Science & Technology Centers Program National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford UC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DELOS Highlights COSTANTINO THANOS ITALIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
NSF Regional Grants Conference St. Louis, MO
Science & Technology Centers Program National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford UC.
Science & Technology Centers Program National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford UC.
CSoI Center Update– March 1, 2011 Bob Brown, Managing Director Center for Science of Information soihub.org Center Staffing We are pleased to announce.
EInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) US Resource Centers Perspective: implementation and execution challenges Alan Blatecky Executive Director SDSC.
ActionWebs : Education and Outreach ActionWebs Kickoff Meeting December 17, 2009 │Berkeley, California Education Overview Kristen Gates, Ed.D University.
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
Leading to excellence Comprehensive Equity at Ohio State: What have we learned? Joan M. Herbers Principal Investigator ceos.osu.edu 1.
SING* and ToNC * Scientific Foundations for Internet’s Next Generation Sirin Tekinay Program Director Theoretical Foundations Communication Research National.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Association of Science-Technology Annual Conference October 31-November 1, 2009 Session Leader: Diane LaFollette, Network Coordinator, Arkansas Discovery.
C ATALYZING I NSTITUTIONAL C HANGE IN STEM E DUCATION AT THE U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA Funded by National Science Foundation March 2009.
NSF ADVANCE Program Academic Careers in Engineering & Science (ACES) Lynn T. Singer (Provost’s Office), PI John Angus (Chemical Engineering), co-PI Mary.
WE ARE A COMPLEX LAND. MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS DESIRE TO HELP OTHERS MEANING TO LIFE ESTEEM NEEDS RECOGNITION & APPRECIATION BELONGINGNESS AND LOVE.
MASBO’s Strategic Plan Mid-Cycle Review MARY C. DELAI, MASBO PRESIDENT DAVID VERDOLINO, MASBO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.
National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford UC Berkeley UC San Diego UIUC Biology Thrust.
Achieving Campus Diversity: The University of Central Florida Model
Summary Alan S. Willsky SensorWeb MURI Review Meeting September 22, 2003.
Science & Technology Centers Program National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford UC.
Science & Technology Centers Program Center for Science of Information Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford Texas A&M UC Berkeley UC San Diego.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Network of Excellence in Internet Science Network of Excellence in Internet Science (EINS) 1 st REVIEW Brussels, 12th April 2013 FP7-ICT
Science & Technology Centers Program Center for Science of Information National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
2011 RP Conference: Growing Solutions. This session will give you: a sense of the bigger issues that are shaping our system an outline of what is happening.
Science & Technology Centers Program National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford UC.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
DOE 2000, March 8, 1999 The IT 2 Initiative and NSF Stephen Elbert program director NSF/CISE/ACIR/PACI.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
Science & Technology Centers Program Center for Science of Information Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford Texas A&M UC Berkeley UC San Diego.
Science & Technology Centers Program Center for Science of Information National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard.
The Ad Hoc Task Force on Internal Funding Fred Beard (Journalism), Bob Houser (Chemistry), & Joe Rodgers (Psychology) May, 2010 Internal Funding Recommendations.
Science & Technology Centers Program National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford UC.
Science & Technology Centers Program Center for Science of Information Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford Texas A&M UC Berkeley UC San Diego.
Emerging Frontiers of Science of Information Management Objectives, Structure, and Operation.
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
2 nd G2G Technical Seminar – May 2013 FORECASTS ON RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN THEORY, TOOLS AND METHODOLOGY AND ITS IMPACT ON PRODUCT DESIGN AND ENGINEERING.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Science & Technology Centers Program Center for Science of Information Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford Texas A&M UC Berkeley UC San Diego.
2013 SCHOOL OF INFORMATION THEORY PURDUE UNIVERSITY – CENTER FOR SCIENCE OF INFORMATION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
EDUCATION & OUTREACH NSF site visit October 19, 2015 Salil Vadhan and Urs Gasser Supported by the NSF Secure & Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) program, the.
Science & Technology Centers Program National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford UC.
Science & Technology Centers Program Center for Science of Information Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford Texas A&M UC Berkeley UC San Diego.
Science & Technology Centers Program Center for Science of Information Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford Texas A&M UC Berkeley UC San Diego.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
EPSCoR means “Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
Making Cross-campus, Inter-institutional Collaborations Work
Center for Science of Information
Flag and Logo USAID/Pakistan Alumni Association Discussion on New Directions October 1, 2016.
NSF INCLUDES – DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT LAUNCH PILOTS
Enabling Collaboration with IT
Emerging Frontiers of Science Information
CSoI Update From Barbara: Center-wide post-docs
Emerging Frontiers of Science of Information
Reflections on Lessons Learned: The Center for Innovative Learning Technologies Roy Pea Stanford University AERA 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Supporting Faculty Research
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

Science & Technology Centers Program National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard MIT Princeton Purdue Stanford UC Berkeley UC San Diego UIUC 2012 External Advisory Board: Overview & Management

Science & Technology Centers Program 1.Science of Information 2.Center Mission 1.Integrated Research 2.Education and Diversity 3.Knowledge Transfer 4.Future Activities 3.Management 1.STC Team 2.STC Staff 3.Management Structure 4.Budget 2

Science & Technology Centers Program The Information Revolution started in 1948, with the publication of: A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The digital age began. Claude Shannon: Shannon information quantifies the extent to which a recipient of data can reduce its statistical uncertainty. “semantic aspects of communication are irrelevant...” Applications Enabler/Driver: CD, iPod, DVD, video games, Internet, Facebook, WiFi, mobile, Google,.. Design Driver: universal data compression, voiceband modems, CDMA, multiantenna, discrete denoising, space-time codes, cryptography,... 3

Science & Technology Centers Program 4 Three Theorems of Shannon Theorem 1 & 3. [Shannon 1948; Lossless & Lossy Data Compression] compression bit rate ≥ source entropy H(X) for distortion level D: lossy bit rate ≥ rate distortion function R(D) Theorem 2. [Shannon 1948; Channel Coding] In Shannon’s words: It is possible to send information at the capacity through the channel with as small a frequency of errors as desired by proper (long) encoding. This statement is not true for any rate greater than the capacity.

Science & Technology Centers Program 5 1.Back from infinity : Extend Shannon findings to finite size data structures (i.e., sequences, graphs), that is, develop information theory of various data structures beyond first-order asymptotics. 2.Science of Information : Information Theory needs to meet new challenges of current applications in biology, communication, knowledge extraction, economics, … In order to accomplish it we must understand new aspects of information in: structure, time, space, and semantics, and dynamic information, limited resources, complexity, representation- invariant information, and cooperation & dependency.

Science & Technology Centers Program Structure: Measures are needed for quantifying information embodied in structures (e.g., information in material structures, nanostructures, biomolecules, gene regulatory networks, protein networks, social networks, financial transactions). Szpankowski & Choi : Information contained in unlabeled graphs & universal graphical compression.. Grama & Subramaniam : quantifying role of noise and incomplete data in biological network reconstruction. Neville : Outlining characteristics (e.g., weak dependence) sufficient for network models to be well-defined in the limit. Yu & Qi: Finding distributions of latent structures in social networks.

Science & Technology Centers Program Time: Classical Information Theory is at its weakest in dealing with problems of delay (e.g., information Arriving late may be useless of has less value). Verdu & Polyanskiy : major breakthrough in extending Shannon capacity theorem to finite blocklength information theory. Kumar: design reliable scheduling policies with delay constraints for wireless networks. Weissman : real time coding system to investigate the impact of delay on expected distortion. Subramaniam: reconstruct networks from dynamic biological data. Ramkrishna: quantify fluxes in biological networks by showing that enzyme metabolism is regulated by a survival strategy in controlling enzyme syntheses. Space: Bialek explores transmission of information in making spatial patterns in developing embryos – relation to information capacity of a communication channel.

Science & Technology Centers Program 8 Limited Resources: In many scenarios, information is limited by available computational resources (e.g., cell phone, living cell). Bialek works on structure of molecular networks that optimize information flow, subject to constraints on the total number of molecules being used. Verdu investigates the minimum energy per bit as a function of data length in Gaussian channels. Semantics: Is there a way to account for the meaning or semantics of information? Sudan argues that the meaning of information becomes relevant whenever there is diversity across communicating parties and when parties themselves evolve over time.

Science & Technology Centers Program 9 Representation-invariance: How to know whether two representations of the same information are information equivalent? Learnable Information : Data driven science focuses on extracting information from data. How much information can actually be extracted from a given data repository? How much knowledge is in Google's database? Atallah investigates how to enable the untrusted remote server to store and manipulate the client's confidential data without learning it. Clifton investigates differential privacy methods for graphs; to determine the conditions under which privacy is practically achievable without rendering the data useless.

Science & Technology Centers Program 10 Cooperation & Dependency : How does cooperation impact information (nodes should cooperate in their own self-interest)? Cover initiates a theory of cooperation and coordination in networks, that is, they study the achievable joint distribution among network nodes, provided that the communication rates are given. Dependency and rational expectation are critical ingredients in Sims' work on modern dynamic economic theory. Coleman is studying statistical causality in neural systems by using Granger principles. Quantum Information : The flow of information in macroscopic systems and microscopic systems may posses different characteristics. Aaronson and Shor lead these investigations. Aaronson develops computational complexity of linear systems.

Science & Technology Centers Program Manfred Eigen (Nobel Prize, 1967) “The differentiable characteristic of the living systems is Information. Information theory, pioneered by Claude Shannon, cannot answer this question... in principle, the answer was formulated 130 years ago by Charles Darwin”. P. Nurse, (Nature, 2008, “Life, Logic, and Information”): Focusing on information flow will help to understand better how cells and organisms work.... spatial and temporal order, cell memory and reproduction are not fully understood. A. Zeilinger (Nature, 2005)... reality and information are two sides of the same coin, that is, they are in a deep sense indistinguishable. C. Bennett (Logical depth, 1988): ``From the earliest days of information theory it has been appreciated that information is not a good message value.’’ … Value of message lies in ``parts predictable only with difficulties, things that receiver could figure out without being told …’’

Science & Technology Centers Program 1.Science of Information 2.Center Mission 1.Integrated Research 2.Education and Diversity 3.Knowledge Transfer 4.Future Activities 3.Management 1.STC Team 2.STC Staff 3.Management Structure 4.Budget 12

Science & Technology Centers Program Advance science and technology through a new quantitative understanding of the representation, communication and processing of information in biological, physical, social and engineering systems. Some Specific Center’s Goals: define core theoretical principles governing transfer of information, develop metrics and methods for information, apply to problems in physical and social sciences, and engineering, offer a venue for multi-disciplinary long-term collaborations, explore effective ways to educate students, train the next generation of researchers, broaden participation of underrepresented groups, transfer advances in research to education and industry. 13

Science & Technology Centers Program 14 Research Thrusts: 1. Life Sciences 2. Communication 3. Knowledge Management S. Subramaniam A. Grama V. Anantharam T. Weissman S. Kulkarni M. Atallah Create a shared intellectual space, integral to the Center’s activities, providing a collaborative research environment that crosses disciplinary and institutional boundaries.

Science & Technology Centers Program 15 Life Science Thrust (Berkeley, Princeton, Purdue, Stanford, UCSD)

Science & Technology Centers Program 16 Communication Thrust Communication 1.Delay in Information Theory a. Quantifying the temporal value of information b. Information theory for finite blocklengths c. Tradeoffs between delay, distortion, and reliability in feedback systems 2.Information and computation a.Quantifying fundamental limits of in-network computation, and the computing capacity of networks for different functions b.Complexity of distributed computation in wireless and wired networks c.Information theoretic study of aggregation for scalable query processing in distributed databases 3.New measures and notions of information a.Soft-information (beliefs) in rate distortion theory b.Semantics in information: framework, probabilistic modeling c.Modern communication networks 4.Interface with life sciences thrust a.Furthering our information theoretic understanding of deletion, substitution, and insertion channels b.Information theoretic models for evolution c.Models for stimuli d.Communication models for intra-neuron signaling e.Models to predict the behavior of various systems, ranging from intra-cellular signaling, to tissues, individuals, colonies, and ecosystems (Berkeley, MIT, Princeton, Purdue, Stanford, UIUC)

Science & Technology Centers Program 17 Knowledge Thrust Knowledge Management (Berkeley, Bryn Mawr, MIT, Princeton, Purdue, Stanford,) 1.Foundations of Learning, Inference, and Decision-Making a.Learnable information and information relevance b.Distributed learning c.Dynamics and control d.Robustness 2.Privacy, Security, and Anonymity a.Collaborative versus competitive computing learning b.Scattered and hidden data c.Quantification 3.Data Reduction a.Manifold learning b.Discovering relevant information c.Scalable methods d.Noisy, heterogeneous, distributed data 4.Application thrusts a.Social networks b.Biological systems c.Economics d.Environmental modeling

Science & Technology Centers Program 18 Opportunistic Research Workshops Kickoff Workshop – Chicago, IL – October 6-7, 2010 (28 STC participants and students) 1. Allerton Workshop, IL – September 28, 2010 (T. Coleman, S. Verdu, A. Goldsmith, P.R. Kumar, D. Tse, W. Szpankowski, students) 2. Stanford Workshop – Palo Alto, CA – January 24, 2011 (Princeton – Stanford –Berkeley) (G. Bejerano, T. Cover, J. Gallant, A. Goldsmith, R. Rwebangira, G. Seroussi (HPL), W. Szpankowski, D. Tse, S. Verdu, M. Weinberger (HPL), T. Weissman, Bin Yu) 3. UC San Diego Workshop – February 11, 2011 (Berkeley – UCSD) (O. Milenkovic, W. Szpankowski, S. Subramaniam, Bin Yu, students) 4. Princeton Workshop – May 13, 2011 (Princeton – Purdue) (B. Bialek, Y. Baryshnikov, R. Rwebangira, C. Sims, W. Szpankowski, S. Verdu) 5. Purdue Workshop – September 9, 2011 (Berkeley – UCSD – Purdue) 6. Allerton Workshop – September 27, 2011 (Purdue –UIUC) 7. Future Workshops: UCSD, Stanford, MIT, …

Science & Technology Centers Program Metrics for our integrative research efforts as developed for the strategic plan: Formulate a small number of high-impact research problems. Several problems were formulated during opportunistic workshops in life science and communication. Identify two grand challenge problems in two years on a web bulletin board. Big Question workshop is being planned for the Spring of Conduct five investigator exchange visits for immersive activity Several visits took place (e.g., Neville, P.R. Kumar, D. Kumar, Szpankowski, Verdu). Initiate five new collaborations through joint supervision, student exchange, etc. New collaboration: Ramkrishna leads Purdue, Berkeley and UCSD team. Subramaniam leads UCSD- Berkeley collaboration; Purdue & Berkeley (Neville & Yu); MIT-Princeton (Polyanskiy & Verdu); Stanford-Princeton (Weissman-Verdu) Develop proposals for sustained external funding within five years. Templeton Foundation considers funding science of information program; NSF TUES, AFOSR, etc. Develop two pedagogical resources (e.g. books, survey, papers, lecture series) at the interface of applications and theory in two years. Honors class, Prestige Lecture Series, summer schools. 19

Science & Technology Centers Program 20 D. Kumar M. Ward B. Ladd Integrate cutting-edge, multidisciplinary research and education efforts across the center to advance the training and diversity of the work force Summer School, Purdue, May 2011 (Stanford, 2012) HONR 399: Intro to Science of Information B. Gibson

Science & Technology Centers Program Industrial affiliate program in the form of consortium: Considerable intellectual resources Access to students and post-docs Access to intellectual property Shape center research agenda Solve real-world problems Industrial perspective Knowledge Transfer Director: Ananth Grama (Industrial Workshop, Purdue, April, 2011) 21 Develop effective mechanism for interactions between the center and external stakeholder to support the exchange of knowledge, data, and application of new technology.

Science & Technology Centers Program 22 1.Two Center-wide post-docs 2.Semi-annual student workshops (students’ council) 3.Center-wide solicitation for collaborative research support 4.Annual summer school (Stanford, 2012, Purdue 2013, UCSD 2014) 5.Science of Information courses (at partner institutions 2012+) 6.CHANNELS Program (broadening participation with STEM) 7.Seminar series & workshops (virtual over the center; Prestige Lecture) 8. Big Question workshop (Spring 2012)

Science & Technology Centers Program 23

Science & Technology Centers Program 1.Science of Information 2.Center Mission 1.Integrated Research 2.Education and Diversity 3.Knowledge Transfer 4.Future Activities 3.Management 1.STC Team 2.STC Staff 3.Management Structure 4.Budget 24

Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr College: D. Kumar Howard University: C. Liu, L. Burge MIT: P. Shor (co-PI), M. Sudan (Microsoft) Purdue University (lead): W. Szpankowski (PI) Princeton University: S. Verdu (co-PI) Stanford University: A. Goldsmith (co-PI) Texas A&M: P.R. Kumar University of California, Berkeley: Bin Yu (co-PI) University of California, San Diego: S. Subramaniam UIUC: O. Milenkovic. Bin Yu, U.C. Berkeley Sergio Verdú, Princeton Peter Shor, MIT Andrea Goldsmith, Stanford Wojciech Szpankowski, Purdue 25 R. Aguilar, M. Atallah, C. Clifton, S. Datta, A. Grama, S. Jagannathan, A. Mathur, J. Neville, D. Ramkrishna, J. Rice, Z. Pizlo, L. Si, V. Rego, A. Qi, M. Ward, D. Blank, D. Xu, C. Liu, L. Burge, M. Garuba, S. Aaronson, N. Lynch, R. Rivest, Y. Polyanskiy, W. Bialek, S. Kulkarni, C. Sims, G. Bejerano, T. Cover, T. Weissman, V. Anantharam, J. Gallant, C. Kaufman, D. Tse,T.Coleman.

Science & Technology Centers Program Nobel Prize (Economics): Chris Sims National Academies (NAS/NAE) -- Cover, Lynch, Kumar, Ramkrishna, Rice, Rivest, Shor, Sims, Verdu. Turing award winner -- Rivest. Shannon award winners -- Cover and Verdu. Nevanlinna Prize (outstanding contributions in Mathematical Aspects of Information Sciences) -- Sudan and Shor. Richard W. Hamming Medal – Cover and Verdu. Humboldt Research Award -- Szpankowski. 26

Science & Technology Centers Program 27

Science & Technology Centers Program Director – Wojciech Szpankowski Managing Director – Bob Brown Education Director – Brent Ladd Diversity Director – Barbara Gibson Multimedia Specialist – Mike Atwell Administrative Asst. – Mari-Ellyn Brock Administrative Asst. Mari-Ellyn Brock Multimedia Specialist Mike Atwell Education Director Brent Ladd Bob Brown Managing Director Barbara Gibson, Diversity Director 28

Science & Technology Centers Program To provide mechanisms for synergistic research and development of foundational principles, methods, and applications of post-Shannon information theory. To educate and train the next generation of information sciences practitioners To deeply engage students, researchers, and affiliated personnel from underrepresented groups in all aspects of the project. To facilitate seamless transfer of knowledge to the broader academic and commercial world.

Science & Technology Centers Program 30 Director Wojciech Szpankowski Director Wojciech Szpankowski External Advisory Committee J. Gibson, J. Bruck, M. Guzdial, J.F. Frias, A. Karlin, W. Levy, N. Shroff Executive Committee A. Grama, PR Kumar, A. Goldsmith, D. Kumar, S. Subramaniam, P. Shor, S. Verdu, B. Yu Executive Committee A. Grama, PR Kumar, A. Goldsmith, D. Kumar, S. Subramaniam, P. Shor, S. Verdu, B. Yu Vice President for Research Purdue University Vice President for Research Purdue University Internal Management Committee J. Rice, Z. Pizlo, D. Ramkrishna, M.D. Ward Knowledge Transfer A. Grama Knowledge Transfer A. Grama Diversity Director: B. Gibson Diversity Director: B. Gibson Education Director: B.T. Ladd Education Director: B.T. Ladd Managing Director B. Brown Multimedia Specialist M. Atwell Administrative Assistant M.E. Brock Managing Director B. Brown Multimedia Specialist M. Atwell Administrative Assistant M.E. Brock Technical Thrusts Communication T. Weissman Communication T. Weissman Knowledge S. Kulkarni Knowledge S. Kulkarni Biology S. Subrmaniam Biology S. Subrmaniam Associate Directors A. Grama, D. Kumar, M. D. Ward Associate Directors A. Grama, D. Kumar, M. D. Ward

Science & Technology Centers Program Composition: –Advisory to the Center’s Director –Center leadership –Chair of the Executive Committee is not the Director of the Center. Coordination: –Often meetings conducted through telephone and/or video conference –Senior personnel from projects and managing director attend by invitation as needed. –Manage new and ongoing projects; deal with issues that have arisen, and discuss possible future directions (fiscal and intellectual) –Action items from meeting are distributed within a week

Science & Technology Centers Program Projects within the Center are managed by the Center Director, Manager and Executive Committee via management, solicitation, and assessment: –Track progress of each project –Ensure progress toward foundational aspects –Terminate projects no longer relevant or demonstrating insufficient progress –Evaluate the success of collaborative investigations. Metrics (letter from ExC sent in December 2010) –Publication of quality peer-reviewed papers –Collaborations between investigators, e.g., joint publications and grants –Development of educational material that illustrate fundamental developments in the domain –Assessment of progress reports by the peers within the Center

Science & Technology Centers Program 33

Science & Technology Centers Program 34

Science & Technology Centers Program Composition: reflects diversity of scientific domains within the Center: J. Gibson (Chair), J. Bruck, M. Guzdial, J.F. Frias, C. Heegard, A. Karlin, W. Levy, N. Shroff Coordination –External Advisory Board receives annual progress reports from the Managing Director –In-person meeting at the annual “all hands” meeting of the Center. This meeting provides a forum for a high quality, detailed appraisal of the Center’s progress (first meeting: August 2011)

Science & Technology Centers Program 1.Science of Information 2.Center Mission 1.Integrated Research 2.Education and Diversity 3.Knowledge Transfer 4.Future Activities 3.Management 1.STC Team 2.STC Staff 3.Management Structure 4.Budget 36

Science & Technology Centers Program $5M/year : Student Support (53+22)Post Docs (12) Faculty Support (39)Visitors & Collaborators Education DirectorDiversity Director Managing Director Administrative Assistance TravelWorkshops Advisory Committee Visitors, Speakers, etc Summer School Collaborators Cost Sharing: Students, Faculty Support, ITaP, Managing Director, Space

Science & Technology Centers Program

39 research faculty, 53 graduate, 22 undergrads, 12 post-doc (101 total ). Center cohort (financially supported): 30 women (29.7%), 71 men (70%), 23 U.S. Citizens (30%), 10 minority (10%).

Science & Technology Centers Program