1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Thursday, December 19, 2002 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
System Analysis Advisory Committee Futures, Monte Carlo Simulation, and CB Assumption Cells Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday, September 27, 2011.
Advertisements

Software Analysis Tools
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
Will CO2 Change What We Do?
Power Plant Development Options in Abu Dhabi Application Portfolio ESD.71 Engineering Systems Analysis for Design Kyle Frazier December 2007.
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
1 John J. Conti Acting Director Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting Prepared for the Energy Technology System Analysis Program (ETSAP) Florence,
Ad Hoc West-wide Resource Assessment Team (WRAT) : Assessment of Western System Adequacy in the Short-term Jeff King Northwest Power Planning Council Presentation.
December 4, 2000© 2000 Fernando L. Alvarado1 Reliability concepts and market power Fernando L. Alvarado Professor, The University of Wisconsin Invited.
Designing a Risk Model Michael Schilmoeller Thursday, December 2, 2010 SAAC.
5/22/20151 Northwest Power & Conservation Council Power Committee Over-generation and Negative Energy Prices – a work in progress Jeff King September 21,
The Cost-Effectiveness Premium for Conservation Michael Schilmoeller Thursday May 19, 2011 SAAC.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Connecticut Energy Advisory Board Conference Hartford, Connecticut December 2, 2004 Kevin Kirby Vice President, Market Operations.
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
Least Cost System Operation: Economic Dispatch 1
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Thursday, October 24, 2002 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Friday, February 7, 2003 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
NASUCA Meeting Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Panel Michael McMullen MISO June 10, 2013.
Applications and Benefits of Energy Storage Maui, Hawaii June 16, 2010 Garth P. Corey, Consultant Sandia National Laboratories Sandia is a multiprogram.
NW Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Conference Call November 4, 2010.
1 Regional Portfolio Model and Direct Use of Gas Assessment Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council for the Regional Technical Forum Tuesday,
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Friday, November 22, 2002 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
Base Case Draft – For Comment Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003.
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Tuesday, April 29, 2003 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
SAAC Review Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday February 2, 2011 SAAC.
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
The Council’s Risk Model and The Requirements of the Act Michael Schilmoeller Thursday, December 2, 2010 SAAC.
Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants: Economic and Environmental Impacts 15 June 2011 Professor Paul Fischbeck Carnegie Mellon University
Climate Change and The NW Power Supply Climate Impacts on the Pacific Northwest University of Washington April 21, 2009.
Discussion of Resource Plans Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Wednesday, June 10, 2009.
10/4/20021 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Friday, October 4, 2002 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
1 Planning Reserve Margin Dan Egolf Senior Manager, Power Supply & Planning.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
Preliminary Results with the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory.
Electric Energy Issues and the Region Connecticut Business and Industry Association Stamford, Connecticut December 2, 2004 Kevin Kirby Vice President,
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Accelerating Energy Efficiency To Reduce the PNW Power System's Carbon Footprint Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
The Council’s Approach to Economic Risk Michael Schilmoeller Northwest Power and Conservation Council for the Resource Adequacy Technical Committee September.
Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project October 16, 2009 Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting.
The Council’s Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory Committee Thursday,
1 Introduction to the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council Thursday, June 10, 2010.
Powered by the Loads and Resource Information System (LaRIS) Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Operational Peaking Adjustment Council Briefing.
How the RPM Meets the Requirements for a Risk Model Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday, February 2, 2011 SAAC.
1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Thursday, June 5, 2003 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
RGGI Workshop on Electricity Markets, Reliability and Planning Topic Session 3: RGGI Design, Markets and Reliability – Issues Relating to System Operations.
Winter Power Supply Adequacy/Reliability Analysis Power Committee Briefing October 17, 2001.
Uncertainty in the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory Committee.
Moving toward a Final Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
1 Proposed Input Assumptions to RTF Cost-Effectiveness Determinations February 2, 2010.
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
The Impact of Intermittent Renewable Energy Sources on Wholesale Electricity Prices Prof. Dr. Felix Müsgens, Thomas Möbius USAEE-Conference Pittsburgh,
Resource Analysis. Objectives of Resource Assessment Discussion The subject of the second part of the analysis is to dig more deeply into some of the.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Challenges, Issues, and Future Direction of the SAAC
Economic Operation of Power Systems
penetration of wind power
Module 4 Smart Grid Implementation Issues
Chapter 10 - Monte Carlo Simulation and the Evaluation of Risk
GENESYS Current Functionality
Planning Reserve Margin
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

1 Systems Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC) Thursday, December 19, 2002 Michael Schilmoeller John Fazio

Northwest Power Planning Council 2 Last Agenda Approval of the Oct 24 meeting minutes Review and questions from the last meeting –Representation of dispatchable resources in the portfolio model –Metrics Representations in the portfolio model –Price responsive demand –Renewables and conservation Hydro (worksheet function, sustained peaking) Loads (HELM model, Terry Morlan’s DSI model) Natural gas prices (description of processes)

Northwest Power Planning Council 3 Today’s Agenda Approval of the Nov 22 meeting minutes Review and questions from the last meeting –Dispatchable plants (Beaver) –Price responsive demand –Renewables and conservation –Hydro –Loads Representation of Transmission Reliability Representation of Resource Diversity Influence Diagram of Effects Statistical Results for –Natural gas prices, electricity prices, load, temperature, aluminum prices, hydro, transmission congestion –Correlations among these

Northwest Power Planning Council 4 Today’s Agenda Approval of the Nov 22 meeting minutes Review and questions from the last meeting –Dispatchable plants (Beaver) –Price responsive demand –Renewables and conservation –Hydro –Loads Representation of Transmission Reliability Representation of Resource Diversity Influence Diagram of Effects Statistical Results for –Natural gas prices, electricity prices, load, temperature, aluminum prices, hydro, transmission congestion –Correlations among these

Northwest Power Planning Council 5 Today’s Agenda Approval of the Nov 22 meeting minutes Review and questions from the last meeting –Dispatchable plants (Beaver) –Price responsive demand –Renewables and conservation –Hydro –Loads Representation of Transmission Reliability Representation of Resource Diversity Influence Diagram of Effects Statistical Results for –Natural gas prices, electricity prices, load, temperature, aluminum prices, hydro, transmission congestion –Correlations among these

Northwest Power Planning Council 6 Plan Issues incentives for generation capacity price responsiveness of demand sustained investment in efficiency information for markets fish operations and power transmission and reliability resource diversity role of BPA global change Review

Northwest Power Planning Council 7 Representation of dispatchables The monthly spread option model gives a reasonable representation of expected capacity factors (and hence value) of resource options Given that the uncertainty in hourly prices exceeds the expected variation, the detailed information about hourly prices from any one scenario tells us little about the expected capacity factor and value of resource options Review

Northwest Power Planning Council 8 Price responsive demand Intended to represent short-term (1 day to 1 month) load reduction, on- and off-peak, if the price is right Does not address longer term DSI load curtailment (which is addressed later) Described by a supply curve Energy available represented as special continuous function of price –Zero variable cost, but some fixed cost Supply curve developed by Ken Corum Review

Northwest Power Planning Council 9 Conservation & Renewables Represent as non-dispatchable energy Supply curve for conservation developed by Tom Eckman Renewables cost and operating characteristics assembled by Jeff King Credit and availability advantages can be valued by adding these uncertainties to alternatives, such as contracts Modularity benefits require a new approach Example of Sustained Orderly Development (SOD) Review

Northwest Power Planning Council 10 “Real Options” minimum shut-down period evalulation phase time wholesale electricity market aluminum-elec price spread expected price trend minimum restart period evalulation phase Review

Northwest Power Planning Council 11 Loads Non-DSI Loads –Calibrate with data from NWPP –Short-term uncertainty driven by random temperatures (HELM) –Long term uncertainty from Terry Morlan’s work DSI Loads –Terry Morlan’s aluminum industry model Review

Northwest Power Planning Council 12 Hydrogeneration Excel Add-in has 50-year record Demonstrate: –Parameters to pull out different data –Use as random draw & correlation with other assumptions –Use of function to pull out specific year Reflects 10-hour sustained peaking capability from the trapazoidal approximation studies Review

Northwest Power Planning Council 13 Today’s Agenda Approval of the Nov 22 meeting minutes Review and questions from the last meeting –Dispatchable plants (Beaver) –Price responsive demand –Renewables and conservation –Hydro –Loads Representation of Transmission Reliability Representation of Resource Diversity Influence Diagram of Effects Statistical Results for –Natural gas prices, electricity prices, load, temperature, aluminum prices, hydro, transmission congestion –Correlations among these

Northwest Power Planning Council 14 Transmission Reliability To Show: The economic consequences of transmission congestion can be captured with the portfolio model The likelihood of congestion is related to other variables we are considering in the model Transmission Reliability

Northwest Power Planning Council 15 Transmission Reliability The portfolio model is not a reliability model or a transmission flow model We will rely on Genesys and primary data to provide insight into conditions when congestion is likely to occur For transmission flow information, we will rely on expert opinion. The Council currently has no transmission flow model. Transmission Reliability

Northwest Power Planning Council 16 Transmission Reliability Begin with a common representation of the uncongested economic transport of energy (e.g., Aurora, Henwood’s Prosym) Simple model: no losses or variable wheeling charges Transmission Reliability Net Native Net Native Net Native * * *

Northwest Power Planning Council 17 Unconstrained Case Given resource stacks in each area, the flows and prices are determined by total native loads, and all prices are the same. Transmission Reliability Net Native Net Native Net Native * * *

Northwest Power Planning Council 18 Constrained Case To get some constraint, we assume the native load in one region increases a lot Transmission lines are filled to their maximum capacity Higher native load means higher net load Prices disconnect Transmission Reliability Net Native Net Native * * * Net Native

Northwest Power Planning Council 19 Constrained Case In the constrained case, the marginal value of transmission is the difference in price between areas of price difference. Equivalently, the cumulative value of transmission is the difference in costs to meet load, with and without the congestion. Transmission Reliability Net Native Net Native * * * Net Native

Northwest Power Planning Council 20 Statistical Representation In these situations, cause and effect is clear. The native loads drive prices. When the system is uncongested, prices in all regions are the same. When the system is congested, higher demand in some areas will result in the dispatch of more costly resources, resulting in higher prices for the high demand area than for other areas. Statistics does not care about causality. It deals with relationships among the values. Transmission Reliability

Northwest Power Planning Council 21 Statistical Representation If the prices are all equal, the transmission system is uncongested. We know exactly which resources are on the margin in each area and consequently what each net load is. (If we know the native load, we can also calculate the transmission flows.) If the prices are not equal, the transmission system is congested. We know exactly which resources are on the margin in each area and consequently what each net load is. Since the transmission flows are at their maximum capability, we know what native loads are. Transmission Reliability

Northwest Power Planning Council 22 Constrained Case The same information can be obtained either with information about the native loads or the native prices. The value of improved transmission reliability, of course, will also be the same. Transmission Reliability Net Native Net Native * * * Net Native

Northwest Power Planning Council 23 Conclusions about Transmission Reliability Market prices in regions, in particular the differences among prices, will give a “dual” representation of the state of the system. To predict when prices between regions are likely to be different (when congestion is likely to occur), we need statistical information relating congestion to other variables, such as temperatures or loads. Transmission congestion can then be modelled using a distribution of price differences that are correlated with the other variables. Transmission Reliability

Northwest Power Planning Council 24 Today’s Agenda Approval of the Nov 22 meeting minutes Review and questions from the last meeting –Dispatchable plants (Beaver) –Price responsive demand –Renewables and conservation –Hydro –Loads Representation of Transmission Reliability Representation of Resource Diversity Influence Diagram of Effects Statistical Results for –Natural gas prices, electricity prices, load, temperature, aluminum prices, hydro, transmission congestion –Correlations among these

Northwest Power Planning Council 25 Resource Diversity Benefits of resource diversity –Enhanced reliability ensemble forced outage rate not susceptible to transmission congestion –Depending on the technology, some diversification away from other, more dominant technologies –Distribution system advantages Voltage support Lower losses Delayed distribution system expansion costs Resource Diversity

Northwest Power Planning Council 26 Benefits of resource diversity Some benefits may be addressed as fixed cost adjustments –Voltage support (displacement of turbine capacity or reactive power elements) –Delayed distribution system expansion costs (displacement of comparable quantities of transforms) Lower losses benefit may be modelled by systematic modification to loads or an adjustment to the unit’s capacity The reliability enhancement related to having resources closer to the load may be modelled in the same way that we model local versus remote resources, i.e., by the price the resource sees The technology diversification is handled automatically Enhanced reliability due to ensemble forced outage rate may be represented using a different binomial distribution for availability (continued) Resource Diversity

Northwest Power Planning Council 27 Ensemble Forced Outage Rate At the user’s discretion, unit availability may be modelled using a binomial distribution (assumed independent of other stochastic variables) Resource Diversity LOLP Hour’s Load

Northwest Power Planning Council 28 Conclusions of Resource Diversity Representation We can expect that the economic advantages of resource diversity can be captured with the portfolio model We will rely on the Council’s Jeff King for the operational and economic detailed attributes of these technologies Resource Diversity

Northwest Power Planning Council 29 Today’s Agenda Approval of the Nov 22 meeting minutes Review and questions from the last meeting –Dispatchable plants (Beaver) –Price responsive demand –Renewables and conservation –Hydro –Loads Representation of Transmission Reliability Representation of Resource Diversity Influence Diagram of Effects Statistical Results for –Natural gas prices, electricity prices, load, temperature, aluminum prices, hydro, transmission congestion –Correlations among these

Northwest Power Planning Council 30 Influence Diagram of Effects Objectives: –To share views and develop some consensus on the significance and relationships among variable. –To construct a roadmap for finding relationships among variables Influence Diagram

Northwest Power Planning Council 31 Influence Diagram Rescource Outages Hydro Generation DSI Loads Non - DSI Loads Market Prices for Electricity Aluminum Prices Reserve Margin Temperature Fuel Prices Transmission Congestion

Northwest Power Planning Council 32 Today’s Agenda Approval of the Nov 22 meeting minutes Review and questions from the last meeting –Dispatchable plants (Beaver) –Price responsive demand –Renewables and conservation –Hydro –Loads Representation of Transmission Reliability Representation of Resource Diversity Influence Diagram of Effects Statistical Results for –Natural gas prices, electricity prices, load, temperature, aluminum prices, hydro, transmission congestion –Correlations among these

Northwest Power Planning Council 33 Statistics –Historical Dailie –Distributions within the month, year –Reasons for variation over time –Correlation among electricity, load, temperature, aluminum prices, hydro, natural gas prices Statistics

Northwest Power Planning Council 34 Statistics Daily correlation between gas prices and electricity prices Daily correlation between hydro generation and electricity prices Weaker correlation between gas prices and California temperatures Statistics

Northwest Power Planning Council 35 Next Meeting Remaining work on statistics Issue: Incentives for new generation Review of risk management problems of –What worked and what did not Initial optimization for Region, using all mechanisms

Northwest Power Planning Council 36 Background Slides These are intended primarily to answer questions that come up

Northwest Power Planning Council 37 Representation of dispatchables Oil price forecast ? ?

Northwest Power Planning Council 38 Representation of dispatchables NG price forecast ? ?

Northwest Power Planning Council 39 Electricity Markets By its nature, distinct markets for electricity exists for different locations and times Terms and Concepts Variation vs Volatility The prices in the figure at the right have NO volatility

Northwest Power Planning Council 40 Mid-Columbia price forecast Average annual w/comparisons ? ?

Northwest Power Planning Council 41 DSI Loads

Northwest Power Planning Council 42 Non-DSI Loads Non-DSI 97.5%

Northwest Power Planning Council 43 Natural Gas Prices Data from Gas Daily Statistics? –Historical Dailies –Price processes –Distributions within the month, year –Future uncertainties (Terry) –Reasons for variation over time –Correlation with electricity, load, temperature, aluminum prices, hydro

Northwest Power Planning Council 44 Natural Gas Prices 1. Mean Reversion - Vasicek Model P(t+dt) - P(t) = Beta*(Alpha - P(t))*dt + Sigma*sqrt(dt)*N(0,1) 2. Mean reversion - CIR Model P(t+dt) - P(t) = Beta*(Alpha - P(t))*dt + Sigma*Sqrt(P(t))*sqrt(dt)*N(0,1) 3. Geometric Brownian Motion - GBM P(t+dt) - P(t) = Drift*P(t)*dt + Sigma*P(t)*sqrt(dt)*N(0,1) 4. Mean reversion - unrestricted P(t+dt) - P(t) = Beta*(Alpha - P(t))*dt + Sigma*P(t)^Gamma*sqrt(dt)*N(0,1) 5. Jump-diffusion (Use the same time step for estimation and simulation - h doesn't scale!!) P(t+dt) = P(t)exp( Drift*dt + Sigma*sqrt(dt)*N(0,1)+Y*N(Drift_j,Sigma_j)) Y=1 with probability h and Y=0 with probability (1-h) 6. Brennan and Schwartz Model P(t+dt) - P(t) = Beta*(Alpha - P(t))*dt + Sigma*P(t)*sqrt(dt)*N(0,1) 7. Mean reversion with jump-diffusion, Vasicek type diffusion P(t+dt) - P(t) = Beta*(Alpha - P(t))*dt + Sigma*sqrt(dt)*N(0,1)+Y*N(Drift_j,Sigma_j) Y=1 with probability h and Y=0 with probability (1-h)

Northwest Power Planning Council 45 Natural Gas Prices 8. Mean reversion with jump-diffusion, CIR type diffusion P(t+dt) - P(t) = Beta*(Alpha - P(t))*dt + P(t)^0.5*(Sigma*sqrt(dt)*N(0,1)+Y*N(Drift_j,Sigma_j)) Y=1 with probability h and Y=0 with probability (1-h) 9. Mean reversion with jump-diffusion, Brennan-Shcwartz type diffusion P(t+dt) - P(t) = Beta*(Alpha - P(t))*dt + P(t)*(Sigma*sqrt(dt)*N(0,1)+Y*N(Drift_j,Sigma_j)) Y=1 with probability h and Y=0 with probability (1-h) 10. Mean reversion with jump-diffusion, "Unrestricted" type diffusion P(t+dt) - P(t) = Beta*(Alpha - P(t))*dt + P(t)^gamma*(Sigma*sqrt(dt)*N(0,1)+Y*N(Drift_j,Sigma_j)) Y=1 with probability h and Y=0 with probability (1-h)