A numerical study of the afterglow emission from GRB double-sided jets Collaborators Y. F. Huang, S. W. Kong Xin Wang Department of Astronomy, Nanjing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supernova Remnants Shell-type versus Crab-like Phases of shell-type SNR.
Advertisements

The Science of Gamma-Ray Bursts: caution, extreme physics at play Bruce Gendre ARTEMIS.
Understanding the prompt emission of GRBs after Fermi Tsvi Piran Hebrew University, Jerusalem (E. Nakar, P. Kumar, R. Sari, Y. Fan, Y. Zou, F. Genet, D.
Collaborators: Wong A. Y. L. (HKU), Huang, Y. F. (NJU), Cheng, K. S. (HKU), Lu T. (PMO), Xu M. (NJU), Wang X. (NJU), Deng W. (NJU). Gamma-ray Sky from.
Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in 2003/2004 Presented By Manasvita Joshi Ohio University, Athens, OH ISCRA, Erice, Italy 2006.
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
Gamma-ray burst afterglows with VLBI: a sensitivity quest Ylva Pihlström University of New Mexico.
Yizhong Fan (Niels Bohr International Academy, Denmark Purple Mountain Observatory, China) Fan (2009, MNRAS) and Fan & Piran (2008, Phys. Fron. China)
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Tsvi Piran Re’em Sari 2nd EUL Workshop on Gamma-Ray Bursts.
GRB afterglows in the Non-relativistic phase Y. F. Huang Dept Astronomy, Nanjing University Tan Lu Purple Mountain Observatory.
Modeling the X-ray emission and QPO of Swift J Fayin Wang ( 王发印) Nanjing University, China Collaborators: K. S. Cheng (HKU), Z. G. Dai (NJU), Y.
Gamma-Ray Burst Optical Observations with AST3 Xue-Feng Wu Xue-Feng Wu Chinese Center for Antarctic Astronomy, Chinese Center for Antarctic Astronomy,
Reverse Shocks and Prompt Emission Mark Bandstra Astro
GRB B: Prompt Emission from Internal Forward-Reverse Shocks Yun-Wei Yu 1,2, X. Y. Wang 1, & Z. G. Dai 1 (俞云伟,王祥玉,戴子高) 1 Department of Astronomy,
GRB Afterglow Spectra Daniel Perley Astro September* 2005 * International Talk Like a Pirate Day.
Spectral Energy Correlations in BATSE long GRB Guido Barbiellini and Francesco Longo University and INFN, Trieste In collaboration with A.Celotti and Z.Bosnjak.
GRBs and Magnetic Fields Shiho Kobayashi (小林史歩) Liverpool John Moores University.
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Krakow Oct. 6, 2008.
GLAST Science LunchDec 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/21 Can emission at higher energies provide insight into the physics of shocks and how the GRB inner.
DETERMINING THE DUST EXTINCTION OF GAMMA-RAY BURST HOST GALAXIES: A DIRECT METHOD BASED ON OPTICAL AND X-RAY PHOTOMETRY Li Yuan 黎原 Purple Mountain Observatory.
X-ray/Optical flares in Gamma-Ray Bursts Daming Wei ( Purple Mountain Observatory, China)
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
Temporal evolution of thermal emission in GRBs Based on works by Asaf Pe’er (STScI) in collaboration with Felix Ryde (Stockholm) & Ralph Wijers (Amsterdam),
Kick of neutron stars as a possible mechanism for gamma-ray bursts Yong-Feng Huang Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University.
G.E. Romero Instituto Aregntino de Radioastronomía (IAR), Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas, University of La Plata, Argentina.
Hunting for the GRB Progenitor Observations of The GRB Radio Afterglow and Computer Modeling of the Circumburst Medium GTAC ConferenceAugust 29,
A Model for Emission from Microquasar Jets: Consequences of a Single Acceleration Episode We present a new model of emission from jets in Microquasars,
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: High Energy I: Gamma-Ray Bursts Geoff Bower.
Modeling GRB B Xuefeng Wu (X. F. Wu, 吴雪峰 ) Penn State University Purple Mountain Observatory 2008 Nanjing GRB Workshop, Nanjing, China, June
Making Light How do we make light?. Making Light How do we make light? –Heat and Light: Incandescent Lighting (3-5% efficient) –Atoms and Light: Fluorescent.
A New Chapter in Radio Astrophysics Dale A. Frail National Radio Astronomy Observatory Gamma Ray Bursts and Their Afterglows AAS 200 th meeting, Albuquerque,
Monte-Carlo Simulation of Thermal Radiation from GRB Jets Sanshiro Shibata (Konan Univ.) Collaborator: Nozomu Tominaga (Konan Univ., IPMU)
Recent Results and the Future of Radio Afterglow Observations Alexander van der Horst Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek University of Amsterdam.
Spectra of partially self-absorbed jets Christian Kaiser University of Southampton Christian Kaiser University of Southampton.
Properties of X- Ray Rich Gamma- Ray Bursts and X -Ray Flashes Valeria D’Alessio & Luigi Piro INAF: section of Rome, Italy XXXXth Moriond conference, Very.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
IceCube non-detection of GRB Neutrinos: Constraints on the fireball properties Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China Collaborators : H. N. He, R. Y.
The Early Time Properties of GRBs : Canonical Afterglow and the Importance of Prolonged Central Engine Activity Andrea Melandri Collaborators : C.G.Mundell,
Studies on the emission from the receding jet of GRB Xin Wang, Y. F. Huang, and S. W. Kong Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, China A&A submitted.
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
Dark Gamma-Ray Bursts and their Host Galaxies Volnova Alina (IKI RAS), Pozanenko Alexei (IKI RAS)
The acceleration and radiation in the internal shock of the gamma-ray bursts ~ Smoothing Effect on the High-Energy Cutoff by Multiple Shocks ~ Junichi.
Gamma-Ray Bursts Energy problem and beaming * Mergers versus collapsars GRB host galaxies and locations within galaxy Supernova connection Fireball model.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
Is GRB050509b a genuine short? Gustavo de Barros, Maria Grazia Bernardini, Carlo Luciano bianco, Roberto Guida, Remo Ruffini.
Magnetohydrodynamic Effects in (Propagating) Relativistic Ejecta Yosuke Mizuno Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research University of Alabama in.
Gamma-Ray Burst Ring-shaped Jets And Their Afterglows Ming Xu Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University Gamma-ray Sky from Fermi: Neutron.
Expected Gamma-Ray Emission of SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (d = 50 kpc) E.G.Berezhko 1, L.T. Ksenofontov 1, and H.J.Völk 2 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute.
Elisabetta Maiorano IASF/INAF, Sezione di Bologna & Dip. Astronomia, Università di Bologna GRB : the burst before the Burst.
VHE  -ray Emission From Nearby FR I Radio Galaxies M. Ostrowski 1 & L. Stawarz 1,2 1 Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University 2 Landessternwarte.
Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in Authors: Manasvita Joshi and Markus Böttcher (Ohio University) Abstract: An extensive multi-wavelength.
(Review) K. Ioka (Osaka U.) 1.Short review of GRBs 2.HE  from GRB 3.HE  from Afterglow 4.Summary.
Poonam Chandra Jansky Fellow, NRAO, Charlottesville & University of Virginia.
1 Radio – FIR Spectral Energy Distribution of Young Starbursts Hiroyuki Hirashita 1 and L. K. Hunt 2 ( 1 University of Tsukuba, Japan; 2 Firenze, Italy)
Alessandra Corsi (1,2) Dafne Guetta (3) & Luigi Piro (2) (1)Università di Roma Sapienza (2)INAF/IASF-Roma (3)INAF/OAR-Roma Fermi Symposium 2009, Washington.
ASTR 113 – 003 Spring 2006 Lecture 12 April 19, 2006 Review (Ch4-5): the Foundation Galaxy (Ch 25-27) Cosmology (Ch28-29) Introduction To Modern Astronomy.
Stochastic wake field particle acceleration in Gamma-Ray Bursts Barbiellini G., Longo F. (1), Omodei N. (2), Giulietti D., Tommassini P. (3), Celotti A.
Radio afterglows of Gamma Ray Bursts Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics - Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Collaborator: Dale.
The prompt optical emission in the Naked Eye Burst R. Hascoet with F. Daigne & R. Mochkovitch (Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris) Kyoto − Deciphering then.
A RUNAVA B HADRA AND B HAKTA K UNWAR High Energy & Cosmic Ray Research Centre, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, WB, India Scattered radiation from.
Magnetized Shocks & Prompt GRB Emission
Thermal electrons in GRB afterglows, or
The signature of a wind reverse shock in GRB’s Afterglows
Mathew A. Malkan (UCLA) and Sean T. Scully (JMU)
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Dark Gamma-Ray Bursts and their Host Galaxies
Speaker: Longbiao Li Collaborators: Yongfeng Huang, Zhibin Zhang,
Photosphere Emission in Gamma-Ray Bursts
Swift observations of X-Ray naked GRBs
Tight Liso-Ep-Γ0 Relation of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts
Presentation transcript:

A numerical study of the afterglow emission from GRB double-sided jets Collaborators Y. F. Huang, S. W. Kong Xin Wang Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, China

Contents 1.Introduction 2.Model 3.Numerical Results 4.Comparisons 5.Conclusion

The Standard Fireball Model Inter- Stellar Medium ~10 8 km γ~1000 internal shocks progenitor e +, e - γ p R~10 km E>10 52 ergs M<10 -5 M sun prompt emission external shock ~10 11 km γ>>1 afterglows

 Schematic GRB from a massive stellar progenitor  Beaming effect: achromatic break in afterglow LCs, polarization, energy crisis, orphan afterglow Introduction XOXO ~10 13 cm >10 16 cm M é sz á ros 2001 Detailed numerical investigation on the counter-jet emission is still lacking

Model  We use the convenient generic dynamical model advanced by Huang et al (2000).  The physical picture is that the homogeneous double-sided jet expands into a homogeneous interstellar medium (ISM).  Dynamics: (the adiabatic index) (comoving sound speed) shock radius photon arrival time ejecta mass half-opening angle bulk Lorentz factor

 Radiation: synchrotron radiation & self-absorption (SSA) electron distribution function synchrotron radiation power optical depth of SSA observed flux density observer’s time

Numerical Results 1.Dynamic evolution of the receding jet 2.Total equal arrival time surface (EATS) 3.The overall light curves (LCs) including the contribution from the receding jet component 4.The effects of various parameters on the receding jet component 5.Peak time of receding component The parameters of the “standard” condition are defined as follows:

Dynamic evolution of the receding jet in a rather long observer’s time (t ~ 100 d), γ of the receding jet remains almost constant the emission from the receding jet will be very weak in this period, since it is highly beamed backwardly. for the large circum-burst medium density case (n=1000/cm 3 ), the receding jet is decelerated more rapidly the emission from the receding jet will peak earlier than that under the standard condition.

EATS for the receding jet branch has much smaller typical radius much flatter curvature much smaller area as compared with those for the forward jet branch at the same observer time. Total equal arrival time surface (EATS)  Due to speed of light is not infinite, photons received at an observer’s time t obs are emitted from a distorted ellipsoid not simultaneously, which is determined by

Exemplar surfaces for a “standard” double-sided jet of ten equal arrival times, i.e. 100 d (red), 200 d (orange), 400 d (yellow), 600 d (olive), 800 d (cyan), 1000 d (blue), 1250 d (purple), 1500 d (pink), 1750 d (dark cyan), and 2000 d (grey).

(c)(d) The overall light curves LCs of the double-sided jet with two parameters altered compared with the “standard” condition, i.e. n=1000/cm 3 and z=0.1 (d L =454.8 Mpc).

The effects of various parameters All 8.46 GHz LCs

Peak time of receding component

Fig. 3 Multiband afterglow light curves considering the contribution from the receding jet component. The total light curves at various observing frequencies, i.e (red), (orange), (yellow), (olive), (cyan), (blue), (purple), (pink), (black) Hz, are represented by solid lines, while the counter-jet emission by dashed lines. The dotted line marks the peak time of the receding jet component at 1 GHz. We can see that this peak time does not remain constant over a wide range of frequency, from radio, to optical, then to X-ray, and the plateau is not always formed in the late time light curves.

Li & Song (2004) Comparisons  with analytical derivations  with other numerical results  with observations Zhang & MacFadyen (2009) Our results are consistent with other colleagues’. radio afterglow LCs of GRB The emission of the receding jet is unable to constitute the radio data at late time. So we agree that the observed late-time flux density is mainly from the host galaxy emission (Berger+ 01; Frail+ 03; Kong+ 10, see SW’s talk)

1.According to our results, the contribution from the receding jet is quite weak and only manifests as a plateau ( ~ 0.3 at 1 GHz). At lower frequency, the relative intensity of the receding jet component becomes stronger, as compared with the peak of the forward jet. 2.Generally, our result is consistent with Zhang & MacFadyen’s and Li & Song’s. However the subtle difference between ours and Li & Song’s is ascribed to the EATS effect as well as the deceleration of the external shock, while the difference between ours and Zhang & MacFadyen’s is due to the SSA effect. 3.Contribution from the receding jet can be greatly enhanced if the circum- burst environment is very dense and/or the micro-physics parameters of receding jet is different and/or the burst has a low redshift. 4.The SSA effect is important for deciding the peak time of the counter-jet emission in radio bands. When the medium density is high, SSA tends to postpone the peak time at higher observing frequencies and decrease the peak flux. 5.We have studied the radio afterglow of GRB It is found that the counter-jet emission is much lower than the host galaxy level, and is completely submerged by the host galaxy emission. Conclusion Jy 

Thanks for your patience!

The effects of various parameters (2) - Different characteristics for twin jets 8.46GHz LCs. In each panel, the solid line is plotted under the “standard” condition, i.e., the parameters are completely the same for the twin jets (but we have evaluated as 0.01 and as here). For other LCs, one or two parameters are changed for the receding jet only.