Duong Model ■ Model 1 and ■ Model 2 ● Modified Duong Models provide a better match ● EUR is constrained.

Slide — 25/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Modified Time-Rate Models: Models Comparison Numerical Simulation Case (k = 8 µD) ● Model Comparison ■ Duong Model ■ Model 1 and ■ Model 2 ● Modified Duong Models provide excellent match to Transient, Transition and boundary-dominated flow regimes. ● Duong Model can also match observed early time Skin and production constraints.

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 26/38 ● Modified Logistic Growth Model ■ With boundary parameter D LGM ■ Boundary-dominated flow can be modeled. ■ Modified LGM time-rate relation: Assuming exponential decline during boundary dominated flow regimes. ■ Modified LGM Loss Ratio relation: ■ Modified LGM Loss Ratio derivative relation: Modified Time-Rate Models: Logistic Growth Model ( MODEL 3 )

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 27/38 Modified Logistic Growth Model: MODEL 3-qdb' type diagnostic plot. ● Modified Logistic Growth Model: ■ Boundary-dominated flows can be modeled accurately ■ EUR estimates are constrained. ■ Exponential decline characterizes boundary-dominated flow. ● Prior knowledge of gas in place (K) is required. ● Direct formulation of Gp is not possible. Numerical methods are necessary.

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 28/38 Modified Logistic Growth Model: (MODEL 4) ● Using Diagnostic plot of [K/Q g – 1] vs. t or t mb From LGM Model we have ● The last relation suggests that a log-log plot of [K/Q g t – 1] versus time shows a power-law relation for transient flow regimes. ● Now, we can suggest the following relation with modification for boundary dominated flow regimes. Where K = Initial Gas in Place. R = Remaining Gas Reserve at t ∞.

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 29/38 Modified Logistic Growth Model: (MODEL 4) ● Now, we can derive the associated modified relations. R = Remaining Gas Reserve at t ∞ ● Cumulative Production [G p (t)] relation can be derived for Model 4.

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 30/38 Modified Logistic Growth Model: Diagnostic Plot Corrected K/Q-1 Relation (MODEL 4) ● If K is known, we can estimate parameters a and n from the transient flow regime. ●.D LGM can be modified based on boundary behaviors. a= 161 n= 0.79 K= 20,219, D lgm = R= 0.157

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 31/38 Modified Logistic Growth Model: Comparison ● Modified LGM models can match transient and boundary-dominated flow regimes better than LGM model. ● EUR is constrained. ● MODEL 4 provides a better match. ● Gp relation can be derived for MODEL 4. ● Prior knowledge of gas in place (K) is required. (MODEL and MODEL 4)

■ A horizontal well with multiple transverse fractures is modeled. Reservoir Properties: Net pay thickness, h= m Formation permeability, k=0.25 µD - 5µD Wellbore Radius, r w = m Formation compressibility, c f =4.35E-7 kPa -1 Porosity, =0.09 (fraction) Initial reservoir pressure, p i =34,473.8 kPa Gas saturation, s g =1.0 (fraction) Skin factor, s=0.01 (dimensionless) Reservoir Temperature, T r =100 °C Fluid Properties: Gas specific gravity, γ g =0.6 (air=1) Hydraulically Fractured Well Model Parameters: Fracture half-length, x f =50 m Number of Fractures=20 Horizontal well length, l=1,500 m Production parameters: Flowing pressure, p wf = kPa Producing time, t=10,598 days (30 Years) Theoretical Consideration: Synthetic Case Examples ■ The model inputs are as follows: Transverse Fractures Horizontal well with multiple transverse fractures Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 32/38 ● Synthetic Examples ■ 14 Models with permeability (k) ranging from 0.25 µD - 5µD. ■ All other reservoir/well and fluid parameters are identical.

● PLE model parameters are related to EUR estimates from PDA Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 33/38 Parameter Analysis: PLE Time-Rate Model

● PLE model parameters are related to permeability Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 34/38 Parameter Analysis: PLE Time-Rate Model

■ A parametric correlation that relates reservoir permeability with rate- time model parameters can be produced. Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 35/38 Parameter Correlation: Permeability

■ A parametric correlation that relates EUR estimates with rate-time model parameters can be produced. ■ The parametric correlation may not be unique. Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 36/38 Parameter Correlation: EUR

● Field data example: Montney Shale, (Brassey) Wells ■ Careful analysis of pressure/production data is necessary to accurately estimate reservoir/well parameters (k, EUR, xf). ■ Decline curve analysis is then carried out to estimate EUR. Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 37/38 Field Data Example: Permeability

■ EUR is normalized by initial BHP (P i ), and number of effective fractures. Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 38/38 Field Data Example: EUR ● Field data example: Montney Shale, (Brassey) Wells

■ It is possible to integrate time-rate model parameters with reservoir/well parameters using parametric correlations. ■ Parametric correlations solve the uncertainty regarding the number of unknown parameters in model based production data analysis. ■ Modern rate decline models are successful at modeling different flow regimes observed from unconventional reservoirs. In summary: — PLE Model › Transient, transition, and, boundary-dominated flow regimes are successfully modeled. — Logistic Growth Model (LGM) › Transient, and transition flow regimes are successfully modeled. — Duong Model › Only transient flow regimes are matched. › EUR is overestimated. › Doesn’t conform to ‘qdb’ type diagnostic plot. Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 39/38 Conclusion:

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Extra Slides Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 40/38

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 41/38

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 42/38

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 43/38

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 44/38 Summary: Model Comparison Rate Decline Models Model RelationsDiagnostic PlotsRecommendation Power-law exponential ●Use diagnostic relation Duong Model●Use diagnostic relation ●Do not match boundary flow regimes. Modified Duong Model Logistic Growth Model (LGM) Modified LGM

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 45/38 Modified Logistic Growth Model: Corrected K/Q-1 Relation ● LGM K (Carrying capacity) is equivalent to Gas in Place volumetric estimate. ● Gas in place estimate should be available to use this model ● K/Q(t)-1 vs. t mb diagnostic plot can be used.

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 46/40 PLE Duong LGM Modified LGM MODEL 2 Modified LGM MODEL 1 Modified Duong MODEL 2 Modified Duong MODEL 1

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 47/40 PLE Duong LGM Modified Duong MODEL 2 Modified Duong MODEL 1 Modified LGM MODEL 1

Slide — 48/38 Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Modified Time-Rate Models: Duong Model - (MODEL 2)

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 49/40 Power Law Exponential (PLE) Model Loss Ratio Relation Basis for PLE Model Rate-Time Relation Loss-Ratio Derivative

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 50/40 Duong Time-Rate Relation q/G p vs. Production Time Log-Log Plot Basis for Duong Model Rate-Time Relation Cumulative-Time Relation Loss-Ratio Loss-Ratio Derivative

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 51/40 Logistic Growth Model (LGM) K/Q(t) -1 vs. Production Time Log-Log Plot Basis for LGM Rate-Time Relation Cumulative-Time Relation Loss-Ratio Loss-Ratio Derivative

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 52/40 Modified Duong Model (Model 1) Loss Ratio Relation Basis for Modified Duong Model Rate-Time Relation Loss-Ratio Derivative

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 53/40 Modified Duong Model (Model 2) q/G p vs. Production Time Log-Log Plot Basis for Modified Duong Model (Model 2) Rate-Time Relation Cumulative-Time Relation Loss-Ratio Loss-Ratio Derivative

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 54/40 Modified Logistic Growth Model (Model 1) Loss Ratio Relation Basis for Modified Logistic Growth Model (Model 1) Rate-Time Relation Loss-Ratio Derivative

Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Status Presentation — Yohanes ASKABE — Texas A&M University College Station, TX (USA) — 12 August 2012 Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations Montney Shale Case Histories Slide — 55/40 Modified Duong Model (Model 2) Basis for Modified LGM (Model 2) Rate-Time Relation Cumulative-Time Relation K/Q(t) -1 vs. Production Time Log-Log Plot Loss-Ratio Loss-Ratio Derivative