Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Land use effect on nutrient loading – nutrient models new assessment tools Inese Huttunen, Markus Huttunen and Bertel Vehviläinen Finnish Environment Institute.
Advertisements

Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
ADRICOSM-EXT PROJECT (ADRIatic sea integrated COastal areaS and river basin Management system pilot project - EXTension) WP2 – INTEGRATED CATCHMENT SIMULATOR.
The Wisconsin River TMDL: Linking Monitoring and Modeling Ann Hirekatur, Pat Oldenburg, & Adam Freihoefer March 7, 2013 Wisconsin River TMDL Project Team.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
LTHIA – Upgrades and Training Bernard A. Engel Tong Zhai Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Department Purdue University In conjunction.
Some of my current research: Modeling sediment delivery on a daily basis for meso-scale catchments: a new tool: LAPSUS-D By: Saskia Keesstra and Arnaud.
Evaluating Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Surface Water Resource Availability of Upper Awash Sub-basin, Ethiopia rift valley basin. By Mekonnen.
Land Use Change and Its Effect on Water Quality: A Watershed Level BASINS-SWAT Model in West Georgia Gandhi Raj Bhattarai Diane Hite Upton Hatch Prepared.
Dr. Martin T. Auer Michigan Tech Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Surface Water Supply.
Landslide Susceptibility Mapping to Inform Land-use Management Decisions in an Altered Climate Muhammad Barik and Jennifer Adam Washington State University,
Modeling Water Quality. Special reference of this work to….
Surface Water Simulation Group. Comprehensive watershed scale model developed and supported by the USDA-ARS capable of simulating surface and groundwater.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
An Analysis of the Pollutant Loads and Hydrological Condition for Water Quality Improvement for the Weihe River For implementing water resources management.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
August 20th, CONTENT 1. Introduction 2. Data and Characteristics 3. Flood analysis 1. MOUSE 2. SOBEK 3. ARC-SWAT 4. Conclusions and suggestions.
1 Application of Surface-water Modeling System (SMS) on River Stream: A Case Study in Brantas River Mohammad Sholichin (1), Faridah Othman (2) (1) Lecturer,
Estimating Pollutant Loads Caroni River Bolivar, Venezuela Global Applications of GIS Technology Lee Sherman.
Assessing Alternative Policies for the Control of Nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Catherine L. Kling, Silvia Secchi, Hongli Feng, Philip.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Hydrologic and Water Quality Modeling of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Huan.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
Effect of Spatial Variability on a Distributed Hydrologic Model May 6, 2015 Huidae Cho Water Resources Engineer, Dewberry Consultants Part-Time Assistant.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
PROJECT TO INTERCOMPARE REGIONAL CLIMATE SIMULATIONS Carbon Dioxide and Climate Change Eugene S. Takle Agronomy Department Geological and Atmospheric Science.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC – 11 July 2007 Evaluating the Integration of a Virtual ET Sensor into AnnGNPS Model Rapid.
Prevention and Cure. Contents Introduction to Reservoirs Preventing Siltation Cure Cost Benefit Analysis Conclusion.
Chaiwat Ekkawatpanit, Weerayuth Pratoomchai Department of Civil Engineering King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand Naota Hanasaki.
Modeling of Critical Areas for DRP Runoff and Targeting Strategies
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
How much water will be available in the upper Colorado River Basin under projected climatic changes? Abstract The upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), is.
Impacts of Landuse Management and Climate Change on Landslides Susceptibility over the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State Muhammad Barik and Jennifer.
Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw
P B Hunukumbura1 S B Weerakoon1
Effect of Potential Future Climate Change on Cost-Effective Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction Strategies in the UMRB Manoj Jha, Philip Gassman, Gene.
CE 374 K – Hydrology Second Quiz Review Daene C. McKinney.
INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING. EIA Scientific Tools and Techniques2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to: 
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
Predicting the hydrologic implications of land use change in forested catchments Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Application of soil erosion models in the Gumara-Maksegnit watershed
Integrating Environment, Climate-Change & Water
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Change in Flood Risk across Canada under Changing Climate
Nonpoint Source Pollution
Image courtesy of NASA/GSFC
Predicting the hydrologic and water quality implications of climate and land use change in forested catchments Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil.
Nitrogen Transport Estimates in the San Antonio River Basin
River Flow into Chesapeake Bay
Using GIS to Aid in TMDL Modeling
Hydrology CIVL341.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Assessment of climate change impacts on semi-arid watersheds in Peru
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2) Shatirah Akib 3) 1) Lecturer, Water Resources Department, Brawijaya University, Indonesia PhD Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia; 2) Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia 3) PhD Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia

Background Increasing population people, wastewater from industry and fertilizer use for farmer become water quality problem in stream. Increasing population people, wastewater from industry and fertilizer use for farmer become water quality problem in stream. Main problem in Upstream Brantas River Basin are land erosion, sedimentation and pollutant load from both agricultural area and residential Main problem in Upstream Brantas River Basin are land erosion, sedimentation and pollutant load from both agricultural area and residential Propose of watershed modeling (AVSWAT) to predict water quality by difference management practice Propose of watershed modeling (AVSWAT) to predict water quality by difference management practice

The main objective of this research are : to assessment of runoff, sediment yield and nutrient load at Watershed to assessment of runoff, sediment yield and nutrient load at Watershed To identification of potentially source of sediment and nutrient load on watershed To identification of potentially source of sediment and nutrient load on watershed to propose the relationship relating sediment and nutrient loads to physiographic and hydrologic properties of the each sub watershed to propose the relationship relating sediment and nutrient loads to physiographic and hydrologic properties of the each sub watershed

The Case Study

Upstream Brantas River Upstream Brantas Banggo River Basin Amprong River Basin Upper Lesti River Basin Genteng River Basin Metro River Basin Manten River Basin Lower Lesti River Basin Kedung Banteng River Basin

Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Uses physically-based input such as soil, weather, land use, and topographic data to predict the impact of land management practice on water, sediment, and agricultural chemical yields Uses physically-based input such as soil, weather, land use, and topographic data to predict the impact of land management practice on water, sediment, and agricultural chemical yields Continuous Long-term Simulation on daily step Continuous Long-term Simulation on daily step Assesses impacts of climate and management on yields of water, sediment, and agricultural chemicals Assesses impacts of climate and management on yields of water, sediment, and agricultural chemicals

Processing and Display of AVSWAT Model

Schematic of input and outputs of the AVSWAT model

AVSWAT Routing Phase Flow routing Flow routing - Inputs (runoff, rain, point-source discharge) - Outputs (evaporation, transmission, extraction for human use) human use) Sediment routing: deposition, resuspension, erosion Sediment routing: deposition, resuspension, erosion Nutrient Routing Nutrient Routing - Model dissolved and adsorbed nutrients. - In stream kinetics adapted from QUAL2E

1. Land Phase

Phosphorous Cycle

2. Routing Phase

Period of Calibration: January 1, 1992 – Dec 2002 Period of Validation : Jan – Dec Rainfall/Runoff/Routing: Daily Rain/Curve Number/Daily Rainfall Distribution: Normal Skewed Potential ET Method: Priestley-Taylor method Channel Water Routing: Muskingum Channel Degradation: Not Active Stream Water Quality Processes: Active Lake Water Quality Processes: Not Active Printout Frequency: Monthly and Annually SWAT Setup Preparation

Slope Classification

Slope Down Area

Land use Map

Soil Type Map

Calibration Period

Correlation Value

Results 1. Land Area Phase

Sediment Yield (ton/ha/yr)

> – – – – Upper Lesti River Basin Amprong River Basin

Organic N (kg N/ha)

Upstream Brantas Bango River Basin

Organic P (kg P/ha)

Bango River Basin

Annual Average Estimates of Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load for Each Basin Based on Period 1995 to 2006 Simulated

2. In Stream

Concentration of Organic N & P

Annual Average Estimates of Nutrient Concentration in outlet stream for Each Basin Based on Period 1995 to 2006 Simulated

3. In Reservoir

Conclusion Banggo river basin is both highest of rainfall mm and surface runoff mm, respectively Banggo river basin is both highest of rainfall mm and surface runoff mm, respectively The highest sediment yield is 85,94 ton/ha/year in Upper Lesti river basin due to maximum erosion rate The highest sediment yield is 85,94 ton/ha/year in Upper Lesti river basin due to maximum erosion rate The concentration of organic P (range 0,36 – 0,99 mg/l) in all sub basin is over of the WQ standard regulation in C class. The concentration of organic P (range 0,36 – 0,99 mg/l) in all sub basin is over of the WQ standard regulation in C class. The concentration of organic N (range 9,34 – 20,80 mg/l) in all sub basins is lower of the WQ standard regulation in C class. The concentration of organic N (range 9,34 – 20,80 mg/l) in all sub basins is lower of the WQ standard regulation in C class. The AVSWAT model was successes for assessment of runoff, sediment yield and nutrient load in Upper Brantas River Basin The AVSWAT model was successes for assessment of runoff, sediment yield and nutrient load in Upper Brantas River Basin

Suggestion The AVSWAT model would be testing to another watershed The AVSWAT model would be testing to another watershed In the next simulation, modification of difference fertilizer used and management tillage in agriculture would be done. In the next simulation, modification of difference fertilizer used and management tillage in agriculture would be done. Simulation of SWAT model can also done which difference of divided of each sub basin which smaller than 200 km2. Simulation of SWAT model can also done which difference of divided of each sub basin which smaller than 200 km2.

Acknowledgement We would like to thank you the following for making this study possible:  Brawijaya University, Indonesia  University of Malaya, Malaysia  Perum Jasa Tirta I, Malang, Indonesia  Department of Agriculture, Indonesia  Department of Surveying, Indonesia

Thank you