NMSZ Event Overview: Roles, Responsibilities, and the Marine Transportation System Recovery Unit (MTSRU) 22 April 2015 Semper Paratus United States Coast.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Airport Emergency Plan - Overview
Advertisements

Title: Protocols for Maritime Transportation System Recovery Author: Sean K. Moon Economy: United States of America.
First Coast Guard District Office of Aids to Navigation WAMS Review Presentation.
Michael R. Christensen, P.E. Deputy Executive Director – Development Port of Los Angeles Port of Los Angeles Emergency Preparedness and Tsunami Readiness.
Visual 4.1 Incident Commander and Command Staff Functions Unit 4: General Staff Functions.
Public Health Seattle & King County Incident Command System Overview May 2004.
Tampa Bay Harbor Safety & Security Committee
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
Cook Inlet Harbor Safety Committee Informational Meeting Enhancing the Marine Transportation System (MTS) in Cook Inlet.
Connecticut Emergency Management and Response
U. S. Coast Guard Role and Process for LNG Mr. Alan Moore LT Dan McLean
U.S. COAST GUARD Presented by LCDR Marcella Granquist
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Eastern Shore Community College Workforce Development Center Melfa, Virginia August 16, 2013 “ A Unified Voice.
LIAISON TRAINING April 20, 2011 Presented by Elin Storey, Policy Analyst and Drill Coordinator Ecology Spill Prevention, Preparedness and Response Program.
LCDR Quincy Davis Commanding Officer Marine Safety Unit Baton Rouge.
The Columbia River Derelict Vessel Task Force is a forum of stakeholders whose purpose is to identify and remove imminent pollution and hazard to navigation.
Marine Transportation System Common Assessment & Reporting Tool (CART) Mr. Thomas Kalisz, USCG “The nation needs a coordinated, integrated approach to.
Introduction to the National Incident Management System Harry R. Evans, Research Affiliate, University of Texas at Austin 8 April 2015 CE 397 Flood Forecasting,
1 October 28, 2010 CDR Stacey Mersel U.S. Coast Guard SECTOR New York Mid-Atlantic Coastal Ocean Observing Regional Association Panel #1: Maritime Safety.
Briefing at: Consequence Analysis Workshop October 30, 2012.
1 Marine Transportation System (MTS) Recovery "Our operational capabilities also include developing a national capacity for Marine Transportation System.
Passenger Vessel Safety Specialist Paul Culver Seventh Coast Guard District.
Planning for One Transportation System – Marine Highways Kevin Schoeben Deputy Director Office of Planning and Programming Illinois Department of Transportation.
The situation in Norway concerning sediments/dredging Tore Lundestad, Port of Borg, Norway.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® NMSZ TTX Operations/Navigation Response.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
Hydrographic Services Review Panel 2011 Hydrographic Services Review Panel 2011 CAPT Mark Ogle COMMANDER, SECTOR HAMPTON ROADS.
NATIONAL RESPONSE SYSTEM OPA 90. World spills by size Oil Spills Involving More Than 10 Million Gallons Gallons in millions Rank according to total volume.
3  Why does a supervisor or manager need to be familiar with emergency management terms and concepts?
Incident Command System (ICS)
U.S. Coast Guard Unclassified
Course # Unit 3 - IEMP and PEMS. Unit 3 IEMP and PEMS Goals: Understand phases of emergency  Before the emergency (Mitigation, Prevention,
INTERMEDIATE: SFFMA OBJ – – hrs credit received.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
“Multi-Purpose Missions and the Government Balancing Act” WHAT HAT DO YOU WEAR?
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
Maritime Security Services
NW Area Committee Meeting 13 February, 2013 Heather A. Parker U.S. Coast Guard 13 th District Seattle, WA.
May 8, GOALS include:  Increase quality of communications and preparedness  Hold a real-time exercise by September 1, involving state agencies,
Unclas December 2008 U. S. Coast Guard Continuity of Operations (COOP)
UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 1 LRD Navigation Scenario.
Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) Guidance for TWIC Reader Pilot Program November 19, 2007.
UNCLASSIFIED B UILDING S TRONG 1 NMSZ ROC Exercise-2015 NAD MISSION – MAIN EFFORT:  Deploy requested response personnel ISO LRD (per OPLAN 2014 to assists.
Strategic Analysis (G-XSS) Policy & Planning Integration (G-XPP) Mission Analysis (G-XAM) Policy & Planning (G-X) Deputy (G-Xd) Maritime Domain Awareness.
“Smells Like Trouble!” The LEA Disaster Response.
2011 Port Heavy Weather Plan for Northeast and Eastern Central Florida Jacksonville, FL 08 June 2011.
 MSU Port Arthur Maritime Industry Plan o Port Conditions  MSU Port Arthur Hurricane Plan o Hurricane/Severe Weather Response Operations  Sector Houston.
11 The Cook Inlet Potential Places of Refuge : Pre-Planning for better decisions Tim Robertson, Nuka Research & Planning Group LLC.
U. S. Coast Guard Security Maritime Transportation.
United States Environmental Protection Agency Environment Canada.
February 27,  Welcome/Introductions  Overview of the Plan  Updates on Information Request  Project Prioritization  Public Involvement Meeting.
Key Terms Business Continuity Plan (BCP) – A comprehensive written plan to maintain or resume business in the event of a disruption Critical Process –
Disaster Planning Workshop Hosted By: Pleasantview Fire Protection District.
Welcome U.S. Coast Guard Response Operations
Authority: Who Does What?. Los Angeles – Long Beach Area Contingency Plan Marine Firefighting and Salvage Plan.
2015 USACE Exercise – December 1, 2015 New Madrid Seismic Zone – Earthquake FEMA Mission, Legal Authorities and Regional Capability Overview Gus Wulfkuhle.
National Waterways Conference 7-9 Nov 2007 Mobile, AL
Business Continuity Disaster Planning
It’s More Than Just A Spill By: Joseph Leonard and Maren Harding.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
 Welcome/Introductions  Overview of the Plan  Updates on Information Requests  Plan Discussion  Hazards/Gaps/Actions/Priorities  Next Steps.
Communications Coordination Group (CCG). MISSION To facilitate interagency coordination and collaboration to provide efficient and effective pre-planning.
Regional Response Team Meeting AUG 12, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego 1.Cases 2.Exercises 3.Items of interest.
U. S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP)/U. S
Canada-U.S. Beyond the Border Maritime Commerce Resilience (MCR)
USCG Roles & Responsibilities During a Ship Fire
EHCMA Hurricane Workshop
SWD Response Overview NMSZ TTX April 2015
Organizational Flexibility
Presentation transcript:

NMSZ Event Overview: Roles, Responsibilities, and the Marine Transportation System Recovery Unit (MTSRU) 22 April 2015 Semper Paratus United States Coast Guard

Semper Paratus Presentation Waypoints Understanding USCG District/Sector Structure and AORs Initial Response Scenario Specific Concerns SLMR/SOHV Recovery (Overview) Marine Transportation System Recovery Unit (MTSRU) Common Assessment Reporting Tool (CART) Event Recovery Scene Specific Concerns SLMR/SOHV Questions and Discussion

Semper Paratus USCG District Eight

Semper Paratus Sector Lower MS River

Semper Paratus Sector Ohio Valley

Semper Paratus Sector Upper MS River

Semper Paratus Initial Response Bridge Failures in Memphis Initial response starts locally MFD, MPD, Shelby County SO, West Memphis FD, Desoto County, ext.. State assets (TN and AR) Sector (SLMR) assets (USCG) Scenario Specific Concerns Large event impacting wide geographic area Multiple disaster scenes competing for resources Expect vessel/facility incidents (port/non-port, pollution, navigation hazards) Loss of resources and ability to get them to the scene Wide scale communications failure Loss of SLMR command structure (Implement COOP)

Semper Paratus Initial Response Barkley Lock and Dam Initial response starts locally Local USACE resources (assessment) MSU Paducah (small boats) (command post) Local city, county, and state resources At least three vessels possibly available Possible use of county mobile command center Scenario Specific Concerns Fleet breakaways Other associated incidents (pollution)

Semper Paratus USCG - Lead Federal Agency for MTS - facilitator of recovery Coordination with stakeholders is critical USACE retains responsibility for clearing channel Goal: Resumption of commerce Key elements of the MTS recovery process MTS Stabilization Short-term (<90 days): MTS operations available at some level Focus: waterways, navigation systems, ports, critical infrastructure, and monitoring systems Long-term (>90 days): MTS to pre-incident operation Process implemented, via ICS, using a UC and/or UAC MTSRU is vital element within the UC/UAC Marine Transportation System Recovery

Semper Paratus Unified Command OperationsPlanningFinanceLogistics Resources Unit Situation Unit Demobilization Unit Documentation Unit Environmental Unit MTSR Unit Unit Leader (MTSL) USCG, USACE, RP, FEMA, DOT Marine Transportation System Recovery Unit (MTSRU) MTSU is not the command element

Semper Paratus MTSRU Composition (Notional) MTSL (Leader) USCG with specific qualifications USCG: Waterways/Facilities/Recovery Specialists USACE USDOT MARAD EPA (Pollution) State DOT/EPA Industry (LOMRC, AMSCs, and others) Other Federal/State/Local Responsible Party (Obstruction Owners) Marine Transportation System Recovery Unit (MTSRU)

Semper Paratus Marine Transportation System Recovery Unit (MTSRU) MTSRU Roles and Responsibilities Track, document and report MTS status in CART* CART data supports Situation Unit Understand critical recovery pathways Develop and recommend COAs Supports Planning Section Chief in developing IAP Includes salvage, dredging, cleanup, recovery of ATON recommendations Input point for MTS stakeholders Crucial in feeding CART Develop/recommend priorities for cargo flow/resumption of vessel movement Identify long-term recovery issues and needs MTSRU is not responsible for determining economic impact

Semper Paratus Common Assessment Reporting Tool (CART) Primary means of reporting impacts to/recovery of MTS Automated reports support higher HQ reporting requirements Essential Elements of Information (EEI) Five categories of EEIs Waterways and Navigation – ATON/Channels Port Area Critical Infrastructure – Facilities/Bridges Port Area Vessels – SPV/CFV/Ferries/Gaming Monitoring Systems – R21/PORTS/NOAA Offshore Energy – Production Platforms

Semper Paratus Common Assessment Reporting Tool (CART) Waterways and Navigation Systems – Aids to Navigation – Deep Draft Channels – Non-Deep Draft Channels – Locks – Vessel Salvage/Wreck Removal – Oil Pollution Incidents – Hazardous Materials Incidents Port Area - Critical Infrastructure – Barge Fleeting Areas – Bridges – Bulk Liquid Facilities – Containerized Cargo Facilities – Non-Container Cargo Facilities – Passenger Vessel and Ferry Terminals – Ports – Shipyards – USCG Unit Port Area - Vessels –Barge Traffic –Commercial Fishing Vessels –Gaming Vessels –High Capacity Passenger Vessels and Ferries –Small Passenger Vessels Offshore Energy –Offshore Platforms –Offshore Production –Offshore Renewable Energy Installations –Mobile Offshore Drilling Units Monitoring Systems –Monitoring Systems

Semper Paratus Event Recovery (Expectations) UAC with supporting multiple UCs (FEMA leads UAC) USCG/USACE lead MTS specific UCs USCG IMTs, MSST, Strike Force support to SLMR/SOHV USACE specialized and technical support outside District/Divisions MTSRU integrated within UCs MTSRU elements could be incorporated in a UAC Priorities (Notional) MTS Assessment (Includes supporting critical infrastructure) Mitigation (pollution) Salvage (Clear waterway) ATONs Support recovery of associated MTS

Semper Paratus Scene Specific Recovery Concerns Memphis Support (Resources) for operations extremely limited Support (Staging) from a distance UAC priorities may divert what resources are available RPs overwhelmed Outside influence on prioritization Supporting port infrastructure availability Physical impacts on facilities/vessels as well as reduction in available workforce Barkley Lock and Dam Flooding along the Cumberland Rapid Rise of Ohio

Semper Paratus Questions/Comments